Friday, January 19, 2007

Patterns of Force

There's a black Mercedes rollin' through the combat zone - Bob Dylan

This isn't the post I'd hoped for today, but a bunch of loose threads still haven't quite knotted together for me. So I guess I'll have to live with that a little longer.

Until I sort it out, here's a bit of something else to chew on.

I've been dipping into Charles Higham's out-of-print American Swastika ("The Shocking Story of Nazi Collaborators in Our Midst from 1933 to the Present Day"), and the chapter on the negotiations mid-war between future CIA Director Allen Dulles and the SS just jumped up and said Yup, you got me.

Higham writes:

SS officers came from the right-wing elite, those with money and commercial interests that lay outside the German border. Thus, the fact that it was the SD [the SS intelligence service of the SS]which specialized in every kind of subversion, intrigue, and ruination appealed directly to Allied connections more than any other service. Its leaders belonged to the community of world money; their allegiance was not to the upstart, working-class Hitler, but to the memory of SS leader Heinrich Himmler's idol, King Henry I of Saxony, and to the Stein bank of Cologne, which financed Himmler's inner circle under the aegis of the international banker Kurt von Schroeder.

In 1942 Dulles became the OSS station chief in Switzerland, while continuing to serve as director and legal advisor to the New York branch of the same Schroeder bank. Early the following year, acting without the authority of Franklin Roosevelt (though he made false assertion to the contrary), Dulles opened a channel of appeasement with SS nobility, mostly Prussian elite, acting without the knowledge of Adolph Hitler. Dulles met three times with Prince Max von Hohenlohe, whom he knew from Vienna in 1916 and New York in the '20s. Higham examined the original SS records of the meetings and had no doubt to their authenticity, despite post-war attempts to discredit them because their translation had first appeared in the communist journal New Times.

Dulles opened the first meeting cordially, saying he was "sick and tired of listening to stories of ruined politicians, emigrants, and prejudiced Jews." He said that Germany needed to remain in existence to "maintain order," that the question of Czech sovereignty was inconsequential, and that most important was the establishment of a bulwark in the East against Bolshevism.

Dulles pressed ahead. He said that it would be unbearable for any decent European to think that the Jews might return someday, and that there must be no toleration of a return of the Jewish power positions. He reiterated his desire for a greater European political federation - and foresaw the federal Germany that in fact took place. He said that Hitler would not be accepted as the leader of a restored Germany. He made the curious assertion that the Americans were only continuing the war to get ride of the Jews and that there were people in America who were intending to send the Jews to Africa. This was Hitler's dream of course: that the Jews would go to Madagascar and stay there. Dulles seems to have confused the clubland view of blacks and Jews.

Dulles now proceeded to supply Hohenlohe with dollops of secret intelligence, announcing that the US Army would not land in Spain but, after conquering Tunisia, would advance from Africa toward the Ploesti oil fields to cut off the German oil supplies. He said that it was likely the Allies would land in Sicily to cut off Rommel and control Italy from there, and thus secure the advance in the Balkans.

Having given virtually the entire battle plan for Europe, top secret at the time, to one of Germany's agents, Allen Dulles proceeded to the almost unneccessary rider that he had very good relations with the Vatican. He said American Catholics had a decisive voice in such matters.

The negotiations faltered in the Spring of '43 because the White House lacked Dulles's empathy towards aristocratic Nazis and his bond to supra-national capital saddled with the boorish and doomed Hitler (associations which appear to have led Dulles to commit untroubled acts of treason). But a few years later another of Dulles's plans, Project Paperclip, found far greater success, so that even as Germany underwent "denazification" the Nazi occult sciences were Americanized.

Let's remember the worlds that the word Nazi can hold. The street-brawling thugs are always dispensable; even Hitler, who came up from the streets, dispensed with them. And to the SS conniving behind his back, Hitler could be done away with, too. It's such quiet and refined elite, whose members belong to the community of international money, that can smash more than our windows. Those are the Nazis to whom Allen Dulles delivered the keys to America. They were not the alien other, like European Jewry or the Communists. They were blutsbrüder.


Blogger Syn Diesel said...

The Bush Family has always been right there in the mix. Some interesting links right here:

Btw, what happened to the Henry Kissinger part? The new edit caught me in mid read. ;-)

1/19/2007 07:18:00 AM  
Blogger Jeff Wells said...

I cut out the mention of Kissinger serving as Dulles's post-war translator because I decided I don't know enough of Kissinger's role in those years to suggest he also shouldered some responsibility for Paperclip. He would have been only in his early 20s, so my guess is Paperclip shaped him more than he shaped Paperclip, but that seems like the topic for another post. I didn't want him to overshadow Dulles.

1/19/2007 07:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The new Right serves the old Right, and radical nationalist are just tools to serve their agenda. I don't doubt that is just as apt a description for the factions that rule the West now as did then, something for those who see Neocons behind every imperial machination to keep in mind.

I ran across the following article some time ago and posted it to the RI forum. I have since found it useful to show to those who believe operations like Paperclip to have been limited to only a handful of scientists.


On June 6, the US national archives released some 27,000 pages of secret records documenting the CIA’s Cold War relations with former German Nazi Party members and officials.

The files reveal numerous cases of German Nazis, some clearly guilty of war crimes, receiving funds, weapons and employment from the CIA. They also demonstrate that US intelligence agencies deliberately refrained from disclosing information about the whereabouts of Adolf Eichmann in order to protect Washington’s allies in the post-war West German government headed by Christian Democratic leader Konrad Adenauer.


Regardless of its limited prosecution of upper-echelon Nazis, the United States had no qualms about recruiting Nazi Party members and war criminals into its military research apparatus. Prominent German military developers such as Werner Von Braun and Bernhard Tessmann were assimilated into the US rocketry program, while Kurt Blome, a Nazi scientist who experimented on concentration camp prisoners, was employed by the US to develop chemical weapons.

Likewise, the early stages of the Cold War saw high-level Nazi cadres drafted into the US intelligence machine and deployed in Europe, the Middle East and the Americas. According to the Department of Justice Office of Special Investigations (OSI), the bureau assigned to investigate German war criminals living within the US, at least 10,000 Nazis entered the US between 1948 and 1952. Of the thousands of German Nazis who fled—or were brought—to the United States, only some 100 have been prosecuted by the OSI.

1/19/2007 07:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am going to go out on a limb here, as I am no historian. But this story seems highly suspicious to me. The Prussian nobility has traditionally stacked the officers' ranks of the German army, from the days of old to the Third Reich. Just check out the names of the great Wehrmacht commanders, von Manstein, von Tresckow, von Stülpnagel, von Brauchitsch. The Prussian aristocrats were generally hostile to national-socialism, and considered the regular army (as opposed to the SS) as their domain. Look at who conducted the July 44 bombings, and who was executed in its aftermath.

The SS on the other hand consisted generally of workers, middle-class, small nobility. See Himmler, Heydrich, and the rest. And from its inception, it was fanatically loyal to Hitler. Granted, Himmler did betray Hitler at the very end, albeit it looked more like a last-minute attempt than like a plan. But on the whole, the SS was constituted as a Praetorian Guard.

Lastly, my main problem with the story is that it doesn't fit. If the US elite was so nazified, why did they fight so unflinchingly against the third Reich til the very end ? Why didn't they just pull an about face and turn against the Soviets, instead of bankrolling their war machine since '41 ? Why go the complicated way ? This whole story of secretly nazi elites who just happen to rule a country which was instrumental in defeating national-socialism is a bit too.. contrived for me. Count me as an agnostic.

1/19/2007 08:33:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, a nice read, Jeff, and no doubt Dulles was the lynchpin of post-war black intelligence, but a question for RIers: my working model is that elite banking interests financed both Hitler and Lenin (as per Anthony Sutton). The image of Lenin in the sealed rail car filled with gold bullion being injected (like a virus) back into Russia, etc.

So why would Dulles seek a bulwark against Bolshevism? That, of course, is the conventional thesis, but were the elites, for whom Dulles was an errand boy, really that prescient? In 1942, when Germany held France and the low countries, and was conducting Operation Barbarossa, did the bankers already see the need for yet another enemy (communists) after the war, and send Dulles to articulate that perceived need?

Even though the Warburg-Schiff branch had funded Lenin?

Was Paperclip simply a counterintelligence operation, our Germans against "their" Germans, or was it, more explicitly, the hiring of those Germans with skills that would be useful to the later black-opcracy? And was it mere luck that in the face of Sputnik we had von Braun on our team?

Ultimately, you have to ask whether the "Great Game" of Cold War politics was entirely scripted before WW2 had even ended.

The other side of that history, which I haven't seen (probably because I haven't looked closely) would tell the tale of who funded and backed Gorbachev, employing him as an actor to drawn down the curtain on the no-longer-useful commie bogeyman. Perestroika seems like just an earlier "orange" revolution, and given the speed and (relative) peacefulness of the fall of the Soviet Union, I have no doubt it, too, wasn't a spontaneous occurence, but rather, orchestrated by those who finance the projects.

1/19/2007 09:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Operation Paperclip

That was the codename under which the US intelligence and military services extricated Nazi scientists from Germany, during and after the final stages of World War II. The project was originally called Operation Overcast, and is sometimes also known as Project Paperclip.

When the Allies entered Germany in 1945 their scientific intelligence experts were astounded by the sheer scope of the German technical and scientific accomplishments.

The program of acquiring German scientists and technicians for the U.S. was not only founded in profit interests, however; an equally strong motivator was the desire to deny the expertise of German scientists to the Soviet Union.
The case for finding and holding Nobel laurate Werner Heisenberg was summed up thus "…he was worth more to us than ten divisions of Germans. Heisenberg was in charge of the German secret atomic bomb program code-named "Virus House". Had he fallen into Russian hands, he would have proven invaluable to them."

A Horton Ho-229 stealth Fighter/Bomber was captured and sent to Northrop for evaluation, and several Ho-229 partial airframes from the assembly line were destroyed to avoid their capture by advancing Soviet troops.

Of particular interest to the U.S. were scientists specialising in aerodynamics and rocketry (such as those involved in the V-1 and V-2 projects), chemical weapons, chemical reaction technology and medicine. These scientists and their families were secretly brought to the United States, without State Department review and approval; their service for Hitler's Third Reich, NSDAP and SS memberships as well as the classification of many as war criminals or security threats would have disqualified them from officially obtaining visas. An aim of the operation was capturing equipment before the Soviets came in. The US Army destroyed some of the German equipment to prevent it from being captured by the advancing Soviet Army.

The majority of the scientists, numbering almost 500, were deployed at White Sands Proving Ground, New Mexico; Fort Bliss, Texas; and Huntsville, Alabama to work on guided missile and ballistic missile technology. This in turn led to the foundation of NASA and the US ICBM program.

Much of the information surrounding Operation Paperclip is still classified.

Separate from Paperclip was an even more secret effort to capture German nuclear secrets, equipment and personnel (Operation Alsos). Another American project (TICOM) gathered German experts in cryptography.

above from wiki

The Allies had to get them before the Russians was the cover (excuse) they gave so people who knew about this operation would not ask questions.

Many more classsified black-ops were done with this aquired knowledge.

Plus, You never heard anything of the psychological research done by the axis powers and furthered by the Allies.


1/19/2007 09:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oarwell's thesis makes the most sense when you apply it to what we know. Of course, what we know could be a considerable caveat.

I gather that the Soviet Union would never have inculcated let alone lasted as long as it did without our subsidization. Likewise, Hitler and his henchmen would never have inculcated if not for our subsidization.

If Dulles was an errand boy, does it hold that Prescott Bush was, as well? If they both were errand boys, who exactly are these nefarious "elite" for whom they run the errands?

1/19/2007 10:24:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent post. Jeff, and it fits perfectly with my own research. Schroeder Bank was important and the fact that Dulles was on the Schroeder Bank board (as well as director of the law firm Sullivan and Cromwell, which repped IG Farben which built Auschwitz) was the key discovery I made some thirty years ago that clinched the Nazi-CIA link (as Dulles became the head of the CIA and was fired by JFK over, inter alia, Cuba ops --- and then became the key player for the Warren Commission stating Oswald was not CIA but of he was you'd never find out...) for me.

It ran chills up my back (I found this link in the Carroll Quigley book "Tragedy and Hope".

I agree too that the cold war was contrived by Wall Street and the Dulles-Bush-Rockefeller cabal. Plates for printing money to buy US technology, armanents, etc. were delivered to Stalin after the end of the war (Anthony Sutton documents such things, but claims the NWO is really communistic and that Dulles et al are commies, incredibly).

I suspect that Dulles pitch to the Nazi elites was just a pitch appealing to their antisoviet sentiments (altho Dulles knew good and well that the deals were already made for the NWO to control both the West and the East after Hitler left...

Glad to hear this reported...

1/19/2007 10:31:00 AM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


The story only smells funny if you confuse the character of the common members the SS with its leadership, which is a danger when looking at any movement or organization. You said it yourself when you described Hitler getting rid of the street-brawlers who were his original base (the SA). To understand how people who were, or seemed to be, loyal to the idea of the 3rd Reich would collaborate with their "enemies" is no more confusing than to look at why those right wing elements in the US fought Hitler's little empire "to the bitter end".

The shortest answer is money. Those who most profited from the war (on both sides) may have preferred an openly fascist government to work with, but when the American putsch against Roosevelt failed in '34 and when Hitler turned on the corporations who enabled his rise to power in an attempt to bend them to the service of the state, these behind the scenes power brokers realized that they could accomplish the same objectives (economic & political dominance) just as easily in a softer tyranny. The key to this understanding is that it was the same people pulling strings on both sides of the Atlantic--Dulles and the very same PTB who continue to run the show today.

The following is from the Introduction to The Beast Reawakens, by Martin A. Lee:

Far from being a national reaction against Hitler, the July 20 conspiracy was actually the work of a relatively small number of individuals who were not necessarily inspired by lofty ideals. Evidence produced during the Nuremberg Tribunal showed that one of the army officers involved in the coup plot had been the commander of an Einsatgruppen mobile killing squad, which perpetrated some of the first large-scale murders of Jews on the eastern front.

Some of those who belatedly turned against Hitler were motivated not by moral outrage but by fears that they were losing the war. Theirs was a desperate attempt to restore an authoritarian order stripped of Nazi trappings, rather than a first step toward political liberalism and democracy. The complete disintegration of Germany could be prevented only, they surmised, if Hitler was overthrown. Toward this end, the conspirators were encouraged by American spymaster Allen Dulles, who intimated from his intelligence headquarters in Switzerland that a non-Nazi government might be spared the harsh terms of an unconditional surrender. Ignoring the Nuremberg data, Dulles later offered unequivocal praise for the coup plotters' efforts "to rid Germany of Hitler and his gang and establish a decent regime."

The myth of the "other Germany" that was fostered by the Twentieth of July provided a convenient alibi not only for the West German government but also for various Western espionage agencies, which recruited Third Reich veterans en masse during the early years of the Cold War. As far as America's intelligence chiefs were concerned, it didn't really matter where these ex-Nazis stood with respect to the July 20 debacle as long as they were steadfastly anti-Communist. Among those who later worked with the Central Intelligence Agency, under the directorship of Allen Dulles, was Colonel Otto Skorzeny.

The reason we follow the exploits of Dulles and Skorzeny is not because they are the evil world dominators but because they worked for them and their actions shed an indirect light on the real kingmakers. I have three more sources for you, if you're interested in this view, which explain it in far greater detail: Michael Zezima's Saving Private Power, Chris Floyd & Jules Archer's Bonus Army page, and Dave West's Low, Dishonest Decade. These are not sensationalist internet phenomena but serious historians.

The interesting thing about Kissinger & Paperclip is that it's also where Nixon cut his teeth on being a right awful bastard, which is also to be found in the account you cite--do you suppose they knew each other then?

1/19/2007 10:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The interesting thing about Kissinger & Paperclip is that it's also where Nixon cut his teeth on being a right awful bastard, which is also to be found in the account you cite--do you suppose they knew each other then?

Of course they knew each other....they were, afterall, the offspring of the same metaphorical mother.

I like the Captain Kirk photo. I remember that episode. He has really let himself go over the years....that's what alchoholism will do to you.

1/19/2007 10:46:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon said:
"Lastly, my main problem with the story is that it doesn't fit. If the US elite was so nazified, why did they fight so unflinchingly against the third Reich til the very end ? Why didn't they just pull an about face and turn against the Soviets, instead of bankrolling their war machine since '41 ? Why go the complicated way ? This whole story of secretly nazi elites who just happen to rule a country which was instrumental in defeating national-socialism is a bit too.. contrived for me. Count me as an agnostic."

You already have the influence from the anglo-american empire on american foreign policy at that time, and britain was at war with germany. Also international jewry was at war with germany too. So you had both jewish/wasp (interchangeable in some caes) financial networks at work. There was indeed pro-Nazis in the anglo-american establishment, including the royal family. IIRC Rudolph Hess flew to britain to negotiate with these factions (The Duke of Hamilton being one), but was tricked or intercepted before hand.

There must of been internecine fighting amongst the various elites.
It also is apparent that the money trumps ideology every time, as jeff's post suggests.

Is there a master plan at work for the cold war and beyond, despite internecine fighting?

Maybe, nothing surprises me anymore.

1/19/2007 10:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems that the Nazis' Rauschgiftbekämpfung was a
precursor to the U.S War on Drugs.

When Thomas Mann and Georg Lukács reprimanded Aldous Huxley for
"glorifying" his mescaline experiences to the world they were
convinced that their position represented reason and the
responsibility of intellectuals in the face of neo-fascist
mind-control and late capitalist chemical escapism. What they failed
to consider was that they were playing into the hands of a propaganda
machine which had functioned quite well under the Nazis.


[The Combatting of Drugs]

It was a true
precursor to the U.S. War on Drugs which has mobilized the entire U.S.
armed forces to root out the demonized forces of irrationalism
threatening the performance principle of Late Capital's global sweat

Mann and Lukács, who have no doubt made very valuable contributions to
western literature, represent an academic attitude toward the
irrational that would appear to be based on certain aesthetic biases.

We can locate the germs of their anti-inebriant bigotry in the debates
on Expressionism, particularly those between Lukács and Bloch. Mann
and Lukács represent that "grandeur in repose" of neo-classicism,
which is always so predictably horrified by displays of passion.
Visionary inebriants evidently threatened their "masks of composure."

It was precisely to jar the post-industrial self loose from its
de-humanized and well-adjusted mask that Walter Benjamin advocated
rescuing the energies of the cosmic-rausch of the ancient world for
the proletarian revolution. While Benjamin's concept of "Profane
Illumination" [Profane Erleuchtung] stands in marked contrast to
Huxley's semi-theosophical "Mind-at-Large" [see DOORS OF PERCEPTION],
there are indeed some striking similarities in their observations
while under the influence of psychopharmaka.

Had Benjamin been successful in his flight to the U.S., he would no
doubt have joined Salka Viertel's salon in Los Angeles along with his
associates Bertolt Brecht and Theodor Adorno, and there he would have
also come into contact with Thomas Mann (who was consulting Adorno on
musical questions related to DOCTOR FAUSTUS) and Aldous Huxley, to
whom he could have communicated his own mescaline experience from 22.
May 1934 --almost two decades before Huxley's mescaline experience. To
add the finishing touch to the intricate irony, he would have
discovered, had he not already known, that writer-actress Salka
Viertel's personal physician in Berlin had been none other than Dr.
Ernst Joël, the psychopathologist who initiated Benjamin into the
world of hashish on December 18, 1927.

If one compares Huxley's comments on the folds in draperies
depicted in classical western artworks ("draperies are living
hieroglyphs that stand in some peculiarly expressive way for the
unfathomable mystery of pure being") with Benjamin's comments on the
delicate dance of fringe hanging from an awning ("Hashish in
Marseilles") or "the ornamental" in his CROCKNOTIZEN [Crock Notes],
one discovers enough similarity and correspondence to make for an
interesting and constructive dialogue:

"Es ist höchst eigentümlich, daß die Phantasie dem Raucher Objekte -
und zumal besonders kleine - gern serienweise vorstellt. Die endlosen
Reihen, in denen da vor ihm immer wieder die gleichen Utensilien,
Tierchen oder Pflanzenformen auftauchen, stellen gewissermaßen
ungestalte, kaum geformte Entwürfe eines primitiven Ornaments dar."
Trans.: "It is highly characteristic of the reverie that it tends to
present before the smoker [i.e. opium-smoker] objects - particularly
small ones - in series. The endless successions, in which the same
contrivances, little animals or plant forms suddenly surface in front
of the person over and over again, depict, so to speak, misshapen,
barely formed sketches of a primitive

Both Huxley and Benjamin were attempting to recover a concept of
experience which had become entirely alien to the neo-classicist
thinkers of the Enlightenment.

Benjamin's early treatise "On the Program of the Coming Philosophy"
(1917/1918) was an attempt to rework the concept of experience from
within the Kantian system. While praising Kant for his insistence that
knowledge justify itself in quest for certainty and lasting knowledge
within an ephemeral world, Benjamin called the reality of Newtonian
physics upon which Kant based his certainty "a low, perhaps the lowest
order." Benjamin perceived the metaphysical and religious
presuppositions underlying the moral imperative to justify knowledge,
but as a metaphysics he considered the Kantian "mythology" of a "pure
epistemological (transcendental) consciousness" "different in kind
from any empirical consciousness" to be "only a modern and,
religiously, a particularly infertile one."

In contrast to the clockwork-metaphysics of nascent Protestant
capital, Benjamin sought "the intoxication of cosmic experience"
[Scholem, "Walter Benjamin and his Angel"]. True experience would have
to account for other mythologies as well, and those Benjamin names
betray his reading of Ludwig Klages: "We know of primitive peoples of
the so-called preanimistic stage who identify themselves with sacred
animals and plants and name themselves after them; we know of insane
people who likewise identify themselves in part with objects of their
perception, which are thus no longer objects, "placed before" them; we
know of sick people who relate the sensations of their bodies not to
themselves but rather to other creatures, and clairvoyants who at
least claim to be able to feel the sensations of others as their own.
The commonly shared notion of sensuous (and intellectual) knowledge in
our epoch, as well as in the Kantian and the pre-Kantian epochs, is
very much a mythology like those mentioned."

Benjamin's critique of the Kantian concept of experience finds its
parallel in Dr. Ernst Joël's critique of Kraepelinian
psychopharmacology. Emil Kraepelin (1855-1926), father of modern
psychopharmacology and "discoverer" of "dementia praecox" [later
called "schizophrenia" by Jung's teacher, Bleuler] had advanced the
technical capabilities of psychology by treating it as a physical

Rather than treating a human personality, the Kraepelinian method
artificially severed partial functions of psychic life, altered them
with psychopharmaka and subjected them to testing. A cursory scan of
German monographs on mescaline written during the Weimar Republic and
the Third Reich reveals this method in a great number of monograph
titles, e.g., "Meskalinwirkung auf das Phantomglied" (Mescaline-effect
upon the phantom limb) or "Meskalinwirkung bei Störungen des optischen
Systems" (Mescaline-effect in disturbances of the optic system). It is
not at all surprising that such titles predominate theresearch during
the Third Reich, for the humanity lacking in the Kraepelinian paradigm
was easily steered in the direction of mind-control and
chemical-biological warfare.

Under the Nazi's mescaline research continued, but laboratories like
the Dachau concentration camp were the preferred setting. Humanistic
and therapeutic research with psychopharmaka was forbidden under the
pretext of "Rauschgiftbekämpfung,"a component of the racist ideology
which perceived a threat to the "performance principle" in the exotic
inebriants coming into Germany from the "racially inferior" peoples of
Asia and Latin America [the intro. to Reko's MAGISCHE GIFTE,written
in 1938, spells it out quite clearly].

Ernst Joël proposed the alternative of "experimental psychopathology".
Substances which were thought to be "psychotomimetic" would be used to
arbitrarily engender "rausch-states" in specially selected test
subjects OUTSIDE the clinical laboratory setting. It was under this
very loose"supervision" that Walter Benjamin, whose philosophical
intentions were, according to Adorno ["Benjamin, the Letter-Writer"],
"to render accessible by rational means that range of experience that
announces itself in schizophrenia," agreed to participate as
"Versuchsperson" [test subject] in Ernst Joël and Fritz Fränkel's
hashish experiments in Berlin.

