Married to the Octopus

It can kill from any distance but you never see it strike - T Bone Burnett
For a long while I resisted the Diana story by the same solipsistic rationale Noam Chomsky resists John Kennedy's: she was inconsequential to me. (As John Judge assesses Chomsky's verdicts on the murders of Kennedy and King, "it's just a function of how much you liked the guy whether he was done in by coincidence or not.") I still find her so, but her slightness of gravity is misleading, because her life and possibly her death were no more about her than my judgement of either should be about me.
If little else is certain beyond the seldom acknowledged fact that Dodi Fayed was the nephew of Adnan Khashoggi, then the late admission that the US Secret Service "was bugging her calls in the hours before she was killed" establishes beyond doubt that this was a person of interest to actors who should be persons of interest to us. It's the kind of disclosure that is usually processed by an incurious media as a fact "that will only fuel conspiracy theories," without asking even the most cursory questions that the new evidence begs, like why were the Americans bugging Diana, for how long before her fatal crash had they been doing so, and is it plausible, as alleged, that they were doing this without a nod and a wink from MI6?
Sometimes you can tell a conspiracy by the high grade of disinformation that accrues about it, including the number and quality of shadowy "renegade insiders" eager to step up, speak out and muddy the waters. For instance, former MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson claimed both driver Henri Paul and photographer James Andanson, whose white Fiat purportedly struck Diana's death car before it lost control, were employed by his agency to spy on the celebrity couple. (Paul of course died in the crash, and Andanson was found dead in the woods three years later, an apparent suicide.) Former CIA agent Oswald LeWinter tried to sell to Mohammed Al Fayed apparently forged documents that spelling out in big, block letters an alleged DIA-MI6 assassination plot. And it may even be true, but to showcase the truth within the framework of a lie is to strip its consideration of credibility. (Regarding LeWinter, Al Fayed's attorney Mark Zaid told CNN six years ago that he "was responsible for disseminating a lot of the - what's been deemed disinformation about [the October Surprise]. He has shown up in allegations that Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme was murdered, he has shown up involving allegations of the bombing of Pam Am 103, and then he showed up in this latest endeavor of his. He is quite a man of mystery.")
Another man, and another mystery, though perhaps the same conspiracy, was George Smith:
I lost my job, my house, my wife and children because it all became too much for me... Today I feel under great stress again because the establishment is mounting a campaign against me. They are very powerful and privileged and have lots of money to pay lawyers to prevent me from telling the truth.
Former soldier, and footman and valet to the royals, Smith claimed to have been raped by Prince Charles' close aide Michael Fawcett (Fawcett and Charles, said Smith, were lovers). Diana interviewed Smith and taped his allegations years before they became public - such as they did - though what happened to the tape "became a matter of considerable controversy" upon her death. In a comic act of self-policing, the Prince's senior staff investigated Smith and found his claims without merit and forced his resignation. And then, less than two years after the story broke, Smith was dead of an "unknown illness."
Diana herself was dead three years after composing a letter to her former butler, Paul Burrell, in which she said "this particular phase in my life is the most dangerous. My husband is planning 'an accident' in my car; brake failure and serious head injury." (A few weeks before the crash, the Mercedes had been stolen from the garage of the Ritz Hotel. "Police recovered the car but found that its instrumentation had been tampered with," Kenn Thomas writes in The Octopus. The limo was then reconditioned. LeWinter's likely hoax document notes this, stating that the car was "rebuilt to respond to external radio controls.")
Lord Stevens has "been assured" that the 39 classified documents detailing Diana's final conversations "did not reveal anything sinister or contain material that might help explain her death." To put it another way, those who clandestinely bugged Diana have given their word there is nothing suspicious on the tapes they refuse to release, and that's good enough for the head of Scotland Yard's "exhaustive" inquiry.
Celebrity can blind us to the thing itself, particularly when beauty and youth are weighted with great wealth and generational power. (Paris Hilton's circle of rich and pantiless fembots is almost enough to make "elite mind-controlled sex slave" go mainstream.) That Di and Dodi meant nothing to me only means that I had no reason to wish them dead. Others, I can't speak for.
137 Comments:
Well, I for one can see how Di could have been a target. She was very deeply inside one of the arms of the octopus, which is of course why you used that term in the title to this post.
Could it be that she was about to expose the royal family's dirty big secrets? Did she have the straight dope on Chucky and Liz? Probably. The fact that after the divorce she was considerably more famous to the "people" than her former family I'm sure scared the ever-loving-inbred shit out of that bloody lot. Let's imagine that she lived, and told a tell-all to the British (and world) public about the high weirdness that goes on in Buckingham Palace. The masses would of course believe her over Chuck and Liz... there could have been a fucking riot that may have resulted in the downfall of the UK gov't. People love a scandal when it involves nastiness, and the one she was going to tell had plenty of it.
Of course she was murdered.
It's just very curious to me that these revelations have surface in the first place. Why would the PTB stir this up, after it has had so long to settle? Is there a mole in the system, doling out real info us, or is this just more disinfo designed to keep us all confused?
Before this story came out, I was in the same boat as Jeff concerning Di, namely: Who cares? But now, I dunno...
Good post--and I'm guessing it'll bring folks to R.I. who otherwise might not be here. To any newcomers, Welcome!
And I join Billy Shears in wondering--why? What could she do to hrut someone? I'm guessing there are otherways to stop/respond to an anti-landmine campaign.
I saw a link on the discussion board "Dodi was real target". I'll go check that now--maybe the bugging was to be sure of her travel plans so a hit on her would also (REALLY) be a hit on him.
Let us not forget that she was the figurehead for the anti-landmine campaign. A lot of people wanted her dead and out of the way because of this.
Here's the link for the discussion board's thread re "Dodi was the REAL target"
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=9454
By the way, reading the first bit of that thread, it seems Dodi's indicated by the PTB as reason for the 'hit' maybe to draw attention from Diana, but also maybe on a more legitimate basis.
As someone in the UK I can say that Mohammed Al-fayed must owe Richard Desmond something as the Di conspiracy stuff is still on his newspaper (The Daily/Sunday Express) twice a week. I for one think she was killed, for any/all of the reasons mentioned. Just to throw the cat amongst the pidgeons as it were, maybe Di was killed because she planned to tell the world that Prince Harry was really James Hewitts' son? Take a look at him.
What about me? I died under suspicious circumstances, and I was married to royalty, but no one thinks to explore my death.
More information on James Adanson, a paprazzi who drove a white car near Diana's Mercedes here (in French):
http://www.investigateur.info/affaires/france/andanson.html
The nitty-gritty of the above article is that Mr Adanson used to work part-time for the British Secret Services (MI5/MI6) and that his death was ruled very suspicious by his friends and acquaintances.
His body was --supposedly -- entirely disintegrated in the fire that engulfed his Black Mercedes. This is highly suspicious since, according to the mortician of his little town, bodies, even badly burned, tend to remain more or less recognizable and in one piece, even when submitted to such atrocities as napalm. Mr Adanson, of course, never acted the least suicidal before his sudden demise, despite some personal problems.
Mr Adanson supposedly drove the white Fiat that crashed into the Mercedes and sent it crashing into the concrete pillars of the tunnel. Despite research by the French police, this car has never been recovered. M. Adanson, despite some proof to the contrary, always denied being anywhere near Pricess Diana that night. However, he did mention that his mother owned a white Fiat, and that he personally sold it to a third party. That car was -- of course -- never analyzed by the French police.
Make of that what you will.
Jeff,
Congratulations on breaching this one.
I have two questions.
First, I'd seen the George Smith notice when he died last year. But that's all it said - that he "has died". Where did you find the quote about his "unknown illness"?
Second, why did you truncate the Diana quote mid-sentence? The actual quote was
"This particular phase of my life is the most dangerous - my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure & serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry."
She was telling us the reason WHY she felt in danger, WHY she felt "her husband" would do such a thing.
The Treason Felony Act of 1848 specifies "our Most Gracious Lady the Queen" as the person who cannot be opposed.
Were Charles to accede to the Throne as a single man there would be no queen.
This is a situation that has not arisen since the LAST succession crisis in 1936. And then the King was forced to abdicate.
So why truncate the sentence?
Let's just economize a theoretical view. Britain is a huge bitter racist eugenic mastoid growing in the nose of earth's human population. It's intelligence organizations are the processed product example of it's murder impulse and revenge capability. They killed her because she was a woman unwilling any longer to be chattel to an aristocratic figurehead, therefore a liablity. The wrath rage and indignation of her choosing to be intimate in daylight with what British society consider a sub-acceptable human member of an impure spiritual belief made her letter to Burrell a measured increment of time, a tick, before what many felt assured must happen, happened. Those who view Henry VIII a man's man are a mirror image of those who neo-conically prepare for a racist founded aristocracy in America who's population by the way seem to out number any other country when it comes to citizens willing to kill for no other reason than they can. One tentacle waves to the other ... Good Morning Mr Blair (endearing smile) ... Good morning Mr. Bush (toothy grin)
Once again JW joins all the dots,even the dots you were not aware of!
I was living in the Florida Keys at the time of her demise although I remember The Royal Wedding celebrations of my childhood.
She always struck me as Paris Hilton Old Europe just a dumbass rich girl from Chelsea London.Nice but dim and yet her womb was of immense value to those concerned with constitutional hereditary.
I've seen photos of her dancing with Henry Kissinger and I feel that makes her the poster girl for Political Correctness.Kudos du jour in- a skirt.
I am currently reading Mediated by Thomas Zengotita which I would acknowledge as the next move onwards from Mcluan.In short she was unique in that she was both of the Old and the New.A clebrity and an aristocrat at the same time and consequently an avatar of the New World Order with the impecable heritage of the Old Word Order.
Where did you find the quote about his "unknown illness"?
That was from the wiki entry on Smith, so I suppose it should be corroborated.
Second, why did you truncate the Diana quote mid-sentence?
The source I used was truncated as well.
The source I used was truncated as well.
Now there's a clue, don't you think? I've found that when that is done it is usually done to hide what comes next.
So who's got the agenda?
Who was the source?
Who was the source?
This recent Reuters story.
Aaaah, Reuters.
Jeff, they DO have a history in parapolitics, don't they?
And quite close to the British Establishment too.
They certainly have an agenda.
Could the readers of this blog consider - WHY the British Establishment would cut her off mid-sentence?
PS Keep your eyes on the carbon monoxide: 20.7 percent concentration (sufficient for suicide).
Jeff - I like this post but think you're skating a tad.
Like with JFK it was cumulative and she was a highly visible and vulnerable person: a target and a sacrifice.
The landmines campaign and the using her status and charisma to emanate compassion to all those at the bottom is something THEY HATE.
Just as they hated JFK using HIS youth, charisma and popularity to try to shut down the US shadow govt.
I don't think the story is complete without understanding European royalty's fixation with "holy" blood. It was Diana's genes - her Merovingian bloodline - bluer than the Windsor's - that were so important to the plans of the British monarchy. Hers was the most arranged of arranged marriages, and once she fulfilled her destiny, she became more valuable dead than alive - an icon of suffering and beauty.
I was working in a Borders Books and Music in the Music department when someone came off the street and said she had died the night before in a car crash. The CD we had playing was "OK Computer" and the song was "The Tourist" I wasn't a huge fan of hers, but I got chills just the same:
The Tourist
It barks at no-one else but me,
like it's seen a ghost.
I guess it's seen the sparks a-flowin,
no-one else would know.
Hey man, slow down, slow down,
idiot, slow down, slow down.
Sometimes I get overcharged,
that's when you see sparks.
They ask me where the hell I'm going?
At a 1000 feet per second,
hey man, slow down, slow down,
idiot, slow down, slow down.
Hey man, slow down, slow down,
idiot, slow down, slow down.
Released:
June 1997
Found on:
OK Computer
"The Tourist" was written by Jonny, who, explains Thom, was "in a beautiful square in France on a sunny day, and watching all theses American tourists being wheeled around, frantically trying to see everything in 10 minutes." Jonny was shocked at how these people could be in a place so beautiful and so special and not realize it because they weren't taking the time to just stop and look around.
I think she was killed for 3 potential reasons:
1) to prevent the monarchy falling apart. She possibly had the power (in terms of public support) to do that.
2) as punishment for her Harry Hewitt stunt. I think she resented the 'heir and a spare' demands upon her and rebelled. However the Royal family must have known Harry was a 'half-blood prince' (chortle, Rowling knows too!) as they are blood tested at birth for this reason.
3) She was pregnant with Dodi's (Muslim) child and that was not going to happen. Ever.
smiths says,
as with most crimes, searching for a single all encompassing 'reason' is a bit of a mistake,
there is no doubt she was a multiple threat to the royals,
she knew too much and bailed, you cant leave the family,
to add to that, hooking up with an arab, you just cant understand how unthinkable that is to the royals,
its true her blood had cleansed the royal heirs of german impurities but because it was stuart, not fucking merovingian,
harry knows the score and he went off the rials for a while, hes come to terms with it now,
but anti is right with the deliberate omission of the last part of her sentence, the reason is linked to their ultimate powers,
it is linked to who the special forces are loyal to and all of those real power issues,
the land mines issuue is connected to the bigger issues of who profits from money an guns aand it comes back to that same family time and time again,
her legend will only grow for good and bad,
i think it points as well to the bigger games,
the smokescreen that british and french foreign policy clashes is cleared by events like this,
their secret services work together and with yanks for the big jobs,
chuck out a few pawns when your really angling for the queen
Speculation.
Whats best is always the guess who did it?
Why?
Was it just a coincidence the place of action?
The flash theory.
weapon that overloads the cerebral cortex with bright light.
It has been implicated in plane crashes too.
So auto wrecks are mundane.
But it works like a charm.
Intel is funny.
Remember Mossad protecting its source and letting the Marines get blown up with a GEE (gas enhanced explosion)in Beirut in 1983?
Intel is always BLACK and RED and will remain the hidden hand.
Watching a key word.
Waiting
Gathering.
After all you never know what trolling for intel will dredge up.
That is why it is done.
The name of the game.
The players use this to build or destroy or mold depending on the situation.
Also interesting is the place of the sacrificial murder.
Used to be ancient temple on that old mountain.
ALICE Looking through the keyhole.....
Her resting place is interesting also.
Come to the Temple of Diane where she now is interned.
Eternal flame present?
Spooky or not?
The scene of the "accident" contains the real clue to what was afoot: the Pont de L'Alma tunnel, which "is ancient, dating back to the time of the Merovingian kings (ca. 500-751 A.D.), and before". "In pre-Christian times, the Pont de L'Alma was a pagan sacrificial site."
All "true European royalty are descended from the Merovingians, " the article continues, it then repeats the recent claims that the Merovingians were descended from Jesus. Princess Diana, as a Spencer, was descended from the Stuarts who gave England four kings (James I, Charles I, Charles II, and James II) and who are partially Merovingian in bloodline. By comparison, the article says, the current British royal family are "imposters."
"Two factions vied for control of Diana: (1) the New World Order or Bank of England faction, founded by King William III of Orange, who allowed the founding of the (private) Bank of England, and (2) the "true nobility of Europe, i.e., those of the Merovingian bloodline."
The article goes on. But it adds further complexity: "Within the New World Order faction there are smaller, warring factions, exemplified by Rothschilds vs. Rockefellers. The plan of the New World Order faction was to marry Lady Diana to an American. Even though Bill Clinton has bastard roots in the Rockefeller clan, he is rejected by them and is aligned with the Rothschilds. Bill Clinton was the designated future husband for Lady Diana, with Hillary Clinton to be eliminated through divorce or even murder. The Rockefellers were furious; in no way would they allow a marriage between Bill Clinton and Lady Diana.
"But Lady Di refused to marry Bill Clinton and seemed inclined to marry Dodi, thus also marrying into the Saudi royal family; for this impropriety, MI6 (British Intelligence) decided to eliminate her. They picked Pont de L'Alma to "send a signal" that would eventually lead to the creation of a Saint Diana, i.e. a new form of the triple moon goddess of the pagans, often called Diana.
Herresting place is also so much like a temple too.
The night she died, I had a nightmare. I was in Paris, in the backseat of a car which was speeding. I was tipsy - I had either been drugged or been drinking. I was screaming "slow down or we're going to die!" at the driver. I was terrified. Then, I woke up with a start, like I had been hit or something. The force startled me. That morning, I spoke with my father at appx. 7am, when he told me about the accident. Now, I have never been a royal watcher, or anything of the sort, however when my father told me about the accident, it disturbed me because it so closely resembled my dream. When I awoke, I had a vague feeling that something about hay fields and or hay harvesting would prove to be significant, but have not uncovered anything yet. Oh, by the way, Dianna and I shared a wedding anniversary - I got married two years before she and Charles did, and I was married to an abusive man. Perhaps that is why she chose to get into my head that fateful night. I believe she was murdered.
Jeff, thank you so much for this post.
OK, I guess the kooks are coming out tonight...I had always been a Royal-hater, and I hated Diana the most, as she was the glamorous face of that wretched cabal. I never looked kindly upon her, or any of the Royals, and wondered why the idiot Brits never came to their senses and took them down. Even after she ditched the walking corpse, I got sick seeing her face splashed about the popular press.
Then, after her death, she came to me in a dream. It was in a parking garage. She walked up to me, kissed me on the lips, then walked away.
I am the LAST PERSON ON EARTH who should ever have had such a dream. But I did. Since I did, I have cherished its memory, and the memory of Lovely Princess Di.
She was most certainly murdered. I think the bloodlines arguments carry a lot of weight. But (cue cheezy momentous Hollywood music) they could not kill her spirit.
Our spirit informs our instincts. We KNOW all of this, but we can't DO anything. At least not yet. Ghandi was right (in my loose paraphrase): Be the change you want to see.
Those who knowingly support the NWO, the real globalists and major owners of the multinationals that are devouring everything in sight and jerking politicians around like marionettes are by no means monolithic.
In fact the whole misadventure seems far more directed at restoring some variant of feudalism only with corportatists as the new aristocracy and liege lords and their corporate holdings as the fiefdoms they fight over or seek to secure either through marriages or clandestine alliances.
The kind of rampant greed and purely mechanical materialism that drives these people couldn't be much plainer, nor I might add fail to substantiate that old axiom that there is no honour among thieves.
Diana was simply shuffled around between the factions in their internal and infernal turf wars. It was her own sense of self-importance and celebrity that made her vulnerable.
She may not have been completely aware of it but she nevertheless enjoyed all the limelight, intrigue and noteriety that went right along with it.
I always had the sense it was never more than some kind of schoolgirl's wildly melodramatic fantasy that had somehow mysteriously sprung to life for her. Like some kind of dream she was floating through that just seemed to keep right on going and going.
There was always an aura of unreality about both her and her life that simply seemed far too much like something right out of some very novel novel. Nothing at all ever ordinary, everyday, or mundane in the slightest. Never a moment that wasn't centre stage and under the full glare of the footlights.
Of course her own fantasy games were taking place inside some far more serious and dangerous ones that simply gave her the opportunity to play them. Unfortuantely for her all the players in those really do play for keeps.
I ignored the Diana saga for the same reason Jeff did--it just looked like so much fluff. Despite the spy v. spy details coming forth, it still does. Look, folks, it doesn't take celebrity icons to make an aristocracy; that's all just the show, for the public consumption of the royal watchers (slightly more sophisticated sopa opera fans). The real power is always a bit more Machiavellian, or, in modern parlance, Kissingerian, which is to say, behind the curtain.
Except, strangely, when they step out from behind that curtain to show us their fangs. Like James Baker's ISG did the other day. From the L.A. Times:
It's still about oil in Iraq
December 8, 2006
WHILE THE Bush administration, the media and nearly all the Democrats still refuse to explain the war in Iraq in terms of oil, the ever-pragmatic members of the Iraq Study Group share no such reticence.
Page 1, Chapter 1 of the Iraq Study Group report lays out Iraq's importance to its region, the U.S. and the world with this reminder: "It has the world's second-largest known oil reserves." The group then proceeds to give very specific and radical recommendations as to what the United States should do to secure those reserves. If the proposals are followed, Iraq's national oil industry will be commercialized and opened to foreign firms.
The report makes visible to everyone the elephant in the room: that we are fighting, killing and dying in a war for oil. It states in plain language that the U.S. government should use every tool at its disposal to ensure that American oil interests and those of its corporations are met.
All told, the Iraq Study Group has simply made the case for extending the war until foreign oil companies — presumably American ones — have guaranteed legal access to all of Iraq's oil fields and until they are assured the best legal and financial terms possible.
We can thank the Iraq Study Group for making its case publicly. It is now our turn to decide if we wish to spill more blood for oil.
And, it turns out there are precedents to this coming out of the closet with naked aggression and not-so-secret plans. Look back to this parallel, pointed out by Mr. Floyd in Global Eye -- Dark Passage
Not since "Mein Kampf" has a geopolitical punch been so blatantly telegraphed, years ahead of the blow.
Adolf Hitler clearly spelled out his plans to destroy the Jews and launch wars of conquest to secure German domination of world affairs in his 1925 book, long before he ever assumed power. Despite the zigzags of rhetoric he later employed, the various PR spins and temporary justifications offered for this or that particular policy, any attentive reader of his vile regurgitation could have divined his intentions as he drove his country -- and the world -- to murderous upheaval.
Similarly -- in method, if not entirely in substance -- the Bush Regime's foreign policy is also being carried out according to a strict blueprint written years ago, then renewed a few months before the Regime was installed in power by the judicial coup of December 2000.
The first version, mentioned in passing here last week, was drafted by a team operating under then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney in 1992. It set out a new doctrine for U.S. power in the 21st century, an aggressive, unilateral approach that would secure American domination of world affairs -- "by force if necessary," as one of the acolytes put it.
When the Dominators were temporarily ousted from government after 1992, they continued their strategic planning with funding from the military-energy-security apparatus and right-wing foundations. This culminated in a new group, the aptly-named Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Members included hard-right players like Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Zalmay Khalilzad (now "special envoy" to the satrapy of Afghanistan) and other empire aspirants currently perched in the upper reaches of government power.
In September 2000, PNAC updated the original Cheney plan in a published report, "Strengthening America's Defenses." In this and related documents, the earlier precepts were reiterated and refined. The plans called for unprecedented hikes in military spending, the plantation of American bases in Central Asia and the Middle East, the toppling of recalcitrant regimes, the militarization of outer space, the abrogation of international treaties, the willingness to use nuclear weapons and control of the world's energy resources.
And the present course of action was clearly set forth: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
But Iraq is just a stepping stone. Iran is next -- indeed, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the PNAC team say that Iran is "perhaps a far greater threat" to U.S. oil hegemony. Other nations will follow, including Russia and China. In one way or another -- by military means or economic dominance, by conquest, alliance or silent acquiescence -- they must all be brought to heel, forcibly prevented from "challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role."
These texts spring from the Dominators' quasi-religious cult of "American exceptionalism," the belief in the unique and utter goodness of the American soul -- embodied chiefly by the nation's moneyed elite, of course -- and the irredeemable, metaphysical evil of all those who would oppose or criticize the elite's righteous (and conveniently self-serving) policies.
Anyone still "puzzled" over the Bush Regime's behavior need only look to these documents...
We're just following the script, no cloak & dagger, no fairytale princess needed, really. (It is a bit odd that that all this old-fashioned geo/petro politicking is going on when all these energy alternatives are now appearing at a refreshingly rapid rate, but the show must go on; pretense is still not past tense.)
But how is this late-stage capitalism any different from feudalism? There is one important distinction that comes to mind. In the olden days the aristocracy had this funny concept called "noblesse oblige," a sort of (mostly theoretical) moral obligation to take care of those unfortunate enough to find themselves further down the chain of being. That's been updated to "trickle down economics," which sounds (and is) more like pissing on those beneath you.
Isn't it just a bit eerie, though, that all the old actors are still on the stage? I thought the US was supposed to be a representative democracy, that run by elected representatives, not eternally-hanging on courtiers like Baker and focking Edwin Meese III. In these last dying days, the Empire is showing its true colors. How fitting that we pause a moment to salute a great foot soldier in the cause, the fallen Chilean Patton, Augusto Pinochet. His eulogy, as given by Big Gav:
When Gen Pinochet seized power in 1973, he knew he would be enjoying the strong support of the US. The secretary of state and national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, was an admirer and anxious that no bridgehead for the left should be established in Latin America by President Allende.
"The prevailing mood among the Chilean military is to use the current opportunity to stamp out all vestiges of communism in Chile," said a CIA memo immediately after the coup. "Severe repression is planned." Another CIA document noted that the methods used by the junta's secret police were "out of the Spanish inquisition".
When Dr Kissinger and Gen Pinochet met in 1976, according to documents released in 1999, Dr Kissinger told him to ignore criticisms from within the US about his methods, assuring him that they were part of a communist propaganda exercise. He told him: "We wish your government well."
Dr Kissinger remained loyal to Gen Pinochet. When the retired dictator was arrested in London in 1998 and was facing extradition to Spain, he backed the campaign for him to be allowed to return home.
Amnesty International and other human rights organizations have lamented the demented one's passing, since it deprives the executioner of his rightful duty, but what the hell--Kissinger is still alive, isn't he? Who's the real mastermind, after all?
Let's not confuse the puppets--the Chimp, the Princess, etc--with the Kings (and the kingmakers).
Mark Zaid was Al Fayed's attorney? Would that be the same Mark Zaid who has represented both Sibel Edmonds and a couple of the people testifying about Able Danger?
Small world.
Grace Kelly said...
What about me? I died under suspicious circumstances, and I was married to royalty, but no one thinks to explore my death.
Louis said...
OK, I guess the kooks are coming out tonight...
Bow this IS unique! I get to roll with laughter rather than read with trepidation and dread
(Paris Hilton's circle of rich and pantiless fembots is almost enough to make "elite mind-controlled sex slave" go mainstream.)
I have to wonder how much literal intent you were intending there, Jeff. I am probably more of a celebrity watcher than I should be, but the mysterious injuries and bandaids/bruises that have been photographed on the galmorous and vapid lately have made me suspicious.
Then there's also the Mickey Mouse club connection with Britney, always a tag of suspicion. When she was seen back with her old manager who was supposedly the one who "broke" her to the world after her divorce from Kevin Federline I couldn't help but wonder if she was checking in with the owner for new material.
I feel dirty for even momentarily sidetracking the discussion with this, but if certain ex-mind control subjects are to be believed I think it could be quite likely. It's creepy how these puppets get so blatantly flaunted infront of us.
I was such a Micheal Jackson fan as a kid too. Oh well, pretty lies or ugly truth...take your pick.
Grace Kelly said...
What about me? I died under suspicious circumstances, and I was married to royalty, but no one thinks to explore my death.
Darling Grace,
How true!
But you had no power, did you?
Princess of Monaco, the size of Hyde Park.
Diana's patch was a litle more interesting.
Especially the sovereignty over London and the London courts ("Royal Courts of Justice").
The London courts which, in the final analysis, regulate the London financial markets.
Here's a long story about the Lloyds of London insurance fraud, ultimately decided by the London courts.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=8533
Princess of Monaco, the size of Hyde Park.
My dear sir, Monaco is very strategic, logistically speaking, in the drug trade into Europe.
The Grimaldi Damily, and specifically Prince Ranier, are represented in the Committee of 300.
I paid the price, with my life, for my husband's greed.
Below is an excerpt from this link.
One of the ways heroin is moved into Europe is through the Principality of Monaco. The heroin comes from Corsica carried in ferries that ply a busy trade between Corsica and Monte Carlo during the summer. There is no check of what goes on or comes off these ferries. As there is no border between France and Monaco, drugs, and more especially heroin (partly processed opium), flows through the open border of Monaco into laboratories in France, or else if it has already been processed into heroin, it goes directly to the distributors.
The Grimaldi family has been in the drug smuggling business for centuries. Because Prince Ranier got greedy and began skimming heavily and would not desist after three warnings, his wife, Princess Grace, was murdered in a car "accident." Ranier underestimated the power of the Committee of which he is a member. The Rover car in which she was traveling had the brake fluid chambers tampered with in such a way that each time the brakes were depressed, fluid was released in measured amount, until by the time the car reached the most dangerous of several hairpin bends, there was no stopping power, and it sailed over a stone wall, hitting the ground fifty feet below in a sickening smash.
Everything possible was done by the Committee of 300 operatives to conceal the truth about the murder of Princess Grace. To this day the Rover car remains in the custody of French police, shrouded under a cover on a trailer which no one is allowed to approach, let alone examine. The signal for the execution of Princess Grace was picked up by the British Army listening post in Cyprus and it is believed by well placed source that the Committee Monte Carlo and P2 gave the order.
Not to mention, I was much more beautiful and elegant than Princess Di of Bolemia.
Grace Kelly said...
What about me? I died under suspicious circumstances, and I was married to royalty, but no one thinks to explore my death.
OK, Grace. This is for you. The above quote is hardly enough to discuss the depravity you got yourself into when you married into Monte Carlo gambling oversexed king himself, Reiner III.
Grace, you were always the better 'high weirdness' candidate for Jeff Wells, with your Monaco connections, than a 'smart as a rock' Princess Diana, even though both of you were interesting examples of "inbreeding" from an outclan that has had some power in the distant past.
Perhaps Jeff was unaware that you, Grace, were likely connected to being killed by your own husband Reiner III (who likely introduced you to the Order of the Solar Temple) because you were a handy covers for money laundering by the Monaco connected "Solar Temple" group--which plugs so well into elite deviance, arms deals, money laundering, intentionally fake media stories quickly penned, and royalty connected ritual sex, replete with claims of "spiritual manifestation in the material" coming out of such sex rituals.
Grace, I should mention to you that you probably didn't know the huge extent of what you were getting into, though who knows--your family was very politically powerful in the United States (they were close to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, later President--though more importantly--grandson of opium smugglers in Canton for Bonesmen connected Russell and Company. That would be FDR's grandfather Delano. Grace, you knew that your father was a close friend of FDR--and even was appointed to an honorary federal political position by FDR).
So Grace, you knew you were in for a ride in life--both in the United States and later--long before you were bred to Monaco royalty who "wanted an actress" because he had everything else.
I start this discussion with noting that the Order of the Solar Temple, which seems to have had Monaco royal connections, had an ideology connecting them to Sirius and astral planing that after death they would go there. This is so reminiscent of the Heaven's Gate (more MKULTRA like operation it seems) "cult" it should be compared immediately--either as something made up later to associate it with Heaven's Gate unfairly, or something to throw the real scent off the Christian Catholic ritual sex angle of the Knights Templar--which is the real heart of the matter, Grace.
This is because, in Europe, the Order of the Solar Temple were all "powerful people" mostly, while Heavens' Gate groups seem like so much "peasants bought and sold" compared to Solar Temple. There was not ritual Catholic sex in Heaven's Gate, despite its name.
And it is ritual Catholic sex, Grace, that seemed to turn on Reiner III--and that's how you got into all this.
The Solar Temple had (and likely has) a far more elitist secretive affair with Sirius and astral planing doctrines. And Solar Temple was (and likely still is) intersected with European esoteric Catholic Christianity, Knights Templar themes, bloodlines, and ritual sex.
Come on Grace, admit you were entinced though soon got out of your depth. When you wanted out, it made your husband Reiner III mad, particularly if (as is claimed) you wanted to blow open the whole organization of money laundering which is the main purpose of Monaco to European elites (and other little "extra jurisdictional" areas tucked away between more boring democratically inclined nation stats (though honored in the breach more than the observance). There are no taxes in Monaco to its citizens, and a huge portion of the money of the state comes direct out of gambling:
"Monte Carlo is home to most of the Circuit de Monaco, on which the Formula One Monaco Grand Prix takes place; it also hosts world championship boxing bouts, the Monte Carlo Masters, fashion shows and other events. Monte Carlo has been visited by royalty as well as commoners and movie stars for decades as one of Europe's leading tourist resorts. Within the casino complex is the Grand Théâtre de Monte Carlo, an opera and ballet house, and the headquarters of the Ballets de Monte Carlo. In 1861 a 50-year concession to operate the gaming rooms was granted to a private individual. Since 1898 the concession has been operated by the Société des Bains de Mer, a private company, in which the government now holds a majority interest. This corporation also owns the principal hotels and clubs of the community that serve the tourist trade. The citizens of Monaco are exempt from taxes, and they are forbidden to enter the gaming rooms."
If you want to money launder, you gotta have a royal on your side, is the lesson here. How much better if they still have their own domain, propped up because such a thing is so useful to the present, instead of because it has something to do with the past:
"All the truly high rollers know that Société des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Étrangers à Monaco (Bains de Mer) owns and operates many of the prestigious luxury resort properties in Monte Carlo, located on the Mediterranean in the tiny principality of Monaco. The company offers gambling at five casinos, including the famous Monte-Carlo Casino, and gives shelter to the world's rich and famous at its five hotels. The company also operates more than 20 restaurants and nightclubs, as well as shops, a health spa, and a golf course. If elegance and glamour isn't enough of a draw, a new conference center has been built. Founded in 1863, the company is approximately 70% owned by Monaco’s ruling Grimaldi family."
If Monaco suddenly looks like a Mafia don's dreamworld of owning his own private government, and getting to call himself a king, well, that's basically what Monaco is.
Where does high aristocratic ritual religious sex come in?
François Grimaldi (François Malizia "the Cunning") was the leader of the Guelphs who captured the Rock of Monaco on the night of January 8, 1297. He was the son of Guglielmo Grimaldi by his wife Giacoba. [This was the era directly after the Templars had finally lost the last bit of the Holy Land at Acre, in 1291--which saw a huge amount of Templar rushes to found little statelets all over Europe. Monaco seems to have been one, given the context in which it was founded and by whom it was founded.
Dressed as a Franciscan monk, François was greeted at the gates of Monaco's castle, only then to seize the castle with his cousin Rainier I, Lord of Cagnes, and a group of men behind him. The event is commemorated on the Monegasque coat of arms, where the supporters are two monks armed with swords. [which may be a Templar warrior monk double meaning; another Templar double meaning is the Monaco flag--red and white equally, similar to the similar black and white of the Templar and in the same way as it was, in two stripes like the Monaco flag].
He held the citadel of Monaco 4 years and was finally chased out. To keep this little statelet area, he married in 1295 with Aurelia del Carretto, though the marriage was childless.
After his death, in 1309, and two years after Philip the Far was going after the Templars from 1307 (though before the Templars were decommissioned in 1314) he was succeeded by his cousin (and stepson), Rainier I, Lord of Cagnes.
"His cousin's descendants, the Grimaldi family, still rule Monaco today, with Prince Albert II, the head of the House of Grimaldi."
That's quite a long time to have a protected state anywhere under one dynasty, however small---much less after 500 years of solid warfare in Europe. Who was this guy established right as the Templars were under attack, and adopting all sort of Templar-reminiscent iconography for his state symbols?
Rainier I of Monaco (born 1267 - died 1314) was, in fact, the first sovereign Grimaldi ruler of the area now known as Monaco. He also holder the title of Lord of Cagnes.
The oldest of the three sons of Lanfranco Grimaldi, French Vicar of Provence, by his wife, Aurelia del Carretto (who later remarried [incestuously inbred] with his late husband nephew, François Grimaldi), Rainier joined to his stepfather and a group of men to take the Rock of Monaco; the event is commemorated on the Monegasque coat of arms, where the supporters are two monks armed with swords (because Francois dressed as monk and open at the gates of Monaco's castle--[and likely because of the Templar double meaning]. He held the citadel of Monaco 4 years and was finally chased out in April 10, 1301.
In 1304 he was appointed admiral of France.
He married twice:
First, married Salvatica, daughter of Giacomo del Carretto, Margrave of Final. They have four children:
* Charles I, his successor, [established during the 1307-1314 period of 'gray' for the Templars when the were unaware they were going to be decomissioned though when a lot of esoteric things happened that still influence European elites presently.]
* Vinciguerra; married Constancia Ruffa.
* Salvaggia; married Gabriel Vento.
* Luca, Lord of Villefranche; married firstly with Tedise, daughter of Daniel Cibo, and secondly with Catarina Carracioli.
Secondly, Rainier I married Andriola Grillo. This marriage was childless.
In that "Templar gray area" of 1307-1314, Charles I of Monaco (died August 15, 1357), was the first true Lord of Monaco, and is thus widely considered the founder of the dynasty. He was the oldest son of Rainier I by his first wife, Salvatica del Carretto, Charles was fled to exile after the fall to the Rock of Monaco in the Genoese control in April 10, 1301.
After thirty years of Genoese rule, who retook the Rock in September 12, 1331, and ruled to his death, when the Rock was taken again for the Genoese army.
In 1346 he took the Lordship of Mentone and, in 1355, he conquered the Lordship of Roquebrune.
In June 29, 1352, in the wake of the Black Death plagues, he designed co-rules of Monaco his uncle Antonio (his father's youngest brother), and his own sons, Rainier II and Gabriel.
Charles I married Lucchina, a daughter of Girardo Spinola, Lord of Dertonne. They have eight children:
* Louis, his successor.
* Rainier II .
* Francis.
* Gabriel, married to a member of the Orsini family.
* Charles, Co-Lord of Mentone; he have a son, Luca, who inherited Mentone. Luca have two sons, Pietro and Filippo, also Lords of Mentone; both brothers died without issue, and Mentone passed to the older branch of the family.
* Lancelot.
* Ruffus.
* Anastasia.
The Orsini are interesting because they were a parapolitical family that made (and unmade) popes for centuries.
The Orsini family was one of the most celebrated princely families in Italy and 1400s Rome, which, had large possessions in Hungary as well. Members of the Orsini include popes Celestine III (1191-1198), Nicholas III (1277-1280), and separated by a small span of five hundred years and still powerful, the Orsini family pope Benedict XIII (1724-1730). Orsini additionally provided numerous condottieri and other relevant political and religious figures.
Orsinis were additionally married into the Ruffos, like the Grimaldis.
According to their family lore, the Orsini are descended from the Julio-Claudian family of ancient Rome. This may be fanciful, as well as the alleged connection to the German families of Anhalt, Baden and Rosenberg sporting the same name.
The Orsini were related to the Boboni family existing in Rome in the 11th century. The first members had in fact always doubled surname of Boboni-Orsini. This first known members is one Bobone, in the early 11th century, father of Pietro, in turn father of Giacinto dei Boboni (1110-1198), who in 1191 became pope as Celestine III.
One of the first "great nepotistic" popes, he created cardinals for two of his own nephews and allowed his cousin, Giovanni Gaetano (Giangaetano, died 1232) to buy the fiefs of Vicovaro, Licenza, Roccagiovine and Nettuno, who formed the nucleus of the future territorial power of the family.
The Boboni surname went lost with his children, who were called de domo filiorum Ursi. Two of them, Napoleone and Matteo Rosso (1178-1246) increased considerably the prestige of the family. The former was the founder of the first southern line, who disappeared with Camillo Pardo in 1553. He obtained the city of Manoppello, later a countship, and was Papal gonfaloniere. Matteo Rosso, called the Great, was the effective lord of Rome from 1241, when he defeated the Imperial troops to 1243, holding the title of Senator. Two of his sons and Napoleone were also Senators. Matteo ousted the traditional rivals, the Colonna, from Rome and extended the Orsini territories southwards up to Avellino and northwards to Pitigliano.
During his life the family entered firmly in the Guelph party--as did the hereditary elite Grimaldis of Genoas top 27 families, and of Monaco.
He had some ten sons, which divided the fiefs after his deaths: Gentile (died 1246) originated the Pitigliano line and the second southern line, Rinaldo that of Monterotondo, Napoleone (died 1267) that of Bracciano and another Matteo Rosso that of Montegiordano, from the name of the district in Rome housing the family's fortress.
The most distinguished of his sons was however Giovanni Gaetano (died 1280): elected pope as Nicholas III, he named the nephew Bertoldo (died 1289) as count of Romagna and had two nephews and a brother created cardinals.
The second southern line
The rise of the Orsini did not stop after Nicholas' death. Bertoldo's son, Gentile II (1250-1318), was two times Senator of Rome, podestà of Viterbo and, from 1314, Gran Giustiziere ("Great Justicer") of the Kingdom of Naples. He married to Clarice Ruffo, daughter of the counts of Catanzaro, forming an alliance of the most powerful Calabrian dynasty. [The Grimaldis married into them as well.]
His son Romano (1268-1327), called Romanello, was Royal Vicar of Rome in 1326, and inherited the countship of Soana through his marriage with Anastace de Montfort.
Romano's stance was markedly Guelph.
After his death, his two sons divided his fiefs, forming the Pitigliano and the second southern line--and this line died out.
It was the line of Gravina, from the name of the city in Apulia, which is the only existing line of the Orsini. It descends from Francesco (died 1456), a son of Count Carlo of Bracciano. Most of his fief were located in northern Lazio, but he entered in the Neapolitan orbit when in 1418 he was called by Sergianni Caracciolo to fight against the Angevine troops, which he defeated. By marriage, he obtained the title of count of Gravina. He was made Duke of Gravina by King Alfonso, title definitely assigned to his son Giacomo (died 1472), to which had been added the counties of Conversano, Campagna and Copertino. Two of Francesco's son, Marino (died 1471) and Giovanni Battista (died June 8, 1476), were respectively archbishop of Taranto and Grand Master of Knights of Rhodes.