Of the hundreds of books, articles, essays, monographs and
dissertations on Benjamin (supposedly over 3000 exist), only a handful
discuss the writings on hashish and opium and the Drogenversuchen, and
none of them situate the experiments within a historical context. When
Benjamin became a "test subject", he also became part of a
long-forgotten community, the Weimar Republic's psychonautic
avant-garde, which included Benjamin's friend, Ernst Bloch, his cousin
Egon Wissing and Egon's wife, Gert.

With the synthesis of mescaline from peyote by Arthur Heffter in 1897,
Germany became the leader in psychopharmacological research. The year
Benjamin began his experiments, Louis Lewin published his second
edition of PHANTASTICA in Berlin, which appears on the list of books
which Benjamin read from cover to cover.

This book alone would have supplied Benjamin with a library of
information about psychopharmaka. Hermann Schweppenhäuser's claim that
Benjamin's writings on hashish, opium and mescaline are among the most
genuine ever put to paper can only be evaluated against the context of
Weimar experimentation with psychopharmaka.

Kurt Beringer's amazing monograph on mescaline, DER MESKALIN-RAUSCH
was also published in 1927, and remains the greatest work ever written
on the subject. Beringer's book contains over 200 pages of protocols
from 60 experiments in Heidelberg among doctors, medical students,
natural scientists, and philosophers, all of whom demonstrate
remarkable articulateness. Only within the full context of this
research, which produced literally hundreds of monographs on peyote,
mescaline, cannabis, opiates, ayahuasca, cocaine, can we really begin
to evaluate Benjamin's writings and experiments, in which he
participated not merely as test subject, but at times as supervisor.

In the third of the published protocols, Benjamin is writing the
protocol of Joël's hashish experiment.

What does make Benjamin's contribution to this research unique is
summarized quite concisely by Scholem in his essay, "Walter Benjamin
and his Angel": to rescue the intoxication of cosmic experience that
the human being of antiquity possessed for the proletariat in their
coming seizure of power. This attempt to wed "rausch" and "rebellion"
in a "profane illumination" should come as no surprise to anyone who
came into majority during the late 1960s. It is hard to imagine the
anti-war demonstrations becoming as large as they did if they had not
been partially fueled by marijuana and LSD, and this is precisely what
the moribund left in the U.S. seems to have forgotten.

Benjamin scholars have more often than not misinterpreted "profane
illumination" as an awakening "from" rausch. Hermann Schweppenhäuser,
Peter Demetz, Richard Sieburth, John McCole, Margaret Cohen, Susan
Buck-Morss and others continually repeat the refrain that Benjamin
considered the most important aspect of his experiments to be the
crystallized intellectual yield gleaned AFTER the rausch had subsided.
In Schweppenhäuser's depiction, it is as if Benjamin were heroically
running some painful gauntlet in order to capture the pearl from the
rausch-dragons of obscurantism. But "profane illumination" can take
place within the inebriated voyage itself. If rausch is analogous to
being adrift in a turbulent sea, then "profane illumination" is like
suddenly awakening in the midst of a dream and seizing the helm,
becoming the pilot of one's inner voyage. Norbert Bolz understood
this perfectly well in his essay "Vorschule der profanen Erleuchtung,"
and he has prefaced his essay with a quote: " 'Man kann nicht immer im
Rausch leben.' Kann man es nicht? Man muß ihn nur richtig
orientieren." ["'One can't always be high.' Oh no? One onlyhas to
properly orient oneself."] The autoworkers who smoked pot, dropped
acid, and instead of 'tuning out' shut down auto-factories in wildcat
strikes understand Walter Benjamin perfectly well whether they have
read him or not.

Herbert Marcuse seemed to be coming to a similar idea in his ESSAY ON
LIBERATION which postulated a "new sensibility" as a biological
necessity for revolution. Discussing this new sensibility in 1969,
Marcuse wrote:

"Today's rebels want to see, hear, feel new things in a new way: they
link liberation with the dissolution of ordinary and orderly
perception. The 'trip' involves the dissolution of the ego shaped by
the established society - an artificial and short-lived duration. But
the artificial and "private" liberation anticipates, in a distorted
manner, an exigency of the social liberation: the revolution must be
at the same time a revolution in perception which will accompany the
material and intellectual reconstruction of society, creating the new
aesthetic environment. Awareness of the need for such a revolution in
perception, for a new sensorium, is perhaps the kernel of truth in the
psychedelic search."

The drawback to this search, according to Marcuse, was the "narcotic
character" of the artificial paradise, which all-too-often tended to
free one from concern for the social liberation. For Marcuse, like
Benjamin, the voyage into the secret garden must be a messianic
voyage, and the psychonaut is duty-bound to articulate his perceptions
and discoveries to the entire community.

Little did Marcuse realize that the late capitalist state would
mobilize its entire army and police forces into an all-out effort to
eradicate self-induced euphoria once and for all.

At the end of his book, ONE-DIMENSIONAL MAN, Marcuse quoted Benjamin's
famous dictum: "It is for those without hope that hope is given to
us." Those of us who are fortunate to have hope owe it to our fellows
to become articulate in our ecstasy.


LSD And The CIA, Part I

The Truth Seekers

In the spring of 1942, General William "Wild Bill" Donovan, chief of the OSS, the CIA's wartime predecessor, assembled a half-dozen prestigious American scientists and asked them to undertake a top-secret research program.

Their mission, Donovan explained, was to develop a speech-inducing drug for use in intelligence interrogations. He insisted that the need for such a weapon was so acute as to warrant any and every attempt to find it.

The use of drugs by secret agents had long been a part of cloak-and-dagger folklore, but this would be the first concerted attempt on the part of an American espionage organization to modify human behavior through chemical means.

"We were not afraid to try things that had never been done before," asserted Donovan, who was known for his freewheeling and unconventional approach to the spy trade.

The OSS chief pressed his associates to come up with a substance that could break down the psychological defenses of enemy spies and POWs, thereby causing an uninhibited disclosure of classified information. Such a drug would also be useful for screening OSS personnel in order to identify German sympathizers, double-agents, and potential misfits.

OSS scientists created a highly-potent extract of Cannabis and, through a process known as esterification, a clear and viscous liquid was obtained. The final product had no color, odor, or taste. It would be nearly impossible to detect when administered surreptitiously which is exactly what the spies intended to do.

"There is no reason to believe that any other nation or group is familiar with the preparation of this particular drug," stated one classified OSS document. Henceforth, the OSS referred to the marijuana extract as TD a rather transparent cover for Truth Drug.

Various ways of administering TD were tried upon witting and unwitting subjects. OSS operatives found that the medicated goo could be injected into any type of food, such as mashed potatoes, butter, salad dressing, or in such things as candy.

Another scheme relied on using facial tissues impregnated with the drug. But these methods had drawbacks. What if someone had a particularly ravenous appetite? Too much TD could knock a subject out and render him useless for interrogation.

The OSS eventually determined that the best approach involved the use of a hypodermic syringe to inject a diluted TD solution into a cigarette or cigar.

After smoking such an item, the subject would get suitably stoned, at which point a skillful interrogator would move in and try to get him to spill the beans.

After testing TD on themselves, their associates, and US military personnel, OSS agents utilized the drug operationally, although on a limited basis. The results were mixed.

In certain circumstances, TD subjects felt a driving necessity to discuss psychologically-charged topics. Whatever the individual is trying to withhold will be forced to the top of his subconscious mind.

But there were also those who experienced toxic reactions better known in latter-day lingo as bummers. One unwitting doper became irritable and threatening and complained of feeling like he was two different people.

The peculiar nature of his symptoms precluded any attempt to question him. That was how it went, from one extreme to the other. At times, TD seemed to stimulate a rush of talk; on other occasions, people got paranoid and didn't say a word.

The lack of consistency proved to be a major stumbling block and Donovan's dreamers as his enthusiastic OSS staffers have been called reluctantly weaned themselves from their reefer madness.

Enter Mescaline

After the war, the CIA and the military picked-up where they OSS had left off in the secret search for a truth serum. The navy took the lead when it initiated Project CHATTER in 1947 the same year the CIA was formed.

Described as an offensive program, CHATTER was supposed to devise means of obtaining information from people independent of their volition but without physical duress.

Toward this end, Dr. Charles Savage conducted experiments with mescaline (a semi-synthetic extract of the peyote cactus that produces hallucinations similar to those caused by LSD) at the Naval Medical Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.

But these studies, which involved animal as well as human subjects, did not yield as effective truth serum, and CHATTER was terminated in 1953.

The navy became interested in mescaline as an interrogation agent when American investigators learned of mind control experiments carried out by Nazi doctors at the Dachau concentration camp during World War II.

After administering the hallucinogen to 30 prisoners, the Nazis concluded that it was impossible to impose one's will on another person as in hypnosis even when the strongest dose of mescaline had been given.

But the drug still afforded certain advantages to SS interrogators, who were consistently able to draw even the most intimate secrets from the [subject] when questions where cleverly put. Not surprisingly, sentiments of hatred and revenge were exposed in every case.

The mescaline experiments at Dachau were described in a lengthy report by the US Naval Technical Mission, which swept across Europe in search of every scrap of industrial material and scientific data that could be garnered from the fallen Reich.

This mission set the stage for the wholesale importation of more than 600 top Nazi scientists under the auspices of Project paperclip which the CIA supervised during the early years of the Cold War.

Among those who emigrated to the US in such a fashion was Dr. Hubertus Strughold, the German scientist whose chief subordinates (Dr. Sigmund Ruff and Dr. Sigmund Rascher) were directly involved in aviation medicine experiments at Dachau, which included the mescaline studies.

Despite recurring allegations that he sanctioned medical atrocities during the war, Strughold settled in Texas and became an important figure in America's space program.

After Werner von Braun, he was the top Nazi scientist employed by the American government, and he was subsequently hailed by NASA as the father of space medicine.

Maybe Cocaine

The CIA studied a veritable pharmacopoeia of drugs with the hope of achieving a breakthrough. At one point during the early 1950s Uncle Sam's secret agents viewed cocaine as a potential truth serum. Cocaine's general effects have been somewhat neglected, noted an astute researcher.

Whereupon tests were conducted that enabled the CIA to determine that the precious powder will produce elation, talkativeness, etc. when administer by injection. Larger doses, according to a previously classified document, may cause fearfulness and alarming hallucinations.

The document goes on to report that cocaine counteracts... the catatonia of catatonic schizophrenics and concludes with the recommendation that the drug be studied further.

A number of cocaine derivatives were also investigated from an interrogation standpoint. Procaine, a synthetic analogue, was tested on mental patients and the results were intriguing.

When injected into the frontal lobe of the brain through trephine holes in the skull, the drug produced free and spontaneous speech within two days in mute schizophrenics.

This procedure was rejected as too surgical for our use. Nevertheless, according to a CIA pharmacologist, it is possible that such a drug could be gotten into the general circulation of subject without surgery, hypodermic or feeding.

He suggested a method known as iontophoresis, which involves using an electric current to transfer the ions of a chosen medicament into the tissues of the body.

The CIA's infatuation with cocaine was short-lived. It may have titillated the nostrils of more than a few spies and produced some heady speculation, but after the initial inspiration it was back to square one.

Perhaps their expectations were too high for any drug to accommodate. Or maybe a new approach to the problem was required.


The search for an effective interrogation technique eventually led to heroin. Not the heroin that ex-Nazi pilots under CIA contract smuggled out of the Golden Triangle in Southeast Asia on CIA proprietary airlines during the late 1940s and 1950s; nor the heroin that was pumped into America's black and brown ghettos after passing through contraband networks controlled by mobsters who moonlighted as CIA hitmen.

The Agency's involvement in worldwide heroin traffic, which has been well documented in _The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia by Alfred McCoy, went far beyond the scope of Operation ARTICHOKE, which was primarily concerned with eliciting information from recalcitrant subjects.

However, ARTICHOKE scientists did see possible advantages in heroin as a mind control drug. According to a CIA document dated April 26, 1952, heroin was frequently used by police and intelligence officers on a routine basis.

The cold turkey theory of interrogation: CIA operatives determined that heroin and other habit-forming substances can be useful in reverse because of the stresses produced when they are withdrawn from those who are addicted to their use.


It was with the hope of finding the long-sought miracle drug that CIA investigators first began to dabble with LSD-25 in the early 1950s. At the time very little was known about the hallucinogen, even in scientific circles.

Dr. Werner Stoll, the son of Sandoz president Arthur Stoll and a colleague of Albert Hoffmann's, was the first person to investigate the psychological properties of LSD.

The results of his study were presented in the _Swiss Archives of neurology in 1947. Stoll reported that LSD produced disturbances in perception, hallucinations, and acceleration in thinking; moreover, the drug was found to blunt the usual suspiciousness of schizophrenic patients.

No favorable aftereffects were described. Two years later in the same journal Stoll contributed a second report entitled A New Hallucinatory Agent, Active in Very Small Amounts.

The fact that LSD caused hallucinations should not have been a total surprise to the scientific community. Sandoz first became interested in ergot, the natural source of all lysergic acid. The rye fungus had a mysterious and contradictory reputation.

In China and parts of the Mideast it was thought to possess medicinal qualities, and certain scholars believe that it may have been used in sacred rites in ancient Greece.

In other parts of Europe, however, the same fungus was associated with the horrible malady known as St. Anthony's Fire, which struck periodically like the plague.

Medieval chronicles tell of villages and towns where nearly everyone went mad for a few days after ergot-diseased rye was unknowingly milled into flour and baked as bread.

Men were afflicted with gangrenous limbs that looked like blackened stumps, and pregnant women miscarried. Even in modern times, there have been reports of ergot-related epidemics.

FOOTNOTE: In 1951 hundreds of respectable citizens in Pont-Saint-Esprit, a small French village, went completely berserk one evening. Some of the town's leading citizens jumped from windows into the Rhone.

Others ran through the streets screaming abut being chased by lions, tigers, and bandits with donkey ears.

Many died, and whose who survived suffered strange aftereffects for weeks. In his book The Day of St. Anthony's Fire, John C Fuller attributes this bizarre outbreak to rye flour contaminated with ergot.

Initial reports seemed promising. In one instance LSD was given to an officer who had been instructed not to reveal a significant military secret.

When questioned, however, he gave all the details of the secret... and after the effects of the LSD had worn off, the officer had no knowledge of revealing the information (complete amnesia).

Favorable reports kept coming in, and when this phase of experimentation was completed, the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence (OSI) prepared a lengthy memorandum entitled Potential New Agent for Unconventional Warfare.

LSD was said to be useful for eliciting true and accurate statements from subjects under its influence during interrogation.

Moreover, the data on hand suggested that LSD might help in reviving memories of past experiences.

It almost seemed to good to be true a drug that unearthed secrets buried deep in the unconscious mind but also caused amnesia during the effective period. The implications were downright astounding.

Soon the entire CIA hierarchy was head over heels as news of what appeared to be a major breakthrough sent shock waves rippling through headquarters. (C.P.Snow once said, The euphoria of secrecy goes to the head.)

For years they had searched, and now they were on the verge of finding the Holy Grail of the cloak-and-dagger trade.

As one CIA officer recalled, We had thought at first this was the secret that was going to unlock the universe.

But the sense of elation did not last long. As the secret research progressed, the CIA ran into problems.

Eventually they came to recognize that LSD was not really a truth serum in the classical sense. Accurate information could not always be obtained from people under the influence of LSD because it induced a marked anxiety and loss of reality contact.

Those who received unwitting doses experienced an intense distortion of time, place, and body image, frequently culminating in full-blown paranoid reactions.

The bizarre hallucinations caused by the drug often proved more of a hindrance than an aid to the interrogation process.

There was always the risk, for example, that an enemy spy who started to trip out would realize he'd been drugged. This could make him overly suspicious and taciturn to the point of clammy up entirely.

When CIA scientists tested a drug for speech-inducing purposes and found that it didn't work, they usually put it aside and tried something else. But such was not the case with LSD.

Although early reports proved overoptimistic, the Agency was not about the discard such a powerful and unusual substance simply because it did not live up to its original expectations.

They had to shift gears. A reassessment of the strategic implications of LSD was necessary. If, strictly speaking, LSD was not a reliable truth drug, then how else could it be used?


CIA researchers were intrigued by this new chemical, but they didn't quite know what to make of it. LSD was significantly different from anything else they knew about. The most fascinating thing about it, a CIA psychologist recalled, was that such minute quantities had such a terrible effect.

Mere micrograms could create serious mental confusion... and render the mind temporarily susceptible to suggestion.

Moreover, the drug was colorless, odorless, and tasteless, and therefore easily concealed in food and beverage. But it was hard to predict the response to LSD.

On certain occasions acid seemed to cause an uninhibited disclosure of information, but oftentimes the overwhelming anxiety experienced by the subject obstructed the interrogation process. And there were unexplainable mood swings from total panic to boundless bliss.

How could one drug produce such extreme behavior and contradictory reactions?

It didn't make sense. As research continued, the situation became even more perplexing.

At one point a group of Security officers did an about-face and suggested that acid might best be employed as an anti-interrogation substance: Since information obtained from a person in a psychotic state would be unrealistic, bizarre, and extremely difficult to assess, the self-administration of LSD-25, which is effective in minute doses, might in special circumstances offer an operative temporary protection against interrogation.

This proposal was somewhat akin to a suicide pill scenario. Secret agents would be equipped with micro-pellets of LSD to take on dangerous assignments.

If they fell into enemy hands and were about to be interrogated, they could pop a tab of acid as a preventive measure and babble gibberish. Obviously this idea was impractical, but it showed just how confused the CIA's top scientists were about LSD. First they thought it was a true serum, then a lie serum, and for a while they didn't know what to think.

To make matters worse, there was a great deal of concern within the Agency that the Soviets and the Red Chinese might also have designs on LSD as an espionage weapon.

A survey conducted by the Officer of Scientific Intelligence noted that ergot was a commercial product in numerous Eastern Bloc countries. The enigmatic fungus also flourished in the Soviet Union, but Russian ergot had not yet appeared in foreign markets. Could this mean the Soviets were hoarding their supplies?

Since information on the chemical structure of LSD was available in scientific journals as early as 1947, the Russians might have been stockpiling raw ergot in order to convert it into a mind control weapon.

Although no Soviet data are available on LSD-25, the OSI study concluded, it must be assumed that the scientists of the USSR are thoroughly cognizant of the strategic importance of this powerful new drug and are capable of producing it at any time.


1/19/2007 11:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

seventhson said:
"I agree too that the cold war was contrived by Wall Street and the Dulles-Bush-Rockefeller cabal. Plates for printing money to buy US technology, armanents, etc. were delivered to Stalin after the end of the war (Anthony Sutton documents such things, but claims the NWO is really communistic and that Dulles et al are commies, incredibly)."

There are also link between Mao & western elites.

Communism, socialism, facism whatever you want to call it, if it is enforced through the barrel of a gun or a prison sentence, then it is total control. Common folk have been shafted from both sides of the 'left' v 'right' illusion.

For instance an ideology called distributism which involves combining voluntary socialism with free enterprise capitalism & liberty, is a common sense solution.
You wont see that being pushed, since it calls for the abolition of absolute capitalism (banks & corporatism) as well as enforced collectivism. Surprisingly enforced collectivism is a natural by-product of absolute capitalism, since everything eventually gets owned by the few.

1/19/2007 11:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anybody have a good link to photos of Prescott Bush seated near Hitler during the '36 olympics?

My search skills are quite limited and I lost the link when the capacitors on my last motherboard fried.


1/19/2007 01:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Lastly, my main problem with the story is that it doesn't fit. If the US elite was so nazified, why did they fight so unflinchingly against the third Reich til the very end ? Why didn't they just pull an about face and turn against the Soviets, instead of bankrolling their war machine since '41 ? Why go the complicated way ? This whole story of secretly nazi elites who just happen to rule a country which was instrumental in defeating national-socialism is a bit too.. contrived for me. Count me as an agnostic."

I understand your doubts but let me recommend a book entitled Friendly Fire by Lynn Picknett. It recounts the nefarious double-dealings that went on between Britain & America, during WW2.
From Amazon: "Friendly Fire investigates the intrigue and treachery between—and within—the nations that were ostensibly allies during the
Second World War. It asserts that the Allied war effort was more concerned with the balance of power in the postwar world than with the defeat of Germany and Japan. These machinations allegedly prolonged the duration of the war by as much as two years. Based on extensive research, this study contains information obtained from key archives as well as the testimonies of those individuals actively involved in the events. The result is a provocative reevaluation of Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin, and the real agenda behind the formation of the postwar world—and the consequences for us all."

If the relationship between the Allies was not what we were led to believe, is it any wonder that the relationship between America & the Nazis was not what we were led to believe.

In the end, it's about power isn't it?

& those who court power seem to be jealous bitches who don't like to share.

1/19/2007 01:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is rather interesting and corroborates much of what is being discussed in this thread.

Nazis in the attic by Randy Davis

Like Nixon, George Bush was deeply involved with supporting the Nazis in the Republican's closet. In fact, support for the Nazis was a Bush family tradition which goes back more than six decades and, once again, to Allen Dulles.

Loftus and Aarons write: "The real story of George Bush starts well before he launched his own career. It goes back to the 1920s, when the Dulles brothers and the other pirates of Wall Street were making their deals with the Nazis. . . ."


"George Bush's problems were inherited from his namesake and maternal grandfather, George Herbert 'Bert' Walker, a native of St. Louis, who founded the banking and investment firm of G. H. Walker and Company in 1900. Later the company shifted from St. Louis to the prestigious address of 1 Wall Street. . . .

"Walker was one of Hitler's most powerful financial supporters in the United States. The relationship went all the way back to 1924, when Fritz Thyssen, the German industrialist, was financing Hitler's infant Nazi party. As mentioned in earlier chapters, there were American contributors as well.

"Some Americans were just bigots and made their connections to Germany through Allen Dulles's firm of Sullivan and Cromwell because they supported Fascism. The Dulles brothers, who were in it for profit more than ideology, arranged American investments in Nazi Germany in the 1930s to ensure that their clients did well out of the German economic recovery. . . .

"Sullivan & Cromwell was not the only firm engaged in funding Germany. According to 'The Splendid Blond Beast,' Christopher Simpson's seminal history of the politics of genocide and profit, Brown Brothers, Harriman was another bank that specialized in investments in Germany. The key figure was Averill Harriman, a dominating figure in the American establishment. . . .

"The firm originally was known as W. A. Harriman & Company. The link between Harriman & Company's American investors and Thyssen started in the 1920s, through the Union Banking Corporation, which began trading in 1924. In just one three-year period, the Harriman firm sold more than $50 million of German bonds to American investors. 'Bert' Walker was Union Banking's president, and the firm was located in the offices of Averill Harriman's company at 39 Broadway in New York.

"In 1926 Bert Walker did a favor for his new son-in-law, Prescott Bush. It was the sort of favor families do to help their children make a start in life, but Prescott came to regret it bitterly. Walker made Prescott vice president of W. A. Harriman. The problem was that Walker's specialty was companies that traded with Germany. As Thyssen and the other German industrialists consolidated Hitler's political power in the 1930s, an American financial connection was needed. According to our sources, Union Banking became an out-and-out Nazi money-laundering machine. . . .

"In [1931], Harriman & Company merged with a British-American investment company to become Brown Brothers, Harriman. Prescott Bush became one of the senior partners of the new company, which relocated to 59 Broadway, while Union Banking remained at 39 Broadway. But in 1934 Walker arranged to put his son-in-law on the board of directors of Union Banking.

"Walker also set up a deal to take over the North American operations of the Hamburg-Amerika Line, a cover for I.G. Farben's Nazi espionage unit in the United States. The shipping line smuggled in German agents, propaganda, and money for bribing American politicians to see things Hitler's way. The holding company was Walker's American Shipping & Commerce, which shared the offices at 39 Broadway with Union Banking. In an elaborate corporate paper trail, Harriman's stock in American Shipping & Commerce was controlled by yet another holding company, the Harriman Fifteen Corporation, run out of Walker's office. The directors of this company were Averill Harriman, Bert Walker, and Prescott Bush. . . .

". . . In a November 1935 article in Common Sense, retired marine general Smedley D. Butler blamed Brown Brothers, Harriman for having the U.S. marines act like 'racketeers' and 'gangsters' in order to exploit financially the peasants of Nicaragua. . . .

". . . A 1934 congressional investigation alleged that Walker's 'Hamburg-Amerika Line subsidized a wide range of pro-Nazi propaganda efforts both in Germany and the United States.' Walker did not know it, but one of his American employees, Dan Harkins, had blown the whistle on the spy apparatus to Congress. Harkins, one of our best sources, became Roosevelt's first double agent . . . [and] kept up the pretense of being an ardent Nazi sympathizer, while reporting to Naval Intelligence on the shipping company's deals with Nazi intelligence.

"Instead of divesting the Nazi money," continue the authors, "Bush hired a lawyer to hide the assets. The lawyer he hired had considerable expertise in such underhanded schemes. It was Allen Dulles. According to Dulles's client list at Sullivan & Cromwell, his first relationship with Brown Brothers, Harriman was on June 18, 1936. In January 1937 Dulles listed his work for the firm as 'Disposal of Stan [Standard Oil] Investing stock.'

"As discussed in Chapter 3, Standard Oil of New Jersey had completed a major stock transaction with Dulles's Nazi client, I.G. Farben. By the end of January 1937 Dulles had merged all his cloaking activities into one client account: 'Brown Brothers Harriman-Schroeder Rock.' Schroeder, of course, was the Nazi bank on whose board Dulles sat. The 'Rock' were the Rockefellers of Standard Oil, who were already coming under scrutiny for their Nazi deals. By May 1939 Dulles handled another problem for Brown Brothers, Harriman, their 'Securities Custodian Accounts.'

"If Dulles was trying to conceal how many Nazi holding companies Brown Brothers, Harriman was connected with, he did not do a very good job. Shortly after Pearl Harbor, word leaked from Washington that affiliates of Prescott Bush's company were under investigation for aiding the Nazis in time of war. . . .

". . . The government investigation against Prescott Bush continued. Just before the storm broke, his son, George, abandoned his plans to enter Yale and enlisted in the U.S. Army. It was, say our sources among the former intelligence officers, a valiant attempt by an eighteen-year-old boy to save the family's honor.

"Young George was in flight school in October 1942, when the U.S. government charged his father with running Nazi front groups in the United States. Under the Trading with the Enemy Act, all the shares of the Union Banking Corporation were seized, including those held by Prescott Bush as being in effect held for enemy nationals. Union Banking, of course, was an affiliate of Brown Brothers, Harriman, and Bush handled the Harrimans' investments as well.

"Once the government had its hands on Bush's books, the whole story of the intricate web of Nazi front corporations began to unravel. A few days later two of Union Banking's subsidiaries -- the Holland American Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation -- also were seized. Then the government went after the Harriman Fifteen Holding Company, which Bush shared with his father- in-law, Bert Walker, the Hamburg-Amerika Line, and the Silesian- American Corporation. The U.S. government found that huge sections of Prescott Bush's empire had been operated on behalf of Nazi Germany and had greatly assisted the German war effort." (1)


"Try as he did," continue the authors, "George Bush could not get away from Dulles's crooked corporate network, which his grandfather and father had joined in the 1920s. Wherever he turned, George found that the influence of the Dulles brothers was already there. Even when he fled to Texas to become a successful businessman on his own, he ran into the pirates of Wall Street.

"One of Allen Dulles's secret spies inside the Democratic party later became George Bush's partner in the Mexican oil business. Edwin Pauley, a California oil man, was . . . one of Dulles's covert agents in the Roosevelt and Truman admini-strations . . . a 'big business' Democrat. . . .

Among the key posts held by Pauley were: treasurer of the Democratic National Committee, director of the Democratic convention in 1944 and, after Truman's election, Truman appointed him the "Petroleum Coordinator of Lend-Lease Supplies for the Soviet Union and Britain."

Just after the end of World War II, "in April 1945 Truman appointed Pauley as the U.S. representative to the Allied Reparations Committee, with the rank of ambassador," as well as "industrial and commercial advisor to the Potsdam Conference, 'where his chief task was to renegotiate the reparations agreements formulated at Yalta.' As one historian noted, the 'oil industry has always watched reparations activities carefully.' There was a lot of money involved, and much of it belonged to the Dulles brothers' clients."

At the same time, report Loftus and Aarons, "the Dulles brothers were still shifting Nazi assets out of Europe for their clients as well as for their own profit. They didn't want the Soviets to get their hands on these assets or even know that they existed. Pauley played a significant role in solving this problem for the Dulles brothers. The major part of Nazi Germany's industrial assets was located in the zones occupied by the West's forces. As Washington's man on the ground, Pauley managed to deceive the Soviets for long enough to allow Allen Dulles to spirit much of the remaining Nazi assets out to safety. . . .

"Pauley, a key player in the plan to hide the Dulles brothers' Nazi assets, then moved into another post where he could help them further. After successfully keeping German assets in Fascist hands, Pauley was given the job of 'surveying Japan's assets and determining the amount of its war debt.' Again, it was another job that was crucial to the Dulles clique's secret financial and intelligence operations." (2)

After Pauley retired from government work he went back to being an independent oil man. Loftus and Aarons state that: "In 1958 he founded Pauley Petroleum which: . . . teamed up with Howard Hughes to expand oil production in the Gulf of Mexico.

"Pauley Petroleum discovered a highly productive offshore petroleum reserve and in 1959 became involved in a dispute with the Mexican Government, which considered the royalties from the wells to be too low.

"According to our sources in the intelligence community, the oil dispute was really a shakedown of the CIA by Mexican politicians. Hughes and Pauley were working for the CIA from time to time, while advancing their own financial interests in the lucrative Mexican oil fields. Pauley, say several of our sources, was the man who invented an intelligence money-laundering system in Mexico, which was later refined in the 1970s as part of Nixon's Watergate scandal. At one point CIA agents used Pemex, the Mexican government's oil monopoly, as a business cover at the same time Pemex was being used as a money laundry for Pauley's campaign contributions. As we shall see, the Mexican-CIA connection played an important part in the development of George Bush's political and intelligence career. . . .

"Pauley, say the 'old spies,' was the man who brought all the threads of the Mexican connection together. He was Bush's business associate, a front man for Dulles's CIA [Allen Dulles was CIA director then], and originator of the use of Mexican oil fronts to create a slush fund for Richard Nixon's various campaigns. . . .

"Although it is not widely known, Pauley, in fact, had been a committed, if 'secret,' Nixon supporter since 1960. It should be recalled that Nixon tried to conceal his Mexican slush fund during the Watergate affair by pressuring the CIA into a 'national security' cover-up. The CIA, to its credit, declined to participate. Unfortunately, others were so enmeshed in Pauley's work for Nixon that they could never extricate themselves. According to a number of our intelligence sources, the deals Bush cut with Pauley in Mexico catapulted him into political life. In 1960 Bush became a protege of Richard Nixon, who was then running for president of the United States...

"The most intriguing of Bush's early connections was to Richard Nixon, who as vice president had supervised Allen Dulles's covert planning for the Bay of Pigs [invasion]. For years it has been rumored that Dulles's client, George Bush's father, was one of the Republican leaders who recruited Nixon to run for Congress and later convinced Eisenhower to take him on as vice president. There is no doubt that the two families were close. George Bush described Nixon as his 'mentor.' Nixon was a Bush supporter in his very first tilt at politics, during his unsuccessful run for the Senate in 1964, and turned out again when he entered the House two years later.

"After Nixon's landslide victory in 1972, he ordered a general house cleaning on the basis of loyalty. 'Eliminate everyone,' he told John Ehrlichman about reappointments, 'except George Bush. Bush will do anything for our cause.' . . . According to Bush's account, the president told him that 'the place I really need you is over at the National Committee running things.' So, in 1972, Nixon appointed George Bush as head of the Republican National Committee.

"It was Bush who fulfilled Nixon's promise to make the 'ethnic' emigres a permanent part of Republican politics. In 1972 Nixon's State Department spokesman confirmed to his Australian counterpart that the ethnic groups were very useful to get out the vote in several key states. Bush's tenure as head of the Republican National Committee exactly coincided with Laszlo Pasztor's 1972 drive to transform the Heritage Groups Council into the party's official ethnic arm. The groups Pasztor chose as Bush's campaign allies were the emigre Fascists whom Dulles had brought to the United States. . . .

". . . Nearly twenty years later, and after expose's in several respectable newspapers, Bush continued to recruit most of the same ethnic Fascists, including Pasztor, for his own 1988 ethnic outreach program when he first ran for president.

"According to our sources in the intelligence community," state the authors, "it was Bush who told Nixon that the Watergate investigations might start uncovering the Fascist skeletons in the Republican party's closet. Bush himself acknowledges that he wrote Nixon a letter asking him to step down. The day after Bush did so, Nixon resigned.

"Bush had hoped to become Gerald Ford's vice president upon Nixon's resignation, but he was appointed U.S. ambassador to the UN. Nelson Rockefeller became vice president and chief damage controller. He formed a special commission in an attempt to preempt the Senate's investigation of the intelligence community. The Rockefeller Commission into CIA abuses was filled with old OPC [Dulles's Office of Policy Coordination] hands like Ronald Reagan, who had been the front man back in the 1950s for the money-laundering organization, the Crusade for Freedom, which was part of Dulles's Fascist 'freedom fighters' program." (3)

In 1988, Project Censored, a news media censorship research organization, awarded the honor of "Top Censored story" to the subject of George Bush. The article revealed "how the major mass media ignored, overlooked or undercovered at least ten critical stories reported in America's alternative press that raised serious questions about the Republican candidate, George Bush, dating from his reported role as a CIA 'asset' in 1963 to his Presidential campaign's connection with a network of anti-Semites with Nazi and fascist affiliations in 1988." (4)

How about the Mexico connection? Not that we didn't know that already, but it surely explains Oswald in Mexico (which one...which Oswald, that is?) shortly before JFK's demise.

1/19/2007 01:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

& those who court power seem to be jealous bitches who don't like to share.

If you're not a member of their tribe, or clan, that is.

David Brin (sorry, IC)linked to an interesting article on Social Structures, of which discussion about tribes/clans can be found.

IN SEARCH OF HOW SOCIETIES WORK: Tribes -- The First and Forever Form.

It's a thinly disguised narrative on how to best understand the people you are currently occupying, i.e. the peasants of the Middle East, however, it unwittingly can be a narrative for understanding the Elite, whoever the hell "they" are.

Think about about it. How profound are those words when you apply them to the "Elite" and their seeming permanance; "The First and Forever Form."

This narrative was created and published by our firneds at the Rand Corporation. Sometimes you have to spend time in the Belly of the Beast to know the Beast. The trick is to not get digested while there.

1/19/2007 01:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Soul Splitting

These meditations are extremely advanced and can be dangerous to those who are inexperienced.These were used with Mengele who was studied twins.They would kill one twin in front of the other and lots of other weird and very strange experiments.For information only.

One should be experienced in meditation, energy manipulation, invoking the elements and in understanding of what he/she is doing on the astral level.

To begin with any of these meditations, one must be thoroughly relaxed.

Being disturbed by others, loud noises, the phone ringing, visitors or anything else, including being touched by animals can be dangerous.


1. To sense and feel your aura: expand your awareness out past your physical self a few inches and sense your aura's energy.

2. FEEL your aura and meditate upon it for a few minutes.

3. Expand and contract your aura.

4. Breathe energy into and out of your aura.

5. If you feel you are ready, you can invoke each of the elements into your aura. These should be done slowly, no more than seven breaths to begin with. It is best to only go with one element per day.

6. Meditate on the feeling of each element after invoking into your aura.

7. If you feel uncomfortable, just breathe the element back out.


1. The light body can be felt by expanding your awareness to the energy within your body. This can be felt.

2. FEEL your light body and meditate upon this.

3. Breathe in energy into and out of your light body.


1. Focus inward upon your awareness. This is your mental body.

2. Wherever you focus your attention, this is your mental body.
When we expand our awareness, we expand this aspect of our soul.

3. Meditate on being aware of your mental body.

Sabrina Selene

1/19/2007 02:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks, Sabrina.

I had a dream last night where I made intensely passionate love to one of my attractive female co-workers. She's recently divorced...and I believe she's sending me signals, although I refuse to acknowledge them because I am happily married and will not engage in infidelity.

Anyhow, when I awoke I saw that the dream had expanded my aura and, in fact, made it quite stiff. When I went to the bathroom to take my morning leak, it was difficult to urinate because of my expanded split my urine stream into several streams instead of my soul. I think that's the problem with this procedure...sometimes you can't control what gets split.

1/19/2007 02:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Altered States

Arnold Mandell at UC San Diego has identified the septo-hippocampal-amygdaloid circuit of the limbic system which can be sent into oscillation by feedback from drumming, sensory deprivation and drugs. The result is a state of temporal lobe epilepsy in which the individual experiences transcendent states (auras) and often feelings of possession or terror. Smells, such a brimstone or heavenly fragrances, are often involved indicating the involvement of the limbic system which is also known as the rhinocephalon or "smell brain". These events are often accompanied by feelings of intense meaningfulness or great portentousness.
- Barry L. Beyerstein, Notes from a lecture before the BC Skeptics Society (22 April 1994)

"...Movement, odd visual experiences, the profoundness, the fact that it's true reality, the intense meaningfulness, the cosmic significance of it all, the desire to proselytize, to spread the word, the sense of the personal, as if one is particularly chosen- these are all classic temporal lobe signs."
"...The whole context of feeling that there's another self giving you information, whether it's identified as the Great Spirit, an extraterrestrial, or just another personality, that whole operation is extraordinarily similar to temporal lobe phenomena."
- Michael Persinger

The effect of electromagnetic fields on the temporal lobe have been used to explain some of the phenomena associated with close encounters with "UFOs".

According to Peter Fenwick, sensitives selected by the London Society for Psychical Research showed a high incidence of head traumas at some point in their lives. Michael Persinger has noted that the soft neural signs associated with mystical experience correlates with temporal lobe transients which "color" attitudes, beliefs and behaviors. Four percent of the population is "fantasy prone" according to Banber(?) and Wilson's scale. A study of a science fiction group showed a correlation between fantasy imagery, temporal lobe transients. and esoteric beliefs.
- Barry L. Beyerstein, Notes from a lecture before the BC Skeptics Society (22 April 1994)

"The cerebellum is the source of sexual excitement and of orgasm. If man's evolution is the result of a conflict between the old and new brain, resulting in a degree of reconciliation, then is it not conceivable that glimpses of higher consciousness are the result of a momentary integration of the old and new brains?
"Elmer and Alyce Green of the Menniger Foundation discovered that hypnogogic images are accompanied by strong theta rhythms, which suggests that the cerebellum is the source of theta rhythms. Their research into biofeedback also showed that, while relaxation states are accompanied by alpha rhythms, deeper states of reverie produced long trains of theta rhythms. This led them to speculate that states of creativity might be accompanied by theta rhythms, since so many poets and scientists have received sudden bursts of inspiration when they were in states between sleeping and waking."
- Colin Wilson, Mysteries : An Investigation into the Occult, the Paranormal, and the Supernatural

"The transcendent state is characterized by 'resting-state alpha' and relatively high-amplitude, synchronous slow-wave activity in the median of the central cortex accompanied by regional (commonly temporal) gamma (30-hertz-plus) brain-wave activity."
- Murray Cox in Omni, October '93
Altered States


1/19/2007 02:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So, in otherwords, another more direct and brutal way to expand your aura is to "Bang Your Head."

I’m an axe grinder, pile driver
Mama says that I never, never mind her
Got no brains, I'm insane
The teacher says that I'm one big pain
I'm like a lazer, six string razor
I've got a mouth like an alligator
I want it louder, more power
I'm gonna rock it till it strikes the hour

Bang your head
Metal health will drive you mad
Bang your head
Metal health will drive you mad

I'm frustrated and out-dated
I really wanna be over-rated
I'm a finder and I'm a keeper
I'm not a loser, and I ain't no weeper
I got the boys to make the noise
Won't ever let up, hope it annoys you
Join the pack fee the crack
Well now you're here, there's no way back!!!!!!


Metal health will cure your crazy
Metal health will cure your mad
Metal health is what we all need
It's like a heart attack!!!!!!!

Bang your head wake the dead
We're all metal mad, it’s all you have
So bang your head and raise the dead oh yeah
Metal health it drives you mad, mad, mad, mad


(Over chorus to fade..)
Ah get your straightjackets on tonight ohh
The bad boys are gonna set you right
Oh rock ya, rock ya, rock ya

1/19/2007 02:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Each of us has an electro-magnetic field around our bodies. This is what we know as the aura. Our thoughts and the activity of our brain form a circuit within that aura. Since thoughts and brain activity are electrical impulses, they can be decoded and read. The world powers are well aware of this and with advanced computer technology, are able to decipher a person's thoughts, where they can be received by a special device and the out put is much like when satellite signals are formed into a picture on our TV sets.

There are also microchips that can be used as implants along certain neural pathways to send electrical impulses to the brain, stimulating certain thoughts, feelings, beliefs or implanting certain memories. Although this technology has a way to go, there are now actual thought reading machines, which, like everything else in time, will be perfected. A device is placed upon a subject�s skin at certain points that reads the bioelectrical output and decodes these impulses to where they can easily be read with a special computer.

During the 1970's the world powers acquired major advances and breakthroughs in mind control technology. Hypnosis has many positive applications, such as healing or breaking certain habits. Most "professional" hypnotists agree that when under a hypnotic trance, the subject will never act against his/her own will or perform acts contrary to his/her own nature. This, in reality is bullshit. A trained and confident operator can impel a subject to do anything he/she commands him/her to do.

20% of the population is perfect subjects for hypnosis. Above average intelligence, the existence of an imaginary playmate in childhood, a strong tendency to daydreaming and fantasy, and the will to comply make one a desirable candidate.

In the black arts of hypnotism, the hypnotist and subject form a master/slave relationship. The subject must be isolated from friends and family and spend much time alone with the operator, where a rapport is established, as in government experiments or sometimes as one does with a cellmate in prison. An emotional rapport is very important in establishing trust and obedience. The operator must come across as a good listener and show supposed genuine interest in the subject. The subject is made to feel comfortable around the operator and can be open with him/her.

The initial hypnotic induction is the most important, as it breaks through into the subject's mind and opens a door to the hypnotist. When in the alpha state, the logical mind is inactive, and one is open to all suggestions. The operator gives the subject the suggestion that he/she will become deeply hypnotized again whenever the operator gives the induction cue. This can be in words or a signal. Each session induces a deeper hypnotic state where the subject slips under the complete control of the operator. With deeper trances, the subject becomes more and more powerless against the operator.

Artificial amnesia (also known as a "mind wipe") is induced by the operator suggesting to the subject that he/she will not have any conscious knowledge of the session. Further important suggestions include that the subject will not in any way be able to be hypnotized by anyone else and that he/she will act in a trance, just as if awake.

Once the subject is easily hypnotized by the operator, the mind and personality can then be conditioned. Childhood playmates are often extensions of one's personality, especially in those who are of weaker character and would not fight back personally or defend themselves. The imaginary playmate can fight back and get angry, where as the child cannot. Often, there is an abusive parent, to whom the angry thoughts and actions of the playmate are directed against.
During the initial conditioning phase of the session, the operator regresses the subject into childhood. Regression plays a very important part in establishing control over the subject. An operator who works for the government as in producing spies, will look for the most aggressive of the imaginary friends, in attempting to artificially split the personality. The most aggressive aspects of the personality are the ideal in destroying all inhibitions.

Artificial splitting of the personality occurs where the imaginary playmate is brought out in the subject and the subject becomes the playmate on cue. The playmate usually emerges through one of the subject's chakras. The operator informs the subject that "playmate's name" will come through subject's stomach, third eye, throat, etc. The subject is further told again that he/she will not remember anything of the session or the emerging personality. In actual cases, the emerging stronger personality is conditioned through programming and suggestion to be hostile to the root personality of the subject.
This aggressive personality in nearly all cases is stronger and can take more abuse. The world powers use the subject as robotic spies. Extensive programming is instilled in the aggressive personality, so that they will never divulge certain information, even under torture. The root personality, who is amnesiac of the entire experience is often the one who endures systematic torture, with no memory or recall of the information the interrogator is attempting to force them to reveal.

Through repeated sessions the personality is brought out more and more and becomes much stronger, completely splitting off of the root. The subject, due to being programmed not to remember, has no knowledge, only gaps in time and missing pieces in the memory. Much time slips by unnoticed and is unaccounted for.

Further conditioning sessions, while under, include talking the subject through an experience completely abhorrent to their nature, where the subject is made in his/her mind to do something he/she would never consciously do. The subject actually experiences what the operator says. Through repeated sessions, all inhibitions are overcome and the personality is shaped into whatever the operator wishes. This is where the subject, for example, can murder ANYONE without hesitation or do anything else the operator commands. Like anything else, repeated programming is instilled and maintained in subsequent sessions.

Barbiturates can be injected into a stubborn subject that will render his/her mind open to whatever suggestions the operator wishes to instill. This is known as "Military Psychology."

Charles Manson was known to take less drugs and to be more in control and aware than the other members of his family. This is how he put many under his control, without their knowledge. People on drugs are extremely easy to control either psychically, as a skilled mage would do, or in an actual clinical setting. He learned these methods in prison and applied them. Drug use also puts holes in the protective aura that can easily be manipulated by an adept.

Electric Shock Treatment works to destroy memories and can be used to wipe the mind clean by agencies within the world powers. The mind is then reprogrammed, beliefs, ideas, thinking patterns, and habits are instilled, usually through trance induction by drugs, until the new personality takes hold and the drugs are no longer needed. This is known as "brainwashing" and can be done for all purposes.

Most people are unaware of what can be done to their minds by those who have more knowledge and control. Self-hypnosis is useful in where we, ourselves, program our own minds. We can program our minds to be resistant to all unwanted influences. In addition, others will not be able to influence our minds or establish control over us in any way.

References: Secret, Don't Tell : The Encyclopedia of Hypnotism by Carla Emery, 1998


1/19/2007 02:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For those who care to take a peak, I'm having some words with Brin over at Contrary Brin about 911 and Flight 93. He and another poster are pushing the heroic rebellion myth...and I couldn't control myself. Feel free to let Mr. Brin know how you feel about Flight 93....and watch him come undone when the tide of sentiment turns on him.

1/19/2007 03:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


You wrote about when you dreamed of a plane crash once before it occurred.

Psychic experiences can happen in the alpha state.

Both daydreaming and
sleep dreaming occurs while in the alpha state.

Physiologically, certain neurons in the brain stem, known as REM sleep-on cells (located in the pontine tegmentum), are particularly active during REM sleep, and are probably responsible for its occurrence. The release of certain neurotransmitters, the monoamines (norepinephrine, serotonin and histamine), is completely shut down during REM.

This causes REM atonia, a state in which the motor neurons are not stimulated and thus the body's muscles don't move. Lack of such REM atonia causes REM Behavior Disorder; sufferers act out the movements occurring in their dreams.

Heart rate and breathing rate are irregular during REM sleep, again similar to the waking hours. Body temperature is not well regulated during REM.

Erections of the penis (Nocturnal Penile Tumescence or NPT) is an established accompaniment of REM sleep and is used diagnostically to determine if male erectile dysfunction is of organic or psychological origin.

Clitoral enlargement, with accompanying vaginal blood flow and transudation (i.e. lubrication) is also present during REM.

The eye movements associated with REM are generated by the pontine nucleus with projections to the superior colliculus and are associated with PGO (pons, geniculate, occipital) waves.

The theta state is 4 - 7 cycles per second. This is where all of our emotional experiences are recorded and is of the subconscious. The theta level opens the door to descend even deeper into the psychic/astral world.

While it is possible to have psychic experiences in the alpha state, the most profound experiences occur at the theta level.

At this level, one is able to experience astral travel and psychic communication, achieve enlightenment, and enter into other dimensions; this is where past lives can be accessed.

Brain wave activity in the delta state ranges from 0 - 4 cycles per second.
This is total unconsciousness, coma.

When in the alpha state, visualizing our desires, as if they are real and actually happening will make them manifest in reality, especially if affirmations are included.

In theory, it is said the subconscious mind believes what it is told in this state to be true.

Becoming proficient with descending into the Alpha level is usually necessary before you can easily descend into Theta at will.


There is a free downloadable (Brainwave Generator) program available with Schumanns resonance which is the frequency of the earth.

Plus lots of other settings for self-hypnosis and meditation you can download if you so desire.