That the Orsini family pretty high "Christian occult" warrior knights so to speak.
The fourth duke, Francesco, was strangled by Cesare Borgia in 1503. One of his nephews, Flavio Orsini, was created cardinal in 1565. The fifth duke, Ferdinando (died December 6, 1549) had all his fiefs confiscated by the Spaniards, but regained it after a 40,000 'scudi payment. After the heirless death of Duke Michele Antonio (January 26, 1627), his lands passed to his cousin Pietro Orsini, count of Muro Lucano (died 1641). The latter's nephew Pier Francesco, who had renounced to the succession in favour to his brother Domenico to became a Dominican, was later elected pope with the name of Benedict XIII.
His successor raised (previous pope) Benedict XIII's nephew, Prince Beroaldo Orsini, to the dignity of Prince Assistants to the Papal Throne (title held until 1958), and the 'other side' wanted the Orsinis as well--the emperor Charles VI had already, in 1724, made him a prince of the Holy Roman Empire. The last cardinal from the family was Domenico.
The family moved to Rome in the 18th century, where Duke Domenico (November 23, 1790 - April 28, 1874), married Maria Luisa Torlonia in 1823. In 1850 [in an era of secular revolutionuary/Illumiati action in Italy, he was on the othe side: the Orsini was Minister of War and General Lieutenant of the Papal Armies, and Senator of Rome as well.
The descendant of the family live in Rome.
The Orsini still exist.
And the Grimaldi are very interesting themselves, because, besides still existing in Europe like their in-laws the ultramontane Orsinis, the House of Grimaldi is associated with the history of the Republic of Genoa and of the Principality of Monaco.
The Grimaldi family descends from Grimaldo, a Genovese statesman at the time of the first Crusades--another Templar networked issue.
He was the son of Otto Canella, a Consul of Genoa in 1133, and in turn Grimaldo became a Consul in 1160, 1170 and again in 1184. His numerous grand-sons and their children led maritime expeditions throughout the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, and soon the North Sea, and quickly became one of the most powerful families of Genoa.
The Grimaldis feared that the head of a rival Genoese family could break the fragile balance of power in a political coup and become lord of Genoa, as it happened in other Italian cities.
They thus reached outside of Genoa, and entered into a Guelphic alliance with the Fieschi family and defended their interests with the sword.
The Grimaldi Guelf allies however were banned from the City of Genoa in 1271, and found refuge in their castles of Liguria and in Provence.
Thus the Grimaldis of Monaco were on the side of the (mostly) urban Guelfs in the whole Holy Roman Empire versus Papacy issues playing themselves out during the life of the Templar organization:
Guelph (often spelled Guelf, plural Guelfi) is most probably an Italian form of a battle cry--"Welf!"--screamed by family allies of the dukes of Bavaria (including the namesake Welf, as well as Henry the Lion).
The Welfs were said to have used the name as a rallying cry first in more 'German domestic' squabbles, during the Battle of Weinsberg in 1140, in which the rival Hohenstaufens of Swabia (led at the time by Conrad III) used another word as a battle cry against the "Welf!". the Hohenstaufen (line of the Barbarossa emperors) used "Waiblingen!" the name of a castle, as their opposing battle cry to "Welf!" As this infighting for the Holy Roman Empire emperorship expanded, it stretched for allies into Italy, and gained a different pronunciation.
"Waiblingen!" became subsequently Ghibellino! in Italian.
"Welf!" became Guelf! in Italian.
The names of these two battling imperial dynastic sides were likely introduced to Italy during the reign of military consolidator Frederick Barbarossa. While campaigning in Italy to expand imperial power there, the more locally automous Po River Valley urban Lombard League and its supporters became known as (those would would say "Welf!"/"Guelf!" in war against Barbarossa's "Walblingen!".
Guelphs supporting the urban areas against the Barbarossa Emperors' encroachments, while those who supported imperial bloodline of Frederick became known as Ghibellines ("Ghibellini!" called in war). The Ghibellines were thus an Imperial Italian party, while the urban Guelphs somewhat supported the Pope--though that was only because of a common enemy invading. Broadly speaking, it was contextual: Guelphs tended to come from backstabbing wealthy mercantile families who made and broke alliances when it suited them, while Ghibellines were predominantly rooted to the spot--were wealthy based on agricultural estates and more 'imperial territorial' in their alliances. There were thus Guelf cities, which tended to be areas against the Emperor when he was a threat to their local interests, though urban areas could be against the Pope as well, since there were Ghibelline cities which tended to tended contextually be in areas where the enlargement of the Papal States--and not the emperor--was the more immediate threat.
In this context with Guelf/Grimaldi networks being broken up in Genoa and losing out, they signed a treaty with Charles of Anjou, King of Naples and Count of Provence, to retake control of Genoa, and generally to provide mutual assistance. The Anjou line is crucial to occult European Christianity, and it is important that the Grimaldi had Anjou treaties and friendships.
In 1276, Grimaldis accepted a peace under the auspices of the Pope, which however did not put an end to the Genoan civil war. Not all the Grimaldis chose to return to Genoa, as they preferred to settle in their own private estates, where they could raise armies for later. In 1299, Grimaldis and their Guelf allies launched a few galleys to attack the port of Genoa before taking refuge to recoup on the Western Riviera (Monaco areas). During the following years, the Grimaldis were going to enter into different alliances that would allow them to come back in force. This time, it was the turn of their rivals, the Spinola family, to be banned from the City.
During all that period, both Guelfs and Ghibellines took and abandoned the castle of Monaco, which was ideally located to launch political and military operations against Genoa.
Therefore, the story of Francis Grimaldi and his faction – who conquered the castle of Monaco under the disguise of friars in 1297 – is largely anecdotal, though that the symbolism of armed monks on their coat of arms, and their Templar crisis era of foundation, and their Anjou connections, and their "high papal political" Orsini political connections are not.
Another Grimaldi formative event was in the same immediate years after Templar disestablishment, the early 14th century, when the Catalans from Spain raided the shores of Provence and Liguria, challenging Genoa and King Robert of Provence.
In 1353, the combined fleet of eighty Venetian and Catalonian galleys gathered in Sardinia to meet the fleet of sixty galleys under the command of Anthony Grimaldi. Grimaldi, the leader of the fleet, lost. Only nineteen of his Genoese vessels survived the battle. Fearing an invasion, Genoa rushed to request the protection of the lord of Milan. The Grimaldi started making lots of other alliances.
Several of the oldest branches of the House of Grimaldi appeared during those unrests, such as the branches of Antibes, Beuil, Nice, Puget, and Sicily. In 1395, they were back though--the Grimaldis took advantage of further discords in Genoa to take possession of Monaco, which they then ruled as a condominium. This time, they kept it. It is the origin of today's principality.
Besides having their own statelet in Monaco, with its Templar iconography, the Grimaldi's were the hereditary elite of Genoa after this as well still, despite losing so disasterously before it seems strange. The Grimaldis were kept in the circle of the highest hereditary of Genoa--a similar arrangement as the elite of Venice maintained, for example.
As it was customary in Genoa, the Grimaldis organized their family ties within a corporation called Albergo.
Albergos seem to be another prime area for solidifying common ideological (and potentially occult) linkages, similar to how Skull and Bones was formed in the same breath as the families involved in the opium trade in the 1830s in New England.
For instance, the Grimaldi Family was numerically large and formed an albergo, a Genoese association of patricians similar in essence to today's corporations. Not only this kind of organization allowed the Genoese aristocracy to liberate the means to explore the trading opportunities the world had to offer, from London to Beijing, but those families came also to combine resources within powerful multi-family alliances. The Genoese concept of albergo thus stretched from the family to the clan. For example, the Cebàs, Cevas, and Olivas were among two dozen allied families in the Grimaldi albergo.
In sum, the alberghi came to form extended families within which its members generally worked together.
A Branch Sets Root Permanently in Monaco
A branch of the albergo/House of Grimaldi eventually emerged in Monaco, progressively acquiring its land from rivals and securing the sovereignty of the Family through a variety of alliances between Monaco and its neighbors. They acquired adjacent domains and lands making the territory of Monaco larger than today's principality.
In the 15th century, John Grimaldi, lord of Monaco, formally established in his will (1454) the Rules of Succession, to bring his albergo into the succession formally.
It was an important step since Monaco had been a condominium until then. The rule can be summarized as follows: First in line of succession is the male issue, whether legitimate or not, by primogeniture. In the absence of a male heir enters the female issue, whether legitimate or not, by primogeniture, provided that the candidate marries a man legitimately born of the Grimaldi lineage — "unum hominem seu virum natum legitime de progenie seu albergo Grimaldorum." Otherwise, the succession passes to the most closely related member of the Grimaldi albergo. In case there would be two or more Grimaldi cousins alive at equal degrees, the eldest would be chosen.
In the political reform of 1528, this ancient "Grimaldi albergo" association of inbred families became one of the 28 alberghi of the Republic of Genoa, to which other families were formally invited to join. After that, the House of Grimaldi, aided assuredly by its allied albergi networks provided many illustrious personalities such as doges, cardinals, cabinet ministers, and countless officers.
So much for Grimaldi history.
Now let's look at the occult angle of the same history.
This follow text is a series of quotes more about the occult Christianity networks that you, Grace, suddenly were moving within.
First, Grace, it is from a really thin book (thin in content, as well as physically) by Sarah Moran. It is called The Secret World of Cults: From Ancient Druids to Heaven's Gate. It looks a lot like a pop-up book on the outside. However, the book has been mostly stripped of the very interesting intelligence connections to the Solar Temple's case, as well as the history of European esoteric Christian connections. Instead, the book explains breezily away its sanitized story about their lack of connection to anything except themselves and how "puzzling" they were. It leaves more loose ends than explains anything as you will see. Some of these loose ends are filled in by other texts after this from either webpages dealing with certain topics that came up (or more glaringly, failed to be explained by Moran's book). These are highly intersperced with my (non online) book reading which has among other things concentrated on inspecting many European historical interpretations at their intentionally frayed ends or lack of connecting the dots, and putting them back together for drawing the larger picture. it ain't pretty, though I think it's more accurate, because it ain't pretty.
So, Grace, here's what you got into when you married into Monaco's high Catholic royalty, a little understood protected principality hundreds of years old on the French coast though whose name bespeaks everything connected to spycraft imaginable.
These names of Monaco and "Monte Carlo" call to mind, thanks to several generations of cinema, particularly 'Cold War cinema' and James Bond. Monte Carlo's glamorous Belle Époque casino was a model for the setting of Ian Fleming's first Bond novel, Casino Royale (1953), 'Royale-Les-Eaux' being a fictional resort in the style of Monte Carlo. The real Monte Carlo and its casino provided one of the glamorous locations for the 1995 James Bond Film, GoldenEye. Such images of perfect 1950s polyester suited spies, classified information passed over a quiet dinner, murders, defections, ridiculous Alpha-male gambling bets, wine knowledge used like fencing thrusts and parrying, and gambling evenings doubling as staged money laundering with your favorite high priced courtesans who really are spies who will kill you back in your opulent Louis Quinze hotel room (never redecorated since 1793), except to remove bloodstains and patch bullet holes in the walls.
Grace, "this was your life"--and a huge part of your death.
THE ORDER OF THE SOLAR TEMPLE
Luc Jouret, a Belgian-born homeopathic doctor and registered obstetrician [for private occult abortions in their ritual sex acts...?], headed the doomsday cult known as the Order of the Solar Temple.
At the time of writing, 73 people linked to the cult have died, either through suicide [sic] or murder, but some experts believe that the group lives on, and there is a chance more [will die]....
The group was practically unknown until a series of events in October 1994 triggered a massive INTERNATIONAL POLICE INQUIRY into the dealings of "obstetrician" Luc Jouret and his partner in crime, Joseph Di Mambro [who had the Princess Grace connections].
What followed has been a story full of intrigue, conspiracy, [fake media blitzes], and unanswered questions.
Various reports have linked the cult to the Mafia, to the death of Princess Grace [Kelly] of Monaco, to illegal gun smuggling, and to a complex money laundering operation.
One of the biggest mysteries the police had to solve [by shelving...] was how the deaths occurred, and why.
Initial reports in the [Mockingbird] media spoke of the typical [comic book rationalization] of mass suicides, but as autopsies were carried out, it became clear that [someone wanted it to appear as a "self closed case of mass suicide" in the media, though]...not all deaths were voluntary. It seems that a substantial number of the bodies found were victims of murder [same as the artificial story of the "Jonestown 'cult'" which was a story of mass murder instead of mass suicide--a topic that Jeff has touched on previously as presumably a U.S. intelligence operation gone awry or quickly 'terminated' with a requisite fake media story to poison the trail of the murders still alive. The same could be said for the Order of the Solar Temple which had international and quick timed repercussions to 'end the project' all within the period of one or two days despite being separated by thousands of miles from each other's cult sites:]
[FIRST] On October 4, 1994, five bodies were found in the peaceful town of Morin Heights in Quebec, Canada. They were all discovered in the same house, which had been set alight. Police soon realized that it wasn't accidental death when the bodies of ex-Solar Temple members Tony and Nicky Dutoit and their three-month-old baby son were found to have multiple stab wounds. They had been murdered [perhaps ritually]. The two other bodies at the scene were also identified as Solar Temple members.
[SECOND] Just as police linked the burning building to its owner Di Mambro, and investigations began into both the cult leaders' whereabouts, reports came in from Switzerland of a 'mass suicide' [that wasn't as well] in the quiet resort of Chiery.
The events surrounding the discovery [there] of 47 bodies in two locations in Switzerland on October 5, 1994 [merely one day after other "Solar Temple" member bodies were found in Quebec murdered on the other side of the Atlantic] are complex. Locals were amazed that something so dreadful could happen in their midst without them suspecting anything, but it soon became obvious that plans for the deaths had been taking shape for a while.
Police were first called to deal with [similarly] a fire at a farmhouse belonging to 73-year-old Albert Giacobino. It was around midnight when they arrived and found the body of the retired farmer. He had been shot in the head. An elaborately rigged firebomb device had only partially worked, and some rooms were left untouched. [Bonesmen founded] Time Magazine reported [quickly] how a firefighter came across "a chapel [inside the farmhouse] with MIRRORED WALLS [for MKULTRA related? programming? that is one known technique] and red satin draperies where 22 bodies lay, many cloaked in ceremonial white, gold, red, or black robes." The magazine reported that nearly all the dead had been shot, and most had been arranged in a circle among discarded champagne bottles. Ten had been suffocated [similar to how the "Heaven's Gate" operation was 'terminated.']
[THIRD] Only a few hours later, a similar scenario was found in Granges-sur-Salvan, a small skiing village, also in Switzerland. This time the fires had been more successful and all of the bodies would prove hard to identify. A group of three chalets had been rigged with gasoline bombs which were ignored by a ringing telephone [a pretty complex 'James Bond' sort of set up.] While the fires continued to burn, police realized that only two of the three bombs had detonated, leaving a potentially lethal situation for the emergency services. All 25 [of these bodies] had to be identified by their dental records [alone]. Five of them were children.
As more information came to light, it seemed that those involved in the deaths had all been members of a cult called the Order of the Solar Temple.
...
Jouret taught that he was a reincarnated Templar Knight (some ex-members have said that Jouret believed, or at least told them, that he was the Son of God), that Di Mambro's daughter Emanuelle was a "cosmic child" conceived by immaculate conception [during ritual sex acts], and that he could take them to a better place [called Sirius. Does this sound familar to some of Jeff's Sirius/Egypitan connected astral planing stories in occult elites?]
The "better place" that Jouret promised was actually in the Sirius star system [similar theme to Heaven's Gate by the way], where he said a planet would be their new home.
...
[FOURTH] Just over a year later, 16 more members of the cult died in south-east France. Three of the group were children, and police concluded that not all of the group had voluntarily committed suicide.
[FIFTH] Five more died in St. Casimir, Canada, on March 20, 1997, although the number would have been eight had the three teenage children of one couple not persuaded their parents to let them live.
...
Little is known about what tied the group together. Members tended to be wealthy and highly educated. When the dead were finally identified, a former mayor, journalist, and several well-respected businessmen were listed. At first, police thought [and publicly said] Jouret and Di Mambro had escaped, [though they were slapped for saying that publicly--for noting that the leadership killed off its personnel and likely escaped, so the story was revamped to make a cleaner case where]...their bodies [and the convenient murder weapon previous noted to be lost] and those of their families were to be found among the [most thoroughly destroyed bodies] at the Grange-sur-Salvan site [where none of the burned bodies were clearly identifiable].
[Unlike other cults, it was a 'sleeper' kind of network.] Members maintained their jobs and lifestyles, only meeting up when summoned by their leader.
Temple activities [or MKULTRA 'passcode activation' or simply occult orders for acting in their typically administrative and politically powerful lives] were kept secret, and the only active recruiting seems to have been carried out internationally by Jouret and Di Mambro.
Members were taught they were privileged, an elite in society who were privy to special knowledge. Total numbers of...members are unknown, but it seems likely that there were no more than about 600, mainly in Canada, Switzerland, and France.
...
Little is known of their activities, but by the time of the first deaths/murders, the cult was already under investigation [then within days, internationally, they are all dead and burned up with few if any witnesses--how convenient.]....Three of them, including Jouret, had been charged with illegal arms possession, and various banks were becoming suspicious about the large amounts of money pouring in. It seems that Di Mambro's business acumen had masterminded [all by his little self?] a complex money-laundering network, based around the ownership and sale of expensive properties....The cult..."may have amassed as much as $93 million."
[And why were they being used as a cover for shipping around illegal armaments?]
While accounts differ as to exactly what the cult members believed and practiced, some surviving members allege that Jouret was actually the third incarnation of Christ on earth. [Here's the spooky elite bloodline issues:] Rituals based on historical interpretations of the Knights Templar practices were carried out in secret. The addition of robes, a strict hierarchy of office,...[is reminiscent of the Illuminati outs stories.]
...
Not only were some of the bodies badly beaten, but investigators of the Chiery site concluded that someone had left the site after the massacre and took with him or her the gun used to shoot some of the members. [Then, he went to kill another cell:] The weapon was later [claimed] found after the fires had been put out at the scene of the second tragedy at Granges-sur-Salvan [or it could have been planted there, when that little flub up was noted because "Jouret" was said to have been found there all burned up with the suspicious transferred gun, which conveniently solved the previous story of Jouret escaping].
[So we have a bizarre international money laundering, illicit drug connected, 'sleeper cell' orders taking high elites, involved in ritual sex who think they are the Knights Templar and connected with astral planing to Sirius stories.]
Whether the deaths of the Dutoit family [on October 4, 1994 in Quebec] triggered [one day later international repercussions in Switzerland mass murder as well], or whether Jouret and Di Mambro had been tipped off that various banks around the world had started investigations [already and then cleared house through mass murder] isn't known.
Princess Grace and Di Mambro of the the Solar Temple as a Money Launderering network for the Temple, Grace was Silenced Earlier in 1982
On December 29, 1997, Britain's Channel 4 broadcast a TV documentary on Princess Grace [married into the Merovinginan offshoot line in Monaco intermarried historically into French royalty] as part of their Secret Lives series.
The documentary suggested, that the actress-turned princess was involved with the Order of the Solar Temple.
It was suggested that the Princess was initiated into the cult by none other than Luc Jouret [which would have involved ritual sex] and was then asked by Di Mambro [to be a money cover for their operations] to pay 20 million Swiss francs [that might have been supplied to her to launder for them] for the privilege.
Interviewees, some [so scared they wanted to remain] anonymous, tell of...rituals involving sex and drugs where the Holy Grail would be "materialized" for members. [Di Mambro said that his own daughter Emanuelle was the product of such a ritual sex "materialization' which he called an "immaculate conception".]
The documentary also suggested that Princess Grace's death, in a car crash [so like Diana, though] in 1982, wasn't an accident but was linked to her involvement with the Solar Temple.
close quote
Frankly, the whole book, on second glance seems like some kind of comic book attempt to stress "isolated cult" aspects of many different stories--while ignoring that almost all of the stories are sanitized versions of strange really high and powerful and well connected groups, some with known intelligence services links.
So Jeff, ever done anything on the Order of the Solar Temple? It sounds like a story worthy of rigorous intuition: with high elite connections, money laundering, royalty, and 'high wierdness' seamlessly touching capable of working internationally all at once.
More on Grace Kelly
Grace, Princess of Monaco, née Grace Patricia Kelly (November 12, 1929 – September 14, 1982) was an Academy Award-winning American film actress who, upon marriage to Rainier III, Prince of Monaco on April 19, 1956, became Her Serene Highness The Princess of Monaco. She was the mother of the principality's current reigning Sovereign Prince, Albert II. Princess Grace was not required to renounce her American citizenship upon her marriage.
...
[The (unsurprising) high elite background of the Philadelphian Kelly's, who knew FDR]
Kelly's father's Irish American Catholic family (originally from Kidney Lake, Newport, County Mayo, Ireland) were new but prominent figures in Philadelphia society. The family was well-known and popular throughout the country. Kelly's father was a self-made millionaire and a triple gold-medal-winning Olympic sculler at a time that the sport of rowing was at its zenith. He was active in politics, running for mayor of Philadelphia and serving on the Fairmount Park commission. During World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt appointed the senior Kelly as his National Director of Physical Fitness, a public relations post which allowed Kelly to use his fame to extoll the virtues of physical fitness [and at this period "Anglo Saxon eugenic race/ethnic hierarchy ideals" assuredly.]
Kelly Drive in Philadelphia is named for John, Jr., who was a city councilman there. Her father's large family included two prominent uncles in the arts: Walter Kelly, a vaudevillian, and the Pulitzer Prize–winning playwright, George Kelly. Kelly's maternal grandparents, Carl Majer and Margaretha Berg, were of German descent [as are many bloodline Illuminists].
Although her family had opposed her becoming an actress, Kelly became a fashion model and appeared [highly sponsored to appear] in her first film, Fourteen Hours (1951), when she was 22.
The following year she "starred" (with a supporting role) in High Noon (1952), a generally praised but somewhat controversial western starring Gary Cooper.
Her next film, Mogambo (1953), was a drama set in the Kenyan jungle which centers on the love triangle portrayed by Kelly, Clark Gable, and Ava Gardner. Whilst filming this movie she had an affair with Gable, later memorably commenting "What else is there to do if you're alone in a tent in Africa with Clark Gable?" The movie earned Kelly an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actress, but the award went to Donna Reed for her role in From Here to Eternity. Kelly made three films with Alfred Hitchcock: Dial M for Murder, Rear Window, and To Catch a Thief.
...
She reportedly was surprised to learn from Rainier that she was expected to give up her film career entirely, but followed his wishes grudgingly.
Her Catholicism and ability to bear children were key factors in her being chosen to marry Prince Rainier, at least officially, though this is truly untrue given the sex lives of the Monaco royalty.
Fear based tales were circulated that Monaco would revert to France in the absence of an heir; and though there is no requirement for a Catholic marriage, it was thought unlikely that a Catholic prince would divorce and remarry if his chosen wife were barren.
In fact, there was really little actual danger that Monaco would revert to France since, in 1882, a childless prince of Monaco could adopt an unrelated heir, thereby ensuring Monaco's survival as a principality.
Prince Rainier's maternal grandfather, Louis II also legitimized his illegitimate daughter Charlotte Louvet (later Princess Charlotte of Monaco, Duchess of Valentinois), who would become Rainier's mother and made her his heir.
...
Prince Rainier and Princess Grace had three children:
* Hereditary Princess Caroline Louise Marguerite, born January 23, 1957, and now heiress presumptive to the throne of Monaco
* Albert II, Prince of Monaco, born March 14, 1958
* Princess Stéphanie Marie Elisabeth, born February 1, 1965
In 2002 a new treaty between France and Monaco clarified that even if there are no direct heirs of the reigning prince, the principality will remain an independent nation, rather than reverting to France.
Due to [Kelly's child] Prince Albert's enduring bachelorhood, Monegasque law now states that in the event of a reigning prince's lack of descendants, his siblings and their children will inherit the throne.
The line of succession is now Princess Caroline, then her children by her late second husband Stefano Casiraghi, who died in 1990, and her daughter by her third husband, Ernst August V, Prince of Hanover.
[Those crazy Germano-English Hanoverians still around here as well, marrying into and outflanking France like they are playing "Europe in the 1400s?" Sheesh. Perhaps they are.]
...
At the age of 52, in September 1982, Princess Grace [is said to have] suffered a stroke while driving. It had been rumored that she was driving on the same stretch of highway in Monaco that had been featured in To Catch a Thief,....[Rainer III admitted that it was the same area, though he attempted to spin that it was "not the same road, just a little higher up the hill" according to one quote I read! Ah. How different.]
...
In the 'discussion' section at her Wikipedia article, we can see the seamy and more real underbelly that fails to fit in the 'Wikipedian Maoist' project of a "proper Party interpretation" of all global information, where, it reads:
"The article is wrong in its claims about Ranier's inability to divorce a wife if she proved 'barren' or about the need to marry a catholic wife. Ranier's family (no, not the younger generation, his precedessors!) led notorious sex lives, regularly having affairs, extra-marital children, multiple divorces, etc. (I think I read somewhere that one of Ranier's parents or grandparents was illegitimate and 'legitimised', but I could be wrong. It was something I read nearly 15 years ago. Was it Ranier himself? ) So the idea that Ranier III had to marry a good catholic girl who could give him children is poppycock. If she couldn't, then as a head of state he could request a Roman Catholic Church annulment or even a Pauline et Petrine Papal Divorce. If it is to enable a catholic monarch to get an heir, the Catholic Church has a long history of bending, twisting and breaking its own rules to help that happen."
...
And, from the National, URL:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/mod03/mod03-story-642.html
Sorry for the lousy source,... though for the quotes from Reiner III, it's priceless.
-
Rainier Outraged By Scandalous TV Report That . . . Princess Grace Was A Sex-Cult Priestess
Prince Rainier of Monaco is furiously denying an investigation that claims Princess Grace was a secret priestess in a bizarre sex cult!
Grace joined the Order of the Solar Temple just months before her death
in 1982, according to a blockbuster TV documentary.
They say she stripped and underwent a sexual initiation ceremony -- and she handed over more than $9 million before she eventually turned against the cult's charismatic leader shortly before she died following a [soon very convenient] car accident.
"Grace was a woman of many secrets," said TV producer David Cohen, who
spent a year investigating the cult.
"Her lovers are only one aspect of
the story. She was an extremely religious woman -- and it was her search for spirituality that delivered her to the Order of the Solar Temple."
Prince Rainier "is furious about these claims," a Monaco insider told
The ENQUIRER. [He's dead by 2006, now, buried beside Grace in the 'state Catholic church' of Monaco.]
"He thinks it's all just sensational rubbish to grab TV ratings and a
cheap shot at somebody who can't answer back," the insider said.
"He's convinced it never happened, and he is sure she couldn't have
given them so much money without him knowing. [Which indicates that the money may have been laundered through Grace, as hypothezied above, instead of coming from her.] Prince Rainier is going to make sure this program is never shown in Monaco."
...
According to the program, Grace was not alone among the European upper
class...[in]...by the Solar Temple.
Many rich and powerful people in Monaco and Europe were lured to join and then conned out of money by cult
leader Joseph di Mambro.
They were told the Order gave them special access to God during
ceremonies that involved part- Catholic, part-mystic mumbo jumbo.
Shades of Nazis and Blavatsky?
Di Mambro convinced his recruits he was in touch with 33 spiritual
masters who watched over the world from the Himalayas. He also told
followers that they were reincarnated from biblical figures or saints.
Producers for the program...aired in Britain...say their evidence comes from interviews with the cult leader's chauffeur/security guard and an acupuncturist who stripped and prepared Grace for the initiation ceremony [in an ex-Templar church in the south of France, near Monaco].
When the Princess arrived at the ancient church in the South of France for the rite, she was "frightened and apprehensive" at first.
But she was sexually aroused by the acupuncturist, then given a drugged
drink before being told to lie on a huge round altar in the church's
crypt during the ceremony.
One of the cult's top leaders, Luc Jouret, then declared her a "High
Priestess of the Order."
[One story is] She was asked to donate $10 million. She paid $9 million, but soon had second thoughts.
Cohen said, "The notion of somebody as loved and respected as Princess
Grace joining a cult -- after undergoing the sexually loaded initiation ceremony -- was hard to believe when we first stumbled across her secret two years ago."
Despite Prince Rainier's strong[winded] denials, Cohen said he is convinced the story is true.
Cohen claims Grace fought with di Mambro when she demanded her money
back, threatening to expose him as a fraud. Then she died [in a likely murder by car tampering or by medical hampering which led to her accident.].
"Her attitude frightened di Mambro," Cohen said. "It draws attention to
the mysterious circumstances of her death."
end quote
WHY WAS IT CALLED THE ORDER OF THE SOLAR TEMPLE.
It was a further addition of 'solar' to the "Order of the Temple," which, ta da, is the Templars 1800s "revolutionary era recreation" out of the shadows, if you believe the story around the "Larmenius Transmission" in the Templars after 1307. Only a very small part of Europe actually banned the Templars, and the Pope (a Blanchefort bloodline pope at the moment--one of the Grandmaster lines of the Templars himself) refused to proscribe them for heresies, and in the end they were simply 'uncommissioned' by 1314. Another author, in the Vatican Secret Archives, has recently (early 2003 I think) turned up a document actually "pardoning" all Templars written by that Pope. The publication of that document, led to some British Templars (supposedly) coming out of the woodwork, giving Guardian-UK newspaper interviews, and demanding a "public apology" from the Papacy about disestablishing them. High wierdness in Europe indeed.
quote
The Larmenius Transmission:
The [claim of the] Larmenius Transmission traces its descent through Templar survivors in France, and is based on a controversial document called that Charter of Transmission of Larmenius (or the Larmenius Charter for short).
This charter was allegedly drawn up the [document's proclaimed] Templar who was secretly appointed by Jacques de Molay to succeed him, Johannes Marcus Larmenius.
It bears the signatures of all the subsequent (predominantly French) 'secret Grand Masters,' down to the beginning of the 19th century.
The charter was first made public in 1804 by an eminent Parisian doctor (and former Catholic priest who had left the clergy in order to marry) named Bernard Raymond Fabre-Palaprat, who used it as the authority for--as he claimed-- [publicly] reconstituting the Order of the Temple.
Fabre-Palaprat claimed his Order had flourished during the previous century, after an earlier revival led by none other than the Regent of France, Philippe, Duc d'Orleans, in 1705.
Many members of the aristocracy had been members - but they, and the Order, had suffered heavily during the [Illuminati period of] French Revolution [as distinct from the uber-royalist Catholic aristocratic sided groups that wanted a Constitutional monarchy, like Comte de Lafeyette among others.]
The last Grand Master [was claimed to be], the Duc de Cosse-Brissac, was executed in 1792, but had passed the archives, including the Larmenius Charter, to another member, Radix de Chevillon.
Finally, elderly and ailing [and fearing the complete dissolution of this transmission, so the story goes], de Chevillon had entrusted the Charter and other documents to the last four surviving members, which included Dr Fabre-Palaprat, who took it on his own initiative to rebuild the Order.
So....
In March 1808 the revived Order of the Temple staged a very public commemoration of the 494th anniversary of the martyrdom of Jacques de Molay - at which the eulogy was [actually] spoken by the Canon of Notre-Dame Cathedral.
Fabre-Palaprat's Order attracted many [still guillotine-escaped] members from the upper ranks of French society - it is even claimed that Napoleon Bonaparte was a member, although there is no documentary evidence to support this.
[However, it would be unsurprising, since Corsican Napoleon, in marrying Josephine, agreed to adopt her children of a previous marriage, from the Carribean, which were likely Merovingian bloodline connected groups. This was Joséphine de Beauharnais (June 23, 1763 – May 29, 1814), the first wife of Napoléon Bonaparte who became Empress of the French and thus set up her children (Merovingian) to be head of the Napoleonic royal empire, if it had survived). Through her daughter, Hortense, she was the maternal grandmother of [equally hard ultramontane Catholic] Napoleon III.
Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de la Pagerie was born in Les Trois-Îlets, Martinique, a French territory, to a slave-owning family that owned a sugar plantation. She was a daughter of Joseph-Gaspard de Tascher, chevalier, seigneur de la Pagerie, lieutenant of infantry of the navy, and his wife, the former Rose-Claire des Vergers de Sanois.
[It is claimed by authors like Michael Bradley that de Tasher was a direct Merovingian bloodline sprout ("Plantagenet" actually means something like 'new sprout'--didn't know that occult reference I bet, did you?) A lot of Carribean interesting connections occured as occult bloodline escapees. Another one is the Spanish Monsanto family, by the way....yes, namesake of evil corporation Monsanto so close to parapolitical things in the United States. Monsanto Founder John F. Queeny (1859 --1930) named the company after his aristocratic wife, Olga Mendez Monsanto. Her Spanish father, Maurice Monsanto, was son of Don Emmanuel Mendez de Monsanto, aristocrat knighted by both Queen Isabella II of Spain and King Frederick VII of Denmark. Her German mother, Emma Cleaves, was a daughter of a private secretary to King George IV of Hanover. Three Monsantos--father, mother and daughter--abandoned Europe for residence on wealth generating sugar plantations on the island of Vieques near Puerto Rico. Vieques of course is the infamous U.S. military test range--despite people living on it. The Monsantos additionally had plantations on St. Thomas in the Virgin Islands. The Monsantos moved to 'New World revolutionary central', New York City, in 1878.
Thus, back to the "Larmenius Transmission." Despite or perhaps because of Josephine's blood and her children that were set up to be Napoleonic royal heirs, there is continuity after Napoleon. The Larmenius Transmission document was certainly formally recognised by Louis XVIII in 1814 and the Emperor Napoleon III in 1853.
In October 1779, Joséphine went to Europe with her father. She married Alexandre on December 13, 1779, in Noisy-le-Grand. Although their marriage was not extremely happy, they had two children: a son, Eugène de Beauharnais (1781–1824), and a daughter, Hortense de Beauharnais (1783–1837), who married Napoleon's brother Louis Bonaparte in 1802.
On March 2, 1794, during the Reign of Terror, the Committee of General Security ordered the arrest of Josephine's aristocratic [Merovingian bloodline] husband. He was jailed in the Carmes prison. Considering Joséphine as too close to the "counter-revolutionary" [non-Illuminati, then] financial circles, the Committee ordered her arrest on April 19, 1794 as well. A warrant of arrest was issued against her on 2 Floréal, year II (April 21, 1794), and she was imprisoned in the Carmes prison until 10 Thermidor, year II (July 28, 1794). She was freed thanks to the trial against Robespierre. Her husband, accused of having poorly defended Mainz in 1793, and considered an aristocratic "suspect", was sentenced to death. He was guillotined on July 23, 1794, together with his brother Augustin, on the Place de la Révolution (today's Place de la Concorde) in Paris.
...
As a widow, Joséphine de Beauharnais reportedly was mistress to several leading political figures, reportedly including Paul François Jean Nicolas Barras. She met General Napoléon Bonaparte, who was six years younger than she, in 1795, when their romance began. He wrote in a letter to her in December "I awake full of you. Your image and the memory of last night’s intoxicating pleasures has left no rest to my senses." Joséphine was a renowned spendthrift and Barras may have encouraged the relationship with Napoleon in order to get her off his hands.
In January 1796, Napoleon proposed to her and they married on March 9, 1796. Until meeting Napoleon, she had always been Rose. Instead of calling her this name, which he apparently disliked, he called her 'Joséphine,' which she adopted from then on. A busy, but passionate man, Napoleon was not around much during the beginning of their marriage. Soon after the wedding, he left to lead the French army in Italy, but sent her many intensely romantic love letters. She, on the other hand, was hardly as romantic, and sent hardly as many letters, if any, in return. Many of his letters are still intact today, while very few of hers have been found. This could be due either to the fact that he lost them, or that she did not write very many, if at all. Whatever the case, his words were undoubtedly more full of passion.
Joséphine, less in love than Napoleon, began an affair with high society playboy Hippolyte Charles in 1796. This so infuriated and hurt Napoleon that his deep, loyal love changed entirely. Perhaps out of revenge, he took on his own mistress, Pauline Bellisle Foures, the wife of a junior officer who became known as " Napoleon's Cleopatra", the affair having begun during the Egyptian campaign of 1798. The relationship between Joséphine and Napoleon was never the same after her affair. His letters became entirely less loving. As far as we know, Joséphine never took on another lover, but Napoleon continued to take on mistresses.
...
Shortly before their coronation, there was an incident at the Château de Saint-Cloud that nearly sundered the marriage between the two. Josephine caught Napoleon in the bedroom of her lady-in-waiting, Elisabeth de Vaudey, and Napoleon threatened to divorce her as she had not produced an heir. Eventually, however, through the efforts of Josephine's natural daughters, the two were reconciled and Napoleon and Joséphine were crowned Emperor and Empress of the French in 1804 in the Notre-Dame cathedral.
When it was clear she was incapable of giving him any children, she painfully agreed to be divorced so he could remarry in the hopes of having an heir to succeed him. The divorce took place on 10 January 1810.
On 11 March 1810, Napoleon married Marie Louise of Austria by proxy; the formal ceremony took place at the Louvre on 1 April. They had one child, Napoleon II of France, who was born in 1811.
[edit] Later life
After her divorce, she lived at the Château de Malmaison, near Paris. She remained on good terms with Napoleon who once said that the only thing to come between them were her debts.
When she died in 1814, she was buried not far from Malmaison, at the St. Pierre and St. Paul church in Rueil. Her daughter Hortense is interred near her.
Curiously, despite his numerous affairs, eventual divorce, and Napoleon's remarrying, the Emperor's last words on the Island of St. Helena were "France, the Army, the Head of the Army, Josephine." [which would imply of course that Napoleon knew he was the chosen puppet for some larger group of "aristocratic counter-revolutionaries" with bloodline intentions and obviously perhaps huge military influence that could aid, or oppose, Napoleon, if he went against it.
So that is the Napoleonic angle. It is known that the same Larmenius Transmission was quickly accepted in 1814 (the year of the death of Josephine) by restored Louis the King of France.
Meanwhile, after Fabre-Palaprat's death in 1838, the British hero of the Napoleonic wars, Sir William Sidney Smith, was elected Grand Master of Papaprat's more overt claims to a restored Order of the Temple.
In the 1840s representatives even entered into talks with Pope Gregory XVI.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the Larmenius Charter has been given short shrift by historians, and almost universally dismissed and ignored as very annoying if true.
However, the Masonic istorian F.J.W. Crowe has demonstrated that, while the document is not necessarily genuine, the reasons that most historians believe it to be a hoax do not stand up to scrutiny.
The main criticisms are that the Latin in which the charter is written is simply too good for the Middle Ages (medieval Latin is notorious for its grammatical errors) and that the wording of the declarations made by the Grand Masters across the centuries do not, as would be expected, vary.
However, Crowe points out that very few of the document's critics have worked from the charter itself, but have used a transcription and translation that was published in the 19th century. Crowe had seen the original - which is now in Mark Masons' Hall in London - and found that the translator had corrected the grammatical errors and standardised the Grand Masters' declarations, in the published versions.
The other main reason why the Larmenius Charter is regarded as a forgery is that it includes a violent denunciation of the 'Scots-Templar deserters'.
[Which would actually make sense if some French templars absconded with French Templar treasure 'illegally' and took it to Scotland, and likely were responsible for aiding Bruce (equally of a french family, de Brus) found an indepenedent Scotland away from both the Papacy (then Scotland was under excommunication as well by the Pope, which made Scottish elites allies by common excommuniation context regardless then) in the crucial Battle of Bannockburn. Official historian of Europe get apopleptic at this point, though without being able to actually prove why if such things as Larmenius Transmission and its quotes about "Scottish treasonous Renegades" from the Templars (Templars still existed from 1307-1314 remember), some of whom seem to have taken away a huge amount of treasure and made out on their own and the other Templars knew it.
As to the document's reference to 'Scots-Templar deserters', historians mostly take this as a reference to Baron von Hund's Strict Templar Observance, which they consider to be an invention of the mid-18th century, which in turn means that the Larmenius Charter must also be a fabrication. However, it could equally mean 1307-1314 period opinions of Templars, where in most of Euruope they were not excommunicated, or tortured. This only happened mostly in France.
Ironically, however, recent research has tended to support von Hund's claims of a Templar survival in Scotland--which puts the whole question of the Larmenius Transmission back to square one.
(Ironically, if the Larmenius Charter is ever proven to be genuine, it would also authenticate its rival, the Scottish Transmission.)
Whether one considers that he founded or mere publicly revived a truely secret order of Templars, Dr Fabre-Palaprat's and 'his' Order continues to flourish today.