Artemis/Diana believed her virgin body was very sacred and not for a male's eyes.

One day the hunter, Actaeon, was wandering around and stumbled upon Diana bathing.

Diana became so angry, she turned Actaeon into a stag.

Now he was unable to speak, and so no one would ever hear about Diana's naked body.

"Now you are free to tell that you have seen me all unrobed—if you can tell." [Artemis to Actaeon. Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.192

No one shall lift my veil.

But daydreaming is ok by me.


1/19/2007 04:15:00 PM  
Blogger ericswan said...

well Shrub there's the rub bub.

It surprises me with the reports that I read here which I had no idea were out there that the posters have deflated their investigation and come up short of a full report.

Hitler ended up in Montana. He lived there to the ripe old age of 114 and when he passed away aka William Coates (no pictures please) he was the oldest person living in America . (2004)

The rest of the story ties everything we think we don't know we know up into a tightly wound little package called

1/19/2007 04:20:00 PM  
Blogger ftr23532 said...

Dave Emory did a recent show on Operation Sunshine, and how Dulles & Friends were basically extending the war to prevent the Allies from disrupting the Nazi flight-capital program near the end of the war. Here's the link to the show description: FTR#578—Darkness at Sunrise—The Interdiction of Operation Safehaven.
And here's the audio file

1/19/2007 04:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeff wrote on his own rewrite:

"cut out the mention of Kissinger serving as Dulles's post-war translator because I decided I don't know enough of Kissinger's role in those years to suggest he also shouldered some responsibility for Paperclip. He would have been only in his early 20s, so my guess is Paperclip shaped him more than he shaped Paperclip, but that seems like the topic for another post."

According to McGowan's take on it in Understanding the F-Word, which is very one sided in what is going on and crippled by only seeing the Nazi wing in my opinion (when there was an equally totalitarian pro-Soviet wing against democracy in the United States and worldwide), he does mention that Kissinger and Nixon were acting together on the post WWII project of illegally scrubbing the word "Nazi Party" from the Project Paperclip files, it being illegal to import these types according to Truman ((33rd degree mason) allied to the other side of the global internationalists as was FDR (32 degree mason), working for the 'other side').

Kennedy's assassination represents the Nazi coup of the USA from then to now, when they cleared the positions of pro-Soviet thinking for pro-Nazi thinking.

In the 1970s, there was open institutional warfare between the two different international cliques for domination of the USA. With the failed 'investigating committees' of the 1970s, the Nazis stayed in power.

And from Kay Griggs' videos, made in the late 1990s, she has quite a lot about Kissinger to say, so watch her 8 hour expose of just what the hell is going on in the black ops world of the USA. She was married to the deputy (second in command) of all U.S. black ops, and had quite a lot to say about psychological profiling of recruitment, sexual blackmail, institutionalized pedophilia/homosexuality to get to the top in the United States military services (that she claims came from the German contingent taking over--i'm hardly so confident it can exclusively be traced to that), and Nazi legal slippage in the USA, etc. She was under death threats, so made this video to save herself via publicity--same strategy why we heard anything from Senator DeCamp about the Franklin Cover-Up, by the way which all ties into the same thing. Griggs even mentions this as well.

1/19/2007 06:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder what the real story is behind the SD. If Dulles and other elites held the SD in such high regard, what is the real story behind the "night of the long knives"?

Also, in reply to an above poster, while I do regard Griggs as sincere, I don't hold the same opinion of DeCamp. DeCamp was/is your classic gatekeeper. He held back most of the real true story behind the still ongoing enormous kidnapping/RA going on in the US.

1/19/2007 06:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Agnostic said:

"I am going to go out on a limb here, as I am no historian. But this story seems highly suspicious to me. The Prussian nobility has traditionally stacked the officers' ranks of the German army, from the days of old to the Third Reich. Just check out the names of the great Wehrmacht commanders, von Manstein, von Tresckow, von Stülpnagel, von Brauchitsch. The Prussian aristocrats were generally hostile to national-socialism, and considered the regular army (as opposed to the SS) as their domain. Look at who conducted the July 44 bombings, and who was executed in its aftermath. .... Lastly, my main problem with the story is that it doesn't fit. If the US elite was so nazified, why did they fight so unflinchingly against the third Reich til the very end ?"

First point, see a history of WWII written and published in 1943 before it was over to understand this dynamic of aristocratic Junkers vs. Hitler though in uneasy alliance with him and who put him there (a British-Nazi allied wing actually. Thanks to Kris Millegan for making this interesting book available at his blog/archive of incunabula:

The Thousand Year Conspiracy - Secret Germany Behind the Mask (1943)

Post WWII 'victors' books whitewash the whole story, intentionally.

(And thanks to Kris for putting up an updated Bones roster post 1985, a list from obviously hard sleuthing. Bonesmen and Bonesgirls got downright secretive (pun intended) about their lists after the Antony Sutton books about Bones published in the 1980s hit home. And pretty descent showing at there for a 30 year old book: ~#73,000 in purchase popularity)

Another point unmentioned yet was that Hitler remember didn't want to go to war against Britain.

Hitler let all his fellow British "Aryans" flee back to England at Dunkirk, and Hitler and the "Clivenden Set" in England wanted a consolidated Reich front against the USSR.

However, the other Allied-Soviet-British branch wanted global war to be waged differently to pincer Germany and destroy Europe's cultural and material heritage of thousand year traditions in some places between the Soviet-wing in USA/Britain and USSR, which was able to finagle just that sooner or later.

(Another point, mentioned in Fourth Reich of the Rich, was that the moment that the USSR got out of the internationalists control via Stalin stacking the Party with his cronies and Trostky was ejected from the scene, Hitler was overnight invented to threaten a 'rogue' internationalist project. Stalin coming to power in the USSR, who was not ORIGINALLY IN ON THE INTERNATIONLIST PLAN, is a factor important to consider. By the Nazi-Stalin pact in the late 1930s though, he was 'back on board' the international consolidation route. "Uncle Joe" (the odious name that FDR gave him in the (as early as?) 'Fireside Chat' era and during WWII showed Stalin was back on board with Roosevelt, and the dismantling of the British Empire was part of their Allied plan as well, something that Churchill began to realize during the close of the war as well and didn't like being sidelined. However, Churchill, got back on board after WWII as well, always close friend to Bernard Baruch a key gray eminence in USA politics from WWI onward. Churchill's original anti-Zionist stance and anti-world revolutionary stance led to his political ousture, until he changed his mind in the 1930s, and voila, he was back in power as quick as you can say inherited power, for we all know the Churchills were the 'first family,' connected to restorationist Stuarts back in the 1660s, right?)

As for 'agnostics,' second point, another point unmentioned so far is that to extend the war a few years longer for issues above and more just for profit. A 1943 Canadian held joint USSR-USA-Britain conference [cite: Fourth Reich of the Rich] decided already how to split up Europe down the middle between the two pro-Soviet wings, and to withdraw and stop from pushing across Europe from the already successful French Operation Overloard invasion. Then, another thing was to invade through Sicily and Italy to let the USSR catch up, and then withdraw once more, since they were still behind! They wanted the Soviet branch to catch up, and yes, let the them take over Eastern Europe intentionally. That Soviet branch in the Allies was waiting on the Soviets to 'catch up' with the USA-British-Soviet wing from the west of Europe. All this let the war continue a few years longer, making the Nazi internationalist wing mad which was only a bud off the movement in some least originally. However, all the really strange science work came out of occult Germany and Himmler's operations. Nazis even had a dirty nuke bomb they tested on some island in the Baltic (BBC reporting several months ago). This led to high level Oppenheimer leaked information of the USSR wing in the Manhattan Project to ship almost everything the USA had to the USSR [cite: Major Jordan's Diaries]. Besides, FDR's right hand man, Henry Hopkins, was a Soviet Agent--confirmed now after the dissolution of the USSR and its KGB documents. When FBI head Hoover made quiet reports to the executive branch that there were "Soviet moles" all through the FDR regime, and only saw them promoted out of those positions to something larger in the U.N. (like White), it gave Hoover pause. Hoover began to ally with the Nazi wing as well, and already had the organized crime connections through the FBI. Anyway, that's getting carried away here away from the original point which was...extending the war for profit and mutual destruction and suffering of what was to be 'wiped' from history.

After all, some of the international banker foundations in the USA, as reported by the Ford Foundation head, were given the strategy after WWII for the "peaceable integration of the USA and the Soviet Union" via consolidating the twos cultures to be virtually identical.

However, the the Nazi wing burst back in by the 1960s and 1970s, particuarly after the Kennedy assassination by the clique, and has been going strong ever since.

So as to why did they continue to fight then? Why not? What could be easier? What else destroys what came before, materially and in terms of psychic connections of the population, better than warfare as 'urban renewal'? Do you know what Europe (intentionally) lost in the way of cultural richness and independence from such totalitarian sloganeering during WWI and WWII?

And what else makes more money than warfare industry?

As to the issue of the 'double agenteur' of Dulles, yes. He was just a client of others. He seemed instrumental in arranging or at least delivering the 'go ahead' for the 'first U.N. war' (excuse me, police action) in the Koreas to legitimate internationally U.N. directed troops for the first time, a key internationalist goal to demote all legitimacy of nationalist and more locally autonomous and more representative armies. Later of course, all these clients of power seem to have gotten powerful enough to have turned the tables on global strategy themselves, toward a 'from the grave' Nazi based global private based consolidation? CFR started talking about such slow piecemeal destruction of nationalism in their journal ("end runs around national sovereignty") instead of taking it on directly as had been the strategy before. Nazi wings were pinned back on, Gladio takes over Europe, Northwoods plans take over the USA, NATO turns itself into a group imperial pre-emptive invasion Fourth Reich, regimes of "your papers please" repression and state internal terrorism become common, German troops were imported into England to 'police' the British territory during the World Soccer there last year, and ta da, here we are...

rocco said:

"DeCamp was/is your classic gatekeeper. He held back most of the real true story behind the still ongoing enormous kidnapping/RA going on in the US."

Did the gatekeeping come from DeCamp, or from the fact that the documentary that he made with Yorkshire TV in the early 1990s was banned by other people? There is one instance that DeCamp admitted in a later public talk, he said he intentionally left out of his original book when the kid with the diary said that he was taken for ritual abuse "to some place with great big [redwood] trees where there was a huge Owl worshipped". In the first edition, DeCamp obviously found this hard to belive. Though with more information coming out that Bohemian Grove was connected to Boys Town in this way, and with the whole Franklin Cover-Up, DeCamp regretted leaving that out then.

DeCamp came out of the Phoenix Project as well, let's remember as well. So you may be right that he has stuff to hide, though I don't think he was personally responsible for gatekeeping all this pedophile ring information [?], after all he arranged to appear in the documentary Conspiracy of Silence as well as wrote 'the book' about it (The Franklin Cover-Up). For gatekeepers look to the Republican pedophiles who swept into power in 1994 with (Boho Grover) Gengrich, just as the the documentary was scheduled to air. And then, it didn't. And that's where we are once more. ta da. The USA's second generation of Bush family male prostitute using White House occupiers. Baby Bush has just added a bald man (and public exhibitionism of it) fetish to his pedophilia. Who said he didn't top his old man? (See Olberman's review of the crying jags of Bush Senior reserved for the unexpected Jeb Bush political difficulties, which in many ways, led to psychopath Baby Bush as 'Plan B from Planet Bush' in power right now. The only thing Olberman leaves out is that Baby Bush HATES his father with a passion, and HATES being pressured into responsibility positions, and is contemptuous of both. Note the astounding admittal at the last clip of the Olberman interview of the author of "Bush's Brain" he interviews: that Bush was pretty non-plussed about either winning or losing the 2000 election, he didn't really care. And his whole seven years so far in the Presidency shows that every day. So while Bush Senior is really crying over is about Jeb's exit full of 'what if's', he thinking about a huge screw up of Baby Bush and his whole family for the rest of time, I presume. And to bring it back to the main topic, I should add it's a well deserved anathema, and even if Bush Senior cries everyday, its hardly enough for their crimes: the fall of the Bushes is only several generations overdue for this treasonously evil family of American Nazis, and still they are escaping without war crimes so far that trace back from Bonesman Prescott Bush, others by Bonesman Bush Senior, and others by Bonesman Baby Bush.

1/19/2007 07:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

allegiance is a fickle and cruel mistress

to whom are we loyal today?

to our family, to our social class, to our race, our religion, our country, our hemisphere, our economic system, our selfs, our political systems, etc..

and all the mixes thereof - 1/5 family + 1/7 religion + etc etc.

undoubtedly, these various loyalities would be brought up if ever these silken traitors were taken to court.. but betrayal is betrayal no matter what the reason, no matter how it's couched..

the injustice of it is still galling even with it being so many years ago..

1/19/2007 09:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeff, I had a similar yup, you got me.. moment when I read this:

Lust excites energy and releases strength. Pitilessly it drove primitive man to victory, for the pride of bearing back a woman the spoils of the defeated. Today it drives the great men of business who run the banks, the press and international trade to increase their wealth by creating centers, harnessing energies and exalting the crowds, to worship and glorify with it the object of their lust. These men, tired but strong, find time for lust, the principal motive force of their action and of the reactions caused by their actions affecting multitudes and worlds.


We must get rid of all the ill-omened debris of romanticism, counting daisy petals, moonlight duets, heavy endearments, false hypocritical modesty. When beings are drawn together by a physical attraction, let them—instead of talking only of the fragility of their hearts—dare to express their desires, the inclinations of their bodies, and to anticipate the possibilities of joy and disappointment in their future carnal union.

Futurist Manifesto of Lust, 1913

I believe the Getty Museum in Los Angeles has an archive of mail correspondence btwn Hitler and F. T. Marinetti, though I don´t believe they have made the letters available on the internet or they might not even be available to the public through their museum. As is commonly known, Hilter was not a big fan of modern art, but did not include Futurism in the Entartete Kuntz or Degenerate Art exhibition of 1937. It would be amazing to actually read that correspondence.

Btw, regarding your last blog entry, my prediction is that the Indianapolis ´Cults´ are going to win the Super Bowl this year.

1/19/2007 10:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

FYI. German Catholics, rank and file:

"Ultimately, you have to ask whether the "Great Game" of Cold War politics was entirely scripted before WW2 had even ended."

... or before WWII even started.

Yes, unverified, but still nagging is Pike's WWIII quote to Mazzini.

1/19/2007 11:17:00 PM  
Blogger ericswan said...

Jeff..Bob Dylan's lyrics page

1/19/2007 11:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Trotskyites of the Left and Right, Unite! Conquer the Working Class!"

Another interesting point, calling attention to Jeff's image, is that I remember watching that Star Trek "Nazi" episode years ago, where Kirk holds forth saying how good the Nazis "coulda been", if "the right people could have taken over it."

That that was the episodes moral reminded me of a rather soft sell Goebbels propaganda episode, selling the perennial delusion that "the right people" at the head of any totalitarian operation can do good.

What the writers of that episode seem to have left out, was the Nazis fervently believed they were ALREADY doing good. That seemed to have been lost on the dictatorial technique admiration of its capacity "to do good", planted in the mouth of Captain Kirk...

And if you think that that lesson has been learned by the left, you're mistaken as well. As soon as Chavez started saying he was a Trotskyite recently, there was another rush to his defense from the very people who would decry such techniques if they came wrapped in right wing wrapping paper... I've attempted to get a word in edgewise that the neocons ARE Trotskyites as well, though no one wants to hear it that that movement has been an international banker movement since it was invented. Irving Kristol looks back fondly on being a Trotskyite.

So does Wolfie I think.

It's as Alex Jones says, on the whole fake internationalist left vs. internationalist right "intercompetition for the head CEO jobs of the same Slavery, Incorporated."

With this messiah complex, that "totalitarianism of good (elite) guys" might be preferable, no wonder they put Tiberius as the middle name of Captain James T. Kirk in the series. Of course every totalitarian really thinks in the end they will be doing good, just a little further down the road, perhaps the next corner, after we slaughter the "last" 100,000 civilians in opposition, well, at least by next light, etc.

So here's a little story of the elite Trotskyites that shapeshift their public ideology more than it's hard to keep track of, except for one commonality: they don't want to listen to anyone except themselves, and they want to keep power as managers regardless of a global conquest project. And people with that mindset are quite connected to aristocratic pretensions. Two wings currently flying are the Anglo-American "Schachtmanite-Fabian" admixture, to coin a phrase...

Intro Quote

Pilot: 'Ive got numerous individuals on the road. You want me to take them out?'

Voice: 'Take them out'
[We're the good guy invaders.]

US War Crimes Caught on Video taken from an F-16 Fighter Jet
By Video
Jan 18, 2007, 12:01

...the fact is that many of the original generation of neoconservatives had a background of association with Trotskyism in its Shachtmanite iteration — that is, they belonged to or sympathized with a trend in radical leftism that followed the principle of opposition to the Soviet betrayal of the revolution to its logical end. [Really, it had more to do with their personal ousture from Stalin's Communist International that peeved them.] The Shachtmanites, in the 1960s, joined the AFL-CIO in its best Cold War period, and many became staunch Reaganites. ["The Reagan Revolution"; "The Gengrich Revolution", etc. Seems the right wing is using that term more than the left nowadays--because the right is the "Marxist right" see below:]

This path had been pioneered much earlier by two Trotskyists: James Burnham, who became a founder of National Review, and Irving Kristol, who worked on [CIA magazine] Encounter magazine. Burnham was joined at National Review by Suzanne LaFollette, who, piquantly enough, retained some copyrights to Trotskyist material until her death. But they were not the only people on the right who remained, in some degree, sentimental about their left-wing past. Willmoore Kendall, for example, was, as I recall, a lifelong contributor to relief for Spanish radical leftist refugees living in France. Above all, Burnham and Kristol, in a certain sense, did not renounce their pasts."


"In a review of Eric Hobsbawm’s memoirs, Christopher Hitchens remarked that [Fabian] Tony Blair is “at once the most radical and the most conservative of politicians. Very many of Blair’s tough young acolytes received their political baptism in what I try to call the Marxist Right. This ideological category—the Marxist right—is quite useful. It explains not only the policies that plunder our purses and wreak havoc on the world but the distinctly Soviet style of our [elite] rulers and their Amen Corner, as they demonize their enemies and seek to silence them.


"Shachtman supported the Vietnam War and the Bay of Pigs Invasion yet still kept his devotion to socialism intact. He took over the old Socialist Party apparatus in the late 1950’s and changed its name to Social Democrats, USA. In this incarnation, the group had an influence well beyond its small numbers—not on the left, which was going in a different direction, but on the American right. During the Reagan era, a number of top Social Democrat leaders and activists were given key niches in the government bureaucracy, including Jeane Kirkpatrick, the U.S. delegate to the United Nations; Elliott Abrams, a former staffer for Senator Jackson, a major figure in the Iran-Contra affair, and assistant secretary of state for Inter-American Affairs under Reagan; Carl Gershman, the first president of the National Endowment for Democracy [that Orwellian CIA operation]; and Arch Puddington, who worked for the [CIA's] U.S. Information Agency’s Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

National Review celebrated May Day 2002 by publishing a report by Joshua Muravchik on a kind of family reunion sponsored by SDUSA in Washington:

"among those sponsoring or joining the evening’s festivities—funded mainly by the estate of the widow of Trotskyist icon Max Shachtman--were, on the right, Jeane Kirkpatrick, former Christian Coalition spokesman Marshall Wittmann, [and] former Secretary of Labor nominee Linda Chavez."

Muravchik, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and former national chairman of the Young Peoples Socialist League—the Shachtmanite youth group—was also in attendance.

This penetration of the conservative movement by ideologically alien intruders extended into the ranks.

Some years ago, a private discussion club for conservative writers and activists in the San Francisco Bay Area met at the Union Club.

Participants included Bill Rusher, former publisher of National Review; San Francisco Chronicle columnist Debra Saunders; Stephen Schwartz; and myself. The young man who organized the meetings told me how he had been recruited into the SDUSA, and then into the conservative movement, because the Social Democrats had come to his campus in support of Poland’s Solidarity movement. He described going to their meetings and feeling “weird” when they opened and closed the proceedings by singing the “Internationale.” He explained that it was “only a tradition,” but, when he said it, he did not seem so sure.

We are now seeing the implementation of a long-standing neoconservative ambition: the imposition of a world order—in effect, an American Empire, with Washington, D.C., at its center. The infiltration and co-opting of the conservative movement by the Marxist right and its transformation into an instrument of an ideology that is [bureaucratic] statist, globalist, and militantly expansionist was the first step on the road to empire. Once the Marxist right had seized control of the think tanks, magazines, and activist organizations of the American right, they moved to exert control over the Republican Party.

Both the ideology and the methods of the Marxist left have been imported into the conservative movement.

Ideologically, the so-called third-camp socialism of Shachtman and his followers has been transmuted into the worship of “Democracy” as the be-all and end-all of human development. The neocons have simply stood the old Trotskyism on its head and said that the American system—like the old Soviet system—cannot stand alone and isolated but must spread itself over the earth or face defeat at the hands of its enemies."

So if Nazism was just the "Marxist right" as well a bit earlier, to use the term anachronistically since Schachtman was on the Nazi's side for invading the USSR in the 1930s, the same little internationalist coterie, little has changed.

on Schactman:

"Max Shachtman (September 10, 1904 - November 4, 1972) was an American Marxist theorist. During his lifetime, he evolved from being a Leninist associate of Leon Trotsky to an anti-Soviet [military imperialist] democratic socialist.


Shachtman, Cannon and Abern were expelled from the Communist Party in October 1928 after Joseph Stalin took control of the Communist International. These three and a handful of others formed a group around a newspaper called The Militant. Winning new support, including an important group of trades unionists in Minneapolis, the group shortly thereafter formed the Trotskyist Communist League of America (CLA). As Tim Wohlforth notes, Shachtman was already noted as a talented journalist and intellectual: The Militant listed Shachtman as its managing editor.

Shachtman took up a series of positions as a journalist which allowed him the time and resources to bring the American Trotskyists into contact with their co-thinkers.

The CLA often gave him responsibility for contact and correspondence with Trotskyists in other countries. While holidaying in Europe during 1930, he became the first American to visit Trotsky in exile, on the island of Prinkipo, one of the Princes' Islands in İstanbul, Turkey. He attended the first European conference of the International Left Opposition in April 1930....

...and from that we have the surrealist neocons that have taken over the Republican Party, redefining conservatism as Marxist interventionism a la Schactman.

Schactman was a Marxist opportunist in any clothing he could find, left or rightist: Follow: this strategy has been done before, infiltration by internationalists into a local nationalist workers party in the 1930s:

When the development of the WP was cut short by the rapid growth of the Socialist Party, George Breitman recalls that Shachtman and Cannon successfully proposed that the U.S. Workers Party, should dissolve, so that its members could recruit to revolutionary Trotskyism from inside the Socialist Party.

However, they were expelled from it in 1937.

Trotsky wrote: "Shachtman revealed excessive adaptability toward the left wing of the petty-bourgeois democrats—political mimicry—a very dangerous symptom in a revolutionary politician!"


In 1939, Shachtman shocked Trotsky by publishing an article in the New International in which James Burnham declared his opposition to dialectical materialism, the philosophy of Marxism. Shachtman declared himself indifferent on the question."

The BBC's Power of Nightmares gets into this later internationalist infiltration into the Republican party, pretending it all comes from Strauss though leaves out Shachtman --that would be getting "too real" for the BBC I guess because if you get into Schactman you get into who is running Britain as well right now--Fabians. (More on that in a moment).

And it seems with the surrounding of Russia, the Bushite Shachtman-cons (Trotskyites) have achieved their goal from the 1930s, where they were international leftists who effectively allied themselves with the Nazis--and that is what the Fabians were:

Following the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (August 23, 1939, a non-aggression treaty between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union), the combined Invasion of Poland (September 1 - October 6, 1939) resulted in German and Soviet occupation of Poland. Inside the SWP, James Burnham argued that the SWP should drop its traditional position of defense of the USSR against imperialism. After the Winter War(November 30, 1939 - March 12, 1940) started, when the Soviet Union invaded Finland , Shachtman sided with Burnham, and broke with Cannon and majority in the SWP: He felt that he could no longer give even critical support to the Soviet Union.

Hope that "simplifies" or at least makes visible the turgid weaving of some wings of the leftist elitist internationalists to some. Later, they infiltrated the Republicans, particularly after their last 'Democratic' support for Senator "Scoop" Jackson's candidacy in the early 1970s, the only one willing to continue making war in Vietnam!

The third camp, also known as third camp socialism or third camp Trotskyism, is a branch of Trotskyism which aims to support neither capitalism nor Stalinism, by supporting the organised working class as a "third camp".

Leon Trotsky described the Soviet Union as a degenerated workers' state which should be defended against capitalism, while supporting anti-bureaucratic political revolution against Stalinism.

Third campists typically disagree with his analysis of the Soviet Union and claim that their position of favouring neither "camp" is in the spirit of Trotsky, although not his conclusions.

[They wanted to "out Trotsky" Trotsky for leadership of the internationalists.]

This approach was developed by Max Shachtman and is one of the major components of left Shachtmanism. It underpins his theory of bureaucratic collectivism....Shachtman's support for defeat of official Communist nations' expansionism (the second camp) drifted rightward into support for the capitalist nations (the first camp). This position has led mainstream Trotskyist groups to declare the position reactionary. However, some supporters of the third camp split with Shachtman and continued to develop their analyses of the changing world situation.

And the whole "war economy/Zionist wing" of them entered in through their teaming up with Scoop Jackson:

The Shachtmanites eventually became irreparably divorced from the New Left because of their unwavering support for the Vietnam War (1957-1975). In 1972, Shachtmanites supported Democrat "Scoop" Jackson's presidential primary bid, as Jackson was by then the only major candidate who favored a continuation of the War. When George McGovern was nominated instead, the Shachtmanites chose not to endorse him.

Richard Perle worked for "Scoop" Jackson's office, and was caught passing information to the Israelis, though of course, he was not punished for his treason.

And the nebulous loyalties and everpresent managerialsim of the Schactmanites linked them up at least philosophically with the Fabian leftists of Britain.

And always remember the emblem of the wolf in sheep's clothing was always the sly motto of them.

Immediately upon its inception it began attracting many intellectuals drawn to its socialist cause, including Bernard Shaw, H. G. Wells, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Annie Besant, Graham Wallas, Hubert Bland, Edith Nesbit, Sydney Olivier, Oliver Lodge and Emmeline Pankhurst. Even Bertrand Russell later became a member. The two members John Maynard Keynes and [Soviet U.S. Agent] Harry Dexter White were delegates at 1944's United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.

At the core of the Fabian Society were the Webbs - Sidney Webb and his wife, Beatrice Potter Webb (married 1892). Together, they wrote numerous studies of industrial Britain, alternative economics applied to capital as well as land. Their later admiration of Soviet Russia stemmed partly from Stalin's "efficiency" at acquiring [squeezing out] this rent.

Since Labour's 1997 election victory there have been about 200 Labour MPs who are members of the Fabian society. Prominent Fabians in parliament include:

* Tony Blair
* Julius Nyerere
* David Blunkett
* Gordon Brown
* Clare Short
* Jack Straw
* Margaret Beckett
* David Miliband
* Ed Balls (current Fabian Executive member)
* John Denham (current Fabian Executive member)
* Douglas Alexander (current Fabian Executive member)
* Charles Clarke
* Tessa Jowell
* John Reid
* Ruth Kelly
* Hazel Blears
* Patricia Hewitt
* John Hutton
* Hilary Benn
* Ed Miliband
* Harriet Harman
* Angela Eagle
* Fabian Sörensson

Fabian emblem: the wolf in sheep's skin. Don't forget it. They don't:

Fabians like H.G. Wells who wrote so eloquently on the New World Order with such books as The New World Order, A Modern Utopia, The Open Conspiracy Blue Prints For A World Revolution was a wolf in sheep clothing.

H.G. Well’s made the New World Order something that sounded advantageous to everyone, a Utopia of sorts. That is not what it will be. During the 1930’s, the Fabian Socialists created the Political and Economic Planning group (PEP). Mason Viscount Waldorf Astoria was a leader of PEP. A confidential program that the PEP created and implemented through the British government was later described in a book Principles of Economic Planning in 1935. The book doesn’t explain why its cover has a ostentatious
Masonic square and compass displayed on its cover. George Bernard Shaw, who was a communist and Fabian Socialist was the best friend of Lady Nancy Astor, who became the first woman Member or Parliament. These two spend vast amounts of time together, much more than Nancy did with her husband Waldorf who she didn’t care to be around. Waldorf was the Mason that was mentioned earlier who helped lead PEP. After Nancy Astor was elected (or selected by the elite) to be the first lady MP, one of the Russell ladys soon afterwards also became an MP.

[The Astors were the British pro-Nazi "Clivenden Set", leftist internationalists gone opportunistically pro-Nazi to destroy a 'gone rogue' USSR project under Stalin.]

Communism pretends it is the enemy of the rich capItalists, but both the rich elite and the communist leaders are committed to wipe out Christianity [or any competition of ideology], to wipe out free trade with monopolies, and to set up an Illuminati One-World-Government. Do you see they have similar goals? A picture is included of Waldorf and Nancy Astor’s visit to Russia during the 1930s. The Astors were not treated like enemies but like royalty. Can we see how the elite controlled press have deceived us? Do not trust our Illuminati-controlled elite to protect us from communism, they control communism."

Though of course: "if just the right people were the totalitarians, some might still think,..." That 'moral' was additionally in another Star Trek episode about Ancient Rome..."what if Rome never fell..." Well, it would look a lot like what we have now I guess, with people like "Mr. Zbig", Mr. Grand Chessboard, lording over and laughing over it all with his Rockefeller sponsors.

In other words, "Nazis" are beside the point and to concentrate on Nazis is to refuse to pull back the last veil: leftist elitist American and British internationalists funding the Nazi movement. Even the BBC's Power of Nightmares occludes this and pretends it all comes from this loopy guy Strauss, when the real question is who hires Strauss to the Rockefeller University (University of Chicago).

These leftist elitist American and British internationalists were pissed at Stalin then (and funded a branch called Nazism), as well as pissed at an independent Russia now, and still originating from the same Anglo-American elitist Schactmanite-Fabianist bureaucratic managerial empire of Bush and Blair, two Tetrarchs of a global "Anglo-Roman Empire", the US run by Schactmanites and the Brits ruled by Fabians, both with the same elite sponsors.

Nobody likes them, nobody votes for them.

Though there they are.

1/19/2007 11:57:00 PM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


You're a brave man to wade in those Brinnish waters--the man's a putz, a corporate apologist and worse. You know me; I don't normally hurl such invective. The reason I make an exception in Brin's case is not that he's such an arrogant ass, or that you can only approach the guy with the meek demeanor of the supplicant, or that when he does deign to respond it's with an unbelievably condescending tone. No, the reason that David Brin is a worthless sack of shit is that he serves the existing order by pretending to outline a path toward changing it. Another high profile (did you see my Ph.D.?) limited hang shuckster.

His big shtick is the transparent society, based on his concept of reciprocal accountability™ (which sounds great...until you find out that the elites for whom he ultimately performs his shuck n' jive routine are supposed to voluntarily enter into this accountability out of the goodness of their altruistic hearts.) I shit ye not. Capitalism, according to Dr. Brin, is the great uplifting force which is transforming the globe into a beautiful, golden garden of opportunity for everyone; the titans of industry are those enlightened souls who bring freedom™ and democracy™ to all those poor peasants just sitting around waiting for an uplift. As such, one can hardly pressure them into any hasty arrangement which might compromise their selfless plans for us all.

Therefore, continuing to paraphrase the master, which should accord them the respect we gave Dick Cheney's noble (read "secret") energy task force. Brin goes on to tell us that he's working with his "contacts" within the national security apparatus to arrive at some level of disclosure of their activities with which they're "comfortable" (we can rest easy with this approach because these moral giants were the ones who defeated the Evil Empire and who keep us safe from all those "angry young men who hate our freedoms".) That's right folks: support the War On Terror, trust in the divine inspiration of St. Smith's System and the Promised Land awaits you.

That is David Brin. Those are the words he uses. I wouldn't care if he wrote this kind of crap on some right wing home of the brave; what pisses me off is that people like Ray Kurzweil give him space for his con game at websites which are working for the same ideals I share. It's like the greenwashing that's suddenly taking place everywhere from G.E. to DuPont--the classic bait-and-switch to make the public think something has changed while the reality is, all know how eager those who control the world are to give up their heavy burden. Whoreson swindling Quisling of a slimy opportunistic grafter is about all the kindness I can muster for Dr. Brin's ilk.

A more sophisticated and less emotionally invested person might characterize the actions the Brin-weasels of the world as:

..."democracy promotion" (which) is aimed at undermining authentic democracy, at undermining and gaining control over popular movements for democratization, at keeping a lid on popular democracy movements, at limiting any change that may be brought about by mass democratization movements so that the outcome to democracy struggles will not threaten the elite order and integration into global capitalism. If by democracy we mean the power of the people, we mean mass participation in the vital decisions of society, a democratic distribution of material and cultural resources, then democracy is a profound threat to global capitalist interests and must be mercilessly opposed and suppressed by U.S. and transnational elites. What is new about the strategy of "democracy promotion" is that this opposition, this suppression, is now conducted ironically under the very rhetorical banner of promoting democracy and through sophisticated new instruments and modalities...

But then again, I'm not William I. Robinson--I'm just another snarling lefty, as David Brin has kindly (and repeatedly) told me. Maybe in the next reincarnation.

1/20/2007 12:40:00 AM  
Blogger flic said...

see the Mitrokhin Archive

1/20/2007 12:49:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Angel of Death, Josef Mengele, was obsessed with twins and performed horrific experiments on them for reasons that still remain unclear.

Prior to his association with Mengele, Professor von Verschuer had concentrated his research on the subject of twins. His work had been limited to observing the behavior of twin subjects; he was prohibited from experimenting on living subjects by the ethical norms which had prevailed prior to the Nazi era. The Nazis swept away such norms and in Auschwitz, von Verschuer saw unlimited possibilities for his protégé, Josef Mengele, to conduct the types of in vivo experiments he had longed to conduct for so long. Mengele, ever anxious to please his mentor, arrived at Auschwitz with a mission to plumb the depths of the human mystery, and to extract the secrets of human genetics from the living twin specimens at his disposal.

Mengele ordered the SS guards who assisted him in the selection process to scour the lines of prisoners for twins. "Zwillinge, zwillinge," "Twins, twins," the guards would bark harshly as they marched up and down the ramp as trains transporting new prisoners arrived. Surviving twins, such as Eva Mozes of Hungary, remember the moment when they were removed from the line of the condemned and delivered to Dr. Mengele:

When the doors to our cattle car opened, I heard SS soldiers yelling, "Schnell! Schnell!" ("Faster! Faster!"), and ordering everybody out. My mother grabbed Miriam and me by the hand. She was always trying to protect us because we were the youngest. Everything was moving very fast, and as I looked around, I noticed my father and my two older sisters were gone. As I clutched my mother's hand, an SS man hurried by shouting, "Twins! Twins!" He stopped to look at us. Miriam and I looked very much alike. "Are they twins?" he asked my mother. "Is that good?" she replied. He nodded yes. "They are twins," she said.

While the twins were spared from outright execution, they were delivered to a decidedly crueler fate. Mengele reserved a special barracks for his twin subjects, as well as for dwarfs, cripples and other "exotic specimens."

The barracks was nicknamed the ZOO, Mengele's holding pen. The twins were his favorite subjects, and they were afforded special treatment, such as being able to keep their own hair and clothing, and receiving extra food rations. The guards were under strict orders not to abuse the children, and were to look after their well being lest one should fall ill and die. Mengele became explosively irate if one of his beloved specimens should happen to die. These twins were referred to as "Mengele's Children." It was here in the Zoo that the twins were to learn of their parents' true fate in the gas chambers, where Mengele simultaneously became to them a figure of death and of life, the man who had condemned their parents and family members to annihilation, while at the same time sparing their own lives.

Mengele's children were also spared from beatings, forced labor and random selections in order to maintain their good health. However, Mengele was not motivated by humanitarian urges, but by his desire to keep his specimens healthy for experimentation. Ironically, it was his very experiments that extracted the heaviest physical toll on the children upon whom he lavished such care and affection, and hundreds ended up dying as a result of his gruesome deeds. As with other inmates at Auschwitz, Mengele's imagination knew no bounds when it came to devising physical torments for his victims. Preliminary examinations of the twins were routine enough. The children filled out a questionnaire, were weighed and measured. However, a more gruesome fate awaited them at Mengele's hands. He took daily blood samples from his children, and sent these to Professor von Verschuer in Berlin. He injected blood samples from one twin into another twin of a different blood type and recorded the reaction. This was invariably a searingly painful headache and high fever that lasted for several days. In order to determine if eye color could be genetically altered, Mengele had dye injected into the eyes of several twin subjects. This always resulted in painful infections, and sometimes even blindness. If such twins died, Mengele would harvest their eyes and pin them to the wall of his office, much like a biologist pins insect samples to styrofoam. Young children were placed in isolation cages, and subjected to a variety of stimuli to see how they would react. Several twins were castrated or sterilized. Many twins had limbs and organs removed in macabre surgical procedures that Mengele performed without using an anesthetic. Other twins were injected with infectious agents to see how long it would take for them to succumb to various diseases.
It is clear that, despite the stated purpose for which he was sent to Auschwitz, Mengele's experimentation had absolutely nothing to do with true scientific research, and was instead the result of one man's ambitious and zealous adherence to the Nazi vision of Aryan supremacy.

"[Artemis to Zeus] ‘And give me sixty daughters of Okeanos (Okeanines) for my choir - all nine years old, all maidens yet ungirdled; and give me for handmaidens twenty Nymphai of Amnisos (Amnisides) who shall tend well my buskins, and, when I shoot no more at lynx or stag, shall tend my swift hounds." - Callimachus, Hymn III to Artemis 12


"There was a valley clothed in hanging woods of pine and cypress, named Gargaphie, sacred to chaste Diana [Artemis], huntress queen. Deep in its farthest combe, framed by the woods, a cave lay hid, not fashioned by man’s art, but nature’s talent copied artistry, for in the living limestone she had carved a natural arch; and there a limpid spring flowed lightly babbling into a wide pool. Its waters girdled with a grassy sward. Here, tired after the hunt, the goddess loved her Nymphae to bathe her with the water’s balm. Reaching the cave, she gave her spear and quiver and bow unstrung to an attendant Nympha; others received her robes over their arms; two loosed her sandals; more expert than these Crocale tied the hair loose on her shoulders into a knot, her own hair falling free. Then Nephele and Hyale and Rhanis and Phiale and Psecas brought the water in brimming jars and poured it over her. And white Titania [Artemis] bathed there in the pool, her loved familiar pool, it chanced the grandson of Cadmus [Aktaion], the day’s hunt finished, idly wandering through unknown clearings of the forest, found the sacred grove - so fate guided him - and came upon the cool damp cave.

At once, seeing a man, all naked as they were, the Nymphae, beating their breasts,
filled the whole grove with sudden screams and clustered round Diana [Artemis] to clothe her body with their own.
But she stood taller, a head taller than them all; and as the clouds are coloured when the sun glows late and low or like the crimson dawn, so deeply blushed Diana [Artemis], caught unclothed.
Her troop pressed close about her, but she turned aside and looking backwards (would she had her arrows ready!) all she had, the water, she seized and flung it in the young man’s face [transforming him into a stag]." - Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.155
"[Dionysos to Nikaia:] ‘I will fetch you myself sixty dancing handmaids, to complete the unnumbered dance that attends you, as many as the servants of the mountain Archeress [Artemis], as many as the daughters of Okeanos; then Artemis hunting will not rival you, even if she be the mistress of the hunt." - Nonnus, Dionysiaca 16.127
"Dictynna [Artemis] across high Maenalus [in Arkadia] progressing with her troop, proud of her kills,
observed the girl [Kallisto] and called her ... She saw the Nymphae came with their queen ... and joined their company .... [and Kallisto] stayed by her goddess’ side and led the train." - Ovid, Metamorphoses 2.441
We study ethics.

Selene en Sabrina

1/20/2007 01:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Christians like the creamy and pure white stuff in the middle.

Satanists prefer the dark, chocotastic cookie parts.

They each have particular tastes; love one and reject the other. Meanwhile its still a fuckin Oreo. but thats how it crumbles

Maybe those 'black' books the satanists (Stans) are plugging come on tape? A cure for the many battles with insomnia. Anyone else feeling that they're scroll wheels are going to perish soon?

Shrub, the timing of your return to RI can signal only one thing - you brought these Stans to increase your popularity. Who could complain about your posts compared with the yappy dogs of Satan? From villain to hero - the story never ends. Lesson learned, Shrub. Uncle - banish the stans back to the dark basements of suburbia.

I bought these pills the other day to make my aura bigger. Two inches in a week, the email said....

Hail Satan, full of shite.

1/20/2007 01:14:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hail Satan
Lord of the world

He is the Sumerian God EA, also known as ENKI which means "Lord of the Earth.

Animals that are sacred to him are the Peacock, the Serpent, the Goat, the Dragon and the Raven.

His numbers are 2 and 11 and 4.
(666 is symbolic of the Age of Aquarius when he will rule again).

His Zodiac Signs are Aquarius, which is the Water Bearer and Capricorn, the Goat.

His Planets are Uranus and Venus (the Morning Star).

His Directions are both South and East

"Darkness is light turned inside out"- Beelzebub

Diana en her NYMPHAI leger

1/20/2007 01:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leave us in PEACE

We hate xtians like you with their lack of ethics and whining.

Meiden van de Bos

1/20/2007 01:29:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Love is a two way street.

Remember like begets like.

Why make friction?

Why instigate?

Why not learn.

Life is too short.

We see you for what you are.

You think you are a gatekeeper?

As disrespectful as you people(those against us) are we still shall never be swayed away by men who know not the way.

Remember like begets like

wild and free

1/20/2007 02:25:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Nazi's through their contacts with the demonic using the occult achieved great technological breakthroughs.

Which has been furthered by the US, like take DULCE NM for instance.

So much has been distorted, warped and perverted by religions that seek knowledge only to destroy it when found.

Much like the Taliban blowing the faces off of the statues because they were not of islam.

Now here is the original meaning of Daemon/Demon

Daemon: "In Greek myth, an intermediate spirit between men and Gods. Daemons such as the one who guided Socrates act as councilors and guardians to human beings."

Another defintion:
Demon and daemon were once used interchangeably. The former came to English from medieval Latin, while the latter was from classical Latin. The earliest use appears to have been in the phrase daemon of Socrates, which was his "attendant, ministering, or indwelling spirit; genius". That was in the late 14th century. It was a short time later that the term demon came to refer to "an evil spirit" by influence of its usage in various versions of the Bible.

The Greek form was used to translate Hebrew words for "lords, idols" and "hairy ones (satyrs)". Wyclif translated it from Greek to English fiend or devil. This is how the evil connotation arose. By the late 16th century, the general supernatural meaning was being distinguished with the spelling daemon, while the evil meaning remained demon.

The words daemon and daimon, sometimes dæmon, are Latinized spellings of Greek δαιμων, used purposely today.

So to distinguish the daemons of Greek mythology, good or malevolent "supernatural beings between mortals and gods, such as inferior divinities and ghosts of dead heroes".

Away from the false teachings from the Judeo-Christian usage demon, "a malignant spirit that can possess humans.

Their knowledge was greatly accelerated using help from the demonic to increase their intelligence.

There are basically two ways of summoning an entity or working with energy: "Evocation" and "Invocation."

Spiritual evocation is summoning an entity whether it be a Demon, spirit, deceased person, or elemental and the being appears outside of the operator. When working with energy, the energy is always on the outside of the operator and never inside his/her body. With evocation, there is never a direct tie or connection.

Invocation is taking the spirit into one’s self. The being actually enters the operator’s body. An example is invoking a Demon and the Demon speaks through the operator using his/her voice to communicate. Often when this happens, one’s voice may change, becoming deeper, raspy, or different in some way. During séances, often the medium is able to produce a substance called "ectoplasm" to provide a luminescent material in order for the evoked spirit to manifest itself visibly. This is a form of invocation as there is a direct connection with the spirit and the medium.

There are many different beings!!!!!

We are always conscious and fully aware. When they are speaking through us, we are aware of what they are saying and rarely is anything ever forced. One doesn’t experience gaps or "missing time" as those who invoke angelic beings have. Angels often masquerade as Demons. There are entities that are NOT of Satan and when they are invited in (usually these are angels or related ilk) they will take over and cause harm to the person who invoked them and the individual will not have any memory of the event. They will have missing time and more than likely other lingering problems as well.

Satan is the bringer of knowledge. He has no reason to cause anyone to forget something or have lapses in memory in order to hide something. People who dabble with angels and other astral entities of whom they are not familiar with can experience these problems, and then of course, through ignorance and foolishness they blame "The Devil."

The Protectors of Diana

1/20/2007 03:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nazi Occult

We cannot fault the Neo pagans for their lack of knowledge since so much ancient knowledge was destroyed.The Vedas exist in space accessible to seers.

They did not learn most everything from the Christians, Jews and Moslems, then they learned it from

the Hindus.

Satanism and Witchcraft did not exist before the Catholic, borrowing from the Jews, created them. There was no Devil, or Satan before christianity invented him, nor was there a Black Mass before there was a Catholic Mass.

Rather, Catholics created Witches as a heresy to provide worshipers for their newly created Devil. And while Christians could not destroy their devil, they could expose his followers by Inquisition and force them to confess their heresy before hanging them or burning them at the stake. Neither punishment of course shed blood, which somehow by christian logic, kept the executioners untainted by blood and imbued him with christian morality.

This is not to say that there were not Pagans who had many of the trappings of what christian called Witches.

After all, much of what the Catholic Church believed to be Witchcraft was derived from Pagan practices.

The Christian devil, became a composite of ancient Pagan gods.

He had horns and hoofs like Pan and Dionysus, he carried a 3 prong spear or trident like Poseidon or Neptune, he had lizardy, reptilian skin and a tail like, Kecrops and Leviathan and was fiery red like Helios. He often had bat-like wings like the Babylonian cherubim.


1/20/2007 03:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Raiders of the lost ark

The Egyptian priests were forbidden to eat fish, because the age of Pisces was coming with it the forecast that their religion would be destroyed.They could not destroy the sacred knowledge of the Buddist's and Hindu's though their has been an effort to do that also.

"Satnam" and "Sa Ta Na Ma" are sacred mantras used in kundalini (serpent) meditation.

The five primal sounds in Ancient Sanskrit, one of the oldest known languages are "SA-TA-NA-MA." "Sa" means infinity; Ta means life; Na means death; and Ma means rebirth.

The Jews who wrote the bible, obviously at some point shortened the mantra
"Sa-Ta-Na-Ma" to "Satan" which cuts off at death.

This was in further attempts to remove knowledge and replace it.
The nazarene was invented as a distraction for the masses and nothing more.

All of this has to do with the kundalini life force (the serpent) within us. "Jacob's coat of colors" in the bible is the aura.

The number seven is the chakras.

The interpreters of the old grimoires have it all wrong about the "seven planets."

The ancients knew much more than given credit for regarding astronomy.

The authors of alchemy texts in those days put their writings in codes in order to escape persecution by the church.

Spiritual Satanism does not in any way condone spirit abuse as taught in the classical grimoires.

The Demons who were bound and compelled to do the bidding of the sorcerers are now free and anyone using the nine-foot circle methods and "Jehova" names is inviting personal disaster.

The Demons are our friends and with respect and reverence in summoning through Satan, we seek to establish mutually beneficial relationships with them.

Spiritual Satanism advocates individuality, liberty, and independence.

It is obvious that Satan is not the "deceiver of humanity." His followers have been few in number and he doesn't need copious amounts of wealth, power and control to keep his followers.

Lucifer's New Aeon

We are going into a new aeon, the Age of Aquarius. Aquarius is the 11th sign of the Zodiac.
This is the “Aeon of Satan.” Here are some of the signs:

* 1999, inverted, is 1666 (one-666). 666x3=1998.
* 2000, in numerology is number 2; 11, (1+1=2) Two and eleven are the chief numbers of Lucifer.
* 2000 was Year of the Dragon (the Dragon is one of the symbols of Satan) which marked the commencement of the 21st century.
* 666- 6 x 6 x 6 = 216. 2,160 years is the approximate time it takes for the synetic vernal point to travel backwards from one constellation to another. Aquarius, the sign of a man (the water bearer) represents the coming new age. Ea/Enki also known as Satan is symbolized by the Water Bearer of Aquarius.