It went through several schisms and changes in fortune, under the name of the Sovereign Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem (SMOTJ), also known by the Latin name Ordo Supremus Militaris Templi Hierosolymitani (OSMTH).
Although tracing its origins Fabre-Palaprat's Order, which is entirely based on claims of Larmenius Transmission, and therefore to the Larmenius Charter, the SMOTJ, likes to distance itself publicly from that, while claiming the same transmission. "So as I say, not as I do" it seems.
SMOTJ today describes itself as a 'Christian ecumenical' Order, does [not] directly endorse the authenticity of the document or claim the Templars as direct ancestors, rather seeing itself as continuing the ideals and principles of the original Order [which can in a mealymouth way mean the same thing].
Significantly, in 1995 the Vatican initiated formal contact with the SMOTJ through the Order's German Priory (whose membership is overwhelmingly Catholic), part of which officially related to reversing the Church's 14th-century verdict on the dissolution of the Knights Templar!
So since 1995, the Papacy itself provided its imprimatur for Larmenius occult forms of Templar transmission from 1307.
It may have been this that led to the rediscovery of lost records in the Vatican archives in early 2002, which, according to one interpretation, appear to show that Pope Clement V was personally persuaded of the innocence both of the Order and of individual leaders such as Jacques de Molay, and which shifts the major part of the blame for the suppression of the Templars onto the political machinations of Philip the Fair.
Background into the "Scottish Transmission" as distinct from the Larmenius Transmission should be noted before we get to the 'Solar' Transmission that attempts to (or proclaims to) trump both the Larmenius and Scottish Transmissions, which both claim to come from post 1307 occult esoteric Templar orders in Europe. (The Solar one, claims to have been started by the still active templar founders themselves as a parallel organization.
The Scottish Transmission:
The Scottish Transmission maintains that the tradition that the main refuge of the Knights Templar after their suppression was in Scotland [similar to the Larmenius transmission, which cross references such a tradition by 'cursing' those renegades that did go to Scotland on their own. Since there is quite a bit more information verifying the documentary claims of the Scottish transmission, and the fact that the Larmenius Transmission ("native French" Templar views for lack of another word or term, on this Scottish flight), we are truly getting into some interesting forms of mutual corroboration that is entirely unintentional. For instance:
There are two components or documentary claims to this line of Scottish transmission: the survival of the Order of the Temple in Scotland and its influence on the origins and history of Freemasonry. The Larmenius Transmission of course corroborates this as well, though dislikes it, so post 1307 there seemed to be at least two wings of esoteric Templarism still around, which makes sense since as noted earlier, Templars were not disestablished (and would have no idea that they would ever suffer such a thing), so a form of 'temporary leadership' would have definitely developed that would have certainly been recombined when they felt that 'all this nonsense would settle out.' However, it never did. And by 1314, with the disestablishment of the Templars officially by the Pope, these two 'once temporary' secret continuity branches of official Templarism were by default fait accompli as esoteric orders of their own, even without their intent or perception when all this started in 1307.
The earliest known public declaration of the Scottish Transmission was made about 70 years earlier than the Larmenius Transmission claims (which have been accorded to documentarily corroborated as authentic for some issues mentioned above, and which reference Scottish Transmission issues, though in the 'French temporary leadership' branch that was forced to go on its own after 1307, just like the Scottish branch after 1307 that the French branch considered "renegades" since most Templars were 'French' and southern French in their property concentration mostly even though their properties extended throughout Europe.
So the Scottish Transmission story came to light in Paris in 1737, in a milestone in Masonic history known as 'Ramsay's Oration'. He never spoke this 'Oration' and it was a printed and very carefully couched written speech about esoteric Transmission of the, in the Larmenius transmission's opinion, the 'renegades of the Scottish Transmission.'
The address by Andrew Michael Ramsay, Ramsey's Oration of 1737, a prominent Scots Freemason and the former tutor to Charles Edward Stuart ('Bonnie Prince Charlie'). [His Grandfather, James I, presumably brought Scottish Masonry to the English court in the early 1600s, on the death of Queen Elizabeth, when the Scottish line arranged to inherit both Scotland (where he was known as James V) and England (where he was known as James I). Since James I was venturing into typically hostile territory, he would have a good cause to bring with him any potential mechansmis to provide and maaintain trustworthy clients. While he was in England, Masonic James I additionally sponsored a complete re-write of the Bible ("King James Version"), including in some things like the Maccabees bloodline issues. It is argued by some that other encoded information was put in the "King James version" of the Bible by master codemaker, Francis Bacon.
Anyway, given this Scottish Masonic context (when Scottish masonry was still literally a secret society instead of "a society with secrets" as the English branch claims presently, i.e., there was a time of course when it was however a true secret society before 1715), Ramsay stated about 20 years after (Scottish in origin) "English freemasonry" came out in the open because Masons were embedded in the Stuart claims of the English throne and some didn't want to be associated with that in England after the Stuarts were toppled in 1688, though they wanted to remain "Masons." So they "outed themselves" as Hanoverian loyalists, which made so many other still secret society cells angry they burned their own information quickly instead of submit it to the "self-outing" English masonic groups that were starting up, and claiming complete jurisdiction over all British Isles masonry.
So in this context, Ramsey comes along. His Oration claims that Freemasonry begun among 'Crusader knights' who had formed themselves into 'lodges of St John', and that Scotland played an important part in the continuity of Freemasonry to his own day.
This was a thinly-veiled allusion to the Templars, as well as the Scottish/Stuart links to the original 'true secret society' Masonry of the Stuart court, which is true though that would take books to describe [see among others The Invisible College (2003), by Robert Lomas, republished for wider appeal with the title Freemasonry & the Birth of Modern Science. The scientific "Royal Society" in England was a Stuart line invention after Stuart Restoration in 1661 for instance, that is hugely a Masonic affair when Masonry was still a "secret society" instead of "a public society with secrets" later.]
After Ramsey in 1737, the next major attempt to popularize that all was "not right" with English freemasonry was in the parapolitical desire to keep the Hanoverians from co-opting the whole 'masonic' thing for themselves in their ongoing dynastic war with the Stuarts (who were still invading into the 1740s in the British Isles). Hanoverians were quick to integrate themselves innto once Stuart-bloodline related secret society issues once scared British masons outed themselves in 1715 as 'loyalists to the Hanoverians' instead of a secret society cell of support for the Stuarts.
Thus, in this context where the Hanoverians were making inroads into stealing secret networks of intelligence and contacts for themselves, a still loyal Stuart dynasty proponent of the connection between Scottish Freemasonry and the Knights Templar was not so reticent. He had Stuart court in exile contacts.
This was Karl Gotthelf, the Reichsfreiherr (Baron) von Hund und Altengrotkau, who went so far as to declare that 'Every Mason is a Templar'.
Like Ramsay, Baron von Hund was linked with the exiled Scottish 'court' surrounding Charles Edward Stuart, through which, he claimed, he had been initiated into a Templar Masonic Order in 1742 or 43. This was right before the huge disaster at Culloden in 1745, when many Stuart supporters were slaughtered and Stuart restoration by war sort of fell by the wayside. It is unsurprising that von Hund helplessly claimed that "he was never contacted again" after being inducted. Likely, the people who supported him were all dead just a year later in 1745.
The French writer Jean Ursin writes in Creation et histoire du Rite Ecossais Rectifie (Creation and History of the Rectified Scottish Rite, 1993):
There is a debate over whether or not [Von Hund] he made a voyage to England, or if it was in Paris that he was received into a Templar Chapter, in the presence of Lord Kilmarnock, by a mysterious 'knight of the red feather,' Eques a Penna Rubra; he had the intimate conviction that it [the 'red feather' secret master spoke cloaked and refused to reveal himself except for a 'red feather' in conversations with Von Hund) was the closely connected to the Stuart Pretender, Charles Edward, and that he had received from Unknown Superiors the mission to reform, to Rectify, Freemasonry [against the Hanoverian inroads of it].
To fulfill his charged mission of returning Freemasonry to its Templar roots [and to Scottish/Stuart dynastic usefulness in competition with the Hanoverian infiltrated branches in England then], Baron von Hund established a new Masonic rite called the 'Strict Templar Observance,' and also produced what he claimed was genuine historical information about the Templars that had been passed on to him by his 'red feather' associated initiators.
Remember that von Hund was initiated in 1742-3, right before the Stuart adherents were all slaughtered in the failed invasion of England in 1745 to oust (in their mind) the "real pretenders", the Hanoverians and all the powerful Whig party London bankers who supported the Hanoverians as their 'puppet kings'.
Since his death in 1776, Baron von Hund has generally been dismissed as either a charlatan or a fantasist - even his own Masonic system rejected his claims concerning its Stuart ancestry and the 'unknown superiors'.
However, his career was far from insignificant: at the age of 20 he was chamberlain to the Elector of Cologne, and subsequently chamberlain to the Elector of Saxony, a Councillor of State and an adviser to the Habsburg Emperor.
[sidenote: It is this German in origin context, through which another transmission starts, that of Swedish Freemasonry, across the Baltic, which is equally "cryptic aristocratic catholic" and hugely a Templar themed higher organization that is actually connected to the von Hund transmission from the Stuarts royal line. Swedish Freemasonry is headed by the royal house of Sweden (then when it was Sweden/Norway, which split in 1910). Swedish Templarism Masonry became sponsored by gray eminence King Karl of Sweden, who besides having perhaps the largest occult library in Europe in the late 1700s, was fanatical about the Templars and paid anything to add more to his collection of Templar memorabilia and incunabula and histories and occult texts. King Karl even had himself painted in a knights outfit, in front of a Templar flag. He was childless, and only took the throne himself as a last resort in sort of a pre-arranged 'kindhearted friendly palace coup' against a relative who lived. This King Karl,sponsored strangely the French Napoleonic military leader Bernadotte as a "counter-revolutionary" aristocratic link to France against the British. Napoleon appointed a lot of interesting bloodlines to what was to be the "new aristocracy" in his empire that failed to work out. The "Bernadotte" bloodline (that's actually not their real name) came presumably from the Pyrenees areas--that hotbed of esoteric bloodlines of Templarism leadership as well as the same area where de Bouillon came from, the leader of the First Crusade who 'retakes' (for his crypto-"Original Christian" (i.e., Jewish non-Gentle Essenic) family his family's home of Jerusalem and the various tombs of. De Bouillion is additionally said to have founded the first monestary of the esoteric Priory of Zion. [See Holy Blood, Holy Grail] So another major bloodline continuity in "Bernadotte" seems involved in Swedish Freemasonry. Though that is another story. To quickly wrap up, there actually is such mystery about the Swedish Freemasonry, that no one has ever written a book about it to my knowledge exclusively, though it ties right into this period of Scottish/Stuart connections to this Habsburg court. As noted in The Origins of Freemasonry: Facts and Fictions, "The Swedish court was deeply masonic and the palace served as feasts for the Swedish Grand Lodge" [p. 59]--which makes sense since Grade 13, the highest grade (or is that grade 11?) was only allowed to be the royal family. It continues: "The fit between the leadership of the leading Stockholm lodges and proximity to the king and court...could not have been tighter. Only Berlin to the south rivaled the linkages between freemasonry and the Central Government. The masonic ambiance of the court of Frederick the Great in Berlin has always been noted," though it is rarely noted that in his youth Frederick the Great was inducted into the Illuminati which proved an embarrasment (though a connection of him) later in life, effectively leading two secret society lives one proper Templar/Catholic Strict Observance, other with Illuminati connections. So in short, the Swedish claims come from the Stuarts to make a long story short, who sold it to esoteric Templarist King Karl (who knows Karl's issues here, I don't) who sponsored "Bernadotte" into the kingship when King Karl and his line was going to die without an heir in the early 1800s. As I said, another story. Swedish Freemasonry, is the only masonic order that stresses, officially and with puritanical zeal, that a requirement is being a Ghristian--very different than (Illuminati secularist) agnostic lodges for instance. Swedish Freemasonry, in what is written about it, is very aristocratic in culture among other Masony. For instance, it doesn't even allow fellow Third Grade masons from other chapter to even visit it, a "masonic breach of brotherhood" in many ways. You have to be of much higher grades to even be allowed visiting status. And all of these trace pretty much back to Scottish Transmission and Suarts as well. Another story...]
The main reason for rejecting von Hund's claims is that, when called upon to do so, he was unable to name those who had bestowed such authority on him because, he said, they had kept their identities secret - and he no longer knew how to contact them. This would have been true though even his one-time supporters thought that this sounded suspiciously like he had simply made his 'unknown superiors' up in order to establish his authority. However, von Hund was hardly some "crazy guy" looking for status and power. He already had it, as chamberlain to the Elector of Saxony, a Councillor of State and an adviser to the Habsburg Emperor. So making any such claims, as he did, cannot be explained by "social climbing." He was already at the top and could only stand to fall, instead of rise, by such jocularity that his claims were greeted.
However discoveries in recent years have tended to repatriate von Hund.
Some of his information does tally with the latest research into the origins of Freemasonry and the Templars.
For example, Baigent and Leigh write in The Temple and the Lodge:
Part of Hund's evidence concerning the pedigree of Strict Observance consists of a list of Grand Masters of the original Knights Templar from their inception in 1118.
Until very recently, there had been numerous such lists, none of which concurred with any of the others and all of which had been academically suspect.
It was not until 1982 that we ourselves were able to produce what can now be regarded as a definitive list of the early Grand Masters (until the loss of Jerusalem, thus, from the 1130s- to around 1187).
This list was compiled with the aid of information and documentation which were not available or accessible in Hund's time, so that he cannot possibly have drawn on the same sources as we did.
And yet, except for the spelling of a single surname, he produced a list, reputedly received from 'unknown superiors', which concurred precisely with our own.
[Thus they argue] Hund's list can only have come from an 'inside source' - from sources that were indeed privy to Templar history and/or records in a way that no 'outsider' at the time could have been.
The Battle of Culloden: 1746 and the slaugher of von Hund's 'unknown superiors'?
Even more favourable to the Baron's case was that Baigent and Leigh were able to identify the 'Knight of the Red Feather' from existing documentation alone.
This had been a stumbling block and a cause or excuse of so much derision on the part of von Hund's detractors. However, in the archives of a Scottish group called Stella Templum, which was formed at the end of the 18th century to preserve documents relating to the Jacobite cause, they found a letter written in 1846 that referred to a ceremonial sword that, 100 years before, had been passed on to Lord Kilmarnock by 'Alexander Seton, the Knight of the Red Feather.'
Alexander Seton, 10th Earl of Eglinton, was a prominent Freemason in the Jacobite movement - and was one of the signatories to the death certificate of Andrew Michael Ramsay, who may almost be regarded as Baron von Hund's 'warm-up man' for the proclamation of the Scottish Transmission.
Baigent and Leigh suggest that the reason that Baron von Hund's 'unknown superiors' seemed to have deserted him was the collapse of the Stuart cause following the Battle of Culloden in 1746, in which many leading Jacobites (including Lord Kilmarnock) were killed or captured to be imprisoned or executed.
However, this evidence in support of von Hund was not known in his day. In 1782, six years after the Baron von Hund's death, a convention of 'reformed' Masonic groups (which included delegations from such groups as the Illuminati of Bavaria) held at Wilhelmsbad attempted to destroy this transmission. Von Hund's Stuart connections of Masonry were rejected and with it authority of Stuart/Scottish bloodline claims although lodges belonging to the [Von Hundian/Stuart] Strict Templar Observance continued, and still exist today. Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick, presided over the Convent (or Congress) of Wilhelmsbad, and it was here that Illuminati so recently founded in 1776, and associated with the English-to-German royal house started a Hanoverian infiltration that truly expanded on the continent against the Stuart linked masonic networks. Typically for Hanoverians, such infiltration was hugely anti-French, simply for geopolitical rationales alone (its' across the Channel), and which led to a Swiss-English connected Illuminized group plotted to destroy France then in the future "French Revolution." (Look up the background of Necker sometime if you want to open up a whole can of worms..., or look up the British East India Company's connections to the "French" Revolution.)
Another interesting Scottish Transmission bit is that the members of the Militi Templi Scotia who received the 'Stone of Destiny' on its return to Edinburgh from Westminster in 1996 (or at least what the Hanoverians claimed was such).
Meanwhile, in the Larmenius Transmission--still secret in the 1700s until after the huge slaughter of the French Revolution by the Illuminati Swiss-German-English wing), a bloodline connection to other French groups was maintained despite mostly wrecked by the French Revolution, and after Bourbon restoration, the Larmenius Transmission was publicly recognized as 'authentic' (and geopoliticall, against the English geopolitical infiltration as well, as well as a bastion for the remaining high aristocratic French crypto-catholic lines--who in Europe became known as the "ultramontanes"--or hard right Catholics against (English/Illuminist) forms of secular revolutionary pressure.
It was the Illuminati attending Convent/Congress of Wilhelmsbad that approved another system of Freemasonry. This was called the 'Rectified Scottish Rite (Freemasonry)' - which was essentially the Strict Observance under a new name, downplaying the Templar and Scottish bloodline Stuart connection. The Swiss-English-German Hanoverians and their ilk had created an alternative.
The Rectified Scottish Rite, although relatively small compared to other Masonic systems, exists today, and is particularly strong in France.
(The Rectified Scottish Rite should not be confused with the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, which is the dominant form of Freemasonry in the USA and was created in 1804, some years before Palaprat "self-outed" the numerically decaying Larmenius Transmission of the Templars of France, to make it survive with larger numbers. There were presumably only four left in the Larmenius Transmission when Palaprat "self-outed" for survival of the tradition and it was then later accepted and sponsored by restored Bourbons after the Napoleonic-British Wars destroyed the Napoleonic chances of the bloodlines using that empire (After all it was Josephine AND her sister that married Napoleon and HIS brother--doubling the chances of keeping in power in the ongoing Napoleonic empire. Napoleon is supposed to have said to his brother when he was being crowned emperor, "if only our father could see us now." They hit the bigtime, and then he was thrown away by the British though on St. Helena and kept on this well guarded cliff of an island for the rest of his life.
Although this French Congress of Wilhelmsbad in origin system called Rectified Scottish Rite has a Knights Templar degree, it does not place any special emphasis on its connection to the Templars.
However, both the 'Congress of Wilhelsmbad crated and approved' Rectified Scottish Rite and the 1804 U.S. creation of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, are both French in origin. Both were formed first in France and transferred around the world. The Scottish Rite in America has been intimiately involved with the Same Swiss-English attempts to destroy the United States democracy at least half a dozen times over the 1800s, one of them was the Civil War. Back to Europe:
Soon thereafter in the early 1800s, during the Napoleonic-English global war, the "self-outing" of the Larmenius Transmission by Paraprat, with its still surviving French high aristocratic connections, became another "French" Templar order on the 'other side' so to speak from the Illuminized, English, Swiss-Germanic versions and in reaction to them by the remaining bloodlines.
Some 19th- century Catholic churchmen believed that the real purpose of the Convent/Congress of Wilhelmsbad was to organize the English sponsored and British East India Company connected (yes, tis true! on one level) French Revolution, in which the Templars finally wreaked their revenge on the monarchy and Church.
However, it wasn't the Templars wreaking their revenge per se. It was the Swiss-German-Hanoverian English royals and others, angry at the Bourbons sheltering the Stuarts for so long from the Hanoverians, as well as all intermixed with the Enlightenment radical antinomianism of the "Cult of Reason" and the destruction of all organized religion and states in Europe and worldwide. Destruction of all religion and all states was an Illuminati global goal from its foundation in 1776. Templar conspiracies are crypto-catholic, and bloodline transmission related to high aristocratic groups--the kind of people that the French Revolution seriously attempted to completely wipe out. (One of the purposes of seizing the Bastille was not "to free French political prisoners", it was to get the weapons, and it was to get the archive of bloodline documents of the French family and others that was kept under lock and key there. From "the lists", the Illuminiati knew who to kill off more than others, who would be a challenge to their plans of world secular domination, and Christian religious destruction in Europe.]
The belief in a connection between the Templars and the Revolution was widely held - as demonstrated by the persistent rumour that, at the moment of Louis XIV's execution, a stranger in the crowd shouted 'Jacques de Molay, you are avenged!' However, according to the Larmenius Transmission (see below), members of the Order of the Temple themselves suffered badly during the Revolution, which makes more sense that the French revolution was a Hanoverian Swiss-Germanic plot, particularly given the historical geopolitical animosity between England and France. I would be the first to admit there were many other factors of the type preferred more by the "flatland" one-dimensional historiansm. However, they are closer to official fabulists of a bizarre comic book form of popular fake history narratives of the past 250 years since they don't want to (or aren't rewarded when) telling Europe and the world that Europe is thoroughly an esoterically run political place--because that would only cause pressures for more democracy and participation, making such quiet control more difficult.
Several other Masonic systems, apart from the Congress of Wilhelmsbad's Rectified (Sanitized and Secularized) Scottish Rite, emerged from Baron von Hund's Strict Templar Observance, including (despite their name) the Egyptian Rites of Memphis and Misraim, which play an important part in continental European occult Freemasonry. Another controversial society that claims a Templar pedigree, the Priory of Sion, also links itself with this tradition.
However, while forming an important part of the Scottish Transmission, competed over by on one side by French ultramontane Catholic aristocratic bloodline groups, versus Germanic-English-Swiss Illuminati groups (I would be the first to argue that by the 20th century they had seen the use of amalgamation though the divisions are still there), these Masonic groups are really all mutual offshoots rather than direct continuations of the Scottish 'renegade' branch of the Knights Templar.
And there is one more.
According to their own traditions, there continued as as yet another separate entity--that became vocally distinct from the infiltrated Germanic-English-Hanoverian versions of 'masonic' transmission. This is why "Lodge Number Zero" was awarded to a certain Scottish lodge to place it tacitly before Lodge #1, the Grand Lodge of England.
As for this Scottish Transmission that rejected the English-Germanic-Illumiati Congress of Wilhelmsbad's 'reformation' and name appropriation, there are occasional references in documents to a separate 'Order of the Temple' in Scotland.
For example, in 1689 the Grand Master was named as Viscount Dundee (John Claverhouse), who fought and died for the Stuart cause. This was still when "masonry was a secret society" yet to be outed by Londoners, who in claiming "loyalty to Hanoverians" were more likely terrified of being found out as associated with a Scottish Stuart masonic lodge system in England (as the origin of secret society masonry was originally).
Indeed, as London masons were screaming loyalty to Hanoverians and masonry simultaneously, in the first decades, there is a record of a meeting of 'the other side'--between Bonnie Prince Charlie and members of the Order of the Temple in Holyrood House in Edinburgh in 1745, before the slaughter of Culloden in 1746.
Later, in January 1807, records of one of Scottish Freemasonry's most prestigious lodges, the St Mary's Chapel Lodge of Edinburgh, describe a visit of a 'deputation from the Grand Assembly of the High Knights Templar in Edinburgh--headed by their most worshipful Grand Master, Alexander Deuchar.'
More significantly, the account goes on to say that it was 'the first time for some hundred years that any Lodge of Freemasonry had been visited by an assembly of Knights Templar, headed by their Grand Master.'
This indicates that the St Mary's Chapel Lodge had records of visits by the Templars in the early 1700s, only a decade or two after the reference to Viscount Dundee's leadership of the Order of the Temple.
References such as these demonstrate that a group of knights (not masons, knights--and knights in Europe are bloodline issues) calling themselves the 'Order of the Temple' existed in Scotland, in association with the Stuarts and their cause, in the 17th and 18th centuries.
And, because of the association between the Stuart/Bourbon French allied court in Paris, and the 'Scottish' (English-German appropriations of the) (Knights) Order of the Temple discussed above, it appears that it was behind figures such as Baron von Hund, so closely connected as advisor to the Hapssburgs--another hard Catholic group.
However, whether this Scottish Order of the Temple (of "knights") has an unbroken line of descent back to the Templars is more controversial.
Everybody seems to have come out or 'self-outed' by the early 1800s to keep membership up, particularly after the French Revolution decemated the traditional Scottish-French connected bloodlines that went back hundreds of years in the "Scottish Guard" of the French kings. For instance, it appears that Alexander Deuchar - an authority on heraldry who was regarded as Scotland's leading expert on the history and rituals of Freemasonry - had revived the Scottish Order of the Temple in the first years of the 1800s (perhaps turning it from exclusively private "knights" keeping tabs on each other's bloodlines as ex-Templar knights families into a full fledged masonic transmission more open to recruitment about such stories instead of limited to those who personally were involved in the stories).
The "knights" bloodlined Order of the Temple in Scotland supposedly had its high elite aristocratic membership fallen to just six at times during the previous century.
Suitably renamed after moving from knights bloodlines to masons, Deuchar's Order exists today as the Militi Templi Scotia (Knights Templar of Scotland), which (along with other modern Templar and Masonic organisations) uses Rosslyn Chapel for many of its ceremonies appropriately--for that is where the "Scottish Templar renegades" treasure is likely buried.
Radar tomography of the surrounding grounds at Rosslyn Chapel show a huge complex of hidden chambers under and around it. However, no one offiical will allow anyone to dig there. As is the story of many of such things, it innocently is agreed to allow excavation, and when that word gets around in the morning papers or something, then the esoteric groups clamp back down on it. Reading innocent articles, they splutter their morning coffee, and quickly call those in the know to exercise a veto on keeping things under wraps. There are many examples of this happening in many areas: innocent formal authorization, then completely hostile and completely unexplained viscious halting of certain things without so much as an official explanation given. The easy authorization of archaeological digs at Rosslyn, and then the spluttering and completely unexplained (and intentionally unexplained) anger on the topic as word got around, is only one example.
So, onto the The 'Solar' Transmission, and Grace Kelly. Grace stepped into occult Catholic ultramontanes involved in a lot of hanky panky:
The third - and, given the evidence, most unlikely (or if true, a hell of a story) - modern group of societies that claim to be the legitimate heirs of the original 1100s coterie of Knights Templar are those adhering to Solar Transmission (or Tradition).
This was perhaps best known from New Age writer Gaetan Delaforge's The Templar Tradition in the Age of Aquarius (1987) - until the fiery deaths of members of one of the groups belonging to this line, the Order of the Solar Temple, in 1994.
So unlike Scottish and Larmenius Transmissions, the 'Solar Transmission' does not base itself on a direct historical line of descent after 1307, but claims that its mandate derives from psychic contact with the spirits of the last of the Templars or from the original templars themselves of the 1100s.
The Solar Tradition was founded in France in 1952 by a group led by the alchemist Jacques Breyer, who met at the castle of Arginy, in the Beaujolais region, where they believed the Templars had hidden relics at the time of their suppression (the most important being a finger bone of John the Baptist).
However, apparently they failed to find these relics, and turned instead to mediumistic communication with the old Templar knights - who he claimed authorised the founding of a new Order, the Sovereign Order of the Solar Temple.
Its founders appear to have been led to Arginy by an intriguing document in the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris, which was written around 1750 and stated that Jacques de Molay had passed authority on to his nephew, Guillaume de Beaujeu, who had hidden important Templar relics on his family estates.
Nothing of this document's provenance is known, but Arginy was part of the Beaujeu lands, and this seems to be the reason that Jacques Breyer and his companions were first attracted there.
Another interesting point about Arginy: it was where the Templar oath between the knights were founded:
"Hugh de Payens and eight other knights took vows on June 12, 1118 at Arginy Castle near Lyons, France. The nine founders pledged themselves to Christ and to the protection of pilgrims traveling in the holy land, the textbooks tell us. [However, they did no such thing, and for nine years it seems they were 'early archaeologists' Under the Temple Mount, finding Jewish treasures and spiriting them away.] King Baudouin of Jerusalem, whose brother, Godfroi de Bouillon, had captured the holy city...for Christendom [and his bloodline] nineteen years prior, received them as knights at his palace with open arms, [however, he bizarrely gave up his established palace for "nine strangers" to dig within, and he moved elsewhere.] According to tradition, the knights built quarters over the ruins of [what was considered to be] Solomon's Temple, which some modern commentators believe says something about the Order's secret purpose....
...
The Order's official raison d'etre, as protectors of pilgrims, remains on the books. Judged by their endeavors and associations, however, the Templars had more profound goals than the textbooks reveal, creating, for instance, material receptacles, Grails, if you will, for the spiritual essence revered within their Mystery tradition: preceptories, cathedrals, churches, even nations, a universal brotherhood. [They were founding an alternative Christianty based on relics and a great deal of lay lines splayed out across Europe--for some astounding information read the Knights Templar in the Golden Age of Spain: Their Hidden History on the Iberian Peninsula by "regular academic" Juan Garcia Atienza.] To this end, the original nine knights excavated the Temple of Solomon, possibly hoping to find the lost Ark of the Covenant (see Graham Hancock's The Sign and the Seal; or more likely, see the arguments mentioned in the [maddening great and terrible at the same moment] book Templar Gold: Discovering the Ark of the Covenant by Patrick Byrne]. So doing, the Templars would have wielded authority that transcended even the pope's, paving the way for a Templar state adorned with structures of mystically oriented design" [which would have effectively solidified "Old Testament" Judaism and "New Testament Christianity (back to its Essenic roots) in one religion, under their esoteric bloodline transmission, like they wanted.]
So, like the Nazis attempted to find in the south of France in WWII, looking for the Ark of the Covenant and other "Grail related" Templar memorabilia (which they presumably failed in doing, leading the Nazis to murder the failed researcher--I can't think of his name right now. They recently republished his 1930s book on "Grail" research, that the Nazis were very interested in.
So in short, in the 1950s, this Order of the Solar Temple group is looking for the Ark of the Covenant and other important Temple Mount relics, like the Nazis were mere years before. Based on their 'inside information', Breyer and his group claimed that the original Order of the Temple had been founded at Arginy by the original nine knights led by Hugues de Payens on 12 June 1118. The same nine nights later went on from the 1128 Council of Troyes, to found the Papal sponsored (though Bernard of Clairveux pressured) Knights Templar as the vehicle to transmogrify Roman Catholicism toward a more Jewish-Christian bloodline ecumenical religion based on graded inductions and relic worship for the masses, and secret knowledge for the elites. That's a pretty major conspiracy there this Order of the Solar Temple is geting caught up in.
So they were claiming to have "out Larmenius'ed" the Larmenius Transmission, and out "Scottish'ed" the Scottish Transmission, by claiming that there was a secret group within the original living Templars long before they were even Templars, and long bfore the 1307 attacks on Templars that led to their dissolution in 1314.
And it is these Order of the Solar Temple people--who despite the ritual sex--are supremely hard right Catholics, tied directly into Nazi and Gladio networks as noted below.
The Solar Tradition incorporates elements derived from 19th and 20th century esoteric philosophies such as Theosophy and, in particular, those promoted by channeller Alice A. Bailey, who claimed to have been taught the 'Solar doctrine' through psychic contact with 'secret masters'. With connecting themselves to Bailey, another can of worms is opened--because the Order of the Solar Temple has then a huge connection to American elites.
Alice A. Bailey (16 June 1880 ‑ 15 December 1949), writer and lecturer on Neo-Theosophy, was born in England in 1880 as Alice LaTrobe Bateman. She moved to America in 1907 where she spent the rest of her life. She was a prolific author on mysticism and founded an international esoteric movement. Like Crowley, her writings gave rise to many aspects of contemporary New Age belief.
Alice Ann Bailey was born in Manchester, England in 1880. She had a strong Christian education, and went on to do evangelical work in the British Army, which took her to India in 1907, where she met her future husband, Walter Evans.
Together they moved to America, where W. Evans became an Episcopalian priest: but their life became harder and harder, and their marriage, after the birth of three daughters, ended in divorce.
In America, Alice Bailey made contact with the Theosophical Society, in which she encountered the work of Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. This led her eventually to become a member of the Esoteric section of the Theosophical Society.
Some years later, she left the Society, but continued to recognise the importance of Madame Blavatsky's works in her life.
Through her studies of Blavatsky's descriptions of esoteric Masters in Theosophy, Alice Bailey recognised the spiritual guide she believed had helped her from the age of fifteen as the Theosophical Master "Koot Humi" (also spelled Kuthumi). Later in 1919 she claimed to be in touch with another Master, Djwhal Khul, also known as The Tibetan.
This began Alice Bailey's writings, 24 books in which she and her claimed Tibetan Master illustrate a body of esoteric teachings relating to ancient wisdom, theosophical studies, religion, philosophy and contemporary events from 1919 to 1949.
In 1920 Alice Bailey married another theosophist, Foster Bailey, and in 1923 they founded the Arcane School to continue her teachings and form a school for the disciples of the coming new era.
Alice Bailey's books are on subjects such as the path of spiritual evolution, the Spiritual Hierarchy, the new discipleship, spiritual meditation as a form of service for human beings, on esoteric astrology, and on esoteric healing.
She envisages a new world religion in which every human being, regardless of race, religion, or sex, could be free to search truth in peace and brotherhood.
It has been said by her supporters that Bailey's books are more inspirational than informational, and that the works themselves are occult artifacts which have a definite effect upon those who read them.
All these books, especially the Treatise of the Seven Rays, are written in a scheme that suggest a spiritual path to be followed to expand mental horizons and gain a new wisdom and awareness on the world and of human beings. The reader is invited to meditate deeply on the theories espoused, and to use intuition to awaken the higher mind and to see beyond first-glance conclusions.
The introduction, written in 1934, explains the purpose of the teachings. She claimed this was written directly by The Tibetan:
"The books that I have written are sent out with no claim for their acceptance. They may, or may not, be correct, true and useful. It is for you to ascertain their truth by right practice and by the exercise of the intuition. Neither I nor A.A.B. is the least interested in having them acclaimed as inspired writing or in having anyone speak of them (with bated breath) as being the work of one of the masters If they present truth in such a way that it follows sequentially upon that already offered in the world teachings if the information given raises the aspiration and the will-to-serve from the plane of the emotions to that of the mind; (the plane whereon the Masters can be found) then they will have served their purpose. If the teaching conveyed calls forth a response from the illumined mind of the worker in the world, and brings a flashing forth of the intuition, then let that teaching be accepted. But not otherwise. If the statements meet with eventual corroboration or are deemed true under the test of the Law of Correspondences, then that is well and good. But should this not be so, let not the student accept what is said."
Like the Nazis, and like Crowley, some of Bailey's writings have been criticised for perceived racism and anti-Semitism. For instance, she wrote that the Nazi atrocities against the Jews had come about because "The Jewish race, who loved the possessions of the world more than they loved the service of Light, joined ranks with the rebels against God" and therefore "... the law of racial karma is working and the Jews are paying the price, factually and symbolically, for all they have done in the past." She further claimed that "the Jews are the reincarnation of spiritual failures or residues from another planet..." and that "the word 'love' for others is lacking in Judaism... The Jew has never grasped the love of God." (Esoteric Healing, 1949), etc. Profoundly an esoteric race theorist, however innocuous she looked, she wrote tidily and more than a bit acidly that anti-Semitism would cease when there were no mre Jews: "the Jewish problem will be solved by intermarriage; that of the Negro will not." (Esoteric Healing, p. 263 et. seq.) (ref)
Bailey herself addressed this issue later in life: “The Jewish problem has seemed to me well nigh insoluble. I [Alice Bailey], at this time see no way out, except through the slow process of evolution and a planned educational campaign. I have no anti-Jewish feeling [i.e., she just things they should all disappear!]; ... "I have been officially on Hitler's "blacklist" because of my defence of the Jews whilst lecturing up and down western Europe. In spite, however, of knowing full well the wonderful qualities of the Jew, his contribution to western culture and learning and his wonderful assets and gifts along the line of the creative arts I still fail to see any immediate solution of their crucial and appalling problem [of the existence of Jewry].”[from the Unfinished Autobiography, Alice A. Bailey.pp.118-9]
In a terrible symmetry, all of Alice Bailey's book publisher to this day is Lucis Trust, part of the Arcane School. Look them up if you want evil.
Central to Bailey's system was the claim that human civilisation owes much to spiritually advanced beings from the Sirius star system, an idea that the Sovereign Order of the Solar Temple seized upon.
The Order appealed particularly to the upper strata of European society, its major achievement being the endorsement and patronage of Prince Rainier III of Monaco. One of his closest advisors, Jean-Louis Marsan, became Grand Master of the Order
Despite Reiner III's apoplectic denunciations--concerning Grace Kelly's 'isolated' or 'non-existant' involvement, likely Reiner her oversexed Catholic king husband not her, introduced her to it.
Reiner III was a real letch. That something like "ritual" sex existed, capable of solacing his repressive Catholic mindset and loins simultaneously surely must have been a self-rationalization dream come true.
So therefore it is perhaps less sensational a story now that Reiner III would have introduced Grace to the Order of the Solar Temple himself, or how Grace could have been caught up in something so highly esoteric and relegated to a very small European and American elite.
And that her connections (according to the British documentary, which could involve her in the Solar Temple's high elite money laundering as a motive for her likely murder) stem from Reiner III's likely aid: Di Mambro could have done it alone, or Di Mambro could have done it with aid of Reiner III--if it was a murder, helping to cover up his "always troubling" and outspoken American wife, who mere months after being introduced to the Solar Temple, was already set on exposing it all in 1981-2.
Full circle where this started, Prince Rainier III's wife, American Grace Kelly (a chafing 'former' film star who disliked Reiner's III curtailing her career) is known to have been a member.
However, over the years [like Gladio in Europe] the Monaco connected Sovereign Order moved inexorably to the extreme right under the influence of Julien Origas, a Frenchman who had been imprisoned after the war for his collaboration with the Gestapo.
The Order of the Solar Temple became linked to the European-wide network of extreme right-wing groups that included the notorious Propaganda Due (P2) Masonic lodge of Italy.
And that leads us to George H. W. Bush, since Gelli, administrator of P2 'parallel occult government' of Italy, was standing next to George H. W. Bush when he was inaugurated in 1988. Who was sponsoring who publicly? It is reputed that "of course" Bush was inviting Gelli. However, what if it was Gelli who was making it known that his organization was sponsoring Bush?
If the overlaps between Solar Temple, Gladio, and P2 are all intermixed, this makes for quite an interesting occult right wing in Europe.
The very year or (or the year before) so that Grace Kelly was being ritually screwed in the crypt, in 1981 the Sovereign Order spawned a similarly named society, the more infamous Order of the Solar Temple, under the leadership of Joseph di Mambro.
He's the one who presumably got into fights with Princess Grace Kelly over her rocking the boat.
This di Mambro branch contained ritual sex, money laundering, and illegal weapons smuggling. It recruited members chiefly from the New Age movement in France, Switzerland and Canada.
Its exact relationship with the hard right wing Gladio-networked and overlapped Sovereign Order of the Solar Temple - whether it was a breakaway group or simply an offshoot - is unclear. Since the tragic mass murder/suicide events that unfolded in the mid 1990s, the Sovereign Order as the 'parent' of the Solar Temple has been at pains to attempt to distance itself from "di Mambro's organisation"--despite it being and coming from their own esoteric neo-Nazi Templar occult wing.
That's perhaps why di Mambro had so much right wing connections, known money laundering connections, high bank investigations pending, and high political connections, and illegal arms deals connections. He was a cutout of sorts for the other organization.
As said above, the Order of the Solar Temple hit the headlines in October 1994 in a desparate attempt to escape even more revealing headlines about upcoming bank money laundering investigatinos that were intenational in scope. So, instead of being badly burned by these investigations, it badly burned the bodies of 53 of its members - including it is still officially claimed, conveniently that of di Mambro himself. It was within hours on both sides of the Atlanic-- Quebec to Switzerland--that cult compounds started to be killed off right in the midst of attempting to escape banking investigations and the claimed useful deaths of the very leadership under investigation and the burning up of much of their property and several dozen witnesses to their activities.
Although it is said that they committed suicide, this is untrue and part of the coverup. Police note that many were murdered. It is clear that this type of dramatic exit was perhaps less dramatic than upcoming banking investigations into massive money laundering connected to di Mambro--and many others. The story of these banking investigations seem to have ended or put under wraps afer over 70 people were murdered within 24 hours and/or committed suicide over it.
With the evidence that at least some of the victims were murdered, including small children, further tidying-up deaths followed in 1995 one year later.
Conclusion
With Monaco high politics still likely connected to the Order of the Solar Temple, money laundering, and a whole lot of neo-nazi esoteric Catholic ideologies, and with a bit of ritual sex and "spiritual manifestation of impregnation" thrown in there for good measure, it sounds a lot like some of the attempts of John Parsons' to create the Antichrist through similar ritual sex out in California, while the Solar Temple was attempting to do the opposite: challelling ritual sex to create Christian immaculate conception" since de Mambro is reputed to have claimed his own daughter Emanuelle was 'generated' as an "immaculate conception" out of such Solar Temple ritual sex, with the few survivors that were willing to talk.
So much for the old story of Grace's death. Being thrown into Monaco connected neo-Nazi, Templaresque ritual sex aristocrats and high politicans and businessmen seems a more memorable way to go.