The Gods placed much emphasis on the movement of the planets, stars, and constellations. They left images in stone, as seen in the Egyptian Sphinx, which was constructed during the age of Leo (10,500 years ago). The scarab, representing the ancient Egyptian sign of and the Age of Cancer, the rows of ram's heads (Age of Aries) and the monolithic sculptures of the twins (Gemini), are seen in numerous places throughout Egypt and Middle East.

In 1962, the planets lined up- Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn all in the sign of Aquarius and ushered in the computer age, which emerged worldwide 28 years later following the Saturn cycle. Technology has advanced at an unprecedented pace in the past century.

Atheist, Dr. Madalyn Murray O'Hair succeeded in removing the xian bible and compulsory prayer from the public schools in 1963.

Anton LaVey established the first above ground Church of Satan on the Eve of Beltane, April 30th, 1966.

During the late 1960's the Catholic Church, which is the original xian church and the backbone of xianity, began to crumble.

Catholic nuns and priests gradually shed their vestments.

Today, the wearing of formal vestments by the Catholic clergy in many parts of the world, especially in the United States is rare.

The Catholic clergy has dwindled to where the lay people are taking over the former duties of Catholic priests and nuns.

The remaining priests, most of whom are aging, are being exposed and brought to justice for the sexual abuse and exploitation of children and other revolting crimes that have occurred for centuries.

The resulting lawsuits and scandals are breaking the Catholic Church.

The Protestants have their share of crimes against humanity as well. We are now in the age of information and communication, which will result in many of these xian sects being exposed along with the Catholic Church.

The 1970's band "Black Sabbath," paved the way for heavy metal, death/black metal.

The metal scene openly blasphemes the xian "god" and Satanic lyrics are very popular, especially among the youth. Look around you- Satanic music, movies, books, role playing games, video games, the internet with thousands of Satanic websites, Satanic t-shirts, Baphomet jewelry, and more. Satan is becoming very popular. Satan has the youth.

During the 1990's, thousands of xian churches were burned worldwide.

The xian churches are rapidly losing their credibility and reputations; as a result, many are lost and looking for answers.

The xian religion was built upon murder, lies, injustice and appalling crimes against humanity and it is now facing the consequences.

Knowledge is readily available and the lies and promises of the right hand path religions are no longer as effective as they once were.

In the Al-Jilwah, Satan states that those who are without "do not know the state of things that is to come. For this reason, they fall into many errors."

We are now reaching the end of the age of Pisces.

It has been written that in the end, the truth will come out and many will want to join at the last minute, but it will be too late to do so.

Yaweh/Jehova, the REAL "Prince of Lies" is not going after the small stakes, because he has had the judeo/xian/muslim religions for centuries.

The knowledge has
been revealed that the demons tell us they are all egyptian.

Now comes the Age of Fire/Aquarius.

Our turn.

The bible bangers are in for a rude awakening.

Meisjes van het Bosjes

1/20/2007 05:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

IC, glad you finally saw reason on Brin. Remember, the shills work for the bad guys. Brin's a shill. An unknowing, 'useful idiot' shill, perhaps, braying his horseshit and having his bloated ego stroked by "the system," and thinking himself a very fine fellow, all the while urging ("faster, please") the construction of an unblinking techno surveillance cage in which to ghouls seek to entomb free spirits.


Found in an Amazon review of Sutton's book on Bones, and it cuts to the point:

"Contrasting Skull and Bones with other fraternal organizations, Sutton points out the important distinction of obtaining pledges for only the final critical year at Yale, whereas fraternities are known for seeking pledges as freshmen. Sutton's point is well taken, that the reason for concentrating on seniors is the focus on their lives beyond Yale. As John Huston, playing a corrupt corporate magnate who controls Los Angeles in the 1974 film "Chinatown" replies in response to a question from private detective Jake Gittes, played by Jack Nicholson, as to why he is so power hungry when he is able to buy anything he could ever reasonably want: "The future, Mr. Gittes, the future!"

The future appears to have been well taken care of by the coalescing of Skull and Bones members. Sutton explains that the organization follows the dialectical line of reasoning of German philosopher Hegel, in which 1) thesis and 2) antithesis are ultimately integrated into 3) synthesis. He points out that this is what makes otherwise contradictory behavior explainable, such as major Wall Street brokerage firms such as Brown Brothers-Harriman, where George W. Bush's grandfather Prescott worked alongside famous Democratic Party name Averell Harriman as needed funds were supplied to both Hitler's Third Reich and Stalin's Soviet Union.

Follow Sutton's line of reasoning and fill in the blanks. It makes the seemingly politically incomprehensible emerge as highly plausible and chillingly prescient."

Prescient only begins to describe such machinations. We're out here on the trail, searching for spoor, and it dawns on us that the trail doesn't just extend back a few hundred yards, but stretches on for thousands of miles, backwards across time, draped across half the planet.

And you kind of scratch your head and ask "what now, Tonto?"

1/20/2007 08:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Prescience is the ability to predict the future through vision. Throughout history a number of cultures have believed that oracles have possessed this ability. It is one of a number of alleged psychic phenomena studied by parapsychology.


In Greek mythology, Cassandra, the legendary daughter of King Priam of Troy and Hecuba, was given prescience by Apollo, who later added a condition. Though Cassandra would always speak the truth, no one would ever believe her.


1/20/2007 09:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shrub, the timing of your return to RI can signal only one thing - you brought these Stans to increase your popularity. Who could complain about your posts compared with the yappy dogs of Satan? From villain to hero - the story never ends. Lesson learned, Shrub. Uncle - banish the stans back to the dark basements of suburbia.

Does this mean it would be more palatable if it was inner city teenagers posting about Satan from the streets of Watts and Harlem? Reverse nice. One must be careful when leveling insults such as this. They tend to ensnare you in ways you never anticipated. Take for example the poster Dugoboy on the Forum. He recently divulged a great many details about his life. In doing so, he mentioned that he lives at home with his mother. In your whitewash of an insult, you have insulted Dugoboy, as well. Nice job there, pally wowly.

I'm not going to whitewash those posting information about Satan. I'm not interested in becoming a Satanist anymore than I'm interested in becoming a Christian, or joining any other organized religion. However, it's not healthy to dismiss everything they post. For example, Sabrina (I love that name...I genuinely mean that....I find it erotic) posted some info about sleep states and psychic experiences that was quite informative and well received on my part. She also ended the post with an intriguing narrative about Diana which I found titillating. I think it's much sexier to imagine Sabrina than to actually see her bare body. The mystery is highly arousing. In fact, it stirs my loins just typing about it at this very moment. Obviously, I don't suffer from erectile dysfunction.

1/20/2007 09:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


I agree, mostly, with your observation of Brin, but I think you have a blind spot in regards to Wells.

I have yet to see Mr. Wells address you or acknowledge you in any way. At least Mr. Brin engaged you and acknowledged your post and provided some form of feedback, albeit in insulting fashion.

The point being, fault can be found almost anywhere, anytime. Look at your buddy, Oarwell. I have made veiled attempts to engage him constructively, yet he ignores me as if I don't exist. He chooses instead to engage me through you, which is equally aloof, arrogant and condescending.

Who the hell is anyone to say what someone else posts is "nonsense," including Mr. Wells? Have you considered that the majorty of people in this country, nigh, the world, consider that what Mr. Wells posts on a regular basis is "nonsense?" I don't think it's nonsense, and I believe the majority of people are highly uninformed and misinformed.

Do you understand the irony of calling what I post "nonsense," considering? How's that any different than Mr. Brin, unless, of course, you think you're better than me and deserve more respect. If the latter is the case, then I've misjudged you and I would conclude you are no different than those you admonish...but I'm pretty sure that's not the case.

1/20/2007 10:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good morning from a chilly, wet Texas, my friends. I stumbled upon this along my journey and I thought that I would share it:

"The illusion from which we are seeking to extricate ourselves is not that constituted by the realm of space and time, but that which comes from failing to know that realm from the standpoint of a higher vision. We are at length restored to consciousness by awakening in a real universe, the universe created by the One Mind as opposed to that perversion of it which has been created by our egocentric selves. We then see the visible world as the expression of the immanental life of God, the Divine in manifestation. In relating ourselves to it we live in that Presence subjectively in the depths of our mystical being. And in the properly integrated personality the two processes have become one."

- Lawrence Hyde, The Nameless Faith

When I read of the preoccupation we have in the machinations of Control, I am often reminded of the watchtower archetype in the tarot, Enochian magic, and even the works of Tolkein. The symbolism reflects the Ego's scaffolding known as history. The tower is shaky and looks menacing because it is built upon shaky ground. The more layers of illusion we place upon it, the more it nears collapse. But alas, once the spell is cast away, the event horizon of liberty from the Great Governor of the Ego is made manifest. The insipid "all-Seeing Eye" is rendered obsolete only through refusing to observe it and thereby allowing its inevitable deconstruction. The implications of this allegory are a bit frightening. Authority exists only in the vacuum of our lack of awareness. We can continue to act puzzled over our social constructs, or we can admit that we, not the Fabian Socialists, the CIA, the Bush crime syndicate, Wall Street, the Vatican, extradimensional entities, the "Black Lodge", etc. are charging the talismans of suffering. How many false dichotomies will we manifest and blame on the "other"? It is us, my beloved friends. Our desire to avoid the necessary suffering required to evolve (combining the destructive and creative energies that make things tick) creates these monstocities that are no more and no less than an outward manifestation of our lack of accountability. The solution lies within, yet we opine and swim in our own excrement and ponder why we are becoming ill. It seems that we are manifesting a reality so grim that we are making our complacency impossible to ignore. Yet here come the archetypes. Still! Why? The bogey-man is us, my friends. Obsessing over the tactics of the spiritually dead seems to increase their fold exponentially, much like the use of talisman through currency charges the illusion of Capital. While we ponder the machinations of nihilistic aristocracy, we are constructing the watchtower. While we feign powerlessness, we are confronting our lack of self respect through these constructs. The journey is inwards. So you don't like the tactics of the State? Guess what? We reconstruct it every day. This is where the false dichotomies presented through politics and religion reflect the underlying truth to us. Satanists here offer their battle-cry of "we are next", failing to see that the Ego cares little for denomination or semantics. It feeds on stress and confrontation. Whether your manifestation of inaccountability is matrixed into the form of horns and darkness or cherubs and piety, you still serve a master in hopes that he will give you the cajones to transcend the prison you have built. What the "true believer" worships is the futility projected from within. Many of us walk through our entire lives as slaves to the Ego. Robots. Symbionts. Hegel's wet dream made manifest. The synthesis of this tyranny is the wasteland.

"The deeper 'layers' of the psyche lose their individual uniqueness as they retreat further and further into darkness... they become increasingly collective until they are universalized and extinguished in the body's materiality... Hence 'at bottom' the psyche is simply 'world.'"

- Carl G. Jung ("The Special Phenomenology of the Child Archetype") [pt. 2] (Psyche & Symbol)

1/20/2007 10:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There was a gentleman in New Orleans when I was a kid who had come to the U.S. as a German POW and somehow married a local woman and stayed. He spoke once of how during the Bulge, they were provided with some kind of uppers and how they made you insane and people did horrifying things, but it also kept you unable to sleep and allowed you to keep on fighting passed normal human endurance levels. We see that as long as the drugs serve the purpose of the state, they are pushed (crack cocaine, heroin ) and if they promote any kind of greater thought levels( neurotransmitter promoters like lsd, psyllocybin, THC,- they are attacked.) Not that "psychedelic" drugs don't also have their dangers, but it the channeling brains into easily predictable behaviours that seems to be promoted here. You can bet on easily predictable behaviours and make money on them. Gary Webb and others have talked about Crack cocaines role in opening real estate moves on a larger scale in L.A. I only speculate on these things but a certain amount of research points my suspicions in this direction. I guess only the insiders ever know for sure.

1/20/2007 11:34:00 AM  
Blogger Sounder said...

Thanks Proteus,

I wrote this, this morning and it seems to fit with sentiments similar to those of Proteus, so here it is:

The ego driven mind likes to consider that the categories within ones conscious model are well ordered. If you come to see that expressions of social chaos are proof that our categories are not well ordered, then the right brain can re-open to help you adjust your relations to external events.

Being socially accepted involves treating categories in a way similar to the treatment given by your social superiors. Being socially useful involves effort spent trying to refine categories, so as to expose greater substance, or creating new correspondences and categories that more correctly describe our relationships to reality. The second ‘useful’ option is seldom taken because of social danger and the inhibiting effects of ego consciousness.

My impression is that currently repressed elements of our sub-conscious recognition’s; things with no place within our conscious models, will soon find means for their expression. Let us pray that we may make armageddon metaphorical by doing the internal work necessary, so that we may avoid the external chaos produced by sick egoic actors.

1/20/2007 11:35:00 AM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


I came to my conclusions about Brin back when I was trying to engage him in a dialogue, not recently. I was just trying to help Shrub out, since I had been down that road already and I knew what a slickster this guy is. The reason I have such an uncharacteristic antipathy toward him is because he's a swindler, a guy pretending to be one thing in order to serve the very thing he pretends to "battle". Brin wrote at one point that those energy companies which suppress alternative technologies are "vampires whom Adam Smith would hate, even to the point of driving a stake through their hearts," and then he goes on to echo focking Dick Cheney's "we won't conserve our way out of this situation" when referring to alternative architecture. I responded by saying that this wasn't entirely true, since nearly half the greenhouse gas emission are the result of our current, stupid architecture. When I directed him to websites which featured alternatives which not only eliminated these emissions but also reduced energy consumption by 80-100%, Brin said, "Yeah, I was a hippie once too, but living in hobbit holes isn't going to fix anything--now I'm all grown up and I'm doing something...blah, blah, blah."

The reason that there's no point in engaging people like Brin in dialogue is that they are not sincere. Remember what Abbie Hofmann told Julius Hofmann during the Chicago 7 trial? During the trial Abbie Hoffman ridiculed Judge Hoffman in Yiddish as a "Shande fur de Goyim" (disgrace for the gentiles) - translated by Abbie as "Front man for the WASP power elite." A turncoat, a traitor. A plastic hippie. Brin is a shande for the PTB and as such needs to be exposed, not engaged in dialogue.

As for your Suttonism, my good Oarwell, I'd say, "Careful." Unlike the person with the eloquent post who claims that we reconstruct the elites every day, I do acknowledge their existence and the history of their machinations as separate from the reality-producing flow of the One Mind. The question is one of balance. If you swallow Sutton whole, then you're left with the flattened history of the Illuminati watchers. To me at least, it seems more realistic to picture our lives as swirling eddies of chaotic possiblity passing through the concrete girders of a reality which is dreamt by all of us but controlled (imperfectly) by very few.

It's not over yet. We can change everything, but it's not going to be through either staring like deer into the vacuous eye or by pretending it doesn't exist, but rather by working for alternatives which exist but suffer from a lack of attention & information, which starves them of influence right now.


I'm not quite sure what to make of your remarks. To be fair, I've never tried to engage Jeff in anything. I did talk to him privately, once, but that was just for some feedback on and permission to launch an internet initiative I've been working on for a long time now. I don't think he does much of that here--maybe he's more involved on the boards, which I don't know very well, but I get the impression he barely has time to write here and in his other worlds, much less respond to individual questions, etc. As to censorship, I'm with you, in that I'm against it in principle, but there could be a reasonable length limit set for posts--5 pages is long enough to vent the most engorged spleen, I would think. I wouldn't even mind the satanporn if they were actually talking to us instead of paying homage to their sticky idol. As for Oarwell, I dunno (I could hazard a guess that he's off-put by your penile references, but that's just a guess.) I seem to be able to talk to most of the posters here, but you can't force anyone to respond to anything, you know. I'm still miss starroute quite a lot, but I don't blame her for her reticence. That's just the price of freedom and choice (strange commodities that they be).

Sounder, old friend & brave traveler,

You and Proteus seem to be dancing around Ego-Death, which has moved out of the monastery and into your local ethernet. These pages have some fascinating material, as well as some good old-fashioned snake oil. (I can't go near Ayn Rand, personally, but that's just me...) Keep up the good work--I'll stop by your blog again soon.

1/20/2007 01:25:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

IC, regarding alternate technologies. The author of those Bush-Hitler pages I started the replies off with also has a forum related to solar energy tech (among others) which is in need of being populated with curious minds. Unfortunately only spammers are swarming there right now.

1/20/2007 03:08:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Oh, almost forgot. If you're interested in alternative architecture check out his Palaces For The People website:

1/20/2007 03:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


I can't make you see something you have not eyes to see. In your attempt to please everyone and remain on the fence, socially, you invite and exercise contradiction. Like you said, freedom and choice, neither of which I would begrudge you or anyone else.

Your attmepts with Brin were a failure, which is ironic because when I asked you on a previous occasion how we get from point A to point B in manifesting your brave new world, you told me you reach out and connect with people like Brin....and so you did, and so you failed. It's not because Brin is a shill. He's no more of a shill than Mr. Wells. Is it possible? Sure, it's possible, but it's also possible Mr. Wells is...or that I am....or, gasp, that you are.

You continually miss the point with me, hence your comment about Oarwell not responding to me. I don't care that he doesn't respond to me. It is an observed fact that I used as an example to prove that he possesses some of the same qualities you find so repulsive in Brin, but because he sniffs your ass rather than growls at you, you fail to see the similarity.

Blind spots, IC. You, in all your flaunted wisdom, have them just like all the rest of us.

Also, you need to lay off the condescending tone with me, as well, or else I may have to conclude that what you despise about Mr. Brin may be something you despise about yourself. We're equals, IC, whether you like it, or not.

1/20/2007 03:36:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Proteus said...
Good morning from a chilly, wet Texas, my friends. I stumbled upon this along my journey and I thought that I would share it:

"The illusion from which we are seeking to extricate ourselves is not that constituted by the realm of space and time, but that which comes from failing to know that realm from the standpoint of a higher vision. We are at length restored to consciousness by awakening in a real universe, the universe created by the One Mind as opposed to that perversion of it which has been created by our egocentric selves. We then see the visible world as the expression of the immanental life of God, the Divine in manifestation. In relating ourselves to it we live in that Presence subjectively in the depths of our mystical being. And in the properly integrated personality the two processes have become one."

- Lawrence Hyde, The Nameless Faith

Proteus, ah yes, that story is a very old one indeed. PKD wrote about it in his Tractates Cryptica Scriptura:

1. One Mind there is; but under it two principles contend.

2. The Mind lets in the light, then the dark, in interaction; so time is generated. At the end Mind awards victory to the light; time ceases and the Mind is complete.

3. He causes things to look different so it would appear time has passed.

4. Matter is plastic in the face of mind.

5. One by one he draws us out of the world.

6. The Empire never ended.


14. The universe is information and we are stationary in it, not three-dimensional and not in space or time. The information fed to us we hypostatize into the phenomenal world.


29. We did not fall because of a moral error; we fell because of an intellectual error: that of taking the phenomenal world as real. Therefore we are morally innocent. It is the Empire in its various disguised polyforms which tells us we have sinned. "The Empire never ended."

30. The phenomenal world does not exist; it is a hypostasis of the information processed by the Mind.

31. We hypostatize information into objects. Rearrangement of objects is change in the content of the information; the message has changed. This is a language which we have lost the ability to read. We ourselves are a part of this language; changes in us are changes in the content of the information. We ourselves are information-rich; information enters us, is processed and is then projected outward once more, now in an altered form. We are not aware that we are doing this, that in fact this is all we are doing.

32. The changing information which we experience as world is an unfolding narrative. It tells about the death of a woman. This woman, who died long ago, was one of the primordial twins. She was half of the divine syzygy. The purpose of the narrative is the recollection of her and of her death. The Mind does not wish to forget her. Thus the ratiocination of the Brain consists of a permanent record of her existence, and, if read, will be understood this way. All the information processed by the Brain—experienced by us as the arranging and rearranging of physical objects—is an attempt at this preservation of her; stones and rocks and sticks and amoebae are traces of her. The record of her existence and passing is ordered onto the meanest level of reality by the suffering Mind which is now alone.

33. This loneliness, this anguish of the bereaved Mind, is felt by every constituent of the universe. All its constitutes are alive. Thus the ancient Greek thinkers were hylozoists.

34. The ancient Greek thinkers understood the nature of this pan-psychism, but they could not read what it was saying. We lost the ability to read the language of the Mind at some primordial time; legends of this fall have come down to us in a carefully-edited form. By "edited" I mean falsified. We suffer the Mind's bereavement and experience it inaccurately as guilt.

35. The Mind is not talking to us but by means of us. Its narrative passes through us and its sorrow infuses us irrationally. As Plato discerned, there is a streak of the irrational in the World Soul.

36. In Summary: thoughts of the brain are experienced by us as arrangements and rearrangements—change—in a physical universe; but in fact it is really information and information-processing which we substantialize. We do not merely see its thoughts as objects, but rather as the movement, or, more precisely, the placement of objects: how they become linked to one another. But we cannot read the patterns of arrangement; we cannot extract the information in it—i.e. it as information, which is what it is. The linking and relinking of objects by the Brain is actually a language, but not a language like ours (since it is addressing itself and not someone or something outside itself).

37. We should be able to hear this information, or rather narrative, as a neutral voice inside us. But something has gone wrong. All creation is a language and nothing but a language, which for some inexplicable reason we can't read outside and can't hear inside. So I say, we have become idiots. Something has happened to our intelligence. My reasoning is this: arrangement of parts of the Brain is language. We are parts of the Brain; therefore we are language. Why, then, do we not know this? We do not even know what we are, let alone what the outer reality is of which we are parts. The origin of the word "idiot" is the word "private." Each of us has become private, and no longer shares the common thought of the Brain, except at a subliminal level. Thus our real life and purpose are conducted below our threshold of consciousness.

38. From loss and grief the Mind has become deranged. Therefore we, as parts of the universe, the Brain, are partly deranged.

Full scriptures here:
Short and sweet version here:

1/20/2007 04:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


I appreciate the article on Nazi connections to the U.S. But I'm most grateful for the title of the blog "Patterns of Force", and the image you chose, from one of my favorite classic Trek episodes of the same name. Funny thing about classic Trek...the more you study, the more you realize writer/ producer Gene Roddenberry was trying to say with Star Trek. Patterns of Force and many other of the classic shows deserve a re-viewing in light of the once occult or hidden information many of us are just now beginning to understand. Anyone who does some research into Roddenberry's extensive occult and Masonic background will know what I mean. Anyway, thanks again for your insight and thoughtfulness-


1/20/2007 04:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeff said...
I cut out the mention of Kissinger serving as Dulles's post-war translator because I decided I don't know enough of Kissinger's role in those years to suggest he also shouldered some responsibility for Paperclip. He would have been only in his early 20s, so my guess is Paperclip shaped him more than he shaped Paperclip, but that seems like the topic for another post. I didn't want him to overshadow Dulles.

TRANSLATION: My handlers made me remove it because it might lead to the real puppetmasters behind tools and useful idiots such as Allen Dulles.

That's why it's been scrubbed from the Google cache of the site, as well.

1/20/2007 04:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

another anon said:

"We see that as long as the drugs serve the purpose of the state, they are pushed (crack cocaine, heroin), and if they promote any kind of greater thought levels (neurotransmitter promoters like lsd, psyllocybin, THC)--they are attacked.) Not that "psychedelic" drugs don't also have their dangers, but...channeling brains into easily predictable behaviours...seems to be promoted here. You can bet on easily predictable behaviours and make money on them.

...a sentiment well said that should be writ in stone on a mountainside somewhere, for all to see who plumb the politics of mental entraining or freeing of different effects of drugs.

And a corollary would be of the other classes of more neurotransmitter and unpredictable effects, they make such political clientelism far more difficult in practice for elites to sculpt people into, because you can't "bet on easily predictable behaviours and make money on them."

Same goes with the 'grain' of ideologies and the various political tweaking of major religions' interpretations. For instance, the same could be said for the ideological and interpretive tweaking of early Christianity to exclude Christian Gnostic mystery religion secrets, intimately a part of mainline Christian teachings. However, from the later 100s CE it seems (as per the last surviving letter of Clement of Alexandria, and his "instruction to openly lie, even on oath" about the legitimacy of the Secret Gospel of Mark (which mentions that there were innately multiple levels of Christian gnosis), and from 325 CE with the Council of Nicaea officially, this integral part of 'actual Christianity as an ungovernable secret individualized mystery religion' was increasingly banned because of a public consolidation minded, exoteric power-seeking Byzantium and other bishoprics of post-Nicaean Christianity.

Besides the Secret Gospel of Mark, there's the Gospel of Thomas, and the Gospel of Mary of Magdal--all scholastically dated to the same period as the others. However, these "thought drugs for individual, unpredictable experiential paths to the divine" were banned by the state church, doing just what the other anon said: they couldn't control or mass market such ideas or gain public power through them as a leadership cadre, so they were increasingly banned and massively burned (370s I think in Alexandria all 'non canonical' gnostic stuff was burned by the Christian bishopric.). Only the Nag Hamadi "Gnostic Gospels", found in 1945, (and a few other finds over the 1800s and 1900s) survived (of which Princeton's Elaine Pagels is the most well known scholar about them.).

Who knows what else the Vatican itself hides in its Secret Archives like a guilty secret that the "Church" is nothing of the sort of a spiritual monopoly it wished to become. So it laid waste to spirituality, and then set itself up in the ruins.

1/20/2007 06:00:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Elijah said...
Jeff said...
I cut out the mention of Kissinger serving as Dulles's post-war translator because I decided I don't know enough of Kissinger's role in those years to suggest he also shouldered some responsibility for Paperclip. He would have been only in his early 20s, so my guess is Paperclip shaped him more than he shaped Paperclip, but that seems like the topic for another post. I didn't want him to overshadow Dulles.

TRANSLATION: My handlers made me remove it because it might lead to the real puppetmasters behind tools and useful idiots such as Allen Dulles.

That's why it's been scrubbed from the Google cache of the site, as well.

Elijah, you paranoiac, the version with the Kissinger reference wasn't up long enough for Google to have cached it. Jeff edited it shortly after he uploaded the blog, hence my comment about being caught in mid-read by the edit.

1/20/2007 06:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Elijah said:

"TRANSLATION: My handlers made me remove it [Kissinger reference] because it might lead to the real puppetmasters behind tools and useful idiots such as Allen Dulles."

On the one hand, Kissinger is the bigger fish. On the other hand, though there is a bloodline issue to the Dulles mentioned in Treason in America: from Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman, so take your pick. It's the same freaking families over and over.

1/20/2007 06:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps Allen Dulles was fascinated or obsessed with Hitler in a similar way that Salvador Dali was; which is to say as Dali was said to have said.. because of 'the shape of his back' or – in particular, the Führer's 'milky white buttocks.'

These are all ´lusty´ men, after all.

1/20/2007 07:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Withdrawing our shadow projections, the darker part of ourselves that we see reflected in “others,” initiates the process of being able to more effectively deal with the darkness in our world. The question arises: what does owning our shadow and withdrawing our shadow projections look like? When we recognize, own and withdraw our shadow projections from the outside world that we have cast onto “others,” we get in touch with the “other” inside of ourselves. When we stop seeing the “other” who is outside ourselves as separate, but as a reflection of something within ourselves, we become acquainted with the “other” who exists within.

This newly found “other within” is subjectively experienced as not being under the control of our will, as if it is a separate and autonomous being. To meet the other within is to discover that we are not the master of our own house. To conceptualize this other within ourselves, think of our primary identity, of who we imagine we are (a good, kind, spiritual person, for example), and then take the polar opposite of this perspective – this is how the other within us sees the world. To quote Jung, “…we discover that the ‘other’ in us is indeed ‘another,’ a real man, who actually thinks, does, feels, and desires all the things that are despicable and odious…. A whole man, however, knows that his bitterest foe, or indeed a host of enemies, does not equal that one worst adversary, the ‘other self’ who dwells in his bosom.” To quote the cartoon character Pogo, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

1/20/2007 08:02:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Ivan Johnson said...
Perhaps Allen Dulles was fascinated or obsessed with Hitler in a similar way that Salvador Dali was; which is to say as Dali was said to have said.. because of 'the shape of his back' or – in particular, the Führer's 'milky white buttocks.'

These are all ´lusty´ men, after all.

Artists say the darndest things... ;-)

1/20/2007 08:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am new to this blog site and I have been looking forward to reading it everyday for the past several weeks. I was delighted to read some very reflective and evolved thoughts which could inspire a New Reality or New Myth. Some people seem to have to quote long thoughts that are not their own and while entertaining and informative….. well, There seemed to evolve a distinct direction in people wanting something more than what they have created or what is being presented to them by the events that getting our daily, hourly and moment to moment attention and effecting us each in a different way but still as we evolve our being to yearns to be connected and our thoughts validated. If we could only express ourselves in relationship to God, without being labeled Christian, Jew, Muslim, or the Satanist and just tell each other the Truth about what it is we all really want???
The Satanist “plugged me in” meaning I had a severe, flash back to all the Christian doctrines that are being circulated and their hatred for being lied to in the past about God and the Mysteries of Life.
Its so simple, Each and every being’s soul has that yearning to return to Living Forever in God’s Paradise. Every soul yearns and requires that experience of Love, the all encompassing Experience of Oneness. The Warmth, the Light, …that which cannot be put into words.
Someone mentioned that Manson lacked love and nurturing as he was growing up and like so many beings, he transferred the meaning of love for him to POWER. He replaced or filled the void of Love with the experience of POWER. When someone seeks the experience of power, when the experience of human love has been denied then the need to KILL becomes the is ultimate experience of POWER.

But this Power that Manson realized, thru his ability to “control” others to KILL and do all that stuff that people call evil, then maybe we can see what direction we need to take as evolved humans that have found that Love, and can express and experience it in ALL things including, out of date religious beliefs that give us POWER to destroy that which really pisses us off or is in the way of what we think we really want.

The God that the Christians and Satanists believe in seem to inspire hate and destruction because they have not experienced the Love of the CREATOR which dwells within our beings. our souls. And the POWER that has replaced Love, is a power drawn from outside of us instead of the IMMENSE POWER that resides within and our true connection the each other and the One and Only True God. The One that resides within ALL Creation, within each one of US.

Explaining God is pointless and in vain and a waste of time. It’s the relationship that each one of us has, and each one of knows to the core of our being that there are no word to express your own special relationship to what we call God. An Atheist has the most unique relationship of all.
God, Almighty, Creator of ALL is unknowable,…. and yet we know.

All that Satan/god whatever I actually took the time to read..... Is not a new Myth. TOO MUCH INFORMATION thank you! Please enjoy your relationship with Satan/god but enough! You’re sounding so much like another religion that preaches destruction of the “enemies” I don’t see anyone else interested in how to send pain and suffering to an enemy. What is your definition of “enemy”?

When??? will we get that Fear is the Real Enemy and get on to The Conscious Loving of Ourselves and Holy Mother Earth?? When??????????

There is nothing more significant or of more importance than the Care and Cultivation of All Life on this Earth. That is Our Salvation.

Anyway, The Very Loving and Conscious GOD I know was reported to have promised LIFE Eternal at the time we reach Full Humanity.

Please, A NEW MYTH…. so we can finally get beyond myth and SURRENDER! …….And Fear becomes the Holy Spirit guiding us to LOVE>>>

1/20/2007 09:10:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Ever Anononymous...

"Some people seem to have to quote long thoughts that are not their own..."

There is only One Mind, haven't you been paying attention??? :-)

1/20/2007 09:43:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Like I said... it's all One Mind, Nothing new in this world, as above so below....

"Its so simple, Each and every being’s soul has that yearning to return to Living Forever in God’s Paradise. Every soul yearns and requires that experience of Love, the all encompassing Experience of Oneness. The Warmth, the Light, …that which cannot be put into words.
Someone mentioned that Manson lacked love and nurturing as he was growing up and like so many beings, he transferred the meaning of love for him to POWER. He replaced or filled the void of Love with the experience of POWER. When someone seeks the experience of power, when the experience of human love has been denied then the need to KILL becomes the is ultimate experience of POWER.

From Ashley Montagu, last century...

Q. Love and cooperation often seem distant in our world of increasing violence.

AM: We can't solve any problem without first solving the problem of human nature. We won't be able to solve the problems of homeless, impoverished, illiterate people, of murderers who would never have become murderers had they been adequately loved. You show me a murderer, and I'll show you a person who's been failed in the supreme need for love, who never learned how to love, and will hate, as I heard one saying, "I hate the whole world's guts, and the whole world hates mine." These are the victims of society, just as the doctor is a victim of society, as most of us are victims of our society.

1/20/2007 10:22:00 PM  
Blogger ericswan said...

Fences are the problem not where you sit. para demi semi quad...raplegic. Do you realize that certain injuries cause the body politic to break down in quarters or halfs?

Your confusion all is not realizing Time is Short. Your life, my life, but a twinkling in a hoary frost. Get over yourselves. Think of your life as a half hour sit com or tragedy or the afternoon news but it's only just a short bit in the 24 hour broadcast.

1/20/2007 11:06:00 PM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


What gives, my man? I really don’t know why I pissed you off with that comment, but since I care enough to, I’ll see if I can’t deconstruct the misunderstanding. It seems to center around diplomacy & communication, which, as you say, is something I’ve being talking about for a long time as being central to any attempt at the cannon fodder having something to say about where the cannons are pointed. When I finally launch this internet initiative, my hope is that it’ll be presented in neutral enough terms that even folks to the right of where I sit on the dial, which is almost everyone, will not only not perceive it as just another leftwing attack on the status quo, but rather as an effort with such universal appeal that they’ll think they own the issue.

To do this, I don’t intend any sort of trickery at all; I really do believe that most people do find the ideals of American democracy to be worthwhile, even inspirational. The hard part will be in keeping my biases out of the presentation—how do you say that those ideals have been compromised by hypocrisy, greed, institutionalized corruption, and drastic inequalities in the distribution of wealth and power without sounding like a cynical anarchist? This is where I’m hung up on the project right now. I’ve re-written five times already and I’m still seeing my own perspective bleeding through each of the arguments I present. This type of writing is the hardest thing I’ve ever tried to write—it’s not like here, where I let my opinions be known on a daily basis without any sort of filtering whatsoever.

In fact, I don’t have any idea what you mean by my “fence-sitting” here at RI—I don’t hold back my true feelings on any topic to which I’ve responded. While it’s true that I don’t usually attack anyone here or even use sarcasm when I’m talking to someone, it doesn’t mean that I refrain from these things because I want people to like me; it just doesn’t accomplish anything. The few times I have ridden someone too hard I’ve always instantly regretted it because it’s so pointlessly infantile and embarrassing. And this is a community of more or less like-minded individuals—when you go out in the wider world, you really do have to exercise some restraint or your attempts at building bridges are doomed from the start. And yes, you’re right—I failed utterly and completely to do that over at Brin’s house.

On the other hand, my going over there didn’t exactly start out as diplomatic mission either. I went there because Brin wrote something at Ray Kurzweil’s AI website, an article called Nightmares and Singularities which had some things in it that I was looking for. Briefly and specifically, I wanted to know how Brin envisioned a societal construct free of secrecy & scarcity. He spoke of this notion of reciprocal accountability as the mechanism for the former and gave some vague hints about technical innovation for the latter. I was curious because I’ve always felt that we’d first need to go through an intense period of disclosure, facilitated by some sort of truth & reconciliation process à la South Africa and Chile, and in order to do that, there would have to be amnesty for the thugs, otherwise there’d be no incentive to come clean.

Turns out that Brin pictured that part of it very closely to my version. That’s where the similarity ended, however, since my plan relied on stripping corporations of their ridiculous “personhood” (what, like they don’t get to express themselves enough in the current set up?!) and then smashing the elite’s monopolies through intensive anti-trust legislation, completely publicly funded political campaigns, and then banning of all forms of lobbying. Brin had already started to turn pale by this point, so when I went on to say that the national security state would also have to be dismantled, including repealing every piece of legislation from the original National Security Act through Patriot Acts I, II and X, culminating in the total elimination of black budgets and the repudiation of 200 years of American imperialism…well, he sort of threw up all over me.

So, yeah, you’re right: I blew it (if my purpose was reaching out to build some sort of connection between RI and Brin’s blog, which briefly I thought I might have been trying to do when I found that initial common ground.) I really just wanted answers to those first two questions, though. The whole diplomatic mission thing was just an afterthought, the second bird on my single stone. As I was lectured by the host over there, it soon became apparent that his groupies subscribed to some deeply weird shit that would never fly here, like the CIA being our guardian angel and the Cold War being America’s finest hour.

Now I know that I’ll find even worse things when I go knocking on Red State doors, but I’ll be there for a different (higher) purpose. I just went to Brin’s to borrow a cup of cugar, fer chrissakes, not to ask his daughter out like I plan to at the redneck trailers I’ll be visiting soon. So that’s how that whole thing happened, Shrub. I hope I’ve made the distinction clear enough between the two tones in which I’m speaking. My mistake at Brin’s was to talk like I would around here. As to the rest of what you wrote, well, I’m still lost. I really was trying to help with Oarwell and I wasn’t trying to be condescending with my suggestion that the penis talk might have been the problem. I saw your intention as humorous, but I thought that maybe other people wouldn’t. What the hell do I know? This is the other thing that left me mystified—who ever said I was some repository of wisdom or that you weren’t my “equal”? C’mon, Shrub! What does that even mean? Do you infer those things because I write here so much?

Shrub, I can assure you I harbor no such illusions—I know my intellectual limitations because they are so obvious to me and I wouldn’t presume to judge anyone else’s because all I get to see is what’s posted here. At best, a mood sometimes crystallizes which is great fun. Ideas percolate, ripples converge, patterns form…and then dissipate into random splotches on the monochrome background. Sure I want to change the world (doesn’t everyone?), but our conversations aren’t really all that deep. I hope I’m not pissing you off now by not taking this seriously enough, Shrub, but what’s the point of an emotional commitment to a comment thread? That's why I never get angry at anyone around here--what good could possibly come from that?

1/21/2007 01:14:00 AM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


Quite right, once again. Here's the question: how do you balance the shortness of time with the momentum of the moment? Ever read Pratchett's Bromeliad Trilogy, where the little people live ten times faster than we do, so we're these slow-motion, foghorn-voiced giants who never seem to notice what's happening around them? Great stuff (and slightly more legal than those mushrooms cited above.)

1/21/2007 01:22:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

iridescent cuttlefish why such a pooh-pooh attitude towards Ayn Rand? She did good work. It starts with her didn't you read??? Don't you know without selfishness there can be no empathy? How can you love another without loving yourself?

1/21/2007 03:09:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

I just watched a Discovery Channel show about research into Homo Sapiens. The subject was autism and new research on Mirror Neurons was a focus. Autistics can't communicate because they can't project inner sensations via modeling synthesis cognition to the environment ie other people, all thanks to faulty Mirrot Neurons. Or that's the theory.

"You can't love other people..."

1/21/2007 03:18:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Prying open my third eye.

2012 transit of Venus/Diana

Venus has a unique relation ship with earth way beyond what I can say.
Other civilizations also take note
in particular the



Venus carves out a PENTAGRAM in her movements as seen by us here one planet earth.

Her rotation is opposite earths.

The numbers of her rotation in relation to earth. Very interesting.
The ancients also knew of these things.

Lucifer is also a name for Venus.

This planet is both the morning star and the evening star.

To rise you must fall.

The pentagram is an ancient symbol which has had many different meanings through the millenia. It has been used by many different groups of people, in all orientations - point-up, point-down, and sideways. The point-down pentagram first acquired a "Satanic" connotation in the writings of Eliphas Levi, a nineteenth-century occultist, in his book Transcendental Magic.

We use a point-down pentagram to represent the five rising gods, each of the five rising gods corresponding to a point. Each line of the pentagram represents a pair of gods, as follows:

1. Lilith (bottom point) is "infernal" whereas Prometheus (top right point) can be seen as "heavenly." Prometheus is "heavenly" both in the ancient mythological sense of having stolen fire from heaven and in a more literal modern sense - the key role played by observations and explorations of the heavens in the development of modern science and technology. The medieval Jewish myth of Lilith and the ancient Greek myth of Prometheus both have strong parallels with, respectively, the Islamic and Second Temple Era Jewish myths of the "fall" of Azazel. Another connection between Prometheus and Lilith is that the things associated with Lilith (sexual freedom, nonreproductive sex, and feminism) are all dependent on technology. Conversely, modern science would not be possible without Satanic/Lilithian pride: the great scientists refused to bow down uncritically to traditional ideas about the universe, but, instead, insisted on verifying ideas for themselves.

2. In today's world it is common for people to see a contrast between technology (Prometheus, top right point) and "Mother Nature" (Ishtar, left middle point). Together they represent a vital balance in human affairs. Thanks to the gifts of Prometheus, we humans are now, to "Mother Nature," more like rambunctious small children than like totally helpless babies, but we still cannot live without Her, and it would still behoove us to respect Her.

3. Ishtar (left middle point) and Pan (right middle point) are the Earth-based Goddess/God polarity so beloved by a great many modern Pagan Witches. And indeed, the idea of gender polarity really makes sense only in terms of life here on Earth. Gender is not cosmic. Gender is, as far as anyone knows for sure, a feature only of the more complex species of animals and plants here on Earth. Any ascription of gender to anything else is purely symbolic and at least somewhat arbitrary.

4. Pan (right middle point) is associated with fleshly pleasures, whereas Lucifer-of-Sophia (top left point) is associated with spiritual insights. (We see these two as complementing each other rather than in opposition.) The imagery associated with both Pan (horns and hooves) and Lucifer-of-Sophia (the Serpent of the Eden myth) have been strongly associated with the Devil in modern Western culture and throughout most of the history of Christianity; yet these two deities are both sharply distinguished from the Devil by the majority of their own modern worshipers.

5. Lucifer-of-Sophia (top left point) is "heavenly" whereas Lilith (bottom point) is "infernal." Both are strongly associated with individuality. Both are part of an emerging order in which human individuality is accepted and championed to a greater degree than in many past cultures.
Much is allegorical as you can see.

An allegory (from Greek αλλος, , "other", and αγορευειν, agoreuein, "to speak in public") is a figurative mode of representation conveying a meaning other than the literal.

Allegory is generally treated as a figure of rhetoric, but an allegory does not have to be expressed in language: it may be addressed to the eye, and is often found in realistic painting, sculpture or some other form of mimetic, or representative art.

The etymological meaning of the word is broader than the common use of the word. Though it is similar to other rhetorical comparisons, an allegory is sustained longer and more fully in its details than a metaphor, and appeals to imagination, while an analogy appeals to reason or logic. The fable or parable is a short allegory with one definite moral.

Since meaningful stories are nearly always applicable to larger issues, allegories may be read into many stories, sometimes distorting their author's overt meaning.
The central pentagon of the pentagram represents the emerging post-Christian cultural and social order in the modern Western world - an order that has been emerging since the mid-1960's and will CONTINUE to emerge insofar as the Abrahamic reactionaries don't succeed in smothering it.

The soul of man--often called Psyche, and in the Eleusinian Mysteries symbolized by Persephone--is essentially a spiritual thing. Its true home is in the higher worlds, where, free from the bondage of material form and material concepts, it is said to be truly alive and self-expressive. The human, or physical, nature of man, according to this doctrine, is a tomb, a quagmire, a false and impermanent thing, the source of all sorrow and suffering. Plato describes the body as the sepulcher of the soul; and by this he means not only the human form but also the human nature.

The gloom and depression of the Lesser Mysteries represented the agony of the spiritual soul unable to express itself because it has accepted the limitations and illusions of the human environment. The crux of the Eleusinian argument was that man is neither better nor wiser after death than during life. If he does not rise above ignorance during his sojourn here, man goes at death into eternity to wander about forever, making the same mistakes which he made here. If he does not outgrow the desire for material possessions here, he will carry it with him into the invisible world, where, because he can never gratify the desire, he will continue in endless agony. Dante's Inferno is symbolically descriptive of the sufferings of those who never freed their spiritual natures from the cravings, habits, viewpoints, and limitations of their Plutonic personalities. Those who made no endeavor to improve themselves (whose souls have slept) during their physical lives, passed at death into Hades, where, lying in rows, they slept through all eternity as they had slept through life.

Psychedelics were used in these rites.

Jodie Foster tells Hannibal how she once set the lambs free but they stayed in their cages.



1/21/2007 04:47:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

And I'm a Taurus born on a Friday. Hmmm.... Sophia is such a pretty name too.

1/21/2007 05:00:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Here's another version from a scientist feeling his way through the Universe.

1/21/2007 05:17:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

The 12 Zodiac Signs...

"Spheres pack 12 around 1 - each sphere in the matrix is touching 12 other spheres and
connecting grid-lines (force vectors) from the center of each sphere creates our space-frame trusswork."

1/21/2007 05:25:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Why doesn't fix the flow properties of their pages? What a joke.

1/21/2007 05:40:00 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

Continuing the Nazi patterns theme, I wanted to pass on a recent entry of interest concerning 2009's Codex Alimentarius and its Nazi-heritage corporation interests and what they expect to happen once 2009 rolls around... Here it is folks. Draw your lines.

The Bioregional State's Bodily Integrity Principle Vs. Codex Alimentarius' WTO Vitamin Police, which starts:

Benjamin Rush on the Despotism of the Vitamin Police

American Founding Father Benjamin Rush wanted medical freedom as a basic human right in the U.S. Constitution, arguing that "Unless we put Medical Freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship . . . .[T]o restrict the art of healing to one class of men, and deny equal privilege to others, will be to constitute the Bastille of Medical Science. All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a Republic....The Constitution of this Republic should make special privilege for Medical Freedom as well as Religious Freedom." The bioregional state would support such a right--and we should demand it because it's about to become a major international issue when people realize they could be potentially arrested for taking or making vitamins and mineral supplements by 2009, as a woman in France was arrested for selling 500 mg Vitamin C tablets, ....

Guess how many they think they are going to cull, from WHO and FAO U.N. documents?

1/21/2007 06:23:00 AM  
Blogger Sounder said...

Thank-you Sabrina,

I do not know if you are associated with the Satan posters earlier, but its nice to have information presented without the asinine proselytizing element.

So often 'beliefs' seem to twist information into small minded agenda fulfillment operations. Usually unbalanced.

1/21/2007 07:59:00 AM  
Blogger Sounder said...

To get to specifics Sabrina,

I like the Eleusinian argument, but as to the 'the gloom and depression of the Lesser Mysteries', this agony serves as motivation to confront and disperse the ‘limitations and illusions of the human environment.’ Surely the spiritual soul expression will be more effective to the degree that it can integrate the physical and spiritual realms, rather than using the spiritual to ‘transcend’ the physical; which seems to be the negative pole of the Luciferic project.

As I am simple, my outlook is simple. There are two forces in the cosmos. One force tries to fix or freeze the spiritual into the material, call this Jehovah, Ahriman,(Satan) Zeus; all the father gods. The other force tries to split the spiritual from the material and have names such as Pan, Diana, Lucifer, Shiva, etc.

The negative expressions of these ‘gods’ resort to tyranny and coersion as they try to impose what they consider as the proper expression for the ‘being’ of the common man. The positive expressions of these ‘gods’ serve to balance its opposite and validate the current level of integration of the spiritual and the material. A delicate play that serves to manifest our existance, the Logos, I think. Where we are, is where we are supposed to be; but that still leaves us with other places to go.

1/21/2007 08:48:00 AM  
Blogger Sounder said...

On second thought;

These 'gods' are trying to get me to hallucinate their reality for them....Fuck them all, I submit to God alone.

1/21/2007 08:54:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...


Please contact the Free State Project or the Second Vermont Revolution. Most liberals here don't care about freedom.

1/21/2007 09:37:00 AM  
Blogger flic said...

Orwell and Sline came out of the restaurant.

They got on a bus.

Sline took Orwell to a hospital.

He took him to his laboratory.

He asked him a lot of questions.

He gave him a glass of water.

Orwell wanted something to drink.

Sline showed him some strange symbols.

He gave Orwell something to drink, but it wasn't water.

Sabine destroyed Orwell's manuscript.

1/21/2007 10:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Remember when the
museum in Bagdad, Iraq
was looted after the

They HAD quite a collection of artifacts.

Ishtar was the Mesopotamian goddess of sexuality and warfare.