Gotta love this little film of the 1956 wedding of Reiner III and Hitchcock star Grace Kelly, which really captures ominous opulence and the era before the 1960s well. Britain looked the same way as late as the 1950s. Look up pictures of the royals then there. By the 1960s, even Prince Charles was wearing his hair long "like a Beatle."
And I love the quote "traditional Catholic marriage" (in French) in the narration after the above Solar Temple stuff.
Zut alors! Cependant, quelle tradition christiene est-ce que le narrateur parle?
Reiner III looks sort of like a overly scrubbed, pug nosed dissolute street tough, uncomfortably the king of his own "Catholic gambling princedom"--a level of elite doublethink that European royals carry off well with practiced bored depravity 'to the manor born'. Sort of like Bush.
Le Mariage du Prince Rainier et de Grace Kelly in timeless black and white
INA
5 min 42 sec - Aug 30, 2006
www.ina.fr
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2250107675257466244
To view it, I had to keep jiggling the playback button, since it reset over and over halfway through. Just grab it with the mouse and pull it over to where you were last, and it should pick it back up.
Nice establishing shot of the Rock of Monaco.
No, Hitchcock didn't direct it though it has the feel of the world's shortest film noir in some places. In one spooky place where a packed crowd starts to push and ogle at Hitchcock's favorite star Grace Kelly, I felt like I was watching Rear Window or Vertigo or something--a little Hitchcock deja vu of psychodrama and I momentarily forgot that this was not staged. The dark wedding seems unintentionally film noir as well. It could have closed with the Hitchcock scene where Grace Kelly swerves down the Monaco curved roads....It had been rumored that she was driving on the same stretch of highway in Monaco that had been featured in To Catch a Thief, and Rainer III himself reputedly said it was a road just a bit higher up the hill, though not the exact road as in the 1955 film To Catch a Thief...
To Catch a Thief is a 1955 film directed by Alfred Hitchcock, starring Cary Grant, Grace Kelly, Jessie Royce Landis and John Williams. The movie is set on the French Riviera and Monaco. In 1956, the next year, Grace Kelly was Princess Grace of Monaco, and died in 1982 (several months after entering the Order of the Solar Temple) on the roads filmed in her last 1955 Hitchcock film.
Jeff,
Actually, this is a request from another, earlier post. You had a link on your Black Lodge post to a humanoid encounter database, but it is broken. Can you forward the link if you have it? You can leave it as a comment on my blog.
I commented on that post, but I'm not sure it got through. You have A LOT of mischievous interference on that post. I could barely load the page.
"A few weeks before the crash, the Mercedes had been stolen from the garage of the Ritz Hotel. "Police recovered the car but found that its instrumentation had been tampered with," Kenn Thomas writes in The Octopus. The limo was then reconditioned. LeWinter's likely hoax document notes this, stating that the car was "rebuilt to respond to external radio controls"
Does Diana's Death have a link now to 9/11?....Remote Control..
PROMIS Software rears it's ugly head again.....
Beter link for the Humanoid Encounter Database.
Great post, Jeff. Very interesting comments, folks.
I think it's appropriate to blog the Diana mystery. Her marriage, life, and death are a 3-act tragedy.
I knew when she hooked up with Dodi that she was in deep trouble. Not gonna happen, as GHWB often said.
Michael wrote:
"Hers was the most arranged of arranged marriages, and once she fulfilled her destiny, she became more valuable dead than alive - an icon of suffering and beauty."
Yes. Well-put. How horrible to lose her innocence as she did. The reality that she was nothing more to Charles than a disposable breeding machine strikes at the heart of every woman who has ever been in love. Her story is a terrible lesson - a 'real life' counterpoint to the Cinderella myth that Disney feeds to gullible little girls. Prince Charming does not, and cannot, exist in the real world. At least, not with royal blood! (All you 'commoner princes' who work and sacrifice for your ladies and children are the real men of the world. Hats off to you.)
anon @ 7:49 wrote:
"However the Royal family must have known Harry was a 'half-blood prince' (chortle, Rowling knows too!) as they are blood tested at birth for this reason."
Hmm. I did not know about this practice, but it makes perfect sense. Thanks for enlightening me. I've always sensed that Harry was Hewitt's. Yes, the resemblance is uncanny. The boys must realize it, as well. I agree with you, smiths. How could they not? Wills with his perfect, blond, king-in-training looks vs Harry's Titian warrior. I hope Harry does something great and good for the world, in his own right. Perhaps that's naive. I still hope it.
Silverfox wrote:
"It was her own sense of self-importance and celebrity that made her vulnerable."
Yes! I used to wonder why she didn't lay low. Did she really believe she could outwit them/outlast them/escape from their despicable power?
It's still sad, after all these years.
Anonymous 11:10 AM,
Your “comment” was only 18,707 words long—so brief, I fear, that no one could have any idea what it “meant” or why you “posted” it.
Could you possibly include a lengthier explanation? 44 pages is hardly a reasonable length for such a deep topic…what was it again?
Will do IC. thanks. I skip over you as well sometimes, so I don't take offense. If it offends, it's not difficult to ignore it. Please be my guest. No offense taken, so don't attempt to start one.
The other death--Reiner III, Grace's husband is film noir in color. Same setting as the previous 1956 film exactly. Even the priest in the film (in French) notes that Rainer III and Grace Kelly "were married in the same cathedral" as they were assembled for the funeral of Reiner III in 2005.
A strange sword--and little dagger that seems really out of place--is sort of placed on Reiner's coffin, unknown why.
Funeral Of Prince Ranier Of Monaco in 2005
2 min 59 sec - Apr 15, 2005
www.itnsource.com
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1800338665828119822
Only the seemingly potentially Merovingian lineaged royals were all present at Reiner III's Grimaldi family funeral in Monaco:
[1] the Bernadotte were there (Swedish King Gustav);
[2] the still existing Spanish/Merovingian lineage line of kings protected by pro-royalist dictator of Spain (not really fascist dictator, since he opposed Nazis as well, which led him to protect the line of Juan Carlos from destruction in the 1930s, so Juan Carlos, of the King of Spain's Bourbon line, could be there still alive in 2005);
[3] Dutch crown prince Willem-Alexander (otherwise known as "van Buren" was there;
[4] and the British Hanoverian representative was Prince Andrew.
For #4, Hanoverian Merovingian connection is their marriage, long ago in a generation far far away, to the daughter of James I, king of Scotland and England in the early 1600s to make the Winter King and Queen of Bohemia. It is from that early 1600s marriage, that the whole Hanoverian claim to that female Stuart--and their puppeted sponsorship by the Whigs to the English throne in 1715, against another Stuart claim from William and Mary (Stuart), is how they got there in the first place. In some sense, in other words, it is only Stuart claims of various kinds to this day that that seem to satisfy someone that the Hanoverians are tolerated as proxy in the British throne.
Merde. Given these four royals associating themselves with Grimaldis, if I'm right, spooky confirmation on four levels of only Merovingian royals appearing at the Grimaldi funeral, more confirmation than I ever imagined would be seen of Grimaldi Merovingian pretensions and Scottish Templar esoteric hard right Catholic Christian (and aristocratic Protestant) connections, which go to the Stuarts of Scotland as well in #3 and #4.
#3 is the rather odd Dutch Merovingian connection to some U.S. Presidential politics. For those who didn't know the Dutch still had a royal line, connected to the original 1688-1715 "[Dutch] William and Mary [Stuart]" king and queen that made themselves over into England as well, this was the other Orange bloodline between 1688-1715, passing after 1715 to another Stuart connection, the Hanoverians.
Prince Willem-Alexander, Prince of Orange, (Willem-Alexander Claus George Ferdinand van Oranje-Nassau, Prins van Oranje, Prins der Nederlanden, Prins van Oranje-Nassau, Jonkheer van Amsberg, born at April 27, 1967) is the eldest son of [Bilderberger] Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands and is the heir apparent to the Dutch throne, with the style HRH The Prince of Orange (in Dutch: "Z.K.H. de Prins van Oranje")....Prince Willem-Alexander was born in Utrecht. His godparents are Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, Prince Ferdinand von Bismarck, Professor Dr. Jelle Zijlstra, Gosta van Amsberg, Queen Margrethe II of Denmark, and Renee Smith. He was educated at a Protestant grammar school in The Hague, where he mixed with children from all social backgrounds. He also attended the United World College of the Atlantic in Wales prior to university. He has been groomed in state affairs to assume the Dutch throne one day. He earned an academic degree in history from Leiden University and is interested in international water management issues.
Merde encore: "Prince Willem-Alexander is an honorary member of the World Commission on [The Privatization of] Water for the 21st Century and patron of the Global Water Partnership, a body established by the World Bank, the UN, and the [Merde encore, Bernadotte connections:] Swedish Ministry of Development."
The U.S. Presidential connection to this Dutch branch is that using the name "Van Buren" is one of the less well-known surnames of the House of Orange-Nassau,....which likely was the Presidential line in the U.S. President Van Buren, thus, connected to the Dutch Princes of Orange. There's a strange relationship as below as well between the Churchills and the van Burens.
Another strange relationship is that the Dutch Presidential Van Burens several generations from President Van Buren had married into the Quackenbushes. These Van Buren-Quackenbushes married into the Theodore Roosevelt line of the Roosvelts and the Franklin Delano Roosevelt wing of the Roosevelts. Roosevelt is Dutch ancestry as well, Dutch for "Rose Garden"--and Roses and other things have a great deal to do with various occult Europe things. Napoleon's first wife (Merovingian de Tasher lined) "Josephine"--her real name was Rose as well.
As for the current Dutch royal line, on February 2, 2002, he married Máxima Zorreguieta (born 1971), an Argentine woman of French, Spanish, and Italian ancestry who, prior to their marriage, worked as an investment banker in New York City.
In choosing her, the prince continued the Dutch monarchy's tradition of choosing a controversial partner. Like all Dutch monarchs, Prince Willem-Alexander is a nominal member of the Protestant Dutch Reformed church but, unlike the highly controversial 1964 marriage to a Roman Catholic by his aunt, Princess Irene, religion was not a major issue in the Prince's marriage.
The prince is a direct descendant of Anne, Princess Royal, eldest daughter of British King George II.
However, under the British Act of Settlement, Prince Willem-Alexander forfeited his (pretty distant) succession rights to the British throne, because he married a Catholic.
The issue of "twentysomething daugher/investment banker" is that Máxima's father, Jorge Horacio Zorreguieta Stefanini was rather sensitive: he was a civilian member of the Videla regime, a dictatorship that ruled Argentina from 1976 to 1983.
As a result of the controversy, Mr. Zorreguieta agreed not to attend the royal wedding when representatives of Prime Minister Kok requested him to stay away.
So, President Van Buren of the U.S. might be related to the Dutch royal house of the same surname. His Dutch Presidential van Buren connections are intermarried into other Dutch Presidential lines, the Roosevelts later.
Roosevelts had one of the first private banks in New York City.
And the Delano grandfather of the Franklin Roosevelt side were opium smugglers.
The other Theodore Roosevelt side basically was a captive pawn of another banking clan, the Morgan bank, throughout his Presidency. Morgan representative lived in the White House with TR and gave him his talking points every morning.
Kinderhook is a town in Columbia County, New York, USA, and home of the van Buren Presidential private estate. The name of the town means "Children's Corner" in the language of the original Dutch settlers. Martin Van Buren was born in the village. The town is in the northern part of Columbia County. Lindenwald, Martin Van Buren's retirement home, is in Kinderhook.
The bizarre bloodline thing about Kinderhook: Jennie Jerome, presumed mother of Winston Churchill, lived in Kinderhook after her father acquired Van Buren's home of Lindenwald?!
A noted beauty—an admirer said that there was "more of the panther than of the woman in her look".
What on earth possessed British aristocracy connections to purchase the van Buren home, except a family relation?
Long considered one of the most beautiful women of the time, she married, first, in 1874, at the British Embassy in Paris, France, Lord Randolph Churchill (1849–1895), third son of John Winston Spencer-Churchill, the 7th Duke of Marlborough. (Princess Diana was a Spencer breeding mare as well, way back. John Kerry has Spencer in him as well I think.)
By this marriage, she acquired the title "Lady Randolph Churchill." They had two sons (or didn't--both parentages are in question by some): Winston Churchill (1874–1965) and John Strange Spencer-Churchill (1880–1947).
As was the custom of the day, she played a limited role in her sons' upbringing, relying largely upon nannies such as Winston's beloved Mrs. (Elizabeth) Everest. Winston completely worshipped his mother, writing her numerous letters during his time away from home at school, begging her to visit him, which she rarely did. However, after he became an adult, she and he became good friends and strong allies, to the point where Winston regarded her almost more as a sister than as a mother.
[Some claim that she was not even his mother, who was actually a Jewish fling of Churchill's father, which explains Jenny's distance from Winston as well.]
Jennie was influential in the uppermost British social and political circles. It was said that Alexandra of Denmark especially enjoyed her company, finding her appealing and enjoyable, despite the fact that Jennie had been involved in an affair with Alexandra's husband, Edward VII, a fact that was well known by Alexandra. [3] Through her family contacts and her extra-marital romantic relationships, Jennie greatly helped Lord Randolph's early career as well as that of her eldest son [only perhaps...] Winston.
It has been long rumored that her second son, John Churchill, was not fathered by her husband Lord Randolph, but instead was possibly the son of an Irish nobleman, Col. John Strange Jocelyn, 5th Earl of Roden (1823–1897), with whom she is believed to have had an affair. That seems unlikely, however, given the similarity of names, which would seem a bit obvious under the circumstances that this was an alleged secret affair. She did, however, have numerous lovers during her marriage, including Count Charles Andreas Kinsky, 'playboy king' King Edward VII of the United Kingdom who pretty much helped set up the alliances that started off WWI 'automatically' in a chain of reactions, and King Milan of Serbia, the more prominent ones with the full knowledge of her husband.
It is additionally rumored that her son Winston was not hers either.
Later marriages
Five years after the death of Lord Randolph, she married George Cornwallis-West (1874–1951) in 1900, a captain in the Scots Guards--always so central to the French Bourbon royal house protection for centuries and very Masonic.
It was during this marriage, in 1908, that she wrote The Reminiscences of Lady Randolph Churchill. They separated in 1912 and were divorced in April 1914. It should be noted that she liked them young: Cornwallis-West was only 16 days older than Winston.
Jennie then married a third time, in 1918, to Montague Phippen Porch (1877–1964), a member of the British Civil Service in Nigeria and then even more relatively younger--some three years Winston's junior!
Throughout her life, and all three ever younger marriages, Jenny had extra-marital affairs. In the early years this was generally for the social and political strengthening of her first husband's position. Her second and third husbands were both more than 20 years younger than she.
Ironically, for instance, the year she married Lord Randolph was the year her second husband was born--and getting younger, for husband #3, three years before her third husband would be born.
During her first marriage, regardless of her affairs, her loyalty was always to Lord Randolph. She supported his causes, and wielded considerable power behind the scenes. Her second and third marriages seemed to have never held that loyalty which she showed for him.
Even after the death of Lord Randolph, Jerome preferred to be known as "Lady Randolph Churchill" despite her re-marriages, and even though she was not strictly entitled to this style any longer she was so well received in royal circles that no one seemed to object.
Death and after
Jennie died in 1921 at the age of 67 and is buried in the Churchill family plot at St Martin's Church, Bladon, Oxfordshire, near her first husband and sons.
...
According to legend, she was also responsible for the invention of the "Manhattan" cocktail.
She commissioned a bartender for a special drink to celebrate the election of Samuel J. Tilden to the governorship in 1874. The party was held at the Manhattan Club, and the drink was named after the club.
Two years later Tilden was the "Northern New Yorker" allied with the Southern Aristocrats--the same sitution that led ot the Civil War actually both attempting to pull the U.S. apart for their "Essex Junto" rationales in the North, getting mixed up and facilitating equal secesssion desires of some Southerners as well. Two different secession movements--one Northern and one Southern--working together helped to combined to pull the U.S. apart in the Civil War. Both had British aristocratic connections.
Democratic popular vote winner for President in the contentious 1876 election carried on the Civil War in some sense, though the Electoral College vote which was corrupted--with many Republican controlled areas of the south (still under Northern martial law), deciding to submit two sets of Electoral College votes to create another crisis.
One one side was the Republican politcking of (Bonesmen) Chief Justice Waite to go to Hayes--who didn't win the popular vote.
Surreally, New Yorker Tilden had a "personal attachment to Martin Van Buren", and Jenny Jerome's father bought van Buren's Presidential private home in New York. Jenny Jerome, British aristocracy, hung around with "New York Southerner allied" Tilden, who had van Buren loyalties. Van Buren was in the cabinet of Jackson, who had British sponsorship as well to some degree against more pro U.S. nationalist Whigs branches.
During the 1876 presidential election, "New York Southerner" Tilden won the popular vote over his Republican Yale opponent, DKE fraternity's Rutherford B. Hayes. Bonesmen had really came into power in the North during the North's army mobilization and the civil war profiteering and contracting, and they wanted to stay there.
However, the "Democrat-Essex Junto" NOrth-South secessionists were back in the political picture following the Civil War and disliking the occupation of the South by the North still. New Yorker Tilden got the "protest vote" of the south, the popular vote, though the South's Republican legislatures all turned in Hayes Electoral college votes regardless.
Bonesmen Republicans don't take voting to be the answer to political power. On the other hand, equally bad, Tilden may have bribed several states to submit duplicate Electoral College votes as well, some for him, to create an intentional crisis coming from the very states that were the most "secession prone".
Thus, both sides were equally corrupted: a two party system where one is a Bonesmen party, and the other is a combined Northern secessionist and Southern secessionist is hardly a good choice....
In the end, the result in the Electoral College was in question because the Republican states of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina each sent two sets of Electoral Votes to Congress. (There was separately a conflict over one elector from Oregon, who was disqualified on a technicality. If that wasn't done Tilden would have won I think, so it is politically suspect because Tilden had 184 and Hayes 185 the way the Bones Republicans wanted it.
Republicans had taken over the state governments in the South during Reconstruction, but were unpopular with the overwhelmingly Democratic (only in reaction were they "Democratic" Party adherents--they weren't necessarily a labor party then) white southerners, many of whom resented what they perceived as interference from the North and blamed the Republicans for the Civil War--as well as blamed them for keeping the Union together when a very small inbred coterie of British leaning Southern elites, NOT the South as a whole (look it up based on each state that seceeded) wanted a Civil War to lead to complete dissolution of the United States. When they were still in the Union after the Civil War, this small group was hopping mad, even though most of the South never wanted secession in the first place.
One set of Electoral Votes from each of these three states had cast their ballots for the Yale Republican Hayes, and another set had cast their ballot for the 'secessionist' linked New York/Southern Democrat Tilden.
Without these three states in question, Tilden had won only 184 Electoral Votes, and required 185 to win the Presidency. With these states--any of them--he won the Electoral College. Regardless, a small coterie of elites in a small number of Southern states seem to have intentionally faciliated a secession scale crisis once more, in league with Northern British linked groups.
However, there were two sets from these three southern states--one of them from South Carolina, which had very pro British secession elites that started the whole secession conflict first. They were still there and powerful in South Carolina, which had originally simply "announced" it seceeded, and never even voted on it or held a secession Commission. South Carolina didn't even participate in the 1860 election for President at all.
If Tilden had taken even one state, he would have become President and the Republican "Reconstruction" (a nice term for military occupation) would be over for better or for worse.
However, if Hayes were to win all the same three states of Electoral college votes, he would receive 185 Electoral Votes himself, and he would win the election. However, Hayes failed to have the popular vote.
Because the Constitution does not address how Congress is to handle a dispute in the Electoral College--in this case, which is the "true" one?--a constitutional crisis appeared imminent--and staged by the same pro-British aristocratic southern states that helped catalyze the secession in the first place. In other words, they didn't care if they messed up the system. They still wanted out.
Federal Washington leaders tried to avert the crisis by creating a 15-member Electoral Commission who would determine which set of votes were valid. This was done outside the Constitution however.
The Commission consisted of five members from the Republican-controlled Senate (three Republicans and two Democrats), and five from the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives (3 Democrats, 2 Republicans). So the party line numbers were even then. However, the remaining 5 members were chosen from the Supreme Court--originally 2 Republicans, 2 Democrats, and independent Justice David Davis. Davis, however, strangely, was quickly elected to the US Senate from Illinois and resigned from the Supreme Court! Justice Joseph P. Bradley, a Republican, was named a shoe in to replace him. Ta da. Unsurprisingly, the Commission voted 8-7 to award all the votes to Yale University's Hayes.
The dispute, however, did not end, as Tilden Democrats threatened to filibuster in the Senate during the counting of the Electoral College vote in questioning the whole electoral Comission which was indeed not in the Constitution and engineered really by powerful Yale University Bonesman Supreme Court Chief Justice Waite.
Eventually, a compromise was reached whereby Hayes agreed to name at least one Southerner to his cabinet and to withdraw all federal troops in the South, bringing to an end the era of Reconstruction. This was known as the Compromise of 1877.
Upon his defeat by Hayes, Tilden said, "I can retire to public life with the consciousness that I shall receive from posterity the credit of having been elected to the highest position in the gift of the people, without any of the cares and responsibilities of the office."
After losing the presidency to Bonesmen connected wing around Hayes, (Dutch Van Buren networked new Yorker) Tilden counseled his followers to abide quietly by the result, but he declined renomination in 1880 and 1884.
The remainder of his life was spent in retirement at his country home, Greystone, near Yonkers, New York.
He died a bachelor in 1886. He confided to a friend that he had never slept with a woman in his life.
Of his fortune (estimated at $5,000,000) approximately $4,000,000 was bequeathed for the establishment and maintenance of a free public library and reading-room in the City of New York; but, as the will was successfully contested by relatives, only about $2,000,000 of the bequest was applied to its original purpose; in 1895, the Tilden Trust was combined with the Astor and Lenox libraries to found the New York Public Library, whose building bears his name on its front.
In 1878, the Republican New York Tribune published a claim of a "series of telegraphic dispatches in cipher," accompanied by the paper's presumed "translations," by which it attempted to prove that during the crisis following the 1876 election, Tilden alone was responsible in some part for the double Electoral college submissions from three southern states. This distracted from the non-Constitutional "Electoral Commission" run by the Bonesmen. And it may have been true.
The Republican New York Tribune claimed that Tilden had been negotiating for the purchase of the electoral votes of South Carolina and Florida. Of course, Tilden denied emphatically all knowledge of such dispatches, and appeared voluntarily before a Congressional sub-committee in New York City to clear himself of the charge.
The attempts to implicate him in corrupt transactions were not successful; but his political opponents endeavored to make capital in subsequent campaigns, out of the so-called 'Cipher Dispatches'. I wouldn't put it past Tilden to do such a thing, though I don't know much about this either. I do know that Tilden was part of the "Bourbon Democrats"--very aristocratic Democrats of which the Whitneys were intimately connected. William Collins Whitney (July 5, 1841 - February 2, 1904) was an American political leader and financier and founder of the prominent Whitney family.
The hyperrich Whitney, Skull and Bones himself, marries his daughter to Lord Queenborough in England, though she dies, and Lord Queenborough remarries. Lord Queenborough then marries another American--Edith Starr Miller as his second wife. This is the Edith Starr Miller publishes the two volume posthumous tome Occult Theocracy. In it, she warns a world that a great deal of secret societies animate European and American history behind the scenes.
uoA DOUBLE SHOCK
Friday's subsequent news announcement -- made only minutes after Queen Elizabeth's address about Princess Diana -- that Mother Teresa had died at the age of 87 only added more sadness to an immensely sorrowful day. Diana is said to have turned to the Roman Catholic nun when her marriage crumbled, reports Reuters.
my dear god people! this woman was killed by, for and around racists an mysoginist adding all this true blood and anti-cure crap only speaks to the dis-information that always makes things so stoopid. they love to murder and use that to control you ... caint you see?
Will do IC. thanks. I skip over you as well sometimes, so I don't take offense. If it offends, it's not difficult to ignore it. Please be my guest. No offense taken, so don't attempt to start one.
Dude,
I wasn't attempting to insult or offend. The problem is that it's not so simple to ignore or scroll by when the paste job is so long. I also didn't mean to imply that I wasn't interested in what you had to say--I'll read anything, once or twice--it's just that I don't get what you're trying to say when your words are interspersed between such massive, unleavened loads of illumin-screed.
Isn't there some other sort of compromise available? You could say, for example, "I found this stuff on the web that explains everything and I really believe it's the whole truth," and then you could give us the link and if we had such an appetite, perfect!
Again, the only problem with scrolling is that you can very easily miss comments that are actually written by the people who post them. (I was obviously kidding about the longer explanation...)
So, here's the challenge: You tell us what all that stuff means, and then we can respond to it. As it is, we'd first have to find who wrote it, and who knows whether he or she would be interested in our feedback? I am curous about about your point--I just couldn't find it in all those miles of text. Really.
If you think Grace Kelly's murder isn't part of the overarching, overall story, then you are sadly mistaken.
It's not called the Octupus for nothing, you know.
Geez!
I will say that for such a beautiful woman, her children (Princess Grace's) are butt ugly just like their father.
I'm waiting now for someone to blow the covers off of Liechtenstein - and somehow to connect it with Roy Lichtenstein. Maybe throw in Kramer, too, for good measure...
From Mike Rivero:
"We've borrowed so much money the lenders are getting nervous. Back during the Johnson administration Charles DeGaulle demanded the United States collateralize the loans owed to France in gold and started carting out the bullion from the treasury. This caused several other nations to demand the same and President Nixon had to slam the gold window closed or the treasury would have been emptied, since the United States was even then in debt for more money than the treasury could cover in gold.
But Nixon had to collateralize that debt somehow, and he hit upon the plan of quietly setting aside huge tracts of American land with their mineral rights in reserve to cover the outstanding debts. But since the American people were already angered over the war in Vietnam, Nixon couldn't very well admit that he was apportioning off chunks of the United States to the holders of foreign debt. So, Nixon invented the Environmental Protection Agency and passed draconian environmental laws which served to grab land with vast natural resources away from the owners and lock it away, and even more, prove to the holders of the foreign debt that US citizens were not drilling. mining, or otherwise developing those resources. From that day to this, as the government sinks deeper into debt, the government grabs more and more land, declares it a wilderness or "roadless area" or "heritage river" or "wetlands" or any one of over a dozen other such obfuscated labels, but in the end the result is the same. We The People may not use the land, in many cases are not even allowed to enter the land.
This is not about conservation, it is about collateral. YOUR land is being stolen by the government and used to secure loans the government really had no business taking out in the first place. Given that the government cannot get out of debt, and is collateralizing more and more land to avoid foreclosure, the day is not long off when the people of the United States will one day wake up and discover they are no longer citizens, but tenants."
Oarwell thought that had pretty much already happened. But this goes way beyond what I thought was already happening. On first read, it makes sense. Can anyone substantiate this?
While there is a strong argument against landmine manufactures themselves plotting against Diana, at the time of her death the production of landmines was still going strong. The Clinton administration had just clinched a £400 million deal to supply an arms package for Bosnian Muslims (Through Honeywell). The French (through the DGSE) had just dried the ink on a $2 billion oil deal with the Iranians and part of the payment was to be a shipment of arms to Bosnia where a very high-profile Princess Diana had recently visited to appeal to the world against the recent carnage and its aftermath. Her very innocence was getting to be a huge embarrassment to several governments. And, perhaps more important, to the machinations of "Le Cercle" An uncontrolled Princess was swanning through their affairs and getting world-wide support. She was a one-woman icon wandering at will through the war zones of the world. She was striking huge chords for international pacifism. And worse, far worse, she was a deep influence on the future king.
Oops, the link for my above post.
My Dear Cuttlefish,
You are also occasionally guilty of the huge data-dump; see above for a reminder. It just seems miniscule compared to The Complete and Unabridged History of the Grimaldi Family, Royal Connections to the Solar Templars, and Kinky Occultic Sex-Rites of the Blueblood Set. But at least you're both dumping interesting stuff.
Anon 5:50--LOL!! And what about those sneaky Danes to the north...?
Oarwell --
When explaining the massive US Govt debt to people, I tend to start with Econ 101 and the basics of mortgages.
At the end of that little discussion, I say (jokingly) "Wouldn't it be interesting if we had to give away Hawaii to China or Japan to satisify our debt?" It is meant to stimulate monetary/collateral thinking, but if what you say is true re: boxing off of lands as collateral, then it may well be more than just a thought exercise.
Unfortunately, I don't have any evidence to substantiate.
Wow. Interesting double death there of Lady Di and her one comforter on the same day? I'm sure just another one of those coincidences....
And IC, all the sources were there. Besides, as I explained it's not a "digest on another website" that is linkable. Sources are linked online when available, or readable, and all listed. Many are books that have accreted slowly in my mind like stalactites, drip, drip dripping on the same topic for quite some time.
There was not an overall link you seem desperate to find, no Holy Grail, just Merovingians. ;-)
There was not "an overall link" to peruse, because it was a series of proposed links freshly put together. It wasn't even a claim to oversimplified purpose or truth--only a theme staring people in the face if you do look for it and follow the people.
The general point of course is 'hard right' aristocratic Monaco occult issues of Grimaldi, the Monaco ruling house, which seems very tightly tied to esoteric Christian Masonry aspects in Europe--that sometimes makes little sense if one thinks that Masonry is innately some sort of secular revolutionary phenomena alone. It's really quite different and 'bloodline aristocratic protective' in origin.
Yes, those "sneaky Danes"--the Oldenbergs, have about conquered all of Europe and no one knows. See below #2.
1.
As for, Lichtenstein it is a tiny Merovingian protectorate, another Monoco 'tax haven' for the hyper wealthy criminals of Europe:
"The Principality of Liechtenstein (German: Fürstentum Liechtenstein) is a small, doubly landlocked country in Central Europe, bordered by Switzerland to its west and by Austria to its east. Mountainous, it is a winter sports resort, though it is perhaps best-known as a tax haven."
...
The Liechtenstein 'dynasty,' from which the Principality takes its name (rather than vice-versa), was a last ditch 'true blue' ally of the Hapsburgs.
The name comes from Castle Liechtenstein in faraway Lower Austria, which the family possessed from at least 1140 to the 13th century, and from 1807 onwards. Through the centuries, the dynasty acquired vast swathes of land, predominantly in Moravia, Lower Austria, Silesia and Styria, though in all cases, these were not outright their own--they were held in fief under other more senior lords, particularly under various lines of the Habsburg family, to whom several Liechtenstein princes served as close advisors.
Thus, and without any territory held directly under the Imperial throne, the Liechtenstein dynasty was unable to meet a primary requirement to qualify for a seat in the Imperial diet, the Reichstag.
The 'true blue' Hapsburg client family yearned greatly for the added power [power? the Reichstag? just prestige and taxation privileges] which a seat in the Imperial government would garner, and therefore searched for lands to acquire held without any links except directly under the Holy Roman Emperor himself having rights on the land. After some time, the family was able to arrange the purchase of the minuscule Herrschaft ("Lordship") of Schellenberg and countship of Vaduz (in 1699 and 1712 respectively) from the Hohenems. Tiny Schellenberg and Vaduz possessed exactly the political status required, no feudal lord other than their comital sovereign and the suzerain Emperor.
Thereby, as late as January 23, 1719, Lichtenstein was created.
After the tax haven purchase had been duly made, Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor decreed Vaduz and Schellenberg united, raising its owners to dignity of Fürstentum (principality) with the name "Liechtenstein" in honour of "[his] true servant, Anton Florian of Liechtenstein".
It is on this date that Liechtenstein became a sovereign member state of the Holy Roman Empire. Ironically, but as testament to the pure political expediency of the purchases, the Princes of Liechtenstein did not set foot in their new principality for several decades.
And by then it was almost over for the whole territorial arrangement.
In 1806, most of the Holy Roman Empire was invaded by Napoleon I of the First French Empire.
This event had broad consequences for Liechtenstein: imperial legal and political mechanisms broke down, while Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor abdicated the imperial throne: the Empire itself dissolved.
As a result, Liechtenstein ceased to have any obligations to anyone beyond its borders, from 1806 around 160 km² only, and with 2006 population maxing out at around 33,000 people. Current per capita relations to the wealth of it are astounding however: Per capita $83,700 per person or $54,000 per person, take your pick I guess (the latter number at least cites something.) The miracle of Wikipedia! The sum total of world unverified knowledge!
For a comparison to Monaco, which has around 33,000 people as well as of 2006, Monaco though is only 1/160th of the area: only 1.637 km² or around 0.75 sq mi. Monaco's per capita is much lower than Lichtenstein as well: Per capita $21,000.
In other words, the real James Bonds are hanging out in Lichtenstein.
Liechtenstein is the fourth smallest country of Europe, after the Vatican City, Monaco and San Marino.
Since Vatican City's invention was really a deal with the Italian fascists of Mussolini, it should be hardly a surprise that other little places like equally ultramontane Monaco, or 'true blue (blood)' Liechtenstein exist and are strangely immune to the secular currents elsewhere. You don't protect little statelets like this unless they really do have the power somewhere to bite back. Monaco may be "smaller than Hyde Park" as someone claimed, though is geographic size a proxy of power here. Stalin said "how many divisions does the Pope have?" supposedly. Stalin may be surprised how well placed infiltration works over brute force. After his "powerful dictatorship", no one wanted to save him and he died alone on the floor. However, even the mental idiots who couldn't even feed themselves in some of the incredibly inbred Hapsburg lines still held some kind of 'magical' power that kept people loyal to some concept, even when the particular idiots--regardless if they had been idiots for generations [see the book Royal Babylon]--whole countries were being official run by people who ate like dogs or were half mad or completely bonkers. it's not hard to sympathize with the aims of the Illuminati on one hand, when you read that book. On the other hand, it's not my point to set up a preference for one form of occult aristocracy simply exchanged for another. That has unfortunately been the story of much of Europe for the past 250 years, as different occult groups want to keep steering. Sometimes they succeed. Another theme was that infighting between them has ironically served to bring more people into their networks in competition with each other, which made the secret societies more democratic and more 'peasant interests' got into them, which on the one hand made them more powerful and dangerous, and on the other hand subtly more representative secret societies. When is the 'heat point' of complete equilibrium when all are integrated? Who can say if they will ever let it go that far before outright repression, though that was another theme: the 'democratization' of secret socities, and the secret socities in (European occult) democracy. The Renaissance wasn't a Roman 'reawaking of secular principles.' It was crypto-Etyptian, hermetic, and ongoing competitions between things that never died out 2000 years ago in Western Europe-- desires of control of everything from the shadows through mystery religions and mystery cults of graded elites and ignorant masses. This meant the intentional undevelopment and repression of a great deal of people within 'democratic societies' run this way, automatically. That is where I would argue we are presently, seeking a way to widen the input. You have to know what you are up against first.
For a comparison on the other side of the revolutionary scale of the spectrum, the European secular revolutionaries kept a statelet as well, San Marino, which was on the side of Garibaldi, who used the little area as an escape from ultramontane Papal politics in the run up to military consolidation and destruction of the Papal States. San Marino was protected from dissolution in thanks, by the same revolutionaries.
Important as a 'basecamp' for the Italian secular Masonic revolutionaries, it never was integrated into Italy.
It kept this interesting history:
San Marino is basically a mountain, surrounded by a plain: "According to legend, Marino left the Adriatic island of Rab with his lifelong friend Leo and went to the town of Rimini as a stone worker. After persecution because of his Christian sermons, he escaped to the nearby Monte Titano, where he built a small church and thus 'founded' what is now the city and the state of San Marino--mostly because he was left alone.
The official date of foundation of the Republic is 3 September A.D. 301.
During the early phase of the Italian unification process of the 19th century, San Marino served as a haven of refuge for numerous persons who were persecuted because of their support for Italian unity. In memory of this support, [Italian secular Illuminized revolutionary] Giuseppe Garibaldi [working with Mazzini] accepted the wish of San Marino not to be incorporated into the new Italian state.
During World War II San Marino was able to officially remain neutral.
The head of state is a committee (council) of two captains-regent. San Marino also holds the record for the world's first democratically elected communist government, which held office between 1945 and 1957.
Back to the opposite microstate, Catholic Lichtenstein:
Modern publications generally (although incorrectly) attribute Liechtenstein's sovereignty to these events of the British-Napoleonic wars. In reality, its prince merely became suzerain by default when the Holy Roman Empire was dissolved, as the area only had its own sovereign lord remaining since it had nothing else in the way of political connections to anything except the personal link to the Hapsburgs--and when that was gone, pssspt!
So it joined the Napoleonic Empire for a while--potentially another Merovingian choice through the Josephine marriage and through her sister's marriage to Napoleon and his brother.
So from 25 July 1806 when the Confederation of the Rhine was founded, the prince of Liechtenstein was a member, in fact a vassal of its hegemon styled protector, French Emperor Napoleon I Bonaparte, until failed with yet another dissolution, this time on 19 October 1813. Pssspt!
Soon after, Liechtenstein joined the German Confederation (20 June 1815 – 24 August 1866, presided by the next surrogate Merovingian, Emperor of Austria).
Until the end of World War I, Liechtenstein was closely tied first to the Austrian Empire and then to Austria-Hungary.
However, the economic devastation caused by WWI forced the country to conclude a customs and monetary union with its other neighbour, Switzerland. The Army was disbanded already in 1868, out of financial considerations. Here's the surreal bit: at the time of the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, it was argued that Liechteinstein as a fief of only the Holy Roman Empire (supposedly still incarnated in Liechtensteiner eyes at an abstract level in the person of the then-destitutued Austro-Hungarian Emperor, despite its formal dissolution in 1806) was no longer bound to Austria, then emerging as an independent state which did not consider itself as the legal successor to the Empire. Liechtenstein is thus the last independent state in Europe which can claim an element of continuity from the Holy Roman Empire.
It's not holy, not Roman, not part of an Empire--and even one up on Voltaire's aphorism, it's "under an Emperor that fails to exist"--still claiming to be the last bit of the Holy Roman Empire, a true European conundrum and European history at its confusing counterintuitive best. "How many divisions does Lichtenstein have?" More than most countries, actually. It depends on how you count them, in numbers or in networks. It's network rich, richer than many other places anywhere:
The Prince of Liechtenstein is the world's fifth wealthiest head of state, with an estimated wealth of $4 billion. It was all made in the last 50 years mostly, with a population of 33,000 or so presently.
The country's population enjoys one of the world's highest standards of living for its 33,000 or so people, living in their Disneyland pretended Holy Roman Empire with an Emperor on "permanent leave" though always ready for his return--sort of like the legend about Frederick Barbarossa just 'sleeping in the mountain' waiting for the day he will return and guide the Reich.
...
Despite its small geographic area and limited natural resources, Liechtenstein is currently the only country in the world with more registered companies than citizens; it has developed into a prosperous, highly industrialized, free-enterprise [narco-]economy, and boasts a financial service sector and also living standard which compare favourably to those of the urban areas of Liechtenstein's large European neighbours.
Advantageously low business taxes — the maximum tax rate is 18% — as well as easy Rules of Incorporation have induced about 73,700 holding (or so-called 'letter box') companies to establish nominal offices in Liechtenstein. Such ["XYZ companies" and corporate shell fronts] provide about 30% of Liechtenstein's state revenue.
Recently, Liechtenstein has shown strong determination to dispel the country's unhelpful [or helpful! depends on who you market yourself for!] image as a centre for international money-laundering.
Liechtenstein is not exactly known for popular pressured civil rights historically--though for civil titles of its royal house, it is without peer.
I'm surprised the name and title can fit in such a small country:
Look at this name:
Franz Josef II, Prince of Liechtenstein, (Franz Joseph Maria Aloys Alfred Karl Johannes Heinrich Michael Georg Ignaz Benediktus Gerhardus Majella), (August 16, 1906, Schloss Frauenthal, Styria, Austria – November 13, 1989) was the prince of Liechtenstein from 1938 until his death. His full title was [even more preposterous: don't look at it! it's evil!: "Fürst von und zu Liechtenstein, Herzog von Troppau und Jägerndorf, Graf zu Rietberg." They still speak Allemande [sp?] German, of all things--the isolated cultlike thing that the Amish speak.
He was son of Prince Aloys of Liechtenstein and his wife Archduchess Elisabeth of Austria (daughter of Archduke Karl Ludwig). He succeeded his childless cousin, Prince Franz I, after his father renounced his right of succession in his favour in 1921.
Then he went wild! He actually let women vote!
During his reign women received voting rights for the first time, following a referendum on the topic (among men only, who decided) in 1984.
More wildness:
Franz Josef was an extremely popular monarch in Liechtenstein. He was the first ruling prince to live full-time in the principality. [Why? Was someone after him?]
He was widely credited with keeping Liechtenstein out of World War II [it had no army since 1868 and would thus not pull its own weight or make a useful ally...] and he also oversaw the "economic development" [come and get it! taaaax haven!!! come and get it!"] of Liechtenstein from a poor agricultural backwater into one of the richest countries (per capita) in the world.
It's the "Merovingian Vatican City" of Money Laundering, just like Monaco.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liechtenstein#History
Another important Merovingian grouping everyone should know about is that Lichtenstein somehow made it into the true upper crust: their family's 'true blue' connection with the Burgundian founded Holy Roman Empire's imperial Order of the Golden Fleece--which additionally like the Templars creations mostly, is without any Christian iconography, though claims to be a "Christian knights honor organization" just like them:
The very first sponsor by the Holy Roman Emperor was Karl I, Prince of Liechtenstein (1569-1627)--the first Prince of Liechtenstein. Emperor Rudolf II of the Holy Roman Empire appointed Karl to Chief Intendant, an important position. Karl held this position until 1607. In thanks for further aid Karl was appointed to the positions of proconsul and vice-regent of Bohemia in 1622 and was bestowed with the Order of the Golden Fleece.
And what was that? Pure esoteric bloodline protectorate Europe at its finest:
The Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish: Orden del Toisón de Oro) is an order of chivalry founded in 1430 by Duke Philip III of Burgundy to celebrate his marriage to the [ex-Templar dominated] Portuguese state's princess Isabelle of Aviz.
It was modelled on the English Order of the Garter, the English version of such Merovingian networks off the 1066 Norman invasion of many different bloodlines that were permantly powerful in England--and many of these became "Magna Carta Sureties" in 1215--and many of those families became American Presidents 550-650 years later. Blood is stronger than water, and blood in this case is stronger than time. Particularly when inbreeding and cross breeding is practiced in a round robin fashion where you get obvious dead giveaways of people with three or four surnames for their name and no real first name. It's like cattle. They carry their multiple surnames like a ranch brand to show off and "moo" at each other who is best in their little cliques.
Philip of Burgundy, founder of the Fleece, had been elected to membership of the Garter in 1422, but had declined to avoid offending the king of France), but dedicated to Saint Andrew (like Scotland...).
Like the Garter it was restricted to a limited number of knights, initially 24 but increased to 30 in 1433 and 51 in 1516. Here's a bit of aristocratic humor: the order was explicitly denied to "heretics", and so became an exclusively Catholic [though ironically esoteric Catholic mark of favor] award during the Reformation, though a choice of the pagan Golden Fleece of Colchis as the symbol of a "Christian order" caused some controversy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Golden_Fleece
Though if you are of an aristocratic coterie who consider the Roman Catholic Church a real heresy--to their esoteric Christian durable bloodline leadership power--then perhaps they were being Jesuitical and "not lying when they weren't heretics"--as long as you understand that they would define the Roman Catholic Church and the Papacy as a useless institution and a heresy to their version of Christianity!
Quite a few of the Fleece names are clearly "Catholic Masonic bloodline protectors".
The names are the kind of secret society networks and institutional connections that the French Illuminati/British Hanoverian aligned revolutionary wing attempted to destroy in the 1790s.
The 1800s was a huge worldwide attempt at purge, which didn't really succeed...A compromise was sort of crated by the early 20th century. I think it is encapsulated in the huge mixed metaphors of "the Christian Gnostic Catholic Church"--i.e., Crowleyism and the OTO--which took over the Roman Catholic Church by the 1930s.
In that way, they can put all the 'regular law abiding Catholics of the heresy' on the lower Apprentice Level, while reserving the higher levels for their recycled selves--who believe completely different things [see Tony Bushby's _The Bible Fraud].
For the Fleece link, see particularly the first cohort and the last cohort for comparison. (De Lannoy, or "Delano" (which is indeed a French/Flemish family who changed their name to one word in coming to the U.S.). That name is fascinatingly there...Delanos actually claim they go back to ancient Greece...I'm in no position to confirm or argue that...); the most recent cohort of the Fleece shows the 70th something head of the Knights of Malta.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Knights_of_the_Golden_Fleece#Knights_Created_under_the_House_of_Burgundy.2C_1430-1477
2.
There's a handful of groups like this, Merovinginan protection networks, around different nodes.
Another group like this is the one around the Holy Roman Empire itself, Order of the Dragon. That one had the Transylvanian madmen counts in it among others:
The Order of the Dragon (German: Drachenorden; Latin: Societas Draconistrarum) is an order of selected nobles modeled on the Order of Saint George of Burgundy. The order was created by Serbs, but originally commissioned in 1408 by Sigismund, the Holy Roman Emperor (while still king of Hungary) and his second wife (Barbara Cilli) in order to protect the royal family. [<---They come out right there and say it.] Members of the Order were known as draconists.
Miloš Obilić, a Serbian knight, had created the secret order of the Dragon of Saint George. His shield represented the sun with twelve rays and there were twelve knights, himself included, belonging to this order. As a distinctive sign, they wore a dragon on their helmet.
Thus, the three you could look into and be fascinated no one told you this before is:
- (Merovingian)Order of the Garter around the Norman/English invaion groups, Plantagent groups; he year of foundation is usually taken to be 1348, although dates ranging from 1344 to 1351 have been proposed. The wardrobe account of the king first shows Garter habits issued in the autumn of 1348. Regardless, the Order was probably not established before 1346--thus, right in the midst of the Guelph/Ghibelline contention as well, an order was crated "to protect the royal family" from being swamped by this conflict as well as perhaps playing it off to survive more independently.
- (Merovingian) Order of the Dragon, from 1408
- (Merovingian) Order of the Golden Fleece, from 1430
- (Merovingian) The Order of Saint Michael (French: L'Ordre de Saint-Michel) was the first French chivalric order, founded by Louis XI of France in 1469, in competitive response to the Burgundian Order of the Golden Fleece founded by Philip the Good, duke of Burgundy, Louis' chief competitor for the allegiance of the great houses of France, the Dukes of Orléans, Berry, and Brittany. As a chivalric order, its goal was to confirm the loyalty of its knights to the king. Originally, there were a limited number of knights, at first thirty-one, then increased to thirty-six including the king. An office of Provost was established in 1476. The Order of St Michael was the highest Order in France until it was superseded by the Order of the Holy Spirit. Another point about how intra-elite competitoin forces them to expand and 'democratize' their secret society networks: "It's membership was initially restricted to a small number of powerful princes and nobles, but this increased dramatically due to the pressures of the Wars of Religion: at the beginning of the reign of Henry III, the order had several hundred living members, ranging from kings to bourgeois." However, he disliked this "deflation" of his order from a more exclusive "who's my esoteric blood peer" aspect of it originally. Only France had the most severe (I would argue) internal wars of religion that set the stage for this "protect the family" extension of the socities. Therefore, recognising and disliking that his order had been significantly devalued during the wars of religion, King Henry of France founded the Order of the Holy Spirit December 31, 1578- thereby creating a two-tier system: the new order would be reserved as before for princes and powerful nobles whilst the old Order of Saint Michael would be given to less eminent servants of the Crown. This Order was dedicated to Holy Spirit for commemorating fact that Henry was elected a King of Poland (1573) and France (1574) during a Pentecost.
- (Merovingian, "Stuarts on the run"--The Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. While the Order of the Thistle was certainly in existence by the 16th century, and possibly has earlier origins (according to legend, it dates to the eighth century), the foundation of the institution in its modern form dates to 1687.
- The Romanov/Gottorp/Swedish Branch of Merovingians: The Military Order of the Saint Grand Martyr and the Triumphant George (also known as Order of St. George the Triumphant, Russian: Военный Орден Св. Великомученика и Победоносца Георгия, Voyenny Orden Sviatogo Velikomuchenika i Pobedonostsa Georgia) is an Imperial Russian and current Russian order of chivalry, originally established in 1769 by Catherine the Great, and revived in 1994 by the Russian Federation. Exactly what would the Russians be protecting in bloodlines? Perhaps Putin does want to be a Czar? Though 1994 was before he was even on the scene. Interesting.
2.
Just a little point about Gottorp:
Gottorp or Gottorf (Danish: Gottorp) is a palace and estate in the city of Schleswig in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein. It is the ancestral home of a remarkable branch of the [Merovingian "northern"] royal dynasty within the House of Oldenburg (that takes in everybody from Norway to Russia] and is a museum today. It is situated on an island on the firth of Schlei, about 40 km from the Baltic Sea. It was first settled as an estate in 1161 as the residence of Bishop Occo of Schleswig when his former residence was destroyed. The Danish Duke of Schleswig acquired it through a purchase in 1268, and in 1340 it was transferred to the Holsteiner Count of Rendsborg of the House of Schauenburg. The manor later, through maternal inheritance, became the possession of Christian I of Denmark, the first Danish monarch from the House of Oldenburg, in 1459. Both the island and the structure were extended through the years, and particularly during the 16th century. Frederick I, younger son of Christian I, at that time the Duke of Gottorp, made it his primary residence and became ancestor of two lines, (1) the monarchs of Denmark and (2) the dukes of Gottorp. The dukes of Gottorp took over the estate, which became a European cultural center in the reign of Frederick III, Duke of Gottorp, (1597–1659). The castle was build by the famous Swedish architect Nicodemus Tessin the Younger (1697-1703). [This is the court architect--with his son--that additionally built all Swedish court royalty buildings...There's some rather interesting occult features of his buildings, like he can barely hold his tongue in what he's doing.]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottorp
The House of Oldenburg is a North German noble family and one of Europe's most influential Royal Houses.
It first became royal when Count Christian VIII of Oldenburg became chosen King of Denmark in 1448, and has been the Danish Royal House ever since. After some hiatus, king Christian I also succeeded in 1450 to the Hereditary Kingdom of Norway.
Marriages of medieval counts of Oldenburg had paved the way for their heirs to become kings of various Scandinavian kingdoms. In 14th century, through marriage with a descendant of king Valdemar I of Sweden and of king Eric IV of Denmark, a claim to Sweden and Denmark was staked, since 1350.
At that time, its competitors were the successors of Margaret I of Denmark. In 15th century, the Oldenburg heir of that claim married Hedwig of Holstein, a descendant of Euphemia of Sweden and Norway and also a descendant of Eric V of Denmark. Since descendants better situated in genealogical charts died out, their son Christian (the abovementioned) became the king of all the three kingdoms of whole Kalmar Union. The House of Mecklenburg was its chief competitor regarding the Northern thrones, and other interessents were e.g the Duke of Lauenburg. Different Oldenburgine branches have reigned in several countries, as this selective chart shows:
look at this and then wonder why you never heard of it. If you have, well, congratulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Oldenburg
The Oldenberg family has basically consolidated Europe quietly. They're almost the only one's left! The "New Hapsburgs." Look at that chart!
Later, more on Grimaldi as Merovingian protecting lines.
THIS IS THE OCTOPUS. ALL OF THESE.
The Grimaldi has its Solar Temple nefariousness. I imagine that any of the above houses that sponsored "family protecting networks" (Order of the Dragon; Order of St. Michael in France; etc., all would get into some interesting parallel Christianities quite quickly.
Conclusion
Plus ca change in the layers of the Merovingian- Templar- Christian Masonic protectorate networks.
This little slice of occult Europe is so different from the view that Masonry is entirely a secular revolutionary phenomena.
There were indelibly several branches. The existence of "hard Catholic Masonic hereditary aristocrats" are almost categorically difficult for most to get their head around, though, it's there.
Show me where we're modern. It's all a lie on one level. We're 'modern' to the extent that the aristocratic groups have wanted us 'modern'. It has yet to mean an unconditioned form of public government at all. One level, when they were competing, 'we' seemed to get more input. With them seeming more consolidated as the 21st century comes on, unsure...
I'm looking forward to real modernism when it occurs, instead of this aristocratic pantomime of it that we have had for 250 years or more. Or at least aristocrats that understand they are destroying the planet with themselves in their false attempt to consolidate it on self-destructive principles unless they heed a few more voices. I guess I have nothing against representative aristocrats--though parasitic ones only end up destroying themselves.
OK, I was going to wait, though I wanted to 'finish' this line of thought for the moment.
3.
Now.
More on Grimaldi. I didn't realize what a Merovingian supporting can of worms Monaco was and is:
In 1685, a British branch of the House of Grimaldi emerged in Great Britain from the exile of Alexander Grimaldi, a descendant of the Lords of Beaufort (Belforte, in Italian). This nobleman belonged to a long line of Genoese patricians doing business throughout Europe.
Their line was actively involved in the Bank of Saint George, one of the first incorporated banks in the world, and produced several admirals, officers, and a cardinal. At the time, the Grimaldis were among the largest bankers of the Spanish Crown and Empire [of the Merovingian Hapsburgs].
Genoa did 'run' the Spanish Empire, financially.
In Genoa, ... at the fall of the City-State under the heavy artillery of the king of France, Louis 14th, Alexander Grimaldi had to take the road of exile. He settled down in London, where the Genoese had been conducting international business for over three centuries. The last marquess of his line died in England in the 20th century.
The House of Grimaldi is associated with the Americas in many Stuart-Merovingian ways. One particularly interesting way is thorugh politico-financial relations with Spain mentioned above, supporting the Merovingian linked Hapsburgs.
Another link is a Grimaldi banker accompanied Diego Columbus, son of the great [Anjou-Merovingian bloodline linked] explorer, Christopher Columbus (his name translates as: "Christ[opher] of the Dove".
No one really knows much about Columbus actually. Though there are some strange non-Christian things about this guy, for such a Roman Catholic domiant period in which he lived. Columbus didn't carry any Roman Catholic priests in his exploration of the Atlantic, despite having made detailed contractual agreements that "if he happened to accidentally find any territory, you know, just by accident I assure you, I want hereditary ownership of it for my family--not as a grant from you royals, though entirely separate for myself"; He claimed he was off to "find China"--which may have been only a cover, since it was well known by the networks he ran in (Drummonds/Sinclairs) that a huge block of land was much closer. Moreover, Columbus's three ships sails strangely carried the long disestablished red Templar cross on them; and equally strangely he did decide to sail out of Europe on the day that Jews were banished from Spain. Templars had always protected Jews over the Christians, in many known strange instances when it came down to it, and particularly preferred to settle or house themselves or build their castles in the Jewish sectors of cities, particlarly in Spain.
More Merovingians: Columbus was very close to the Masonic Scottish Drummonds. Drummonds are married into the royal Merovingian Stuarts as well as the Sinclairs of Rosslyn, who are married into both.
Sinclairs of course are THE multi-century hereditary grandmaster line of 'secret society' Masonry in Scotland, i.e., before the English masonry publicity of the early 1700s.
A Prince Sinclair built Rosslyn Chapel in the mid 1400s, presumably a small scale copy of the destroyed Jerusalem Temple Mount--as an icon and historical monument for the Scottish branch of the Templars that escaped from Philip the Fair--with some very special treasure that no one knows for sure what this branch has....
Rosslyn is a copy of the Temple Mount, replete with its damaged "Wailing Wall" on one side of Rosslyn. Rosslyn is not a 'Christian chapel' construction, and for centuries did not have any Christian iconography at all in it--all that was added in the Victorian era by priests who were very uncomfortable seeing such a structure.
With historically NO Christian iconography in the 'chapel', it bodes that whatever the Sinclair Princes of Rosslyn intended to do there, particularly intended to bury there (in the still untouched catacombs of Rosslyn), it has some link to Jerusalem Jewish memorabilia and not Roman Catholicism. Since Rosslyn is not a Christian structure, it was for centuries a public testamonial to many thousands of pilgrims who knew that it was not a Christian structure. Rosslyn was the northermost pilgrimage site on a huge network of them connected with St. John of Compostella ('the route of the stars') in the Spanish Pyrennes areas, stretching across Spain, and eventually one branch of this pilgrimage route goes to Rosslyn. Lots of very "non Roman Catholic" versions of Christianity are involved if you research a bit about the pilgrimages and organizations linked to getting to Compostella.
There is additionally other Merovingian links to the New World that are preserved in Rosslyn, besides the attempts in later centuries of groups around Grimaldi/Oglethorpe in Georgia.
For example, the Merovingian/Tempalr linked Sinclairs put a lot of protomasonic iconography in Rosslyn.
There's even the intentionally damaged head of a "Hiram Abiff" on one wall, carved in freaking stone in the mid 1400s, which is a story instrumental to the Master Mason ceremony. The Sinclairs additionally put American species of plants that "officially" had not been discovered by Europeans before Rosslyn was built). However, obviously it was known and they were making a record of their discovery/achievements in "the New World"--that no one had 'officially' discovered yet.
Oscar Wilde has a great quote about all the New World discoveries: "People talk about America being discovered by Columbus. Well, America was discovered long before. However, they were smart enough to keep quiet about it."
North American maize for one example, is carved into Rosslyn chapel.) The first Templar preceptory in all of European Christendom after their early 1100s establishment was on Sinclair land in Rosslyn. The links go way back with the Sinclairs as trusted Templar agenteurs.
It's pretty much established by many that Prince Henry Sinclair, hereditary grandmaster line of the protomasonic Scottish Transmission of Templars (that became Scottish masonry), journeyed in 1398-1400 or so, in league with the Zeno clan of Venice, to the New World--around 95-100 years before Columbus.
Columbus turns up 100 years later and has contact in the Azores with the very families intermarried with the Sinclairs like the Drummonds. [Templars in America: From the Crusades to the New World, among others].
Much later, Merovingian issues in North America once more: [1] among those Stuart/Merovingian linked bloodline protectors who traveled through the British Empire that was increasingly throwing away the Stuarts, were the Grimaldis and the Oglethorpes--who seemed to team up in Georgia in 1732-35--right when a really early North American pro-Stuart Masonic lodge was established there.
Oglethorpe seems to have attempted to establish a "Masonic Scottish Transmission" colony of Stuart supporting bloodline groups, Grimaldis inclusive, right in the middle of the British Hanoverians' Empire, in his venture in Georgia!
Grimaldi went there in 1735, where he lived in Savannah and Augusta, a few years after Oglethorpe started it as a truly "Masonic colony of dissenters."
Georgia was mostly a Scottish colony, by James Oglethorpe who himself had some rather high bloodline connections to equally Merovingian links to Savoy.
The colony's corporate charter was granted to James Oglethorpe on April 21, 1732, by clueless George II, for whom the colony was named--though Oglethorpe proved to have more Stuart allegiances than Hanoverian ones.
Oglethorpe made very strict laws that many colonists disagreed with. Oglethorpe envisioned and sold the province as an idea like Australia later--as a location for the resettlement of English prisoner debtors and "the worthy poor".
Another motivation for the founding of the colony was as a "buffer state" or "garrison province" that would defend the southern part of the British colonies from Spanish Florida. It also would prevent slaves escaping from South Carolina from reaching Florida where they could gain their freedom. However, Oglethorpe himself arranged for slavery to be banned in Georgia, making slave escape easier within the British Empire itself.
Additionally curious, Oglethorpe imagined a province populated by "sturdy farmers" and religious dissenters from Anglicanism--and perhaps a whole lot else.
In the beginning, the colony had a slow start. James Oglethorpe would not allow liquor and colonists weren't allowed to own more than 500 acres of land. People were upset, so James finally bent the rules and the colony started to grow much faster.
James Edward Oglethorpe (22 December 1696 – 30 June 1785) had previously entered Corpus Christi College, Oxford, in 1714, but in the same year joined the army of Prince Eugene of Savoy. François-Eugène, Prince of Savoy-Carignan (October 18, 1663 – April 24, 1736), known as Prinz Eugen von Savoyen in German, was arguably the greatest general to serve the Merovingian Habsburgs--which were connected with the Merovingian Stuarts.
It was through another Stuart link-- through the recommendation of Stuart Restoration royalist supporter John Churchill (the 1st Duke of Marlborough) that Oglethorpe himself was recommended to become aide-de-camp to the prince of Savoy!
Oh no. Churchills show up once more: a key royalist Masonic aristocratic interlink:
"1st Duke of Marlborough, part of the Stuart Restoration after 1661, was John Churchill. He was born to Elizabeth and Sir Winston Churchill (the famous Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill was a descendant) in 1650, near the end of the English Civil War. He was educated at St Paul's School, London. Apparently he learned the basics of military strategy from a book in the School library. His father had fought for the Royalists during the Civil War and had suffered badly for it—they lived in very modest circumstances until the end of the Commonwealth. His staunch support for Charles II of England paid off with The Restoration, however, and one of the fruits of this was the appointment of 17-year-old John Churchill to the household of the man second in line to the throne, James, the Duke of York and Lord High Admiral. (Rumour, then and later, also had it that Churchill's appointment was aided by the liaison of his sister Arabella and the Duke.)"
Thus another Stuart bloodline adherence link seems to have signed off on creating Georgia for Stuarts, instead of Hanoverians. The Churchill/Oglethorpe/Hapsburg/Stuart links were animating the founding of the Province of Georgia.
Oglethorpe even 'dared' to start Scottish Stuart linked Masonry there, when the Hanoverian vs. Stuart war was still very much undecided. Stuart aligned Oglethorpe crated the "oldest masonic lodge in North America" according to some it is claimed. (Others would claim the Tukers of Bermuda, hugely important in the history of the British East India Company, had that 'honor.')
Anyway, Oglethorpe sailed for Charleston, South Carolina on the ship Ann, arriving in 1732, and settled near the present site of Savannah, Georgia. A Banker Grimaldi was there within three years, and only one year after the founding of the 'parallel government' of the Colony of Georgia, the Scottish linked masonic lodge, started in 1734.
Oglethorpe negotiated with the Creek tribe for land and established a series of defensive forts, ostensibly against Spain, though with Oglethorpe's pro-Stuart allegiances, it could be against the Hanoverians at some future date as well.
Were they making an esoterically run Stuart/Habsburg protectorate in a Hanoverian empire? Germans and Swiss for example were invited to come. Many of Georgia's new settlers consisted of poor English tradesmen and artisans and religious refugees from Switzerland and Germany. Oglethorpe even returned to England and arranged to have slavery banned in Georgia.
To top that off, right after he started the colony, on February 21, 1734 the English Soldier, Statesman, Philanthropist and Freemason James Edward Oglethorpe established the first Masonic Lodge within the British Colony of Georgia--though as a Stuart aligned one! Now known as Solomon's Lodge No. 1, F. & A. M. it is the "Oldest Continuously Operating English Constituted Lodge of Freemasons in the Western Hemisphere." (Some say). Grimaldi was there the next year.
Oglethorpe's Stuart Masonic adherence was legion: Ten years later, "in 1745, Oglethorpe was promoted to the rank of major-general. His conduct in connection with the Stuart Jacobite Rising of that year resulted in his court-martial, but he [got out of potential treason during 1745 and] was acquitted."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Oglethorpe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_of_Georgia
http://www.grimaldi.org/en/history/england.asp
Failures there failed to stop the Merovingian issues. It is known as well that the "kingdom of America" was offered to THE STUART "Pretenders"--offered by the people who founded the Articles of Confederation period of the United States. And who was one of the major groups involved in much of the territory? Why, another Sinclair, military overlord of the Ohio Territory, as well as connected with being President at once point under the Articles of Confederation.
These were all serious occult bloodlines:
The following list is of those who led the Congress of the Confederation under the Articles of Confederation as the Presidents of the United States in Congress Assembled. The "president" under the Articles was the presiding officer of Congress. He was not the chief executive, as is the President of the United States under the Constitution.
* Samuel Huntington (March 1, 1781 – July 9, 1781)
* Thomas McKean (July 10, 1781 – November 4, 1781)
* John Hanson (November 5, 1781 – November 3, 1782)
* Elias Boudinot (November 4, 1782 – November 2, 1783)
* Thomas Mifflin (November 3, 1783 – October 31, 1784)
* Richard Henry Lee (November 30, 1784 – November 6, 1785)
* John Hancock (November 23, 1785 – May 29, 1786)
* Nathaniel Gorham (June 6, 1786 – November 5, 1786)
* Arthur St. Clair (February 2, 1787 – November 4, 1787)
* Cyrus Griffin (January 22, 1788 – November 2, 1788)
...
Arthur St. Clair (March 23, 1734/1736 –August 31, 1818) was the ninth President of the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation, holding office from February 2, 1787 to October 29, 1787. He was also a general in the Continental Army during the American Revolution, the highest-ranking officer in the US Army (1791-1792), and the only territorial governor of Ohio.
St. Clair was born Thurso, Caithness, Scotland on March 23, sometime between 1734 and 1736. He attended the University of Edinburgh and studied medicine under the renowned anatomist William Hunter. In 1757, St. Clair purchased a commission in the British Army and came to America with Admiral Edward Boscawen's fleet for the French and Indian War. He served under General Jeffrey Amherst at the capture of Louisburg, Nova Scotia on July 26, 1758. On April 17, 1759, he received a lieutenant's commission and was assigned to the command of General James Wolfe, under whom he served at the Battle of the Plains of Abraham.
On April 16, 1762, he resigned his commission, and, in 1764, he settled in Ligonier Valley, Pennsylvania, where he purchased land and erected mills. He was the largest landowner in western Pennsylvania--another colony established for "religious dissent", exactly like the Colony of Georgia.
He was intimately involved in the creation of the bloodline oriented Order of the Cincinnati:
The General Society of the Cincinnati is a historic association in the United States and France with limited and strict membership requirements.
he concept of having a Society of The Cincinnati was the idea of Major General Henry Knox. The first meeting was held at a dinner in Fishkill (near Newburgh), New York in May of 1783, as the British had not yet withdrawn from New York City. It was chaired by Lieutenant General Alexander Hamilton and the participants agreed to stay in contact with each other after the war. Membership was limited to officers who served in the Continental Army and Navy and also included officers of the French Army and Navy who met the same requirements. Membership was passed down to the eldest son, after the death of the original member. The criteria were to have been an officer in the Continental Army or Navy for a period of three years, an officer who died or was killed in the line of duty, or an officer serving until the close of the war.
It's the hereditary group aristocracy of the Articles of Confederation period.
Within twelve months, a constituent Society had been organized in each state and in France. There were about 5,500 originally eligible members, and 2,150 had already joined. King Louis XVI himself approved the French Order of the Cincinnati, which was organized on July 4, 1784. Up to that time, the King of France had not allowed his officers to wear any foreign decorations. He immediately, however, made an exception in favor of the emblem of the Society of the Cincinnati. Membership in the Order was so eagerly sought that it soon became one of the most coveted in Europe.
George Washington was elected the first President General of the Society. He served from December 1783 until his death in 1799. The second President General was Alexander Hamilton.
The Society of the Cincinnati has always been considered the premiere lineage society in the United States. Its members include many of the most distinguished military leaders and civil servants in the history of the country, beginning with twenty-three of the fifty-four signers of the U.S. Constitution. It is salient to note that The Society of The Cincinnati is the oldest continuous military society in North America.
The Cincinnati were integral in establishing many of America's first and largest cities to the west of the Appalachians, most notably Cincinnati, Ohio and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The first governor of the Northwest Territory, Arthur St. Clair, was a member of the Society. He named Cincinnati to honor the Society, and to encourage Society members to settle there. Lt. Ebenezer Denny (1761-1822), an original Pennsylvania Cincinnatus, was the first mayor of the incorporated city of Pittsburgh (elected 1816). Pittsburgh grew from Fort Pitt, which was commanded from 1777-1783 by four original of the Cincinnati.
It seems to even hold official rank, in the United States, where it is illegal to have such hereditary honoraria!
"Full members of The Society of The Cincinnati are the only United States citizens to hold a Federal civil rank, equivalent to just under that of a commissioned officer [all this though they are just civilians hereditary related to something that happened 200 years ago. It's basically saying 'if your great great grandfather was our version of a knight, you deserve special blood consideration and diplomatic OFFICIAL precedence--instead of just private group precedence--in the United States!]:
Even more official aristocratic U.S. precedence is given to the President General, head of the Society of The Cincinnati:
"The President General of the Society of The Cincinnati (General Society), who is elected to a three year term of office, holds a civil rank equivalent to a Federal territorial lieutenant governor. The basis for this is Congressional Order of January 29, 1885 and was necessary to determine protocol and seating arrangements at official diplomatic functions."
"While no official record has been made public, it is estimated that membership is roughly 3,700 worldwide today, including many living former Presidents of the United States, cabinet members, and their eldest sons. Broader-based organizations have been created, including the Sons of the American Revolution and the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR). The only U.S. President who was a true hereditary member was Franklin Pierce [Barbara Pierce, his heir, married George H. W. Bush] (George Washington and James Monroe were original members) and Ronald Reagan was the last U.S. President to be granted non-hereditary, honorary membership as a sitting President by the Society of The Cincinnati's General Society. George Herbert Walker Bush has been made an honorary member since leaving office.
...
Anderson House, at 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., houses the Society's national headquarters, historic house museum, and research library on Embassy Row--the most fashionable neighborhood in turn-of-the-century Washington--and across the street from the famed academic social circle, the Cosmos Club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_cincinnati
There's a book out there to be written about "Merovingian Masonry". If when you think "Masonry" you categorize it all as one 'brotherly' thing, you have missed the point already and huge chunk of what is STILL going in Europe is occluded from you. The original bloodline groups here, truly an OFFICIAL aristocracy with diplomatic precedence exists in the United States in a little known American aristocracy. The same thing can be said for the networks of sponsorship around Merovingian linked groups in general.
There are of course intergenerational unofficial issues in American wealth and prestige.
However, the Cincinnati stand out as a pre-Constitutional group of military officer bloodlines--who not only fought against the Hanoverian British Empire, who were seemingly supportive of a serious bid to bring over the Scottish Pretenders for a kingdom in America.
The Stuarts however refused--even though at one point a potential 'palace' for them was built in the southern Quebec/St. Lawrence area, area I believe, replete with their crest emblazoned in the floor.
However, when they didn't come over, the place was destroyed while still incomplete.
That story comes from a descendant of the architect who was commissioned to create the 'Stuart palace in North America', mentioned in one of Michael Bradley's books.
This should not be strange.
Actually another Merovingian/Templar connection, is the Portugese Braganza line. With its Templar connections (the Portugese state simply renamed the Templars instead of agreeing to disestablish them, and put them under the grandmastership of the Portugese royal house. This royal house in the centuries still maintained its grandmastership over this group of ex-Templar organiazation.
The Braganza, with their masonic/Templar Portugese networks, moved to South America. They 'colonized Europe' in the process-- making Portugal the Brazilian colony of the Brazilian based Braganza royal house instead of the New World being the colonial area. The Old World was made the colonial area for a while. Brazil is another strange state. It's Braganza king was additionally hereditary Grandmaster of Brazilian Masonry. He personally greeted Masonic renegades from the U.S. Civil War on the dock and shook all their hands for coming to his "enlightened Masonic monarchy". [_Lost White Tribes book]
Same Conclusion
Plus ca change in the layers of the Merovingian- Templar- Christian Masonic protectorate networks.
This little slice of occult Europe is so different from the view that Masonry is entirely a secular revolutionary phenomena.
There were indelibly several branches. The existence of "hard Catholic Masonic hereditary aristocrats" are almost categorically difficult for most to get their head around, though, it's there.
Show me where we're modern. It's all a lie on one level. We're 'modern' to the extend that the aristocratic groups have wanted us 'modern'. It has yet to mean an unconditioned form of public government at all.
I'm looking forward to real modernism when it occurs, instead of this aristocratic pantomime of it that we have had for 250 years or more.
heres one of the merovingian kings coat of arms,
notice anything familiar
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Armoiries_Charles-Martel_Hongrie.png
Ah yes, Liechtenstein. I have no idea whether all the medievel history and royal sex magic is relevant or an elaborate smokescreen, but Liechtenstein certainly does seem to be a major center of money-laundering and other financial improprieties, including terrorist funding.
Looking through my files, I find references to Nazi gold:
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/Elkhorn3.html
The authors interviewed "a former colonel in U.S. Military Intelligence who specialized in tracing enemy assets. He claimed that only a tiny portion of the Reichbank's gold ingots actually reached the Vatican Bank, while the rest was held in cooperative banks in Belgium, Liechtenstein, and especially Switzerland." It was only necessary to transfer the paperwork on the gold, not the gold itself. Since, by that time, Dulles knew his telegraph communications were being monitored by the British wiretap operation in New York, he instead used couriers to "ensure absolute secrecy in moving the foreign currency and the ownership documents out of Switzerland . . . special agents of the Vatican who had diplomatic immunity to move back and forth across both Nazi and Allied lines. . . ."
Bush-bin Laden links plus neo-fascists:
http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=3306
Intel sources are also revealing more paper trails linking George H. W. Bush to the now defunct Al Taqwa ("Fear of God") bank operated on behalf of Osama Bin Laden, his family, and some of his closest business associates.
The network of Swiss-based terrorist financiers is also linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and prominent European fascist leaders. The Al Taqwa bank was headquartered in the Italian Swiss enclave Campione d'Italia and had offices in the Bahamas. It ceased operations after assets were blocked by a US Treasury Department order, its assets were frozen by the Swiss government, and its banking license was revoked by the Bahamas.
Al Taqwa subsequently changed its name to Nada Management Organization. Al Taqwa and a complex web of affiliate front companies and brass plates in Switzerland, the Bahamas, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Jersey, Isle of Man, Turkey, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Croatia, Slovenia, the United States (Delaware and Texas), Germany, Belgium, Albania, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, Sudan, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Austria, Bahrain, Singapore, Thailand, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Liechtenstein were reportedly involved in funding terrorist operations around the world, including the procurement of nuclear material from the former Soviet Union through Baltic intermediaries.
According to a EUROPOL diagram obtained by WMR, these companies included Iksir Holding, SA (Italy), Asat Trust (Liechtenstein), Iksir Ltd. (Bahamas), Gulf Center (Italy), NASCO (Turkey), Nasreddin International Group (Liechtenstein), Akida Bank (Bahamas), MIGA (Switzerland), and Nasreddin Foundation (Liechtenstein).
And a distinctly questionable set of talks on the future of Chechnya:
http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/peace/peacenews_shermatova.htm
August 30, 2002
A recent meeting in the duchy of Liechtenstein on Chechnya saw prominent Russians and pro-independence and pro-Moscow Chechens go some way to burying their differences, as they laid out a compromise plan for the war-torn republic. . . .
The gathering took - organised in part by the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, two of his whose co-chairmen are the prominent American politicians Zbigniew Brzezinski and Alexander Haig - took place over three days in a small mountain village in Liechtenstein and was financed by the government of the duchy. . . .
Some reports of the talks have appeared in the Russian press - what follows is a detailed account based on information gleaned from participants at the meeting, who do not wish to be identified. . . .
Representing rebel president Aslan Maskhadov was his deputy prime minister Akhmed Zakayev. . . .
The participants did not intend to make the substance of the three-day meeting public, but a controversy over the involvement of the Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky pushed it into the spotlight. Berezovsky, who took a lead in formulating Moscow's policy in Chechnya in 1997-9, has or had close links with many of the participants in the meeting. After a bitter falling-out with the Putin administration, he now lives in London.
So when Alexander Goldfarb, a lawyer close to Berezovsky, turned up in Liechtenstein and said he was representing the magnate, the organisers asked him to leave. He did - but only after a protracted argument. The others were afraid that a link with Berezovsky would devalue their meeting in Moscow. Goldfarb was more closely involved in a separate meeting between Rybkin and Zakayev in Zurich.
Berezovsky, Goldfarb, and Zakayev are currently, of course, all up to their ears in l'affair Litvinenko -- which causes that reference in the second quote to "the procurement of nuclear material from the former Soviet Union through Baltic intermediaries" to have a strange resonance. (Among other things, Berezovsky has ties to the Baltic states -- that's where he took Neil Bush to peddle his educational software last year.)
At the very least, it does seem that Liechtenstein holds a certain attraction for scoundrels.
You guys do realize that you can walk across Liechtenstein between lunch & dinner without breaking a sweat, right? I know I was in Switzerland in the morning one day, and then in Austria a few hours later, and I know I saw the signs announcing the kingdom, or grand duchy, or whatever Liechtenstein was calling itself...
(Just a little perspective, between all the magical heraldry...)
And, yeah, I know I occasionally reprint some text, but only to illustrate my point, you see...well, okay, fine--if that's the consensus, I guess I'll live with the density. How about italics at least?
And that leaves...
Luxembourg!
Not to be confused with Rosa Luxemburg. Or Lexus. Or Fluxus.
And let's not forget... Branson!
You know, I think in the end the only person found not connected with nasty bloodlines, conspiracies, pedophilia, ritual slaughter, and bad music in Branson will be Thelonious Monk.
And the only "clean" place to live is the North Pole.
In fact, I think they recently released a box set, Thelonious Monk Solo at the North Pole.
Methinks that "anonymous" of the massive data dump has been imbibing rather too much of the Larouche Guelphian liquer mixed with the Twyman absinthe. It produces a decidedly elevated "high", but let's not mistake it for reality.
A while ago there was a CONSPIRACY RESEARCHER on NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL RADIO ("saturdays with kim hill"?)
and he believed NO CONSPIRACY, he ridiculed THEM ALL... but when asked
"which of the conspiracy theories made you think it could have been one?"
he said:
"The death of Princess Diana ... he was almost certain that it was foul play"
Anonymous said...
A while ago there was a CONSPIRACY RESEARCHER on NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL RADIO ("saturdays with kim hill"?)
and he believed NO CONSPIRACY...
I've got another one, the ever so level-headed Joe Bageant has finally thrown in the towel and joined our paranoid ranks. Joe describes his reluctant conversion in Somewhere a Banker Smiles (Muffled noises from the ranks of the babbling paranoid)
December 6, 2006
It's hard as hell to keep conspiracy theories out of one's mind these days. And I'm not talking about "Who really brought down the Twin Towers? or the "Are Zionists behind the Iraq War?" kind of stuff. The booger stalking my ragged old mind these days puts both of those in the shade. And it runs like this:
Is the consumerist totalization of this country and the world really a conscious plot by a handful of powerful corporate and financial masters? If we answer "yes" we find ourselves trundled off toward the babbling ranks of the paranoid. Still though, it's easy enough to name those who would piss themselves with joy over the prospect of a One World corporate state, with billions of people begging to work for their 1,500 calories a day and an xBox chip in their necks. It's too bad our news media quit hunting with live ammo decades ago, leaving us with no one to track the activities and progress of what sure as hell seem to be global elites, judging from the financial spoor we find along every pathway of modern life.
In our saner moments we can also see that it does not take dark super-centralized plotting to pull off what appears to have been accomplished. Even without working in overt concert, a few thousands of dedicated individual corporate and financial interests can constitute a unified pathogenic whole, much the same as individual cells create a viable dominant colony of malignant organisms -- malignant simply by their anti-human, anti-societal nature. We don't see GM, Halliburton, Burger King and CitiBank lobbying the state for universal health or clean rivers, do we? But mention unions or living wages, and the financial colony within our national Petri dish shape shifts into a Gila monster and squirts venom on the idea and shits money all over Capitol Hill. I looked at all this as coincidence for years until the proposition finally strained credulity so much that I threw in the towel and said, "Fuck it. There is only so much coincidence to go around in this world."
Notice what finally got to Joe (aside from my frequent requests to join us here on the outskirts of civilization): the weight of coincidence was just too much for the rational mind to carry. This is what gave Jeff such a burst of momentum and credibility when he launched The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11, not the zany explorations of the rituals of the Dark Side. Yeah, the quirky trails of DMT and other esoterica are fun (I've been down those paths many times myself, in an earlier, unsuspecting life), but you still have to use your head, even after you've fed it.
Common sense is what I'm talking about here. We don't need to grasp for hidden straws when the truth is hitting us over the head every day. I was arguing the basic truths of socialism with my friend the other day, and his response gave me some perspective, or at least some distance from the beast's belly, so that I could see my argument through his eyes:
Obviously the media as a whole frequently operates as a propaganda system for various entrenched interests - but there are other groups out there that have an interest in clean, cheap energy and avoiding the effects of global warming - and the media itself is going through a period of great change.
I think its important to remember that the US is an extreme case as well - things like universal health care, for example, are normal everywhere else in the developed world.
Yeah, America is an extreme case, the most extreme example of robber barons running a country in the history of history--looking for evidence of narco-syndicates and ancient bloodlines is small potatoes in comparison. The holy grail is not discovering who is descended from the fish people, it's in understanding that the entire wave of crisis--ecological collapse, poverty, despair, war & disease--is not only avoidable and unnecessary, it's a manufactured crisis.
I suppose we could spend our energies and our time "investigating" the dynastic chains of secret handshakes through history, but we could also choose to confront the official story and say, "Wait a minute. This is fake news they're feeding us. If we took half the defense budget we could fix the world." But that's not a very sexy position, is it? Much more exciting is the search for reptilian shape-shifter spoor.
Much more productive as well.
I know that sounds insulting to those off on those chases I've just ridiculed, but I'm not saying that the crazy stuff isn't true. My point is that nothing is going to get fixed that way, and that we do have the means to solve the world's problems, if only we can get the world's attention long enough to explain both the problem and the solution.
if only we can get the world's attention long enough to explain both the problem and the solution.
That is an awfully big if, Mr. Cuttlefish.
Just how do you propose to compete with Bread & Circuses?
Please answer in your own words without referring to lofty, obscure references and in a paragraph, or less, please.
I like "Grimaldi Burger"'s nickname--and his concern.
I, though currently an egregious example of verboseness here in this instance for the record, actually have more of a Zen ethic when it comes to social movements--which is what "Grimaldi Burder" is really talking about. A recent haiku for instance:
I will circle back
To entangle in trivia
This enlightenment
I think it has been said before here, perhaps better, though you have to have a plan of action and ideals. People aren't going to shift or change simply out of "Rigorous Intuition Fear 2.0" if they have nothing to reach for at the same moment.
So I pointlessly continuing the fear side of the equation only ;-) (just kidding, I don't think its pointless because its...), the "what we're up against" sort of things, because I know it is useful in part for those who ponder to come up with more ideas, who to integrate, what to consider. This is mainly of course for those who want ideas and who do read and follow up:
Luxembourg AND Libya: the U.N. creating a Sufi theocracy, modernist people creating imperial territory
Other 'modernist monarchies': like Luxembourg, Belgium, Norway, even Lybia.
This is only a discussion of Lybia and Luxembourg:
First some background on a form of elite power rule: graded induction and its seeming use in the Jewish Essenes:
Essenes before we get to Luxembourg, because it helps to explain some things about the Templars and their round robin way of looking after each other and likely breeding with each other and sharing projects based on bloodlines of secret faiths:
The Essenes (es'-eenz) were followers of a religious way of living in Judaism that flourished from the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. Many scholars today argue that there were a number of separate but related groups that had in common mystic, eschatological, messianic, and ascetic beliefs that were referred to as the "Essenes".
...
The accounts by Josephus and Philo show that the Essenes (Philo: Essaioi) led a strictly celibate but communal life − often compared by scholars to Buddhist and later Christian monastic living − although Josephus speaks also of another [outside] "rank of Essenes" that did get married (War 2.160-161). According to Josephus, they had customs and observances such as collective ownership (War 2.122; Ant. 18.20), elected a leader to attend to the interests of them all whose orders they obeyed (War 2.123, 134), were forbidden from swearing oaths (War 2.135) and sacrificing animals (Philo, §75), controlled their temper and served as channels of peace (War 2.135), carried weapons only as protection against robbers (War 2.125), had no slaves but served each other (Ant. 18.21) and, as a result of communal ownership, did not engage in trading (War 2.127). Both Josephus and Philo have lengthy accounts of their communal meetings, meals and religious celebrations. From what has been deduced, the food of the Essenes was not allowed to be altered (by being cooked, for instance); and they may have been strict vegetarians, eating mostly bread, wild roots and fruits. [citation needed] After a total of three years probation (War 2.137-138), newly joining members would take an oath that included the commitment to practise piety towards the Deity and righteousness towards humanity, to maintain a pure life-style, to abstain from criminal and immoral activities, to transmit their rules uncorrupted and to preserve the books of the Essenes and the names of the Angels (War 2.139-142). Their theology included belief in the immortality of the soul and that they would receive their souls back after death (War 2.153-158, Ant. 18.18). Part of their activities included purification by water rituals, which was supported by rainwater catchment and storage."
A lot of that sounds like Templars which were graded induction groups of warrior mystic monks, collective ownership (though not impoverished!), and "outside ranks" of lay helpers who were work forces while the core was a monastic Druidic like caste of religious workers and leadership. etc. I expect (as others) that the Templars, were a continuation of this that went underground. That is why they supported the Albigensians, which had a similar ranked religious and laity framework. The Templars by default refusing to aid in their destruction even when ordered by the pope--though they couldn't really come out and say "we don't believe in you Pope" their actions of protection and infiltration and foot dragging within the Albigensians are known. Many Albigensians fled, with the Templar conquest, and aided it, of the Balearic Islands in the Mediterranean as well--which occurred during this time.
To Lybia: perhaps the most interesting:
First Lybia
Lybia was a monarchy created by the U.N.! King Idris WHO WAS BLOODLINE SUFI LEADERSHIP Idris I ( (March 12, 1890 - May 25, 1983) was the first King of Libya, reigning from 1951 to 1969. Born Sidi Muhammad Idris al-Mahdi al-Senussi, he was the grandson of Sayyid Muhammad bin 'Ali as-Senussi, the founder of the Senussi Muslim sufi order. [The U.N. 'chose' him as king. Bet you didn't know the U.N. gave itself that right, to create kings much less theocracies, eh?]
The Senussi or Sanussi refers to a Muslim political-religious order in Libya and Sudan founded in Mecca in 1837 by the Grand Senussi, Sayyid Muhammad ibn Ali as-Senussi (1791–1859). Senussi was concerned with both the decline of Islamic thought and spirituality and the weakening of Muslim political integrity. He was influenced by the Wahhabi Movement [which may be actually a Sabbatean/'Jewish ' bloodline heresy <---read the link if you didn't know about Shabbtai Tzvi global goals of infiltration and destruction of all world religions, which fit right in with mostly 'Gentile' Illuminati goals], to which he added teachings from various Sufi orders.
From 1902 to 1913 the Senussi fought French expansion in the Sahara, and the Italian colonisation of Libya beginning in 1911. The Grand Senussi's grandson became King Idris I of Libya in 1951. In 1969, King Idris I was overthrown by a military coup led by Colonel Muammar al-Qaddafi. A third of the population in Libya continue to be affiliated with the Senussi movement.
You like cheap easy themes, IC? Here's one:
You should know that the Muslim world and the Sufis in particular are "what the Christian esoteric aristocrats want" a bloodline based religion and state, ruled in graded induction.
I would agree with Craig Heimbichner in his _Blood on the Altar (on the OTO history) that by the 1930s, that is exactly what the internal and highest groups of the Roman Catholic Church leadership has become--by OTO infiltration. The ex-Roman Catholic Church is already turning itself into a graded induction framework run by what are in effect ritual sex and child sacrificers. Not that they are Catholic (which was the 'traditional' call of the Pope as the anti-Christ, etc., within European parochial repertoires of protest and history), that they are another religion that is taking Roman Catholic forms and will maintain them on the outside.
Here's how it went down in Muslim religion, without necessarily the 'update' of two faced religions like in the RCC:
First, most of Muslim sufi orders are graded induction forms of religion, perfect for cell formation and knowledge elites and maintaining ignorant masses as their model already. Second, in addition to that theme, they are bloodline based in leadership and in doctrine that it "has to be so." Third, another theme is governmental power in addition to religious power being organized on the same manner. Muslim heritage states are all heritage of bloodlines from the Mohammad family. Sufis are the same, hereditary religious orders where the hereditary is part of the dogma of leadership, per se. This is not to say that all people living in the Muslim world want that. Far from it. Most want competitive democracies and to be left alone by European destruction of their economies. However, it is what their elites want to engineer over them, and is what Europe wants to engineer over them.
The British Corporate Empire went hand in hand with propping up this kind of religious rule against "European ideas" of democracy.
Britain was regressive everywhere it touched--even at home (in Britain, where universalistic adult voting rights didn't even exist until after WWII! 'Mother of Parliamentary democracy' my ass. Britain is a joke. The Magna Carta mythology: it didn't benefit anyone except the 1% of aristocrats until the mid 1600s, who were of these bloodlines mind you [read the Magna Carta Sureties, by Weis], and its extension was 'not in the game'--it was still opposed well into the 1600s when its first test cases of extension (for knights actually, not for commoners!), and all through the 1700s it didn't apply for instance--the categorical disbanding of all unions in Britain in 1799.; and as said with the francise so limited in Britain until after WWII, Britain is perhaps the worst offender of false democracy: all of the institutions, none of the reality of participation.
Back to Sufi. Note the Templar dates and locations are the same?
"Sufism, during 1200-1500 CE, experienced an era of increased activity in various parts of the Islamic world. This period is considered as the "Classical Period" or the "Golden Age" of Sufism. Lodges and hospices soon became not only places to house Sufi students, but also places for practising Sufis and other mystics to stay and retreat.
The propagation of Sufism started from its origin in Baghdad, Iraq, and spread to Persia, Pakistan, India, North Africa, and Muslim Spain. There were tests of conciliation between Sufism and the other Islamic sciences (sharia, fiqh, etc.), as well as the beginning of the Sufi brotherhoods (turuq).
...
Origins
Sufism is generally reckoned to originate in the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad although some Sufi teachers have claimed that Sufism pre-dates Islam and simply adopted Islam as a suitable vehicle. [Sound familiar to Crowleyism? And there is quite a bit of homosexual induction issues (not that I care about that, ha ha) as part of the induction in some). Almost all traditional Sufi schools (orders) trace their "chains of transmission" back to the Prophet via his cousin and son-in-law Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib except the Naqshbandi order which traces its origin to caliph Abu Bakr. From their point of view, the esoteric teaching was given to those who had the capacity to contain the direct experiential gnosis of God, and then passed on from teacher to student through the centuries.
Back to Lybia, the U.N. Sufi theocracy,
taking a page from the British Empire?
or something else?
The something else I'm thinking about is that there's a lot about Illuminism and Sufism that conjoined back in the 1700s. I'm not well versed on that though, though it should make you feel very eerie and concerned that the U.N. is creating what amounts to a 'secret society graded induction state.'
In this particular U.N. created Sufi graded induction theocracy it goes back to the line of Fatima:
Sayyid Muhammad ibn Ali as-Senussi (1787 - 1859), the founder of the Senussi order in 1837, was born near Mostaganem, Algeria, and was named al-Senussi after a venerated Muslim teacher. He was a member of the Walad Sidi Abdalla tribe, and was a sharif tracing his descent from Fatima, the daughter of Mohammed. ...He built a great mosque an a university which came to rival Al-Azhar, but which was shut down on the orders of Khadafy in 1984, the graves and remains of the Sanussi family being desecrated at the same time. After the death of Muhmmad as-Sanussi his son Muhammad al-Mahdi (1859-1902) became the new leader of the Senussi order.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_Ali_as-Senussi
To Luxenmbourg:
Inbreeding Buffet, same graded induction though for esoteric Christian aristocrats who think they are the Essenic House of David?
Luxembourg and Belgium and Norway are monarchies invented AFTER Napoleonic-English Wars, and with (in bold for IC...) the very very few families that surfaced as mentioned already. It all circles back increasingly to a few bloodlines. Luxembourg Buffet: admixed Bourbon and Hapsburg and Prussian (Hohenzollern) and Dutch/English (Orange) royal/imperial lines--AND NONE EXCEPT THOSE, they are first cousin marrying overlinks for the most part:
"The Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg (House of Nassau-Weilburg, agnatically a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon) consists of the extended family of the sovereign Grand Duke.
The medieval duchy of Luxembourg was elevated to a grand duchy in ['modern times'] 1815; William VI, [2] Prince of Orange ascended the grand ducal throne as its first holder.
...
The first grand duke invented in 1815, was already king elsewhere:
King William I of the Netherlands, born William Frederik of Orange-Nassau (The Hague, 24 August 1772 - Berlin, 12 December 1843), was the second King of the Netherlands (the first king was Louis I Napoleon Bonaparte). He was named 'Sovereign Prince' of the Netherlands in 1813, proclaimed himself King in 1815, and abdicated in 1840. William I was also the grand duke of Luxembourg.
King William I's parents were the last stadtholder William V of Orange and his wife Wilhelmina of Prussia. Until 1813, William was known as Prince William VI of Orange. In 1791, William [inbred] married his first cousin (Frederica Louisa) Wilhelmina, born in Potsdam. She was the daughter of [son of Illuminated 'Frederick the Great'] King Frederick William II of Prussia.
That's actually his own cousin, and ties into the formation of Prussia twice over. Remember Prussia is pretty new, sort of like the cancer of military consolidation internally within the Holy Roman Empire of Germany areas--leads right into actually who consolidated the 'nation state' of Germany (and who supported Hitler, the Junkers).
And who were the Junkers? The "German Knights Templar"--durable aristocratic bloodlines who had their own theocratic (and truly criminal) state, known as the Teutonic Knights. Little wonder that Teutonic Knights and Nazism went well together.
This is the line that goes into Luxembourg:
Frederick William II (German: Friedrich Wilhelm II; September 25, 1744–November 16, 1797) was the second King of Prussia, reigning from 1786 until his death. He was son of father Prince Augustus William of Prussia (the second son of King Frederick William I of Prussia, (i.e,. the Illuminated "Frederick the Great" AND GrandMaster of Freemasonry in his statelet--I forget exactly which masonic branch), and his mother was (equally imperial) Louise Amalie of Brunswick-Lüneburg. Even his mother's sister was married into his family: His mother's elder sister, Elisabeth, was the wife of Augustus William's brother, King Frederick II ("Frederick the Great"). That's double cousins in one generation. It's positively Egyptian royalty...
The medieval duchy of Luxembourg was elevated to a grand duchy in 1815; William VI, Prince of Orange ascended the grand ducal throne as its first holder. William was through his Prussian mother a descendant of the medieval heiress Anne, Duchess of Luxembourg,....
And who's Anne? The last imperial lines emperor's daughter into the 1800s.
Anne of Bohemia and Austria (1432 – 1462) was a Duchess of Luxembourg in her own right, and as consort, Landgravine of Thuringia and of Saxony. She was born into the House of Hapsburg, being the eldest daughter of Albert of Austria, the future Emperor-Elect.
Though small, the microstates are very mainline issues. They can show who is still around aristocratically with power enough to keep their little statelets. Do you think for one moment that national state conquests and particularly ruthless Illuminized groups who stop at NOTHING to achieve what they want, would not have toppled these little places unless they still have power in some sense that had to be accommodated--or were a faction of the whole thing? A future reflection of what they want, disguised as a throwback?
Moreover, you have to remember that within this imperial buffet that is Luxembourg, the dynasty itself an imperial one itself--long ago a short lived imperial Holy Roman Empire house:
"Anne ... also was a close descendant of the newly extinct Imperial House of Luxembourg, her mother being the last Luxembourg heiress, Elisabeth, queen of Bohemia, the sole daughter of Emperor Sigismund."
It was [this] Sigismund who started the Hollenzollern [Prussian] branch going with his favors [the very one that his later generations are still favoring 500 years later and intermarrying with, noted above in Luxembourg history]:
"The third and last German Emperor and fourth Bohemian king of the Luxembourg dynasty, Sigismund, second son of the Emperor Charles IV, was born in Nuremberg. Sigismund was margrave of Brandenburg from 1378, succeeding his father, until 1388 he handed it to his cousin Jobst of Moravia. After Jobst's death in 1411, he again became margrave of Brandenburg until 1415, when he granted the territory to Frederick I, burgrave of Nuremberg, making the Hohenzollern family one of the most important in Germany. Why the most important? Because that is who created Prussia, and that is who remarried back into Luxembourg imperial house.
Franconian branch
Beginning in the 14th Century, this branch of the family decided on expansion through marriage and a purchase of lands. The family gradually added to their lands, at first with many small acquisitions, such as the margraviates of Ansbach in 1331 and Kulmbach in 1340. However, the awarding of Brandenburg in 1417 and the inheritance of the Duchy of Prussia in 1618 was to eventually propel the Hohenzollerns from a minor German princely family into one of the most important in Europe. [More round robin:] The family were supporters of the Hohenstaufen and the Hapsburg rulers of the Holy Roman Empire during the 12th to 15th centuries, by which they were rewarded with several territorial benefits. [and still are intermarrying with them in the 1800s-1900s.]
Conclusion
The ink an octopus spills can distract you from the octopus (and perhaps these posts), though the octopus is very very small and can compress itself when required to slip through trying times though its current size is little clue what it can get into or get out of (<----cute video).
HOWEVER, this is not a major part of history as I said. It's like the Wizard of Oz, you get there and meet the bungling guy and say "WTF? Is this all you are?" This is however one of those '0.00001% butterfly effects' that because of their institutional placements have a hugely preponderant effect regardless of their small size.
_Rex Deus, a book recommendation: A very "pro-Rex Deus" book here, where I might be described as an anti. :-) However, a book you should read for a nice description of the "normally unexplainable" round robin of a handful of families intermarring for at least 800 years where geopolitics has very little to do with it. Regardless of changing geopolitics, even when they are enemies, they are doing the same thing. They are conserving some esoteric ideology or blood (or esoteric ideology of blood). However, ironically, that's the perfect recipe to turn themselves into drooling mongoloids as well (no offence to the real Mongols, or to pug nosed Reiner III). It additionally helps to remember that Europe, though it may be center of world networks and financial capital in the present, 500 years ago it was the most backward and disconnected place anywhere on the planet. It never had really an overarching 'brainwash' of a truly consolidated empire in its territory, and lots of the religions that never died just sort of kept moving to the frontier. Much of northern Europe only had a state experience in the past 500 years, which makes some parts of Europe more durable 'pagan' or potentially esoteric than Japan (which didn't have state formation (over most of the whole islands as one) until around 650 and onward). These people were part of that isolation. No one knew anything about it. No one wanted to. These were the nonentities then in that situation, and with more power flowing into their geopolitical territory THEY DIDN'T CHANGE, they just kept doing the backwater things they were doing with more power to do them, and now they are just more magnified nonentities.
Well IC...
It was the spreading Merovingian rule over what is now most of France that led directly to the creation of feudalism and its subsequent adoption elsewhere by other emerging power elites.
A quite powerfull structure that still controls and dominates most of our existing social and economic order throughtout the western world while using every and any means possible to keep that little fact absent from our minds or convince us that that there is something definitely wrong with them if it is.
It was they who first manipulated and engineered the radical shift that transformed purely defensive tribal warriors into a military caste bent not simply on the defence of those Merovingian elites themselves but on the ruthless and brutal supression and exploitation of the very ordinary people they once defended to enrich their new masters and themselves beyond their wildest dreams.
It was the Merovinginians that knew how to "capitalise", if you will, on their advantage in arms and to teach them similar methods for the added personal power and privlege they themselves would bestow on them in return.
To gain untold riches for themselves and with but a small portion of it create that greatest and most fantastic oxymorons in the English language known simply as "the nobilty"...hmmm? LOL
Now the Europeans, with some justification, can identify and trace most of their elites right back to those same feudal roots when it comes to explaining most of the social and economic ills that they quite knowingly grapple with even today.
Their socialist and liberal attitudes and leanings and staunch aversion to war are hardly naieve in that respect. Unlike Americans they actually know what they're up against.
We have seen but a partial list of some of the more notable "noble" scions and the kind of documentation that is so readily available on them and the kind of power they still exert, but how are we to actually account for even greater and far more dramatically growing discrepancies in the US which not only has no such historical background but one that was intended to be antithetical to precisely such deleterious and backward developments?
Or how we do explain the relentless efforts by the US government and media to try and compell Europeans to accept even lower standards than they already have or create the impression both at home and abroad that most Americans all firmly believe that they should?
Now just prior to Reagan taking office the US had only 16 billionaires. During the Reagan years that number first doubled, and then quadrupled.
All at a time, I might add, when most Americans were beginning to experience the kind of harsh cutbacks, wage reductions and serious rollbacks of hard fought gains in pension and medical benefits because everyone was supposedly "feeling the pinch" and simply had to do their part.
Today that figure now stands at over 400. We might well wonder at what has happened among the mere multi-millionaires while the quality of life and standards of living in the US could only be described as being in "free-fall"?
Now it would be nice to think that these wildly successfull individuals have all come about because of some truly remarkable growth of equal proportions in the economy to account for it but that is hardly the case.
If anything the Us economy has actually been shrivelling while all this has taken place. By and large much of the money that has kept the US economy alive has far more to do with ordinary Americans borrowing even more and spending the equity in their homes as if there's no tomorrow.
There's more than just a pasing similarity between that historical feudalism we were all taught no longer exists in grade-school and fascism in our present era.
The latter is merely the modern face of it whenever it emerges from all the shadows and clouds that have been planted in our minds to keep it from sight.
...but how are we to actually account for even greater and far more dramatically growing discrepancies in the US which not only has no such historical background but one that was intended to be antithetical to precisely such deleterious and backward developments?
Getting some really different perspectives on what the U.S. history has been, for a start:
_Treason in America, by Anton Chaitkin
is a good start. You'll probably need a drink after (or during) reading, or at least read in in a place (like I was) where you could put the book down scream profanity, and just sort of sit back and let it all sink in... U.S. official history is the most useless laughingstock comic book there ever was. A history based only on 'feel good myths' is part of the graded induction (<---another good book) and is more of how elites generate clientelistic cult subservience in the masses and how they artificially brainwash the masses) than provide them with actual knowledge. America teaches its history like a cult would. This is very very wrong.
However, as for the original ideals in the snipped quote, yes. What you talk about seems to have been an ideal promulgated about 'cross national brotherhood' and 'mutual anti-colonialism of all republics' and 'no entangling alliances' which were arrayed and formalized against royalism, Europe, empires, and colonialism by the Monroe Doctrine (actually written by Adams though) as well as ideals of Washington. Adams as well is the President who began to openly "curse" Masonry in public speeches, for failing on its goals by the 1830s in the U.S.
Later of course the ideals of Washington and the Monroe Doctrines anti-colonialism and anti-empire were enacted by the colonialists themselves even as they cited these people as representatives of the completely twisted policies. The Monroe Doctrine of keeping out others, became keeping out others to dominate them for the U.S. imperialist wing. "no colonialism" became "these people aren't fit for democracy,....yet....though we're working on it honest....as we colonize them for the good of creating democracy....later....perhaps..."
The mythos of America is pulled into colonialism and empire and delegitimates the wrong thing--American ideals---when the ideas are not being used at all, they are being twisted. For how this inside out switch occurred that first book is very important.
I'm with IC, these huge data dumps end up being, essentially, spam.
All of what you copy about Merovingians, etc. (and you've copied it here before) may be true, but it doesn't touch on the Fed. Or did it? I don't have time to go and parse every graf. You can worry about Merovingian blood lines all you like, but it occurs to me that it's a safe topic, whereas talking about the Fed isn't.
You know who your real masters are because you're not allowed to make fun of them. (shouted)
Heck, even WFB Jr. had one of his James Bondoid heroes planking the Q of E. Not much harm done, huh?
Not so the American presidents who've tried to dismantle the central bank schemes. They get assassinated.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7065177340464808778
is a nice survey of Fed history. Lays it on a little thick (check out the narrator's trench coat), but probably more pertinent than prolix examinations of powerless royals.
Not to disparage your efforts or your sincerity. I just don't think it's relevant to the current American dilemma, nor do I have time to plow through all your postings. We would all benefit if you'd summarize, and link.
Ah! FIRST, though who actually created the Fed. They were all mostly the intergenerational Skull and Bones families. Comb through the Skull and Bones list roster, and you will find that its not a separate issue at all. SECOND, the goals mentioned in _Tragedy and Hope, show that the "private central banking" was a common coin of familial control across nations in those 'formal' institutions. THIRD, you can still find that the private owners of the 'highest class' of private stock of the Fed are these international banks that are owned by these bloodlines. It was a quiet Senate Report or something that came out in the 1970s. You can find it on the web. I've got it on file here somewhere...I'll see if I can get you a cite.
Anyway. A few more geographic points about this topic of 'family states'.
Utah (Masonic) Theocracy and Bloodlines,
(Illuminated pro-British Masonic) Texas
(Sabbatean bloodlines) Israel
United States Presidency
1.
Related post on Mormon as Merovingian linked in the Smith line (particularly through the Goddards actually. Yes, as in "Goddard Space Flight Center.")
Utah, Mormon Masonic Merovingians,Broken Posse Commutatus; Religious Manchurian Candidates
So just what IS IT about Utah? Below, [actually at that above link] some quotes I thought all should be aware of about Utah history and politics and the 'national security' infrastructure and experiments there, and the bloodline and occult issues of the founders and higher-ups.
2.
And Texas
and Israel
The Masonic Origins of the Lone Star State of Texas, Utah, Israel...
author: connecting the stars, I mean dots...
arranged temporally, these separate geographical state autonomy attempts are interesting. They reward closer personal study of their interconnections, than really discussed here...
Texas --1830s
Mormon Utah -- by 1840s
Israel --- by 1940s
In putting this together, I would make a differention between Masonry and those other groups that have infiltrated Masonry over the years [Illuminists, Palladians, etc.], however, to utilize it for their purposes. [That fails to mean "one good, one bad"--only what it says--a differentiation though the same methods are used.]
TEXAS MASONIC PRIDE
---------------------
With the celebration of the new millennium, we have many things to look back on and be proud of. Masonry and the formation of the Republic of Texas are so interwoven that they cannot be separated.
...
From the first shot of the Revolution, fired in 1832 by a Mason, William J. Russell,....[oh shit...The Russells]
One of these, James A. E. Phelps, was among the five masons who met near the town of Brazoria and drafted a petition to the Grand Lodge of Louisiana that resulted in the founding of Holland Lodge, the first Masonic Lodge in Texas. [If any relation to the Holland Lodge in New York, thats a major lodge there that the Roosevelts, Astors, etc. all belonged to over the generations]
...
The Grand Lodge of the Republic of Texas was formed on December 20, 1837, in the Senate Chambers of the Capitol of the Republic in Houston. Representatives of the three lodges then chartered in Texas met, and Sam Houston presided. Anson Jones was elected as the first Grand Master. The first meeting of the Grand Lodge took place on April 16, 1838. From that meeting until Anson Jones, as the last president of the Republic, lowered the Texas flag on February 19, 1846, twenty-two lodges were chartered. Fifteen of those lodges survive today.
...
3.
UPDATE: ISRAELI whole capital is occult Masonic shrine;1960s plan for World Supreme Court
Date: 2004.09.20 12:02
Description: Here is what these groups planned to do with this building based on their 1960s statements, this building with a huge Masonic pyramid in the 'holy of holies' as a substitute for God in a Jewish temple arrangement, where 33 levels from darkness to light take you to where only retired judges have a non-public worship area near the pyramid base level....
If you haven't seen those pictures, you might be in for a surprise.
4.
On Mexican history, similar to this:
"The Grand Lodge of the Republic of Texas was formed on December 20, 1837, in the Senate Chambers of the Capitol of the Republic in Houston."
This is what happened in several instances in "Mexican democratic history." A very interesting book is _Puzzling Neighbors, dealing in a short book quite exhaustively what can be known about various 'occult republican' movements there and their external connections to the U.S. polities.
5.
08.Jan.2004 13:59
corporate dominance | legacies | police / legal cheney protests
Aristocratic houses behind the democratic institutions? An Analysis of Bush/Gore/Cheney
People may scoff that Kevin Phillips latest book, American Dynasty (2004) because Phillips calls the Bush family a royalist dynasty. "What?!" You may say, "we are at least democratic, there are no long term aristocracies in power!"
Or is that what the aristocrats, who designed your peasant schools and your peasant curricula, told you to think to make you compliant to their informal power? Read on, and hopefully the scales will drop from your eyes and guard you against still living royalists who ape democratic slogans.
Hopefully it will help you configure your sense of 'modern history' very differently: democracy as a work in progress slowly ridding aristocratic houses from manipulating the democratic institutions.
What if multi-generational families and aristocratic houses still exist and can be traced through the past two hundred years as easily as a royal blood line, connected with various political, scientific, financial, and corporate relationships—all intertwining?
I am arguing, the family state is still very much alive. It is only hiding out in a democratic wrapping as popular forms of governmental legitimacy have changed out from under it--from monarchy to 'democracy'--and many aristocrats want to see that discourse move away from democracy back to royalty, as it suits their interests.
While positionally speaking royal houses are still is busy with political marriages, conflicts, clientelistic sponsorships, inherited position and intergenerational inherited wealth, has much actually changed, in practice? Democracy seems a work in progress instead of something we already have. This globalized anti-corporate movement is finally ripping off the fake democratic mantle of these aristocrats who have been hiding out in the nation state for 200 years.
[
Nationalism and 'nationalism racism' hierarchies, historically viewed as a process of appeals, actually are inculcated by royalist houses and others of wealth to keep them from being thrown from power by democratic movements. This is very clear for instance in many European countries and the United States
Another interesting book:
The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic by Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker (2001)
back to the quote:]
This is far from a place to make the full case of evidence I am familiar with, though it should be more widely known that both George W. Bush, Jr., and Albert Gore are related to one another—and this relation goes back several hundred years to British royalty.
1. [Bush Beats Gore in Presidential 'Blue Blood' Stakes, Reuters, http://news.excite.com/news/r/001017/11/odd-royalty-dc. ]
If royal genes have anything to do with electoral success, then Republican U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush will be the next man in the White House, Britain's blue blood bible said Tuesday. Burke's Peerage, a revered guide to the breeding of the aristocracy, said both Bush and his rival Al Gore are of royal descent, but investigations deep into their heritage show Bush has far more noble and royal connections.
Bush is closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne -- including the King of Albania -- and has kinship with every member of Britain's royal family, the House of Windsor.
He is a 13th cousin of Britain's Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth and is a 13th cousin once removed of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles.
Bush's family tree can be documented as far back as the early 15th century.
He has a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII's sister Mary Tudor, who was also the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England.
"WELL ENDOWED"
"It is now clear that Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush have an unusually large number of royal and noble descents," said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's Peerage.
"In point of fact, never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances."
Brooks-Baker said there had always been a significant "royalty factor" in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, among others, all boasting blue blood links.
Democrat candidate Gore, who is currently lagging Bush by one point in opinion polls ahead of U.S. elections in November, has a less illustrious gene pool.
Being a descendant of Edward I, he [Gore] is also a cousin of former U.S. president Richard Nixon, who resigned from the White House in 1974 for his part in the Watergate scandal.
But Gore does have direct links to the holy Roman Empire.
He is a descendant of Roman Emperors Louis II, Charles II and Louis I and is therefore also a direct descendant of Charlemagne -- the eight-century Emperor.
The problem is, Gore's Charlemagne links also make him a cousin of George W. Bush.
2. Second, the Bush administration is particularly nepotistic.[ http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=13493 . Nepotism in the Bush administration By Barbara Ferguson, Arab News Correspondent ]
"In the Bush administration, governing is a family matter," writes Dana Milbank in The Washington Post, who reveals a list of appointments that looks, to many, like downright nepotism.
"Two weeks ago, the State Department announced that Elizabeth Cheney, the vice president's daughter, would become a deputy assistant secretary of state. Her husband, Philip Perry, last week left the Justice Department to become chief counsel for the Office of Management and Budget. There, Cheney's son-in-law will join OMB Director Mitchell E. Daniels Jr., whose sister, Deborah Daniels, is an assistant attorney general.
"That's just the beginning," notes Milbank. "Among Deborah Daniels's colleagues at Justice is young Chuck James, whose mother, Kay Coles James, is the director of the Office of Personnel Management, and whose father, Charles Sr., is a top Labor Department official. Charles James Sr.'s boss, Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao, knows about having family members in government: Her husband is Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and her department's top lawyer, Labor Solicitor Eugene Scalia, is the son of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
"Everybody knows the Bush administration is famously loyal. One reason Bush aides are like family is because some of them are family. Ken Mehlman, the White House political director, regularly calls his younger brother Bruce, an assistant commerce secretary, to get his input. 'He's a great adviser — I trust him like a brother,' quips Ken.
"Deputy White House press secretary Scott McClellan recently found himself in front of the microphones introducing a member of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, Mark McClellan. Scott called Mark 'my older, smaller brother,' and Mark replied: 'Thanks, my larger brother.'
"The Bush administration bloodlines begin at the top and flow through the rank and file," notes Millbank. "Secretary of State Colin L. Powell is the father of Michael Powell, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. The director of the Federal Trade Commission's office of policy planning, Ted Cruz, is married to a senior official in the US Trade Representative's office, Heidi Cruz. 'It's a little bit like having adjoining booths at the county fair,' she says.
"Also on the fairgrounds are FCC commissioner Kevin Martin, married to Cheney aide Cathie Martin, and Cheney aide Nina Rees, spouse of White House speechwriter Matthew Rees. The brother of National Economic Council staffer John Ackerly begins work later this year on the president's Council of Economic Advisers. OMB spokesman Chris Ullman served in the administration with his wife, Kris, a Justice Department official, until the couple's daughter was born 14 weeks ago. 'She's never worked in the administration,' he says of the infant.
"Then there are the inter-branch families. Chief Justice William Rehnquist's daughter is at the Department of Health and Human Services. Bush is now pushing the Senate to confirm US District Judge Charles W. Pickering as an appellate judge. He's the father of Rep. Charles W. "Chip" Pickering Jr., a Mississippi Republican. If successful, the Pickering duo would join father-son combinations Jim Bunning (a Republican senator from Kentucky) and David Bunning (confirmed last month as a federal judge) and Strom Thurmond (South Carolina Republican senator) and Strom Jr. (new US attorney in South Carolina).
"Some appointments have brought questions of nepotism ... Administration officials say the appointees are qualified in their own right." State Department spokesman Richard Boucher denied a report that the deputy assistant secretary position was created for Elizabeth Cheney.
Plus, excepting Dick Cheney (who flunked out of Yale his first year), the Cheney family for generations has gone to Yale and joined the secret society Skull and Bones. Be aware that behind the democratic presidency is a tyrannical monarchical group of families [many within secret society networks as backup] desperate to show their true colors.
6.
LINEAGE CHARTS: The CLOSET CRIMINAL MINI-MONARCHY of American Presidents
author: Springmeier's research
welcome to your world, already in progress...to somewhere....
and you wonder why there is endemic organized crime protected in the world, when you have these interbred elites who keep themselves above the law? Look to your inbred leadership for why the world is screwed up.
25+ American presidents related....
12 from Edward I; 3 from Henry II; 6 from French kings
...15 from the same Merovingan bloodline
here
Not sure about the "cheap and easy themes" thing (was I asking for or promoting such?), but I will answer the question of how to compete with "Bread & Circuses"--by making connections, actual, person-to-person communication with people who write & reach many thousands of people with their work. I do it everyday. While it's true that I've never corresponded directly with Jeff (it always seemed superfluous, when I write here so much), I do talk to most of the people I link here.
These connections are important because memes are contagious--the more I extend & receive ideas, the wider the circulation that they enjoy. In that spirit, here's a lifeline for the despairing (or those afflicted with tunnel-scopic Icke-ism): David Brin's analysis/prediction of our seemingly doomed future (Singularities and Nightmares). I sent this to Mr. Bageant, since I knew that his descent into our world (Somewhere a Banker Smiles) was painful to him, but it's a grand expander of perspective for all y'all. Here’s an excerpt:
My contention--running contrary to many prescriptions from both left and right—is that we should trust Locke a while longer. This civilization already has in place a number of unique methods for dealing with rapid change. If we pay close attention to how these methods work, they might be improved dramatically, perhaps enough to let us cope, and even thrive. Moreover, the least helpful modification would appear to be the one thing that the Professional Castes tell us we need—an increase in paternalistic control.13
In fact, when you look at our present culture from an historical perspective, it is already profoundly anomalous in its emphasis upon individualism, progress, and above all, suspicion of authority (SOA). These themes were actively and vigorously repressed in a vast majority of human cultures, because they threatened the stable equilibrium upon which ruling classes always depended. In Western Civilization—by way of contrast—it would seem that every mass-media work of popular culture, from movies to novels to songs, promotes SOA as a central human value.14 This may, indeed, be the most unique thing about our culture, even more than our wealth and technological prowess.
It's only my opinion, but I do believe that reading the rest of Brin's analysis is a far better use of our time than chasing Merovingians (What the hell would you do with one in the event you did catch it?) because, so armed, you can then spread the word even further, you big meme vehicles, you.
To Silverfox,
Even if your theory were correct about the Merovingian origin of feudalism, so what? How does knowing this help you/us/the world? Knowing our past so as to protect our future? With what? (Who's the patron saint of fishes, anyway? Oarwell, can you help me out here?)
Mighty Anon, I'll take everything you've posted at face value, and thank you for your scholarship.
You wouldn't by any chance be Charles Coulomb, would ye?
I must say, though, that any attempt to engage the American public with talk of Merovingian bloodlines will be met with either blank dismay or angry mutterings of "get the f*** outta here."
And these are the same "insubordinate Americans" who will save us, if we are to be saved, as I noted a few days ago.
They just don't do Merovingians (although I guess Dan Brown might differ).
There is a huge closed door of Bread & Circus (or, in fin de siecle America, creme brule & Le Cirque) blinding, numbing, stultifying John Q. What is the thin wedge that can be slipped under the door to pry it open?
I've argued in the past that a novel is, historically, the best method, although I reluctantly admit that nowadays a film is probably the only means of engaging a sub-literate public. Apocalypto might be "the most powerful film ever," but is probably not explicit enough in linking its thesis to post-millenial US politics.
Plus Mel's self-woven baggage.
I would think (ha!) a film beginning in Dealey Plaza, yup, the JFK hit, and brought up to the present, through the eyes of someone who was a small child in 1963 and who later attends Yale, gets tapped for Skull, and then becomes disillusioned (plot vehicle--by whom? His wife?) and tries to blow the whistle but finds all doors shut, the NY Time betraying him, until he's run to ground, ala 1984, and the American version of O'Brien tells him YO that's the way it is. (Before he puts a 9mm between our hero's eyes and the camera fades to a big flag waving in the sunset.)
As you can see from the above hackneyed drivel, I don't have the talent to write such a script. But I bet someone reading this blog does, and maybe such a film could be the "next step" for a public already "illuminated" by the 911 events.
Oliver Stone, call your office.
And now, back to your local stations...
IC, we posted with a certain ... synchronicity
(like wow), but the Bageant essay is next, then I'll check out Brin. As always, good linking.
St. Andrew is the patron of fisherfolk, himself just kind of minding his own business on the shore when he got recruited into that minor Essene cult. As far as fish themselves...maybe Mr. Irenic himself, St. Francis.
Uh oh, I've been outed as RC. Plus I know the current head of the Society of Cincinnatus, and have actually supped in Anderson House, which I thought rather musty.
But the potage de poissons was tasty.
ic, what part of the bread & circuses do you not understand?
american adult males, and increasingly females, devote a substantial amount of their time watching, or are otherwise preoccupied with, sports, and that's just one example, albeit a pertinent one, of circuses.
think about how powerful a form of control sports are in american society? does joe fat fffnn blow subscribe to bageant's writings? of course he doesn't because bageant the merovingian is not bread & circuses. you writing to bageant and other merovingians isn't going to dislodge and unplug the somnolent couch potatoes.
Oarwell,
I wouldn't discount your ability to write that screenplay; after all, what's the competition? And thanks for St.s Andrew & Francis, two of my favorites, but I was actually looking for the saint of the lowly fishes themselves. I suppose Francis had that Dr. Doolittle thing going, on second thought.
Bread & Circus Person (gotta love the Latkes, btw),
I understand the mass appeal of these somnolent shows, but folks are waking up; you can't trust media reports for anything, including those pronouncing widespread stupidity & apathy. It just ain't logical. As for Joe, he's not a fish--he's a fightin' reiver (Drink, Pray, Fight, Fuck). And he's not continuing that tradition, so you see, there's hope...no matter what your sources tell you.
Here's a nice Banionism, culled from that essay:
"It's too bad our news media quit hunting with live ammo decades ago..."
I quibble with his cell culture analogy: parasites is more apt. But anyone who quotes Michael Parenti is already on board the train.
"Latkes" must realize that we'll never get everyone on board. You only need a small percent, 2 or 3 or maybe 10%, because that's all that matters, anyhow. It's not class consciousness that makes me say that: it's just plain reality. Most people WANT to watch the NFL rather than have to read something. Only a minority read anything of importance: public schools, mission accomplished.
That's what makes memes so powerful, and that's why Jacques Ellul in 'Propaganda' made the astounding but true observation that it is the most highly educated who are most susceptible to propaganda, even though they might think themselves most resistant. The more tied in you are to the Kulturamoton (pardon the clumsy neologism), the Videodrome, the more you tend to crave their propaganda.
Which was true until the internet came around. Remember the way it used to be, how you'd obsess over a recondite passage in a Vidal essay, or a Flora Lewis column,
or search the bookstore racks for some Chomsky? Not no more--the internet is a Walmart of propaganda, counter-propaganda, spoof propaganda, and even, here and there, real information (and probably a lot of that industrial-sized Waldorf salad above is real, if not entirely germane, info). Our search has ended, and those of us who viewed things with suspicion all those years have (esp. since 911) had our worst fears crystallized.
That's what was funny about that Nation disinfo piece that made the rounds last week, the author asking how so many millions of Americans can function with such a high-level of cognitive dissonance? If millions of us think our government elites are guilty of mass-murder, how do we live with that?
Ah, there's the kicker: he didn't say "elites," did he? Only "government." And there's a world of difference, without that modifier: none of us think the postman or the lady down at DMV or the night-shift nurse at the VA or even our own local benighted representative is involved in elite machinations. It's because we harbor an abiding optimism about our fellow men, including virtually everyone outside the cabal, that we can function.
The homicide detective tries to solve his case, not imagining for a second that all of society has become murderous. Once he has solved the case to his satisfaction, he know he needs to have amassed enough evidence to convince a judge and jury.
In fact, it's not cognitive dissonance at all, when you think about it. We DON'T
hold two contrary thoughts simultaneously. We know
quite clearly that the bad guys, the elite machinators, and the good guys, all the rest of us, are two distinct groups.
We might be amazed that a cabal has seized control of power, but we don't confuse the cabal with the grunt in Fallujah or your average FBI guy. We are comforted by the fact that the more the cabal tries to squeeze us, the more people become away theirs a boa wrapped around their necks.
As more and more of the rest of us, that 2 or 10% who read and think about issues of governance, figure out just how deeply rigged the game is, then the tiny minority (no more than 10,000, all told, if that) of cabalists find themselves increasingly encircled, isolated and frightened.
Hold up mirrors to their attempts at terrorizing us, and kill them with their own gorgon-visage.
Are some of the posters perhaps working on a book?
A book that sits on their hard drive when suddenly - Wow, here's a chance to get some of it 'published'!!
And out it spews...chunks at a time.
Essay posting seems misplaced in the comments section of a blog. It has all the appearance and effect of SPAM.
Why not spare the indulgence, link to your website and post a summary of your thoughts?
It's not that difficult and would be more impressive.
i'm sure many are familiar with the movie "from hell" and the subject matter - basically the theory that the jack the ripper murders were ritualized killings meant to terrorize in hopes of playing down the fact that a prostitute was carrying a catholic heir to the throne. this was done with full authorization of the secret intelligence network of the queen through the apparatus of a masonic lodge.
i noticed that this new information on diana being snooped on by intelligence agencies around the time of her demise has been coupled by this rash of murders of prostitutes in London. some are calling more gruesome than jack the ripper. i could not help but think of parallels and i can't help but think this is a repeat to drive in a subliminal point(morphic resonance)
To anono 5:05--touche.
You're right, I am writing a book. Working title: "Merovingians Ate My Toyota." It's written from a Carolingian perspective.
anon 5:50 pm mentioned Kramer.
Kramer = Michael Richards = 33 degree mason. I always wondered, why him? Now I see. That "apology" was sooo fake. Apparently he's to be used to make us all realize we have deep seated hatred for "niggers" just under the surface that's ready to explode at any time. Hmmm. I don't have that anger. Do you all? I don't watch TV anymore at all. But I do keep up with the latest bullsh*t.
As for all the data dump stuff - I'd rather read the book, easier on the eyes.
ps I've had trouble getting on your radio station. Any body else having that problem?
I wasn't even going to post this, as I thought it redundant, through IC and perhaps many others still don't see the point.
IC sayz:
It's only my opinion, but I do believe that reading the rest of Brin's analysis is a far better use of our time than chasing Merovingians (What the hell would you do with one in the event you did catch it?) because, so armed, you can then spread the word even further, you big meme vehicles, you.
I wanted to (once more) clear up something. No where have I argued that these 'family states' are the core phenomena that is going on.
So take that back. That's your own view which speaks a great deal about you, instead of what I posted.
History is mostly 'socio-politcal-ideological- institutional' change issues left out from all the above, instead of these strange anchoring families that happen to be an important part of European history. These families, because their organizations of gnostic welters of esoteric ideologies and the occult from the 'ancient world' had bloodline transmission as part of the dogma, made that important to some people.
However, increasingly as Byzantiam attempted to reestablish some sort of combination of sponsorship, reformation, and repression selectively for a state religion that absorbed and stripped simultaneously anti-state features, some just went underground.
Or since transport is really easy in the Mediterranean, they could simply leave and do their own thing elsewhere. And they survived at least around the late Roman Empire contexts as we increasingly know.
Whether we like it or not, its there.
First, since it is so widely ignored instead of because it was being offered as a metanarrative, is one rationale for mentioning it.
Second, it's worth mentioning since it's a particularly strange theme because its a static phenomena relatively speaking, in a welter of historical change. They attempt to 'readjust' themselves to re-coopt; built institutions, or work reinterpretation on others institutions or ideas; make sure they are leaders of some different movement, make sure that they categorically avoid sponsoring it; or actively go out and repress it. They are riding along with us in history, and the 'they' would have many different internal divisions, mutual self-hatreds, etc.
As the person who brought up the issue of the institutions of the U.S. Federal Reserve, with my caveat, the larger phenomena are the pseudo-formal institutions in which these smallish families are a part. That's what I'm talking about here-- NOT the families themselves which are relatively and by themselves unimportant. Mixed with their history of being linked in esoteric cults and secret societies, that makes them important instead of visa versa.
The formal institutions that 'we' have formalized are born of contention, and we are all a part of that. They are of relative degrees public serving or simply informal private clientelism serving.
Sometimes they are organized for the public, or by the public, though in some very spectacular cases (the U.S. Federal Reserve is one example) in many cases their entire invention is at odds with public pressure.
In huge 'managerial' attempts at institutions, which seem to be intentionally designed to avoid public or local input or gatekeep against it, I would theorize that this is where it is easier to see many of these families. That is the point, and its opposite can be demonstrated I think: they would want to stop something that has overwhelming support from being institutionalized or changed, unless it enhances their clientelism.
Thus, the larger issue is the octopus itself instead of just the head. It's the general 'social field' around these families that is at issue.
I attempted to indicate right off that because what makes these families special is their endless recycling within these secret socities. You can't separate the secret societies from the families in other words. It's one clientelistic network. We're talking about what they do, what are their institutional effects, and who they mutually self-sponsor. What really interests me is plumbing their mutual divisions with each other and why this comes about and what are the motivations of them and their changes.
I could care less about the families per se.
What is interesting is the real phenomena of 'families embedded in secret socities for multiple generations as collective inbreds.'
That's what we're talking about here.
Someone else might want to debate the fine points about details of Merovingian bloodlines and whether this chart or that chart is right, though that is a side issue from the parapolitical point of 'families embedded in secret socities for multiple generations as collective inbreds.'
Oh, in addition add 'who might think that anything they care to do is legitimate' because they have an ideology that (just two examples):
[1] they are the House of David or the 'best, original Christian leadership,'
[2] an ideology of intentional two-facedness as a test of how they can 'turn other religios frameworks and symbolism to their own, combined with global religious infiltration (Sabbatean families/dynasties). The founder of Turkey, Kemal Attaturk, actually was a military officer who founded a secret society first, then later helped to found Turkey as a 'secular public state?' Come on. He was likely from a Sabbatean bloodline, and was not really animated by secularism, but animated and was path for others for religious destruction because it was a 'release of the lights' in Sabbatean occult-speak to remove the 'dead containers of all religions' to free God. They were and are antinomian in other words. Many Sabbatean bloodlines were behind the attempts to destroy Russian Orthodoxy in the USSR. Rabbi Wise (who attempted to convince FDR that "there's nothing we can do about the coming Jewish Holocaust' here in the USA), was from a Sabbatean bloodline. The whole Zionist movement was run by Sabbateans, and worked hand in glove with the Nazi Party (see Ben Hects's Perfidy; Black's The Transfer Agreement; or _51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis; or read some Barry Chamish books). Sabbateans are not Jews. They are Sabbatean, and they worship if anything themselves and their bloodlines because Tzvi was their Messiah, and justifies everything, and they move in and out of other religious faiths as a test of their own. They prey on destruction as part of their religion as a sign of favor from God. Instead of worshiping God for example, they (this is literal) intentionally sin because that is the quick way to foregiveness. They are so incredibly antinomian that they institutionalized wife swapping and bastard children so they became once more a 'social field' of different families held together by their common practices. Other examples of holding celebrations (instead of mourning) on the anniveraries of the destruction of the Second Temple, etc. then having an orgy, etc. There are records of these things. They are additionally called Domleh, and attempted to get some publicity recently in Turkey.
[3] The Druze are interesting as well, though that's not particularly European linked, though may be early Christianity survival hidden under many layers. They are still very secretive graded induction sort of people.
[4] Another early Christian survival were in the marshes near the mouth of Iraq at the Persian Gulf, though mostly destroyed in the past half century.
There are several others I could cite (Church of the East and West, in India).
Thus, there are many examples of the phenomena I am talking about, instead of talking about exclusively the Merovingians. They're just one case that came up because of poor Grace Kelly.
There are many intergenerational cloaked groups, who are (duh) not Merovingian.
In fact, some would like nothing better than to destroy each other--even though they are all forms of graded induction groups. There seems to be, parapolitically, that I can tease out, a huge hostility (as expected) between Sabbatean groups and Merovingian esoteric Christian ultramontane aristocrats according to some Jewish rabbi research into these issues, work together in Illuminist groups. [search up Clifford Shack's website]
[5] Another group interests me. The historical Jewish Sanhedrin. In other cases (not really worked on this though it's something else staring us in the face), the potential 2,000 quiet existence of self-knowledge among durable ma'madot Jewish priestly castes of families, known as the Sanhedrin. Remember that rabbinates are post Temple destruction, instead of innately part of a feature of Judaism historically. Historically, there was a theocratic state where a hereditary elite were the judges of the Bible and of the law codes within it, and carried the authority to inflict punishment as well as were the only ones to enter the Temple directly. They switched out every year or so. Supposedly around 25 or so different families were like this, for centuries. You know they had a ritual sex act of impregnation of young girls in the Temple, hieros gamos style, who would be sent back to raise the child, then when it was an adolescent it was 'owned' by the priestly caste to teach for the next generation.
"Clean division" writing history would say the Sanhedrin simply vanished when the Romans destroyed the place after the 130s rebellions of Bar Kochba (SP?).
It ain't necessarily so.
[6] Another is the Desposyni. For instance, Eusebius, unless he made up this crazy story (he was after all state propogandist for psychopath Constantine I, founder of the Roman empire in the East later to be known as Byzantium)-- Eusebius in his Ecclesiastical History said that after Constantine was slowly allowing what was by then a Gentile-Christianity admixture to be sponsored, guess who turns up, even though it had been almost 200-300 years since The Romans had gutted Jerusalem and renamed it Aelia Capitolina and banned all Jewish people from it to attempt to pacify the Roman province?
Eusebius said a bloodline elite leadership cadre of representatives turned up, calling themselves the Desposyni.
The Desposyni (from Greek δεσπόσυνος (desposunos) "of or belonging to the master or lord"[1]) was a sacred name reserved only for Jesus' blood relatives. The closely related word δεσπότης (despotes) meaning lord, master, or ship owner is commonly used of God, human slave-masters, and of Jesus in the reading Luke 13:25 found in Papyrus 75, in Jude 1:4, and possibly in 2nd Peter 2:1 (Strong's G1203). In Ebionite belief, the desposyni included his mother Mary, his father Joseph, (and in the modern Protestant Christian perspective), his sisters and brothers such as: James the Just, Joses, Simon and Jude; in modern Catholic Christian belief, Mary is counted as a blood relative, Joseph only as a foster father and the rest as step-siblings or cousins.
As some asserted their descent from both king David and high priest Aaron, all male desposyni could have laid claim to both the throne (King of the Jews) and the office of high priest of Jerusalem. However, the Roman occupation of Palestine (Iudaea Province), with the collaboration of the Judean establishment (Herodians), made any attempt by a desposynos to rise to or seize political and religious power impossible or limited in scope."
They claimed they were hereditary leadership from James the Just. They said, as Jews of Jerusalem and leadership of Essenic Christianity, they had 'right of jurisdiction' over Constantine's newly state sponsored form of Christianity, so could they have just one bishopric (not called that yet I think) over Jerusalem.
The short of it is, Constantine said no.
So they went away.
So if Eusebius is correct, we have an example of a successful 'experimental' verification of such durable bloodline transmission. If they could handle 200 years when they were directly opposed, they can handle 1000 easily.
That was just six examples to show that it's not a Merovingian exclusive issue. Wrap your head around that.
There are many other examples with bloodline leadership cadres though they all fled in different directions. The Byzantine Christian Church and the (one among many bishopric nothing really special about it at all) Roman Catholic bishopric in the Byzantine empire are just a small part of the world and they knew it.
Nothing kept "Christian-Jewish renegades" and lots of other things that increasingly were repressed in "official Byzantine Christian Europe" from leaving.
However, Rome to get some of its historical power back sponsored Merovingians (who weren't Christians) as a strongarm for breaking away against Byzantium, and later as a continuing strongarm against expanding Muslim power across the Mediterranean with Carolingians. Why would supposedly the "Roman pope" do such a thing? Well, it may have family things once more. The Roman Senate, still in existence, was very hereditary and inbred. A lot of the early families of the Senate, simply went over and became major Church 'polticians' doing the same thing they were doing before in the Senate, in the Roman church institution. A lot of the Roman early papal and priest regalia was adopted wholesale from the Senate official state clothing, as well as wearing the purple, etc.
[7] So while the families in Rome might be considered another example of inbreds getting into the Roman version of the Church, and continuing their hatred of the capital move to Constantople and their political marginalization, other groups simply left the backwater of Europe that was incresaingly covered in invasion after invasion from the north, or from the sea, or from Muslim areas, ..
Other Gnostic or even Christian renegades fled to the far east (Iran or further; Caspian; India; even China had Nestorian Christians) or to the far west (Ireland-England-where it gets admixed in Druidic groups hiding out in Ireland mostly and Scotland; some indicate Essenic like Jewish culture survivals there as well at least until the Synod of Whitby in the 660s CE) and far north (Scandinavia/Russia/Baltic/Iceland where lots of pretty violent paganism (instead of violent state religion...) still existed and would until WELL after 1400 CE).
There's probably more of the real history of Christianity as well as Europe in the "heresies" plurality that survived than the effects of the world done by institutionalized Christianity. Food for thought.
Conclusion
What is interesting and boggling is the intersection of these families in 'democratic institutions' while a huge blackout exists on their very presence or the presence of those they have sponsored.
Many formal institutions are only pseudo-formal institutions because they are built selectively around how informal groups can formally keep power.
A lot of things are interesting about fluid history more than such strange 'stuck in a rut' static Merovingian, Sabbatean, Sufic, or (who knows about this) Sanhedrin things. Israel though, you can read news about it, wants to start up the Sanhedrin once more. That would mean of course they are thinking of springing some kind of "surprising survivals" of bloodlines on Jews? 2000 years? What is 2000 years to an inbred cult group? Nothing. That's the dangerous point. Dangerous because they will stop at nothing.
As said above this is one theme that is staring people in the face and they typically always blink at it, instead of attempt to stare it down and find out about it.
So I don't mind wasting a day or so out of my life presenting a cursory summary of my limited knowledge about the whole thing.
And Silverfox said, on the "spreading of Merovingians over France," the same thing happened with Normans in England/Scotland after 1066, as well as the effects of the Teutonic Knights into Eastern Europe, etc. That all three groups were tight bloodline invasions into these areas should be food for thought.
And as Oarwell said:
You wouldn't by any chance be Charles Coulomb, would ye?
No, not that I'm aware of. I don't think my likely arthritis, at that age, would allow me to type:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Coulomb
Oarwell once more:
I must say, though, that any attempt to engage the American public with talk of Merovingian bloodlines will be met with either blank dismay or angry mutterings of "get the f*** outta here."
Ah! Since I hopefully have explained some other examples of what I am talking about, since the general issue is not Merovingians, don't worry about that.
They will respond to the general issue of gatekeeping against and intentional destruction of their democratic institutions, that concept is easy to convey. Polls show they are pissed. Be a politican, read some polls, find out what they are pissed at and then you can find a way to phrase it better.
:-)
Then you decide how far you want to take it past "elite".... take your pick ( "inbred occult"; etc.) However, if its a social movement you want, and institutional change and protection you want, details about the enemies of democracy or how to recognize them by their chins or eyebrows are not the important bit.
Thanks. And in talking about this, I am aware it's sort of a "damned if I do, damned if I don't though" sort of proposition. Indulgence? I thought that RI would be at least more open to such things, which it is mostly, intriguingly so, so I bothered to post.
Yes, I have thought of a book, though it's not a priority presently in my hectic life which is absorbed in much else presently alas.
I think this will be my last substantive post on this thread about this.
I could get into microstate areas Navarre or Andorra (Andorra is "Navarre reborn as second tier tax haven," where literally the "Co-Princes" are the elected head of France and a Spanish bishop, which gets into interesting points when you know some of the French Prime Minister's bloodlines though I will only leave you to wide eyed ponder that, and I won't get into details. ;-) (Or how many know that Oliver Cromwell was a descendant of English royalty as well. Food for thought.) France is very much a "Grand Orient Republic", from Philip Egalite onward... England may have been that way since 1066...
Something on General Motivations Here
I've always been interested in these strange microstate survivals in Europe, mostly as an antiquarian interest at first, fascinated and wistful at examples of 'the few long term continuities' in Europe (what I thought!) that 'accidentally survived' (what I thought!) into the the 1800s.
When I found out that they were high bloodline issues, that was one more issue of interest, since I was interested in that.
When occult organization things connect to their foundation itself, and those occult things connect to "Christian heresies" as well as much later revolutionary periods, it's even more interesting.
When they are not 'accidental survivals', though represent something intentionally surviving, it's politically important about not falling for a "sleepwalking modernism", when it might say something entirely different about what "modernism" is and what that says about European elites to this day. Particularly since something called the "European Council of Princes" is taking up becoming an overt political force, in so many words, attempting to foist the "More Merovingian" Stuart line back into England instead of the surrogate Hanoverians there. [the best ghostwritten book ever: _The Forgotten Monarchy of Scotland, by Prince Michael Stuart. In his conclusion, the Belgian basically lays out "I want to come back and rule you bastards, if the British people will have me" in so many words.
Yes, I think particularly a good summary book--on all the Templar survivals into states and microstates--and then into the 1700-present world revolutionary period would be very interesting...
You'd have to talk about Switzerland's different cantons foundation (note it's flag?); Spain; Portugal; Monaco; London's City/Temple Bar; Ireland (Cristo-Druids); Scotland (protomasons and the Sinclairs; the earlier Scotish kings; the Norman ca. 1066 invasion bloodlines (to the present! Cheney is one of them by the way...); Lichtenstein; Teutonic Knights; Knights of Malta (that almost got a state after WWII!; and in the "United Nations" the are a non-voting member! They aren't a nation! They are a crypto-bloodline secret society that requires at leasts around 300 years proof of lineage justification, yet there they sit at the "United Nations"); some islands in the Caribbean (perhaps Tortola in the Virgin Islands--which might be named after one of the last Templar strongholds in the Levant, Tortola!; the durable Monsantos, in the Virgin Islands; de Tascher in the Caribbean and Napoleon brothers and their double marriage into the bloodlines via Josephine and her sister; the raiding of the Bastille for bloodline documentation--the first British/BEIC/Illuminati/"Nazi lists"
in Europe for mass liquidation; Bornholm in the Baltic (truly freaky); the Baeleric Islands in the Mediterranean, off Spain; Sicily and the "Vespers" and the Mafia; Malta and female earth mother cult site; Crete (bloodline issues of who got it and had more authority than the Templars to seemingly have them forced to sell it to someone...); the unexplained purposes of why some Crusades wanted to conquer Egypt right off and screw Jerusalem and the 'Jewish Holy land', food for thought--did Christianity start in Egypt?; was the 'real holy land' the area off Egypt across the Red Sea?; Akenaten; the theme of the bloodlines wanting to set up their own state in the Holy Land under their bloodlines; what to make of Ethopian Christianity; the Black Jews of Africa; the bloodlines of Byzantium (Constantine onward!, Caesaropapism incarnate, just what they like); lay lines in Europe and the Templar sites; multi-religious use churches in Europe; etc.
You see, it's sort of an exhausting plethora of topics that this touches in "Occult Europe." Carpal tunnel hell. :-(
And even if the Merovingians ate your Toyota LOL, the Carolingians quickly married back into them by the way to solidify their power...while the rest likely went into the Pyrenees and from that toppling the rest of Europe is still feeling the effects...
This stuff is interesting, and I didn't mean to disparage. Perhaps the length shouldn't put me off.
By the way, not that Charles Coulombe, this one:
http://www.cheetah.net/~ccoulomb/hermeticimagination.html
You might enjoy his site. He's a monarchist, really, and he has numerous pro-monarchy links (as well as some interesting essays on The Golden Dawn). Met him at a wedding a while back; ferociously bright, a former stand-up comic in LA, but no similarity to Kramer.
The monarchy links are here:
http://www.cheetah.net/~ccoulomb/monarchy.html
The link titles surprised me the first time I saw them. International Monarchist League...Sacrum Imperium...Royalist Party of America...Monarchist Society of America... very strange, to (most) American eyes. You would probably be intrigued by the "Almanach de Gotha" and the Almanach de la Cour." He even covers third world monarchies--Indonesian Sultanates and Indian Maharajadoms!
Enjoy.
Sorry. Monarchy links here:
http://www.cheetah.net/~ccoulomb/monarchy.html
Yikes. I just checked out the "Sacrum Imperium" site,
http://www.monarchieliga.de/
And I get this:
In memoriam Presidente Auguste Pinochet
Heute starb Auguste Pinochet und ich will keine Minute zögern, meine Gedanken in Trauer und Dankbarkeit auf sein Leben zu richten, ein Leben, das von zwei Affekten bestimmt war: Liebe zum Vaterland und Liebe zur Freiheit.
"Love for the fatherland and for liberty." Yuh.
To put it perhaps a little more succinctly...
Merovinginian = Feudalism = Capitalism
Got it yet?
Try this one on for size but be prepared to stay up late.
http://mypage.uniserve.ca/~synergy/toc2.htm
What a bloody nuisance links can be, well never say die or is that doh?
Curious isn't it? Didn't this somewhat unexpected drift start with Di and Dodi dying? LOL
http://mypage.uniserve.ca/~synergy/toc2.htm
Since Blogger has isisted on eating the last line of my last two posts I shall simply place it in the middle slap some quotes on it and see what happens...hmmm?
"http://mypage.uniserve.ca/~synergy/toc2.htm"
Sorry about any Yahoo trashcans or wherever your dead letter urls happen to take you.
It seems that I am unable to post this link for some mysterious perhaps even nefarios reasons. Please add toc2.htm following the synergy backslash.
This will take you to a site that is a complete text outlining the elistist and corporate ransacking of America backed up by quotes and information gleaned from all those same elites most favorite and trusted publications themselves. Forbes, the Economist, and the like.
Look, I'm sure the idea is maybe interesting, but it's still spam. It's not readable. Why can't a cogent argument be made of it, instead of a protracted Registry of Deeds document? Is sheer volume the proof in the pudding now?
Speaking of arguments, Silverfox, your "Merovinginian = Feudalism = Capitalism" is certainly shorter, but what's it supposed to mean? That the late-stage capitalism eating the earth is directed by Sirius-descended fish-men and we better just know that because...?
Both extremes (the 9000 page King Fecundo begat Princess Anesthesia begat...and M=F=C) are devoid of any argument whatsoever. What the hell is the point of all that stuff? What would you have us do now that we understand these essential truths? Crawl under a rock, buy some No-Doze, make some tartar sauce? What?
Much interesting reading, but:
To return, at the risk of giving everyone whiplash, by far the sledgehammer factoid of this latest Di death watch (for me) was the one which the kept media flashed at us for just an instant, like advertising's naughty attention grabbing busom, and which Jeff made note of: the Yanks making this weird noise about a national security cloaked audio peeping tom operation, Di as (main, partial or inadvertent?)target.
What's up? What are the messages? That the US intelligence [sic] community [sic], or their master(s) (if it or they exist) have some juicy damaging stuff (or maybe not) about - well, that's the mystery - and they're making - somebody - sweat?
Why is the black-spot message-dart hurled just now? And at who?
Could this be an indication that the British were beginning to signal terminal discomfort with the role of junior partner in high crimes and catastrophic policies, and that the US in return have played the you're- not-leaving blackmail card?
Which would leave the CIA buddy-competitors at M16 feeling royally screwed. In the back. Or was the dart-card merely for Blair and his gang? Betrayal in either case.
And would this signal that the US leadership is seriously, madly Desperate, their previous nukes in the quiver, grim-reaper, lord of the empire glare now vacant, deranged, bankrupt drooling?
To recapitulate: the British inquiry says re: Di. nothing happened go to sleep. And the US wallops the gong?
Can we pretend for just a minute that history doesn't exist and all of us were created about twenty seconds ago and faced with the task (like someone in a computer game) of figuring out who we are and what we're supposed to be doing?
Under those circumstances, those coming to awareness here on Earth who happened to find themselves with more than their fair share of wealth and power would very likely invent stories about how they got to that happy position and why it was all a Good Thing and preferably ought to stay that way.
Those without such advantages, on the other hand, would have more choices in their stories. They might invent ones which explained why everything was really okay because they'd be rich themselves some day, or their children would, or they'd get their reward in Heaven, or something like that.
Or, if they felt relatively bitter about their position and eager for change, they might make up stories about how the rich got to be where they were by being bloodsucking parasites, or alien reptilian overlords, or agents of the evil demiurge -- or anything else that might justify killing them and taking their stuff.
But me -- I guess I've been around long enough to get pretty cynical about all stories. By and large, they're invented to provide a rational explanation for why you're doing the stuff you'd be doing anyway on an intuitive basis. They can be useful to help get your bearings at moments of confusion, or to transmit tribal wisdom to the young and untutored. But any time you end up taking them too seriously, you're fucked.
I've done my own share of story-telling, here and elsewhere, but I do try to follow a few basic rules. (1) Keep it short. (2) Never tell the same story twice. (3) Be sure to throw in plenty of reality gaps to keep any of it from being taken too seriously. Even with those safeguards, I'm starting to wonder if all stories don't eventually do more harm than good.
We're here. We don't have a clue as to why -- except that we seem to be designed to solve problems. And all we can do is follow our noses, doing one thing at a time and trying to move along a gradient from less-good to more-good, like any responsive proto-organism floating in the primal soup.
Of course, that in itself is a story -- for which I apologize. But I will claim in my own defense that at least it's one intended to foster humility rather than arrogance.
Thanks Silverfox and Oarwell for those links.
some commentary quotes off IC:
"Look, I'm sure the idea is maybe interesting, but it's still spam. It's not readable. Why can't a cogent argument be made of it, instead of a protracted Registry of Deeds document? Is sheer volume the proof in the pudding now?
What a whiner. No one is asking you to read it. Don't. I don't care. Use your little mouse, here's a reminder how. Change the subject of you want to talk about something else, no one is stopping you, no one is keeping you from that, I'm certainly not. I would encourage it. I thought so.
I want to hear more on Lady Di, Spencers, you know.... (And I checked, I don't think Kerry was Spencer, though Kerry and Bush's common ancestor is Edmund Reade mar Elizabeth Cooke, both circa early 1600s, with two dau, both daughters mar
1. John Lake mar Margaret Reade (leads to Bush)
2. (Yes those Winthrops of Massachusetts) John Winthrop mar Elizabeth Reade (leads to Kerry; Kerry's line intermarried quite a lot it seems with other Winthrops and even Cabot/Winthrops).
And for starroute:
Though, as you finished your own comment, I think you realized in a befuddled way your self-proclaimed policy of 'lack of a metanarrative, so shut up and believe that instead'...is a metanarrative anyway.
I think I'm just being more transparent about it, and if you follow me, less nefarious: I wanted to comment on this:
"But me -- I guess I've been around long enough to get pretty cynical about all stories. By and large, they're invented to provide a rational explanation for why you're doing the stuff you'd be doing anyway on an intuitive basis. They can be useful to help get your bearings at moments of confusion, or to transmit tribal wisdom to the young and untutored. But any time you end up taking them too seriously, you're fucked."
...
Of course, that in itself is a story -- for which I apologize. But I will claim in my own defense that at least it's one intended to foster humility rather than arrogance.
Well! Do you ever take your comments on that perspective too seriously? ;-) That 'humility' and 'mysticism' of yours seems positively puritanical--since it is directed at others and since it 'pretends to do them good'. The U.S. Puritans were 'humble' as well, particularly when they were burning people for lack of conformity to their form of disciplined individualist (dare I say mystic) view of Christianity, that was intentionally a removal of all social elements.
Frankly, the posh of "I have no stories, I am free, leave me alone as an ambivalent consumer", I think makes you as well as many others far more controllable by the very groups we are talking about. There are several examples I know of where
such types of mysticism was actively encouraged while a 'right punch' of corporate consolidation of your life, was quickly followed with handing out 'left punch' selling the very drop out perspective simultaneously. It reminds me of the way the Pentagon 'helped' the people on 9-11. They had available psychologists, passed out hot towels, t-shirts, and gave 'love dogs' to help people morn (instead of asking the freaking questions of why they banned helicopter aid from coming in or out, refusing to evacuate people to the hospital, refusing additional firefighting aid, and then 'helped' by taking a wrecking ball to the uncombed wreckage). Gotta love those love dogs they had around. Thanks, Pentagon. You think of everything, guiding the people around into immediate sympathy and morning, instead of "why the hell did you allow this to happen?"
Other brute force things combined with mysticism and emotionalism solace offered: The British did it in India, actually as the British monopoly corporation BEIC destroyed India and started creating famines from their policies, they simultaneously were 'investing' in India by encouraging a refurbishment of lots of Indian caste religion pilgrimage routes and pilgrim taxes to keep it up. The British/Americans did the same brute force combined with escape, with opium in China. The Chinese however got it into their head to socially mobilize against such befuddlement, so---
All stories aren't opiates of the masses, starroute. Some are amphetamines and mobilizers. Some are pesticides taken to parasitical elites. However, I think your version of categorical opposition to them can unwittingly be a form of self-administered tranquilizer. That is why such pro-hierarchical and escapist inequality versions of mysticism, such as the ones the BEICS or individualized mysticism stories such as yours, are far more commodifiable.
The Rockefellers did the same in all of South America (see the book Thy Will Be Done), with the common mantra "you aren't allowed to have a social ideology, only an individual ideology. Here, take a flavor of the month, we sell them all for your convenience!"
The 'global 1960s' perhaps were used as a vehicle to sell the same, to make sure that drugs and music were not used for the most part used for social organization or religious/intellectual experimentation, though were used for fey escapes and mass entertainment from (in the U.S.) the social organizational politics of Kennedies and King (and worldwide (against anti-colonial movements).
Your free to be mystic if you want, I've been accused of that as well, though don't expect my mysticism to be a willing pawn in someone else's intentional mystification, as opposed to mysticism, program.
An interesting example of mysticism and social activism were the Collier brothers who wrote the Votescam book. [www.votescam.com] They were involved in many late 1960s meditation groups and monastic retreats. Another example is Buddhist mysticism inclinations, though social activism, of Mr. Knight, who wrote the British/Australian bestseller _The Brotherhood: The Explosive Expose of the Secret World of the Freemasons, in 1974, which went through many publications for the next decade. It's still a stir in the UK. Knight in my opinion, was murdered. Other examples of personal mysticism that take social activist leanings would be many in green politics.
Then there is the opposite, which I think you exhibit.
I think you are playing into being a pawn of the very people you seem to hate. Follow.
Here's a little intro bit something I wrote a while ago, that I think addresses just what our debate is on and over, from my perspective.
THE FASCIST STATES OF DISNEYLAND:
American fascism as the perfection of fascist techniques
A bit of commentary on the image above: There are a lot of similarities between America and Germany, though the difference is actually a compliment to fascists out there: where Germany failed in the 1930s, America has succeeded. The compliment to fascists out there would be that America [I would add, as well its global reach] seems to have perfected State control of society and ideology far more than Germany was ever able to attempt or achieve, quite possibly because American fascist ideology has made good on Orwell's fear of the State dominating through complete control of the identity of individuals--from cradle to grave.
Let's call it State Individualism, which is different from actual individualism because it is a individualism that only serves the American corporate state. American fascism has entirely done away with any social ideologies--which Germany, Italy, Japan or other fascist [or leftist!] movements in Eastern Europe or Scandinavia had. The American fascist ideology of is one of (corporate state managed of course) State Individualism.
Here are some similarities between Germany's fascism and America's fascism that only shows that America's version is a more perfected variety of hyper-fascism. It takes the principles of State control and divide and conquer of the citizens to a hyper-level: down to the individual level.
...
1. Like Germany, a centralized media exists. However, unlike Germany, American fascism of State Individualism has allowed a very different kind of fascism than before: a special American hyper-fascism that is a combination of the historical corporate state fascism and typical police state repression, corporate interlocks, jingoism, and imperialism--combined with a public personae that is entirely disconnected from society instead of about it: the ideology sails over society and numbs it instead of asks for its participation. It sells escapism through particular state mandated 'individualisms' instead of actual individualism, it sells disney-esque cant, slogans, and jingles, each lasting 30 seconds for 24 hours a day, and endless kaleidoscope of blurring emptiness. The ideology of State Individualism is that the individual is a tabula rasa to be programmed with whatever State elites want, whatever emotions, whatever ideas, and this programming can be achieved year after year precisely because no one is given any manner to approach the issue of their manipulation historically. Updates, fads, planned obsolescence, deprivation, [certain forms of mysticism] and consumption are the techniques of State Individualism. What are illegal are localism, pro-active political action, [mysticism or religious movements that are social or even locally protective], and democratic challenges.
...
4. American fascism is so appealing because it is so beguiling: it pretends to offer individuation and freedom and representation though all you can ever become is an adjunct of some mass marketing or targeted marketing campaign, designed by American fascists to trick you into buying something (whether items or ideologies), by manipulating your values and numbing them into acquiescence instead of reflecting your [mystic?] values or encouraging you to proactively act upon them.
....it goes on at the above link
I suppose I could add that the whole 'futureshock fascism' aspect of it serves to create such a personalized view as well.
Starroute, I think your kind of drop out mysticism would fit perfectly in our globally 'updated' fascist society, extending out of Oceania, where the fascism is the fascism of the corporate individual, in other words.
Starroute, you seem to have quite a negative sense of power. Most theories of power have that negative cast. Hannah Arendt was different:
Hannah Arendt (October 14, 1906 – December 4, 1975) was a German political theorist. She has often been described as a philosopher, although she always refused that label on the grounds that philosophy is concerned with "man in the singular". She described herself instead as a political theorist because her work centers on the fact that "men, not Man, live on the earth and inhabit the world".
In other words, I don't think that even that kind of radical individualism you claim to mystically exhibit, ever even exists. It's a very social mental view with social effects just as any other very social mental view with very different social effects.
(An interesting bit of trivia: neocon neozionist neofascist Leo Strauss, who got a job teaching at Rockefeller central, the University of Chicago, was rejected in his sexual and marriage proposal advances by Hannah Arendt, who hated him and his philosophy:
"If the brilliant and beautiful Hannah Arendt, the German intellectual who famously described the 'banality of evil' at work in of Nazi Germany, had not spurned a young suitor named Leo Strauss, would Americans be killing and dying in Iraq? Not only did Arendt reject Strauss' affections, she panned his ideas. According to Arendt's biographer, she told the embittered Strauss that a political party advocating his views could have not place for a Jew like him. Strauss bore the wound of her words for decades. Even today, his followers the Straussians, despise Arendt. Could her reject have been the stirring of a butterfly's wings that led to the inevitable desert storm?"
Another person like Arendt is Norbert Elias:
Norbert Elias (June 22, 1897 — August 1, 1990) was a German sociologist of Jewish descent, who later became a British citizen. His work focused on the relationship between power, behavior, emotion, and knowledge over time. He significantly shaped what is called process or figurational sociology. Due to historical circumstances, Elias had long remained a marginal author, until being (re-)discovered by a new generation of scholars in the 1970s, when he eventually became one of the most influential sociologists ever.
His late popularity can be partially attributed to the fact that his concept of large social figurations or networks explains the emergence and function of large societal structures without neglecting the aspect of individual agency. In the 1960s and 1970s, the overemphasis of structure over agency was heavily criticized about the then-dominant school of structural functionalism.
As I said, a kind of drop out mysticism fits perfectly in a fascist society. Though sold as a cure, a drop out mysticism (from a seeming psychic wound such as yours--I don't care to ask, though I sympathize, it's none of my business) remains a wound.
I am a great admirer of mystics, though not really of misanthropes.
starroute's sensibility:
"But me -- I guess I've been around long enough to get pretty cynical about all stories. By and large, they're invented to provide a rational explanation for why you're doing the stuff you'd be doing anyway on an intuitive basis. They can be useful to help get your bearings at moments of confusion, or to transmit tribal wisdom to the young and untutored. But any time you end up taking them too seriously, you're fucked."
Now that's what I call 'Joseph Campbell in a nutshell.'
As a typist often accused -- and just as often found guilty -- of purpling the occasional bit of prose, I can identify with the free-wheeling freewrite style the erudite anonymous on this thread embraces as a loved one.
His/her anonymous approach is not just following a singular thread but instead finding structure in the fabric via the overlay of a number of significant historical threads. As such, though following the convolutions of King Fecundia and his lizard harem sometimes feels like falling down a dark well, I grok the writer's angling.
At once, having made a small sack of drachmas in the carpal tunnel biz over the years, I've also had to face the editorial fire and singed a few whiskers along the way. I know the honest value of brevity, but I also know the compromises made there often equate with "dumbing down". The proverbial double-edged sword. In the end, we each have our own style, which when well and often used develops that elusive quality known as "voice." See anything contributed here by starroute by way of exmaple.
A succinct statement easily repeated, packs a memetic wallop because the viral behavior of ideas in a socio-cultural milieu is rooted in the iconic nature of our cognitive framing biomechanics. Vast tracts -- especially from anonymous sources -- run counter-intuitive to this basic process, both at a natural and fundamental biological level and in the etheric state called consciousness in which we all (somehow) collectively participate.
Brilliant reductive statements like...
"Merovingian = Feudalism = Capitalism"
...can extricate a sense of the larger argument in play, but as the Iridescent One so rightly observes, at that point and in that form -- despite its stronger memetic kick, it is no longer an argument per se.
As for the other anonymous individual (5:05), who said:
"Essay posting seems misplaced in the comments section of a blog. It has all the appearance and effect of SPAM.
Why not spare the indulgence, link to your website and post a summary of your thoughts?
It's not that difficult and would be more impressive."
Sadly, I have worked with the spirit animating this anonymous editor-in-training. I suspect the carpal tunnel-inducing efforts of the former anonymous have little to do with impressing us, and the use of such blunt psychological tools by the latter doesn't appear to affect our confident and tangential anonymous friend.
Thank goodness. I've been enjoying these convoluted historical romps, for the occasional moment of added clarity. Seen as an overlay situated adjacent to the "official history", they are (dare I say it here) illuminating. Mostly, that can be read to mean that I haven't toured as deeply in his/her favorite rabbit warrens, though some are very familiar. My most significant dissident trigger was a media teacher in an American high school deconstructing television commercials. Today, it is re-learning pre-industrial ways of living and old hands-on skills like actual stone masonry (does this make me "masonic" by default?) and swinging a scythe.
Those who think it spam are playing goalie without a mask. What exactly are you defending? If Mr. Wells deems it okay, so be it. Find the scroll bar and move along. I find it refreshing that the abundant anonymous one has responded to each criticism without rancor and by bolstering his central arguument to the point of actual clarity and near-brevity by the third or fourth major essay.
Let the simple lesson be that editors and editing are necessary, for all our railing on at their ability to transform others raw ideas. In the end, we are all editors, our own editors, or at least we should be. That perception was picked up from the only other mentor from my school daze, a creative writing teacher who spent time as a small child in a Nissei internment camp.
Each anonymous follow-on connects to the back story of European royals and their morbid fascination with bloodlines. For what it's worth, the earlier Rowling observation gave me a hoot. I expressed that very same sentiment in an e-mail conversation with an English friend in the wake of reading Half-Blood Prince.
I, for one, am happy to wade through the long bog of European esoteric tradition and suspicion if the net result is a longer, wider and clearer view of the self-interested forces arrayed amongst us who remain largely out of public view in their aeries and enclaves.
Circuitous, yes. Long-winded, yes. Informative,yes. Slightly self-indulgent, perhaps. Spam, no.
I, for one, would enjoy seeing regular outbursts from this particular author -- whether here or by e-mail missive. As it stands, our methods and our madness are neighbors on the same intellectual cul-de-sac.
Starroute, your point above about self-generated myth-making for the purposes of self justification and/or explanation is a well taken, if understated, one. I do think it is a bit naïve when applied to the political class and priestly castes of myth makers who need to sway or swoon the masses into submission or somnolence.
I think that the core concept of a genetically endowed or divinely destined political or spiritual elite is, in general, one of the most pernicious falsehoods ever to arise in human history. Though surely one could argue these fables have served some useful and even salutary purposes at times in the past. I think that it just so, that those times are indeed past. And I can prove it with modern science (or Moderna Designs, as the tv bloke put it in Time Bandits). Consider this analysis, if you will.
As an on-topic sweetener I promise that this wholly original essay
will map threads
IRREFUTABLY connecting DIANA, the late
PRINCIPESSA of WALES, to self-styled
SWISS SUFIS accused of PEDERASTY,
pretending to be SIOUX INDIANS while DANCING NAKED in
(where else?) Indiana – the well-heeled but barefoot and BARE ASS
progenitors of the dying WET DREAM of the elite –
a single world mytho-religion
designed to keep the masses SPELLBOUND,
along with other such HIGH WEIRDNESS.
Rather than feeling like one has been RIDDEN ROUGH
and put away WET
(as is often the case on this blog and in this voluminous post)
I promise to bring it all back home, safe and dry.
I swear that it’s true. No tricks. Just read on. REALLY.
This is not a joke. Like Bill Hicks said, “No. REALLY.”
MOST IMPORTANTLY,
I promise, as God is my WITNESS, to quell the BARKING
dog of “bloodlines” once and for all,
and to lock it in its kennel where it belongs. Sorry DOGS.
Re the Anonymous mega-poster and his dialogue with Oarwell:
Oarwell, I think all of your points are on the money (punning allusion to the Federal Reserve intended), and yet, like you, I extend my thanks to Anonymous for the time and effort he took to put up his material. It was interesting, but I’ve already forgotten 99 and 44/100 percent of it. On much of the European material I have little with which to quibble. But like you said, so what? Well, yes, white like Ivory soap, but... As for the surface scratching viz. the Sanhedrin. There is vastly more to that issue, to be sure.
Just look, for two brief examples, at the fact that both John Kerry and Wesley Clark, by their own claims, are ancestrally Cohens, namesakes whose families each originally bore the surname exclusively reserved for the rabbinate, the Kohanim. Even the NY Times ran articles on this during the 2004 presidential primary season. There are abundant links.
Now don’t go all Mel Gibson and Michael Richards/Kramer on me. It ain’t about that kind of crap at all. I promise.
To long-winded Anonymous, since you placed your own disclaimer of having limited knowledge on the Sufis, I am inclined to cut you some slack there, but there are a couple of huge errors you obviously copied from someone else’s errant “scholarship.” This is most glaringly true in your conflation of Sufism and Wahabbism.
Sufis and Wahabbis are at completely opposite ends of the Islamic spectrum, and this is no mere false dichotomy of phony bicameral politics. The Wahabbi government of Saudi Arabia, which was cultivated as a nascent political movement and placed in power by the British in the 19th century, takes a very dim view of Sufism, and has quite restrictive laws and policies concerning Sufis. Something along the lines of Alabama’s treatment of its black citizens in the first half of the 20th century.
You talk about “bloodlines” of leadership or control in one or more Sufi tariqat. This is largely nonsense. And I can demonstrate that with some clarity. By the way, the Arabic word Tariqa (plural “turook”) means “way” or “path”(much the same as the Chinese word Tao). Not “brotherhood.” Not even close. It is not even from the same Semitic root word, which for “brother” is “aakh” (it looks more graceful when calligraphed in Arabic). You need some more accurate sources if you are going to stroll down this particular path of research.
As far as the “bloodline” issue viz. Sufism: No way, José. The traditional mode of transmission from one teacher or shaykh to his or her successor is via baraka. And yes, there are women teachers or shaykhas in Sufism. The universally admired Rabi’a, from Basra (now in Iraq) in the 8th century, is one of the earliest and most illustrious woman Sufi – beloved, quoted, admired, and emulated by Sufis from every tariqat over the past 1,300 years.
Baraka is a word which means “blessing” or “grace”. Baraka is not a concept exclusive to Sufism at all, but I am restricting the topic to that realm for this discussion. If baraka passes from one person to another in the succession of a Sufi teaching lineage, it occurs via prayer. Or it is simply present as a gift, an endowment from our Creator. (Yes, I believe in the evolution of life on a 4 billion year old earth over hundreds of millions of years. This is not about that.) Sometimes leadership of a Sufi order may be passed from a father to his son or nephew (with or without any accompanying baraka, mind you) but this familial mode of succession is by far the exception rather than the rule in the dozens of different Sufi lineages, which include the Bektashi, Chisthi, Darqawi, Malamati, Mevlevi, Naqshbandi, Qadiri, Qalandari, Rifa’i, Shadili, Tijani, among others.
See this excellent link for a superb brief overview of Sufism’s many paths, one which is replete with its own extensive set of hyperlinks:
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~godlas/Sufism.html
Ironically, the Mevleviyya, the tariqa founded by Sultan Valad, son of Jalaluddin Rumi in 13th century Konya in what is now Turkey (back then it was part of the Persian speaking world), does have some pretension to hereditary transmission, but this has more to do with the wealth accumulated by the order rather than anything remotely religious or spiritual.
In 1925 Kemal Ataturk issued three decrees which banned all Sufi orders in Turkey by writ of law. Ataturk literally shuttered all dergahs (sufi meeting houses) and he had them padlocked and placed under military guard. His decree also banned the wearing of any clothing identified with Sufism, including certain types of hats or headgear, as well as wool cloaks, particularly those patched together out of different scraps and worn as an indication of spiritual poverty.
There is a Celebi family that took exile from Turkey in Switzerland sometime after 1925 when Ataturk started imprisoning Sufis, a practice which still continues to this day despite the putatively “muslim” government elected just before the US invaded Iraq. Only two years ago one Mevlevi Sufi in Turkey was jailed and prosecuted simply for wearing a Fez hat (thank you Steely Dan). [WTF is it about hats and veils, people? Is it only nuns and mouseketeers who are allowed to sport their own idiosyncratic headcovering of choice? Get real and get a life!]
The Celebi family in Switzerland bills their current scion as the “33rd generation grandson of Mevlana Jalalu’ddin Rumi” (sic) and claims “leadership” of the Mevlevi order in absentia. However, the choice of succession for the Mevlevi shaykhs in Turkey and Syria and elsewhere has traditionally been, and is still, made by each current shaykh in situ on the basis of his perception of the nature of the religious insight and depth of heart in his chosen successor.
The last appointed shaykh of the Mevleviyya in Konya had served in the kitchen of the dergah as cook there for twenty-five years before he was named head of the order. And it shocked the shit out of many pretenders who wanted the post. Kind of a Muslim version of Putney Swope, if you know that film about a black janitor named CEO of an advertising firm. Hardly a “bloodline”. And the last time there was any significant de jure and/or de facto political power held by Sufis anywhere in the Muslim world was in the sultanate of Morocco in the 12th to 15th centuries.
Now, as for the current day, your assertion about Libya made so little sense I can’t even muster a refutation, because like Iridescent Cuttlefish stated about some of your other “data”, I don’t know what it is that you were trying to say.
As far as Sabbatai Tzevi goes, there is no Sufi on this earth that we inhabit that I have ever heard of who could even remotely be said to be a follower of his. This doesn’t even contain enough of a grain of truth to be dismissed as “poppycock”. I don’t know about some planet orbiting Sirius, but here? No way.
On the other hand, there is in fact a Sufi tariqa which may well have the kind of “one worlder” elite connections to which you alluded. That is the eponymously titled “Maryamiyya” tariqa founded by a Swiss citizen named Frithjof Schuon. The Maryamiyya claim to be followers of Mary, the mother of Jesus (Maryam in Arabic).
Schuon claimed a shaky succession from the Shadiliyya order in northern Africa, but the Shadili shaykh under whom he very briefly studied disavowed Schuon from the get go, claiming that he was only a novice initiate, and not even fully that. Donning his own imagined mantle of “shaykh-dom” after only a few weeks or months as a novitiate dervish, Schuon declared himself a shaykh to his mostly Swiss and French followers, and most all of them went along for the ride.
Just like white people, ain’t it? Now, don’t freak yourselves out. I’m white too, but that doesn’t mean I have to like it!
For a truly RI laugh at LSD-stoked spooks (the CIA kind, not Kramer ilk) mating with lizard people from outer space on top of pyramids, see this unparalleled minute and a half of stand up comedy from James Inman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoJOIq5ACBY
Bill Hicks meets Lenny Bruce: A white man’s lament:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtD1I4DhMs0&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpbMT-688-k&mode=related&search=
Double your money back if you don’t bust a gut, or at least split your sides, laughing. Of course, if you die laughing, don’t blame me. You have been warned.
Back to serious stuff:
Frithjof Schuon had been quite a brilliant philospher of comparative religion, but he became deluded in his middle and later years with some kind of messianic or avataric fantasy. Though he is deceased, many of his followers even today consider him an infallible guide. Just like the pope.
Before Schuon died he moved to Indiana in the US where, among other things, for years he led selected female members in “Indian dances” that he falsely claimed were based on esoteric practices of the northern Great Plains tribes, particularly the Lakota. Several women would dance nude and Schuon (the only male participant – natch) would wear a small loincloth, regularly flashing his privates to the privileged initiates. The latter detail happily provided by one of the women participants who remained faithful to Schuon.
Because he also included young adolescent girls in these dances Schuon was arrested on charges of sexual abuse of a minor, but the charges were dismissed because the judge found that there was no sexual intent or content to the dances.
Prince Charles of England is, in addition to being a member of the Lucis Trust, an avowed admirer of Schuon. Diana’s ex is also a patron, and serves on the board of directors, of a scholarly journal published by Schuon’s order. Charles is also associated with Schuon’s more broadly based school of religious thought, known as Traditionalism. There’s your Diana link, as promised. Free of charge.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED, part one
But now, for the seriously important part of the essay. The final scientific debunking of all the “bloodline” b.s. It’s worth it to read on. If you’re strong.
Sayyid Hosein Nasr, chairman emeritus of Islamic studies at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. is also a disciple of Schuon. Nasr is a Traditionalist scholar, and also a Maryamiyya. All Maryamiyyas are Traditionalists, but not all Traditionalists are Maryamiyyas. There are several prominent Catholic academics and academic clergy who are Traditionalists. If they are also Maryamiyyas they have yet to come out of the closet publicly, though it wouldn’t be that much of a stretch.
Under the late “Shah” of Iran, Nasr, with the personal patronage of the Shah’s wife Farah Dibah, had founded and was chair of the department of Islamic studies at Teheran University. Like the shah, Nasr fled Iran for the U.S. when the shah was deposed.
In all fairness to Sayyid Hosein Nasr, here is a video of an interview he gave on the nature of Islam. Just to show that he has something valuable to contribute, as well. It is an excellent, brief, comprehensive introduction to the Muslim religion, elegant, accessible, and nearly flawless in its exposition of basic Islam. Really, the best I have ever seen. I sincerely recommend it if you are curious:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7163678675859613485&pr=goog-sl
Interesting enough, but let’s go to the issue of the appellation “Sayyid”.
Sayyid (for men) and Sayyida (for women) are, as Anonymous correctly alluded, honorifics bespeaking descent from Fatima, daughter of the prophet Muhammad and his wife ‘Aisha. But, since inheritance among Arab and Persian muslims is exclusively patrilineal, and the cultures are patriarchic, what does that mean? While it depends on which country or cultural group you may hail from, the short answer is: not a lot.
And just as George Washington was the father of his country, so was Muhammad the father of his empire. There are more Sayyids who claim Fatimid descent in the muslim world than you can shake a forest full of sticks at. So the name or title, while good for feeling or acting puffed up, hardly provides any entrée to insider status or elite power.
Besides that, it is also just a very common first name that anyone can give to their son. So, while I know a number of people named Sayyid/Sayeed/Said, not one of them claims descent from Fatima.
Ism schism.
Another term name used to denote family descendence from the prophet Muhammad is “Hashemite” as in the “Hashemite Kingdom (sic) of Jordan, which is really a masonic fiefdom. The grandfather of the current king Abdullah was an army sergeant placed in power by British intelligence. His son, who was made into “King” Hussein by the Anglo-American intelligence boys, was a CIA favorite, and was widely reported to receive an annual personal stipend of $25 million per year from his Skull and Bones pals at CIA, among other perqs. Even Skull and Bones’ own TIME magazine reported it. Sort of “in your face”, dontcha think?
Lest we forget, the equally diminutive, aforementioned “shah” Reza Pahlavi of Iran was installed on the Peacock throne thanks to the in-country efforts of coup maker Kermit Roosevelt (son or nephew of FDR, I forget which), who was working for his CIA boss Allan Dulles. Kermit engineered a coup by staging false flag riots in Tehran in which demonstrators falsely claimed that the democratically elected prime minister Mohammed Mossadegh was not a pious muslim, but an atheist and a communist. It was the first coup known to be engineered by the CIA as such, and Roosevelt famously bragged that he had overthrown Prime Minister Mossadegh for only $15,000, most of it paid to the phony demonstrator/rioters.
Two little Napoleons, not quite self-crowned, but with some help by us, the “good guys.”
Traditionalism and its Traditionalist adherents like Nasr, the shah’s chief scholar of Islamic studies and a proponent of the spurious Traditionalist sect of Marayamiyya, must be considered as a candidate for being the elite-imposed ‘one world religion’ not just because of the CIA and British “royal” family connections, but because it tends to conflate Islam, Christianity, Hinduism and even Native American religion (as they erroneously portray it) into one somewhat fetid soup.
Oh yes, and the signature political doctrine of Traditionalism avowedly derives from Plato, that only the “natural aristocracy” are fit to rule. Put a U.N. in there and you’ve got a more accurate “un-natural aristocracy”. The Traditionalists believe that democracy is an abomination, and explicitly state so in their literature. Btw, Huston Smith is a Traditionalist.
Not to be forgotten is the Dalai Lama, another CIA patsy whose personal “oracle” was on the Skull and Bones boys’ payroll in 1959 when he had a fitful “vision” that directed the Dalai Lama to flee Tibet for India and Western control. JFK Jr. personally authored an article about this in George magazine back in the 1990’s.
More recently, the Dalai Lama presided over an invitation-only meeting for several days in San Francisco with “muslim leaders” of the U.S., many of them card-carrying Traditionalists, who sought Dalai’s help as a public relations shill to the media. How sad is that.
So, back to the bloodlines thing and the proof that it is all imaginary. Not that these elite a-holes don’t believe in it themselves. They surely do. Just like the genetic researchers at Israel’s Hebrew University announced in the past year or so that they had isolated a Y chromosome-linked genetic marker unique to the Kohanim, the rabbinic Cohens and Cohans of the world.
As Dana Carvey, that old GHWB impersonator used to say in Church Lady mode:
How conveeeeeeenient!
But don’t be fooled. It’s based on a lie.
Look at this article from the London Observer Guardian entitled
“Journal Axes Gene Research on Jews and Palestinians”
by Robin McKie, science editor, Sunday November 25, 2001:
“A keynote research paper showing that Middle Eastern Jews and Palestinians are genetically almost identical has been pulled from a leading journal.
“Academics who have already received copies of Human Immunology have been urged to rip out the offending pages and throw them away.
“Such a drastic act of self-censorship is unprecedented in research publishing and has created widespread disquiet, generating fears that it may involve the suppression of scientific work that questions Biblical dogma.
“’Ihave authored several hundred scientific papers, some for Nature and Science, and this has never happened to me before,' said the article's lead author, Spanish geneticist Professor Antonio Arnaiz-Villena, of Complutense University in Madrid. 'I am stunned.'
British geneticist Sir Walter Bodmer added: 'If the journal didn't like the paper, they shouldn't have published it in the first place. Why wait until it has appeared before acting like this?'
[Why indeed???]
“The journal's editor, Nicole Sucio-Foca, of Columbia University, New York, claims the article provoked such a welter of complaints over its extreme political writing that she was forced to repudiate it. The article has been removed from Human Immunology's website, while letters have been written to libraries and universities throughout the world asking them to ignore or 'preferably to physically remove the relevant pages'. Arnaiz-Villena has been sacked from the journal's editorial board.
“Dolly Tyan, president of the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, which runs the journal, told subscribers that the society is 'offended and embarrassed'.
“The paper, 'The Origin of Palestinians and their Genetic Relatedness with other Mediterranean Populations', involved studying genetic variations in immune system genes among people in the Middle East.
“In common with earlier studies, the team found no data to support the idea that Jewish people were genetically distinct from other people in the region. In doing so, the team's research challenges claims that Jews are a special, chosen people and that Judaism can only be inherited.
Uh huh. Here’s the link:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,605798,00.html
Arnaz Villiena not only lost his editorial post at the international medical journal Human Immunology, his university tried to shit can him and he lost all of his funding, all because he published research which showed that, genetically speaking, Ashkenazi Jews and Muslim Arabs in Palestine were genetically indistinguishable, ie. that they were all part of one family.
Yes, we are truly all brothers under the skin.
But that didn’t fit in with European politics and the agenda for ethnically cleansing Arab Muslims from Eretz Yisrael, not to mention the purported genetic uniqueness of the Kohanim.
So he was fired and the issues of the journal were recalled from the medical librarys of Europe, the U.S., Africa, Asia, and Australia.
....To hide the truth that we are genuinely brothers and sisters, my friends.
Yessir, Yassir.
So, not only is that “bloodline” thing a complete myth when it comes to Sayyid and Hashem, it is also a lie viz. the Cohens and Cohans.
Just as it is a complete and utter lie with regard to “Kings” and “Queens” and “Princes” and “Princesses”.
Of course, in the case of the “Christian” so-called “royalty” we do have evidence of extensive inbreeding, a la hemophilia and the Hapsburg lip. So if the Eurasian “royals” are indeed any different genetically, it is in the manner of their being INFERIOR to we commoners.
Q.E.D.
Mission Accomplished part deux
Muslims, Jews, and Christians. Badda bing, badda bang, badda boom. Nuh uh, baby, don’t try to pass that counterfeit currency off over here.
The “bloodline” meme is nothing but one corrupted crock of stinking shit.
Though in this case the bullshitters have come to believe in their own bullshit.
Certainly that doesn’t mean that we should. Quite the contrary.
Brotherhood and sisterhood, that’s the ticket.
I will put my vote in with the genetic diversity of the masses. Strong and beautiful people of mixed blood. Mestizos. We are all that. Except maybe the wannabe “nobles” and the hemophiliacs and funny looking folks among them. You know who you are. Why not join us? Get down with the common folk.
We are where it’s at.
Two turn tables and a microphone.
Let the elite who want to stay that way expire on the shelf. Don’t buy what they are selling. Let it spoil of its own accord. Their “sell by” date is almost passed.
The last shall be first, and the first shall be last.
Anonymous One,yes I agree,that was quite lengthy by anonymous,should have gave a link instead my friend.That said,let me take you on a real trip,in the early 80's I had the privilage of working on the island named Palm Beach.The outfit I worked for did specialty stone,there were only two contracters allowed on the island at that time.In the four years I work there I witnessed the most incredible world,that exists along side the one that we feel is reality.You have no fucking idea what is possible in their world.I even got to meet and know Senator John Heinz,we work a whole summer at his mothers estate in Hobe Sound,just down the road from the Bush's compound.Even got to work at the Bush dump once,can't say I was to impressed.But always remember this these folks don't live in the same world as us peeons,later.
To Anonymous One, who said "they don't live in the same world as we peons do".
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
Check your map.
They sure as fuck do.
To Anonymous mega-poster: After reading your latest 5:15 a.m. post I do believe we are almost on the same page. Or at least on facing pages in the same chapter.
Right the fuck on. Keep it up.
I read all your stuff, and though I only picked up a few new nuggets worth taking home and savoring, that was a few nuggets more than I got from any other post on this entire thread, or indeed on this website in the past week or so.
Keep on truckin'.
And okay, so I was mistaken....today....appearing two times only.
And by the way, it's true, We ARE just energy condensed to a slow vibration.......our individuality IS an illusion......and we and God are ONE.
I knew it all the fuck along.
Peace
B.H. Resurrected
Dear A-Letter Reader,
Imagine a device so powerful and so flexible that it could shelter and nurture almost every single investment and asset you own (even your business) - all under one impenetrable umbrella...
A device that was more secret than a Swiss bank account...more judgement-proof than an offshore trust...
A device that enabled you to:
Make your assets truly invisible, so no computer hacker, no private investigator, no lawyer, no government snoop could ever find them.
Access superior investment opportunities, (some of which come with built-in tax savings) but are normally 'off-limits' to American investors.
Invest freely in soaring investment classes, strong currencies, booming foreign markets, low-risk mutual funds, offshore hedge funds...and many more unique investments that could've spared your portfolio from the American stock and mutual fund massacre.
Avoid the need for costly malpractice insurance, and other complicated asset protection and estate planning structures. With this one device, all your needs will be met.
Hands down, it's the ultimate financial device ever created. While other financial engineers in various parts of the world have tried to mimic it, they have fallen short. For 78 years now, this device has stood tall.
Finally, all your assets, investments, life insurance policies, businesses, trusts can converge under one iron-clad roof...safe to nest and grow in secret. And now as a loyal Sovereign Society Offshore A-Letter reader, you'll be one of the privileged few, to take advantage of them...
It's called the Anstalt. And it can accomplish diverse financial objectives beyond any other financial vehicle in the world...
But it's only available in one tiny European valley that most people couldn't pinpoint on a map.
Forget Switzerland - a Better Secret Lies Next Door.
My name is Erika Nolan, and I am the Executive Director of The Sovereign Society , and I'd like to tell you today about a very special country and the unique and extraordinary financial opportunities that lie therein.
Wedged between Austria and Switzerland (two of the world's leading financial havens) lies another haven that's even more compelling. It is completely autonomous and completely private. The wealthy have used it for generations to hide and multiply their wealth - yet few people know about it - even though it harbors even more benefits and services than its neighbors.
It's the ancient Principality of Liechtenstein.
This quiet and peaceful financial utopia has managed to stay neutral and unscathed for centuries, despite many European wars that swirled around it. It has survived the Hapsburgs...Napolean...Hitler...the Swiss...and has sustained its place in Europe.
The country is ruled today by Prince Hans-Adam, the reigning heir of Europe's oldest monarchy. But royalty and titles aside, the Prince is first and foremost a businessman. And that's how he runs his country. And that's how in the past several decades he has managed to transform his ancient principality into a dynamic modern microstate with one of the most progressive and successful economies the globe over.
By creating a small, but highly successful economic oasis in which corporations, industries, investors and individuals thrive, and by cultivating and preserving a unique set of financial laws that have encouraged the development of a truly unique and exceptional financial industry, little Liechtenstein has become the most industrialized nation per capita in all Europe, and now ranks as one of the wealthiest nations on the planet! GDP continues to grow as much as 10% annually, and unemployment has remained below 2% for many years.
I was so excited when I learned of the powerful and unique opportunities that existed in Liechtenstein, many of which do not exist anywhere else on the planet, that I asked our Sovereign Society Offshore A-Letter editor, Bob Bauman, to prepare a special online report for you. Bob visited Liechtenstein and its leader, then we put our global network to work, drew on our European banking and investment contacts, and created the very first report on all of Liechtenstein's hush-hush secrets. It's called Liechtenstein: The World's Oldest Offshore Tax Haven.
All the Benefits of Swiss Banking -
But Even More Private...
Liechtenstein boasts one of the world's most sophisticated banking and financial service industries in the world. It also enjoys some of the world's strongest bank secrecy and privacy laws. In Liechtenstein, you can still open up a secret numbered account. While the banks must keep records of your identity, such records are not made public. Plus, one of the world's richest governments will agree to insure every cent you hold there on deposit, even though bank failures almost never occur. And from this account, you'll be able to access investments and markets everywhere, legally free of the restrictions placed on you by the Securities and Exchange Commission in America.
What's more, pioneering Liechtenstein's asset protection laws date as far back as the 1920s. And it is home to unique financial devices like the Anstalt, which have no equal anywhere else in the world.
Make Macro-Profits in this Dynamic Modern Microstate
In Liechtenstein: The World's Oldest Offshore Tax Haven, you'll learn about:
The Secrets of the Anstalt - the ultimate financial sanctuary that can dissolve many of your financial fears with one smart move.
How to privately control a family fortune, and pass it on to your heirs completely free of excessive estate taxes.
The tightly-kept secrets of the world's top accountants and asset protection specialists.
How to open a numbered account...and access Liechtenstein's 'forbidden' world of offshore investments.
How to use Liechtenstein's unique, private, creditor-proof 'family foundations' to secure your wealth.
How to set up a tax-advantaged Liechtenstein corporation with an impenetrable corporate veil.
Why attorneys in Liechtenstein rank among the most respected and most ethical in the world.
You'll also receive lists of Liechtenstein's leading banks, attorneys, trust companies, financial consultants, including contact details and web sites. Plus you'll get a valuable list of Liechtenstein contacts: bankers and advisors who can help open doors for you.
Much more than a report, Liechtenstein: The World's Oldest Offshore Tax Haven is a powerful financial program that can furnish you with the information and the specific contacts that can launch you into the exclusive world of Liechtenstein finance. In the past, you might've had to travel to Liechtenstein yourself, in order to find out about its unique, hush-hush financial instruments and opportunities. But now all you need do is just click on the button below and get your copy of Liechtenstein: The World's Oldest Offshore Tax Haven.
A Royal Guarantee
I'm sure that once you learn the secrets of the Principality of Liechtenstein, you'll be as impressed as I was. If not, we'll happily refund your money up to 30 days after purchase. No questions asked.
But don't delay. In Liechtenstein: The World's Oldest Offshore Tax Haven, you'll learn the tightly-kept secrets of the world's top accountants and asset protection specialists. Secrets that can only improve your financial situation. You'll be geared to take control of your financial future. No more expensive, ill-advised cookie-cutter financial solutions. No more second-rate asset protection and estate tax planning vehicles. No more loosely-protected and poorly-performing life insurance policies and retirement accounts.
Liechtenstein can guide you to a new era of safe and secure profits.
Sincerely Yours,
Erika Nolan
Executive Director
The Sovereign Society
PS: To celebrate the 2006 European Banking Tour's stop in Liechtenstein, we're offering this valuable book at a 25% discount. Pick up your copy of The Liechtenstein Report before October 2nd and you'll pay just $36.75 + shipping. With all the uncertainty in the American markets, not to mention soaring deficits and the specter of a looming recession, there has never been a more critical time to enter into the safety and security of this age-old financial haven, where you can freely access profitable opportunities that just aren't available at home.
I just heard John Stevens on the BBC news announcing his conclusions on the Diana inquiry. His intonation was a bit strange: "From the evidence available... _now_... there is no conspiracy." A threat? A warning? A cry for help? Who knows?
Whenever a public figure makes an announcement, I can't tell who this stuff is aimed at any more. Too many concentric circles. Like that guy down and to the left who GWB seems to spend his whole time talking to at press conferences. Talk to the back of the room, George! Didn't they teach you nothing at Camp Cheney?
B.H. Res, please come back, that was some fine material. As you say;
"And by the way, it's true, We ARE just energy condensed to a slow vibration.......our individuality IS an illusion......and we and God are ONE."
This idea connects to mega-anons idea that the sharp operators seem to encourage misguided individualistic expressions, that seem to sublimate more natural social expressions.
Anyway, thanks for the Sufi material and for setting mega-anon straight while still engaging with his ideas.
Journal Axes Gene Research.
Galileo silenced.
Impressive.
As for Silverfox's
Merovingian=feudalism=capitalism plasmid, doesn't that kind of fly in the face of Max Weber's thesis, and a general understanding of the rise of the villages and mercantile class? Didn't aggregate capital make war on the leige lord/feudal/aristo system, emboldened (and covertly supporting) the protestant reformation against the fiefdomite Catholics?
Wasn't feudalism the antithesis of aggregate capital and mercantile power?
From the Wiki article on Max:
"Weber wrote that capitalism evolved when the Protestant (particularly Calvinist) ethic influenced large numbers of people to engage in work in the secular world, developing their own enterprises and engaging in trade and the accumulation of wealth for investment. In other words, the Protestant ethic was a force behind an unplanned and uncoordinated mass action that led to the development of capitalism."
I enjoy Raimondo's "bizarro world" thesis, sure, but must take exception to this kind of breezy Know-Nothingism.
Apologies to Starroute for taking ideas seriously.
The "Fascist States of Disneyland" article is very nicely done, but ask yourself -- can we really trust independent media?
Yes, sarcasm. Thanks, too, Anon, for the clue-in about Arendt and Strauss. Too bad Ayn and Leo never hooked up (or did they, and Michael Ledeen was their love child?)
All stories aren't opiates of the masses, starroute. Some are amphetamines and mobilizers. Some are pesticides taken to parasitical elites.
Really? This turgid, oatmealesque writing is going to motivate the “somnolent” masses? They’re going to wallow through this miasmic, and yet very reductionist view of history, put down their remote controls and scream, “It’s the fish people, and they’re everywhere!”
And then there’s this gem:
Your free to be mystic if you want, I've been accused of that as well, though don't expect my mysticism to be a willing pawn in someone else's intentional mystification, as opposed to mysticism, program.
No, no—it’s just not possible that the elites, who are surely quaking in their boots at your lightning bolt revelations, would want inquiring minds to believe that dark, supernatural forces beyond our ken are moving through history and that we are powerless against them. No, they would want us to believe the opposite, that we can change the world, right? No willing/unwilling pawn, you. No mystification at all…
Miraculix,
Maybe you're right in your assertion that it's not spam, exactly, but the point of the whole conical worldview is hardly empowering, enabling, or in way enlightening. The opposite, RAW-influenced stream of anti-bloodline mystification from the Bill Hicks progeny poster is the sort of juice that wakes folks up and lets them believe that cosmic truths can liberate, not imprison them.
Starroute,
As always, right on. Any story that has to be so tightly held is automatically suspect. True/not true/maybe both is not an irredeemable capitulation to the "horrors of relativism" (as the tightly-sphinctered always scream), it's an understanding that perspective is the final, final truth.
To the disgusting commercial for Liechenstein: your assets should all be confiscated and your patrons should all be taught the lessons of the other end of the capitalist digestive tract, as intoned by Mr. Zappa:
As it applies to you and me
Our country isn't free
And the law refuses to see
If all that you can ever be
Is just a lousy janitor
Unless your uncle owns a store
You know that five in every four
Just won't amount to nothin' more
Gonna watch the rats go across the floor
And make up songs about being poor
Blow your harmonica, son!
many thanx to grace kelly for contacting us from beyond. if not for her encouragement, this thread would not have blossomed into the masterpiece it has become.
grace, you are as elegant in death as you were in life. rest in peace, my love.
Really? This turgid, oatmealesque writing is going to motivate the “somnolent” masses? They’re going to wallow through this miasmic, and yet very reductionist view of history, put down their remote controls and scream, “It’s the fish people, and they’re everywhere!”
well, according to you and oarwell, we don't need the "masses." they can continue to fuck, pray, fight and drink while the handful of us hold mirrors up to these nebulous and illusive "evil ones" until they melt like the wicked witch of the west, so you really can't use that as your argument because its double-speak.
MEGANON wrote:
Here's a little intro bit something I wrote a while ago, that I think addresses just what our debate is on and over, from my perspective.
THE FASCIST STATES OF DISNEYLAND:
American fascism as the perfection of fascist techniques...
....it goes on at the above link
HAHA. I bet it does go on. And on, and on, and on...
Now take the four dried grams of mushrooms I taped underneath all your seats before the show and LET'S GO!!!
No way, man. You are way out of line, borderer! Oatwell and irredescent cuttlesnob are doing big things!! They're spreading the righteous truths of small community socialism by communicating with other illumined, but, alas, anonymous bloggers and getting them to spread these same ideas. It might seem like a lit match at the far end of the universe right now, but soon it will be a raging wildfare of social movement and justice that'll light a fire under all of our asses. You know, as soon as the masses quit watching the NFL. I saw you! Get your eyes off that cheerleader's ass and let's get moving!
Give people with less education and book-lurnin than you a little more credit. Jeesh, you blowhards almost make me wish Shrub would come back. IC complaining about someone else's "turgid, oatmealesque writing"?! That's rich!
of figuring out who we are and what we're supposed to be doing?
Don't you think it would be more appropriate to find out "what" we are prior to determining "who" we are. I mean, afterall, we're only 20 seconds old for Christ's sake. We haven't even had ample time to form a "who."
Also, the phrase "what we're supposed to be doing" doesn't sit well with me. It smells of predeterminism. Why would you presume we're supposed to be doing anything, or at least one thing over another?
That oatmeal helps mitigate the metaphorical plaque that compromises out arteries, I'll have you know. Plus, it's a good source of fiber for those who are constipated.
Actually, it's a decent essay. Here's the Reader's Digest version:
"Another way that American fascism has perfected a divide and conquer strategy in party politics is by making the One Party State into a Two Headed Beast. This effectively co-opts any grass roots movements whether the right or the left into the waiting maw of either of the two wings of the same corporate state party. American fascists are in domination of both the Democratic or the Republican parties. Their agenda, whether domestically or for foreign policy is identical. You can vote for only their American fascist candidates.
Like Germany, American fascism's is a divide and conquer ideology. Though instead of on racism or Aryanism, it is fascism of the individual, a wider chaos. Instead of dividing people up into ethnic groups with state propaganda, and then going after each one group separately, the state propaganda is down to the level of individuals, and the police state under Homeland security goes after particular individuals based on your consumption patterns, or your reading materials. Like Germany, like Hitler, all 500 channels in America are centrally programmed from the same corporate ideology. Like Germany, like Hitler, the secret police record everything and watch everyone's moves.
American fascism is enshrined in the micro perspective of psychology, which has been instrumentallized and warped into being an experimental science of the police security State aspects of American fascism-as it was under Germany as well. This is documented quite well in a pithy chapter by McGowan's book Understanding the F-Word (2002). McGowan discusses in his book in how the discipline of psychology as practiced in the United States has always been a part of the State military or police mechanisms of experimental control over persons, as in this discipline (funded mostly by military budgets interestingly enough) the State learns to manipulate individuals successfully through motivation priming, enflaming outrage, generating fear, testing biological compounds upon them, or even killing them under different regimes and tabulating the results to see what methods are most efficient.
Like Germany, American fascism has a privatized through centralized money context actually designed off German models thanks to many including the Warburg family (another important European international banking family that can trace its lineage for around 400 years as international bankers). This 'centralized-privatized' American corporate state context had been attempted for over 100 years in the United States and had been rejected. It was passed with what amounted to high corruption. The best summary I have found is in Epperson's the Unseen Hand (though this book is an invaluable summary of research, beware of the religious motivations-instead of simply historic-of this book!), or Antony Sutton's The Federal Reserve Conspiracy. First, this American corporate state framework has enslaved the American public to an American Federal Reserve all stock is privately owned monopoly stock: nothing public ever can touch that or complain about their 'scientifically' created depressions or inflations that are designed to shift debt and wealth to them whenever they want by manipulating the price of money and interest payments in bank debt of citizens. Second, this corporate state that administers the financial relations of American fascism creates massive debt severage of the American government itself to international private bankers who hold the bonds (literal and figurative) of the United States.
Unlike Germany, which had a state ideology interestingly enough of environmentalism, health, and well toned bodies, American fascism has propagandized through State Individualism ideologies in the interest of protecting ecological degradation as a "individual [corporate state] right", to protect ill health and lack of hospital care and medical coverage for 40 million of its citizens, and to protect a people who are all 50% overweight from ever seriously considering the health ramifications of their lives or their foods or their terrible medical care (The American corporate state hospital framework is the third leading cause of death in the United States [malpractice, erroneous administration of 'treatments'], according to the New England Journal of Medicine.)
Each side of this beast rides each other in a feedback loop of expansion, keeping the whole American-proxy world headed on a consumptive goosestep towards a combined health, ecological, and economic abyss. Mass consumers as a mass pressure of individuals though decidedly separated (who consume State Individualism sponsored modes of being) are partially to blame for American fascism. They are raised to know nothing else. As Germans had to be led to follow along, citizens under American fascism are born into a crade-to-grave context of American fascism and know nothing else: they simply coast along from kindergarten to elder care, sucked dry at every step.
What are the characteristics of people under American fascism? American fascism's mass politics are mass consumers. They are chracterized by mass ambivalence, low self worth, and fear of politics for the most part. They are unable to form opinions or carry their memories beyond a very short term period. America is without a history, without a means of gaining one. Bring them anything, anything that will keep up the suspension of disbelief: the Nuremberg rallies in the United States are consumptive, manipulative-behaviorist, and individuated--instead of political mass rallies.
And furthermore, any localisms to get out are swooped down upon by American fascism to get commodified and spun as marketing strategies back to the consumer masses, denutered of course of their political messages: for instance, the co-option of folk music beginning in the early 1960s, the co-option of rock music by the early 1970s, the co-option of any attempts at serious news reporting (the invention of the cloying style of "happy voice" on news is only from 1970!) and the extreme reduction of foreign news and labor news from the late 1970s onward have created a bubble world, almost a separate planet called America, on this shared planet. America is a parasite to the earth..."
-----------
Nothing exceptional there, just cogent analysis of Mussolini's vision, Betty Crocker/Marlboro Man-style.
It even has a Devo-like coda: "Await your programming." And keep updating, and keep watching. Do you have an identity without it? Prepared to be sculpted! Brainless Couch Potatoes, Standby!"
Of course, that's a bit smug, but probably is simply an understandable manifestation of alienation from the mythos of the heroic Massman.
Mirror, mirror, on the wall
Who's the greediest of them all?
'Massman' is, of course, a convenient fiction, useful when generating orc-armies of debtbots and deracinated vidheads, some of whom can be employed in spreading thick the sauce of Democracy upon the black bread of the world when not mindlessly generating wealth for the owners.
Hey Hicks: I've already written twice (quoting Bill Kauffman quoting Robert Frost) that it is those same unwashed "insubordinate Americans" who will save us, if we are to be saved.
I'm under no illusion about the efforts of epicene pointy-heads: hell, look what the Straussian pointy-heads got us into in Iraq. It's the "bull-headed, fuck-you" crowd that will finally win the day.
But surely, Mr. Scoffer, Mr. Dead Comic, you must admit that SOMEONE steers that pickup truck-driving, massively-bicep'd, NASCAR-sucking juggernaut? Today it's John Madden (or whoever--is he still alive?), in best "They Live" fashion bleating "sleep...obey...touchdown...sleep...obey...," but the whole point of resisting fascism
uh, hold on, my microwave's beeping
IC complaining about someone else's "turgid, oatmealesque writing"?! That's rich!
Well, it takes one to know one, right? Furthermore, my oatmeal, the encouraging variety that tells you all things are still possible, will surely clean more
"metaphorical plaque" from the collective arsch of the NFL worshipping crowd than the blood-lined pudding that has so thoroughly clogged this thread. You are what you consume; or, again in the parlance of FZ, "You are what you is."
quotes
To the disgusting commercial for Liechenstein:...
I thought it was hilarous, it read like its own satire.
quote
As for Silverfox's
Merovingian=feudalism=capitalism plasmid, doesn't that kind of fly in the face of Max Weber's thesis, and a general understanding of the rise of the villages and mercantile class? Didn't aggregate capital make war on the leige lord/feudal/aristo system, emboldened (and covertly supporting) the protestant reformation against the fiefdomite Catholics? Wasn't feudalism the antithesis of aggregate capital and mercantile power?
Was it? :-) British finance was highly aristocratic, and based on state monopolies and warfare.
[1] Some people can't even find 'non-feudalist, classicial economic market behavior' in the history of the British stock market.
Just where are these depoliticized market behaviors, anyway? Or is it all a mystification scam? Did you choose your GMOs? Your oil? Your car technology? If Monsanto runs the GMO world from those quotes, and the Rockefellers ran the global oil business, and (Dupont/Rockefeller) ran General Motors, do we have anywhere examples of these market utopias?
All this "free market" ideology nonsense can be traced back to the largest state supported monopoly on the planet, the British East India Company:
Another great book, with a great title. Neo-Marxism goes conspiracy theory:
_The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation, by Michael Perelman (2000)
Book Description
The originators of classical political economy—Adam Smith [worked for the British East India Company], David Ricardo [multi-millionaire friend of James Stuart Mill, father worked for British East India Company, and his son J. S. Mill, was director of British East India Company "Intelligence" Department, responsible for strategy], James Steuart, and others—created a discourse that explained the logic, the origin, and, in many respects, the essential [ideology of] rightness of [a shorter way to say "don't touch our huge private monopoly and state subsidies!" otherwise known as...] capitalism. But, in the great texts of that discourse, these writers downplayed a crucial requirement for capitalism’s creation: For it to succeed, peasants would have to abandon their self-sufficient lifestyle and go to work for wages in a factory. Why would they willingly do this?
Clearly, they did not go willingly. As Michael Perelman shows, they were forced into the factories with the active support of the same economists who were making theoretical claims for capitalism as a self-correcting mechanism that thrived without needing government intervention. Directly contradicting the laissez-faire principles they claimed to espouse, these men advocated government policies [instead of 'markets'] that deprived the peasantry of the means for self-provision in order to coerce these small farmers into wage labor. To show how Adam Smith and the other classical economists appear to have deliberately obscured the nature of the control of labor and how policies attacking the economic independence of the rural peasantry were essentially conceived to foster primitive accumulation, Perelman examines diaries, letters, and the more practical writings of the classical economists.
He argues that these private and practical writings reveal the real intentions and goals of classical political economy—to separate a rural pe