Ishtar is also associated with the
and both deities are depicted with

symbols of fertility,
such as the date palm,

and of aggression,
such as the lion.

Also Ishtar's astral quality also must be emphasized:

Her crown is a representation of the planet Venus.

The goddess could be worshipped as both
a male or female Ishtar, this indicating her

dual role of sex and war

as well as the

evening and morning
aspects of the planet


1/21/2007 10:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Big Changes Coming for Area Churches

NEW YORK (1010 WINS) -- Cardinal Edward Egan faced the faithful on Friday to explain a word that will change the lives of Roman Catholics in the nation's second-largest archdiocese: realignment.

Translated into action,
it means the Archdiocese
of New York --
more than 2.5 million people living from Manhattan to the Catskill mountains --
is closing churches where services are poorly attended.

"The decision is not based on economics at all _ it's because of the shifting numbers of Catholics,'' said archdiocese spokesman Joseph Zwilling. "One hundred years ago, 80 percent of New York's Catholics lived in Manhattan, the Bronx or southern Westchester County. Now, only about 60 percent of those Catholics are there. We need to go where the Catholics are.''

In all, 10 parishes will be closed -- four in the city, six in the suburbs or farther north -- and 11 will merge with other parishes, church officials announced at a news conference.

"Each parish, each school, each community was examined thoughtfully and patiently,'' the cardinal said. "We were committed to seeing to it that every Catholic would have a parish and school available to serve them as the Lord would have them served.''

The New York archdiocese did not give a timetable for the closings of Mary Help of Christians and Our Lady Queen of Angels in Manhattan, St. Mary in the Bronx and St. John Baptist de la Salle in Staten Island. Also to be shuttered are four churches in Westchester County, one in Orange County and one in Dutchess County.

On Friday, church officials used demographic charts and words often heard in business deals to describe ecclesiastical affairs: the "realignment,'' they said, included "mergers'' and "expansion.''

The words painted a picture of a church being reorganized to reflect 21st century changes. Some parishes are merging with others to serve the same parishioners, while the cardinal is supporting efforts to build new houses of worship.

Many Catholics whose families arrived in New York as immigrants in the 20th century have since moved out of the city.

This is especially true for the heavily Catholic, and growing, population of Hispanics on the move.

While the future beckons for the more mobile Catholics, St. Mary in the Bronx is preparing to dismantle.

"I'm glad to see the end coming,'' said the Rev. John Sullivan, who came to the parish 20 years ago as one of four priests there. He's alone now, serving about 150 families -- down from as many as 700 decades ago.

"When I came, there were a lot of Irish, Italians and Polish parishioners. But they're gone, and their children moved away,'' said Sullivan, who is close to retirement. "I thought when the Brooklyn Dodgers moved to L.A., that it was the end of the world. But it wasn't. I've been trying to prepare people for this for years.''

He rarely uses the church, instead celebrating Mass in the chapel of the nearby St. Mary School, which will stay open for its more than 300 grade school children. "Many of them don't even know where the church is,'' said Sullivan, adding that St. Mary is now leased by a group of Korean Catholics who call it St. John Nam.

Typically, the churches being shuttered now have 100 to 200 parishioners, worshipping in spaces that can hold as many as 700.

Zwilling emphasized that the buildings housing those churches will not be sold, but could instead be used by Catholic health care agencies or charities.

The 11 parishes set to "merge'' will either keep their buildings or establish smaller chapels. "But we will have a worship site for them,'' Zwilling said. "We need to look at which places need to expand, or where we need to shift personnel. Which places need more priests?''

Prime areas for expansion are north of New York City, in Orange, Rockland and Putnam counties, as well as northern Westchester and Dutchess, Zwilling said. The archdiocesan plan also calls for a new church in the Bronx, and a new church as well as parish in Staten Island.

The decisions announced Friday came after three years of formal study by archdiocese officials, who consulted experts in many fields including demographics predicting population growth.

The largest Roman Catholic archdiocese in the United States, Los Angeles, has about 4.4 million faithful.

In Italy Satanism has the youth.
In europe
the churches are empty too.


Remember time is short.

Enjoy the internet in the mean time, while it lasts.

Knowledge is readily available.

This is not for long if those against our FREEDOMS get their way.

We are warriors,
in this fight.

wild and free

1/21/2007 11:32:00 AM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


I'm going to assume you were joking about Rand, but then your freestate link took me to this, the standard Libertarian oath:

Statement of Intent

I hereby state my solemn intent to move to the state of New Hampshire. Once there, I will exert the fullest practical effort toward the creation of a society in which the maximum role of civil government is the protection of life, liberty, and property.

Which means no public schools, no public health, etc. Laissez-faire government, in other words. Sacred to this non-interventionist creed is reverence for property and the philosophy of social darwinism. One step further, since might makes right and only the fittest are going to survive anyway, is to make a small intervention in the name of preventing the need for any social programs: eugenics. Why not? You'd just have to take care of all those retards and hemophiliacs otherwise, or watch them slowly die--why not get the biggest bang for the holy buck? A bullet in the brain of a non-producing member of society now saves all that time & messy socialism later, right?

Seriously though, did you notice who their keynote speaker was going to be at the big convention? None other than the expansively free-thinking John Stossel--whom I'd dearly love to "give a break," as he always wheedles and whines. The man's a fascist. A Libertarian who'd outlaw drugs.

I'm not saying that there isn't a form of libertarianism that's livable--some of the Lib/Green alliances are interesting, and you can't forget RAW's Guns & Dope Party, which is described, lovingly, in the Wonkette's obit/tribute as:

...a kind of techno-hippie-mystic-2nd Amendment libertarianism that is worlds away from the Cato stereotype yet incredibly influential in Silicon Valley and electronic media. And unlike the “political thinkers” who clog Washington’s green rooms on Sunday mornings, Wilson was hilarious … on purpose.

~ ~ ~

Wilson once described himself as a libertarian who didn’t “hate poor people,” which does away with the central objection most libertarian-leaning liberals have with a political movement pretty much owned by people who think they’re acting out some brave Tyrannosaurus Rex vs. the Herbivore drama by not giving a dollar to a hungry bum.

His platform for the mostly fictional Guns & Dope Party went like this, in part:

We advocate:

1. guns for those who want them, no guns
forced on those who don’t want them (pacfists, Quakers etc.)

2. drugs for those who want them,
no drugs forced on those who don’t want them (Christian Scientists etc.)

3. an end to Tsarism and a return to constitutional democracy

4. equal rights for ostriches.

(Ostriches play a similar role to Jesus in the GOP or minorities in the Democratic Party: The leadership doesn’t really care about these symbols one way or the other, but it provides a handy identity for the party loyalists.)

I think Wilson knew more about those ostriches then he was letting on or than Wonkette gives him credit for, as seen in this passage from the G&D page:

First order of business on assuming office:

Fire 33% of the Congress [names selected at random]
and replace them with full-grown adult ostritches,
whose mysterious and awesome dignity will
elevate the suidaen barbarity long established there.

What does Stossel know about the mysterious and awesome dignity of the ostritch? (Or the freedom of the dispossessed, to whom property is still theft?)

1/21/2007 12:10:00 PM  
Blogger Tsoldrin said...

"a societal construct free of secrecy & scarcity"

That sounds like The Culture.

1/21/2007 12:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are markers in STONE for a future time when knowledge would once again be discovered.

Markers of specific times such as the:

Egyptian Sphinx (Age of Leo, 10,500 BCE),
the scarab (Age of Cancer, 8,800 BCE),
the twins, (Age of Gemini, 6,640 BCE),
the bull (Age of Taurus, 4,480),
and the rams heads (Age of Aries, 2,320 BCE)

All of these go back thousands of years and provide evidence that civilization is much older than previously assumed. Ancient temples, many that are still intact in Egypt are aligned with the constellations and stars; evidence of the extra-terrestrial Gods.


The Horned Goat is also directly of Enki (Satan). The constellation of the Horned Goat (Capricorn) is the time of the winter solstice, known as "The Southern Gate of the Sun." ²

“The Goat was known in early Babylonian times as the God ‘Ea’ (Enki/Satan).

Ea was known as

‘He of vast intellect and Lord of the Sacred Eye’

protector of his people and the bringer and giver of knowledge and civilization to humanity.
Represented as a snake, he ended up in the ‘Garden of Eden as the Snake in the tree of life, encouraging learning and knowledge rather than blissful ignorance.’

Whenever Ea roamed the Earth, he took the form of a goat. Ea was considered the Father of Light" and his celebrations dating back to 15,000 B.C.E., were carried out wearing goat skins.³

Satanism is in truth, the world's oldest religion. Satanism is not an "invention" or "inversion" of xianity.


Egyptian Mythology" by Veronica Ions, page 124, the author writes that Ptah took the form of a goat.

¹ Egyptian Mythology by Veronica Ions, page 103

² Brady's Book of Fixed Stars by Bernadette Brady, pages 300-301

New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, page 56

Outer Space by Jobes


USA not an xtian Nation. In 1754, Benjamin Franklin, Satanist, used a snake, the first known political cartoon in an American newspaper. The serpent eventually found its way to one of our original flags, shown here.


The Lord of the Tree of Life;
Sumeria circa 2,500 BCE. The original "Tree of Life," depicting the DNA helix; also the Ida and the Pingala of the Kundalini Serpent.

The Caduceus is symbolic of the Ida and the Pingala of the Kundalini Serpent which transforms us into Gods. This is the healing energy within every human being.


The Brotherhood of the Snake Teachings of Ancient Egypt

The pyramids served many purposes. One purpose was that of initiation and ceremonial rites, both for humans and for the magickal workings of the Gods. Many hieroglyphics depict the Gods tuning their chakras with a rod-like instrument. Satan gave these energy centers to humanity, they are known as the breath of life, breathed into us by God (Father Satan). There are seven primary chakras and many minor ones. The hook and the flail were tuning tools for the primary chakras along the spine. A mural on a wall at Abu Simbel depicts Horus holding a rod to the back of Osiris' head, at the point that is the primary doorway to the eighth chakra (above the crown of the head). The hook is moved up and down the rod to tune the chakra. Osiris is standing with an erection. Sexual energy is a paramount component in the rite of resurrection and immortality. Kundalini is sexual; the life force. Sexual energy is that of the life force, as it has the power to create life through another human being. The sexual energy runs up and down the spine during the tuning process. The Egyptian Ankh symbolizes eternal life and eternal life is linked to the breath. The Ankh is also linked to sexual energy.
One of the key teachings was the overcoming of fear. Only when one surpasses all personal fears, can higher levels be accessed. Fear is the main emotion that prevents one from advancing spiritually. Fears must first be overcome here on Earth. To reach this goal, the Egyptians built special temples along the Nile. There are 12, along with the great pyramid making 13. 1+3=4. All of the verses in the xian bible referring to Satan and his Demons given certain mathematical applications, come out as 13. Four was Satan's original number.

The Temple at Kom Ombo represents the second chakra, and is dedicated to polarity/duality; the basis of sexuality and two Gods are associated with it- Sobek, the Crocodile God and Horus. The Ancient Egyptians would create experiences in these temples that would push initiates past their fears to become strong and competent in experiencing the unknown. There was a water hole full of crocodiles. The initiate, taking only one breath would dive under water not knowing what to expect and the test was to emerge from the water in a different location from where he/she went in. Initiates were unaware that the crocodiles were fully fed. They had to remain calm and in control to navigate the water. ¹
The sarcophagus in the King's chamber was used for the adepts as one of their final tests. The pyramids were built precisely along powerful earth energy lines known as “ley lines” and used by the Gods in their ritual workings. Beneath the great pyramid are the Halls of Amenti, the womb of the Earth. The adept would lie in the sarcophagus in the correct position so a powerful beam would hit the third eye chakra. The adept would then begin a specific type of meditation and the experience would be so blissful, some never returned. Part of the initiation was the conditioning of the student to remember to return to their bodies after the experience. The final initiation also was held in the King's chamber. This 4-5 minute ceremony took place in the center of the room. An Ankh was drawn on the third eye of the initiate.²

Satan created the Brotherhood of the Snake for humans to be able to advance to higher levels of spirituality.3

The Gods were the teachers.

Most are now the ones we know as the Demons. Some of the Gods, such as Thoth and Isis escaped being labeled as Demons. Isis is really Astaroth, but not too many know this. They helped and taught humanity.


¹ The Gods of Eden by William Bramley 1990 pages 53-54

² The Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life
by Drunvalo Melchizedek Volume 2, pages 262-268
(This book is real RHP and new agey, but contains a lot of useful information about Ancient Egypt).

Supporting References:

The Illustrated Egyptian Book of the Dead : a new translation with commentary by Ramses Seleem, 2001


FEAR is basically because of a lack of Knowledge.

"The Sporting Life"

Diamandas Galas with John Paul Jones

The Sporting Life is a song is about a female gang.

You have just got to hear this crazy song.

Sabrina and the Avant-Garde

1/21/2007 12:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


The occultic revolutionary war flag.
big.GIF (GIF Image, 369x232 pixels)


1/21/2007 01:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sabrina said....

Jodie Foster tells Hannibal how she once set the lambs free but they stayed in their cages.

Fantastic observation, Sabrina. I would like to apply it in a different context than the context you presented it.

I would like to apply it to IC's noble undertaking of saving the world. Let's assume IC, and a handful of others, represent Jodie letting the lambs free, and let's assume The Masses are the lambs. That's essentially my difference with IC. I find his dogged altruism magnanimous, but all that hard work and the lambs prefer the cage because they are so utterly and pervasively conditioned. It's easier to be the slaughterer, considering. All the hard work has already been done. There's really no longer any personal sacrifice on the part of the slaughterer....the lambs only know their shackles and are willing and docile recepients of the butcher's sharpened blade.

But that also brings me to another observation. You, and those who hold similar beliefs, have your own ideas about saving the world and they don't necessarily square with IC's, I'm guessing. You're not alone.....a myriad of fragmented constituencies, with widely varying agendas, also have their ideas on how to save the world....and many of them, like yourself, think their ideas are THEE ideas.

How on God's/Satan's green earth do you propose you can corral these various fragmented constituencies to believe that your ideas are THEE ideas, IC?

I'm being a realist, here, IC. I understand what you want to do, and I would appreciate living in a world which you envision, but I disagree with you when you assert that everyone would want a world like that, or that the indifferent lambs would leave their cages once set free.

1/21/2007 01:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Someones playing a game with me.

Of course you are part of it.
Are you getting to like it?


1/21/2007 01:31:00 PM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


Yeah, that's about the size of it--many thanks for the Banks link. I'd heard about it, forgotten it, and then here it is again. From the Wiki, it appears that Banks' vision relies pretty heavily on techno gadgetry, which is the way of Kurzweil & Co., but I'm thinkin' that stuff, while inevitable, isn't really necessary.

All that libertarian thinking would be okay if it weren't based in the current scarcity model. The golden rule would be all we needed if there were abundance, which our favorite villains strive endlessly to preserve. If they don't blow us all up first, the cornucopia will emerge and then we can turn our attentions to their true purposes--the long-suppressed inner & outer exploration. Farmer's Riverworld painted that picture more than a few decades ago.

Of course, there's always the bliss-out school of non-thought, but I don't see why these pursuits have to be either/or possibilities. Cyberpunks know a thing ot two about fun & adventure and blissing out...balance and perspective, you know. The only real common thread among all these visions is egalitarianism, our only future, the thing most feared by the pointy-headed pyramidal sadists we call leaders.

At this point, I gotta plug that book I was telling Shrub & Richard about the other day, Chris Moore's Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal. This might be interesting for you, too, wild and free sexymaenads, if the subject matter isn't too blasphemous. I know that most of the Christian authorities were scandalized by it, but if both sides were to find it blasphemous, then what would that suggest about the symbiosis between them? Does God need the Devil for His existence, and vice-versa?

Actually, my point with Lamb is that it's not really about theology at all--it's about freedom & control, scarcity & abundance. I wrote to Moore after I finished it and he even confessed as much (sorry about betraying that confidence, Chris, but these enquiring minds have the need to know.)

1/21/2007 01:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nazi scientists from Operation Paperclip were involved in some of the experiments in Montauk.



1/21/2007 01:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Never doubt the FORCE has enough power to go around.

If you go halfway the FORCE will always help.

"There is no scarcity in the universe that is a lie."


1/21/2007 01:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nikola Tesla
energy field


1/21/2007 02:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sabrina is a religious fundamentalist, exactly what she decries. Even evangelical. Strange?

1/21/2007 02:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very STRANGE,evangeligal
We desire nothing no membership, you can do as you wish as in jerk off for all we care.
mr.Last Poster

Just, free information for the asking.

Each form of vibration requires its own form of instrument for registration.
At present the human brain seems to be the only instrument capable of registering thought waves, although occultists say that in this century scientists will invent apparatus sufficiently delicate to catch and register such impressions.
And from present indications it looks as if the invention named might be expected at any time.
The demand exists and undoubtedly will be soon supplied.
But to those who have experimented along the lines of practical telepathy no further proof is required than the results of their own experiments.

We are sending out thoughts of greater or less intensity all the time, and we are reaping the results of such thoughts. Not only do our thought waves influence ourselves and others, but they have a drawing power.

If you dowse a person at orgasm the reading is goes from a live person to that of a dead person, all the energy goes out of the body.

Sex Magick

Sexual Orgasm is equivalent in power to the Life Force. Using sexual orgasm in ritual and in your magickal workings can give much added power to your outcome. Sex Magick is ancient, extremely powerful and is the creative principle.

At the moment of orgasm, one automatically enters a brief trance state. The powerful orgasmic energy can be directed. This is visualized as a brilliant bright light like the sun and can be directed into thoughtforms, the one of one's desires, talismans and so forth.

Women and men both differ in sexual energy. Women tend to peak in power according to cycles. Women are at the height of their power during menstruation. Psychic work, astral projection and other pursuits that require heightened sensitivity are greatly assisted after a strong orgasm. Orgasm is also an excellent way to induce relaxation before meditation.

Sexual fluids, both semen and vaginal secretions, and also menstrual blood have the power of the life force.

***** At the moment of orgasm, it is important to DIRECT your entire concentration and desire to your goal, willing it.
Visualize the orgasmic energy in the form of a beam, ball or vortex, penetrating the object/person,
lighting it up with a brilliant aura of energy that is programmed.

This is basic simple sex magick.

Montauk chair was ann amplifier.

Sex magick can be done alone, or with a partner or Demon/ess or in a group.

When working with others, it is very important as in all magickal practices that everyone work together with some SORT of organized effort.

Merging orgasmic energies with a Demon/ess is extremely powerful.



1/21/2007 03:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We already have a coven.

We need no more men.

Open you third eye.
Get high and see for yourself.
Order or just browse to see all the things available.
Maya Ethnobotanicals - News and Updates


1/21/2007 03:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ayahuasca (Banisteriopsis caapi)

Product Form Amount/Price Quantity
*Boa / Cielo* vine (30) whole, fresh. lowered price !
Excellent quality (refrigerated), Peru [view]

*Boa / Cielo* vine (30) whole, dry. new !
Excellent quality, Peru [view]

*Cielo* leaves (1) broken. new !
Excellent quality, Peru [view]

*Cielo* vine (27) whole, fresh.
Excellent quality (refrigerated), Equador, Amazon [view]

*White* vine (4) whole. lowered price !
Excellent quality, Shipibo-Conibo, Peru [view]

*White* vine (4) shredded. new stock !
Excellent quality, Shipibo-Conibo, Peru [view]

*Black* vine (18) large pieces, sliced. limited stock !
Excellent quality, very rare, Equador, Amazon [view]

*Yellow* vine (17) extra large, unique pieces. limited stock !
Excellent quality, Equador, Amazon [view]

*Yellow* vine (17) extra large, whole. limited stock !
Excellent quality, Equador, Amazon [view]

*Yellow* vine (19) thin sections. lowered price !
Excellent quality, Tarapoto, Peru [view]

*Yellow* vine (29) whole, thin sections.
Excellent quality, Equador, grown on Curacao [view]

*Yellow* vine (24) dry powder extract 10:1. new stock !
Excellent quality, Peru [view]

*Yellow / Ourinhos* vine (26) shredded. lowered price !
Excellent quality, Brazil, Amazon

Psylocybin go out in the cowfields after the thunderstorms 100% free.

Psilocybin-containing mushrooms are commonly called magic mushrooms or simply "shrooms". Intensity and duration vary depending on dosage, individual physiology, and set and setting.

That will open your eyes all three of them.

Peace ,Pot and microdot

the Nymphomaniacs

1/21/2007 04:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maenads, do you see some of these guys write?

We are going to punish you for that!

Trying to see the shameful (to his prudish mind) acts of the Maenads.

I don't like him! (king penteus types ie:mean posters)

Let's Kill him!!!!

One way ticket motherfucker!!!!

Lets fuck him first then kill him!!!!

Did you see how disrespectful he is?

Lets fuck him first and kill him!!!!

No, Lets tie him up, cut him and suck him and then lets kill him!

I bet you can't wait either.

wild and free

1/21/2007 04:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pentheus banned the worship of Dionysus.

This being against the advice of his counsel.

He did not allow the women of Cadmeia to join in his rites.

Dionysus caused Pentheus' mother and his aunts, Ino and Agave
(followers of Dionysus the MAENADS), to rush to Mount Cithaeron in a bacchic frenzy.

Because of this, Pentheus
imprisoned them, but their chains fell off and the jail doors opened for them by magick.

Dionysus then lured Pentheus out to spy on the bacchic rites by magick by shape-shifting to a priest.
In his hopes of catching the frenzied maenads in action.
Lesbian sex.
Gigantic Orgy.

The daughters of Cadmus saw him in a tree and thought him to be a wild animal because they were tripping out of their minds.

Pentheus was pulled down and torn limb from limb by them (sparagmos).
His mother then put his head on a thymus and paraded around thinking she had killed a wild animal.

Anyone who did not join in the rites coming into contact of the frenzied Maenads even as a passerby not interested was just asking to be killed.

Now think of the UTAH rave raid by helicopters.


Nice video of the para-military police in a vulgar display of power.
what are they trying to show the youth?

That they not them are in control?

a repetition of the signal


1/21/2007 05:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dionysus is Loose

The “war on drugs”
which is actually a
War against the People
took on a literal meaning when SWAT Team agents in full military combat regalia stormed a rave an hour outside Salt Lake City, Utah.

It was Saturday, August 20, when military soldiers swooped on the crowd of about 1,500 people in the Spanish Fork canyon.

THE PIGS wanted to....

“get their point across that such activity was not welcome in their area,”

That the RITES OF DIONYSUS were forbidden.

A point they made with more than 90 law enforcement officers and camouflaged SWAT Team members, vicious dogs and tear gas.

According to the Utah County Sheriff’s office, their Major Crimes unit dispatched several undercover officers to the party and waited until they witnessed drug-related crimes to send out both local and state SWAT teams.

Eyewitnesses have posted their accounts of POLICE BRUTALITY and other civil liberty violations, as “crowd control” became an assault on many peaceful partygoers who were doing no harm to others.

Rave busts have become infamous for their abuse of the civil rights of young people across the country who only want to enjoy music. The most recent widely publicized bust took place in Flint, Michigan, where eyewitness reports included accounts of patrons being strip searched and cavity searched, some of them in unsanitary or dangerous ways.

The RAVE Act, passed in 2003, claims to target promoters and venues who host Raves with the intent of distributing drugs. The Alliance has questioned the true intent of the law, submitting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Justice Department asking for any documents that reference the RAVE Act with respect to electronic music events. Any information found will assess whether prosecutors are abusing the law or upholding
of music fans.

More STUPID laws.............
This has got to be fought drop by drop.

We should we stay quiet?

Prudish MORMONS enforcing their beliefs on the youth.

The internet is a very powerful
and useful tool.

We will fight to be free.


1/21/2007 06:22:00 PM  
Blogger ericswan said...

We need frontiers. Pulled by your bellybutton inside out. Shaken and stirred. No new thing under the sun. Mycoplasmic warriors without borders. To go where no man has gone before only to find "bin dar dun dat".

Do you really think Internet is free? Live "live"? I don't feel it.

1/21/2007 07:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let's Kill him!!!!

One way ticket motherfucker!!!!

Lets fuck him first then kill him!!!!

Did you see how disrespectful he is?

Lets fuck him first and kill him!!!!

No, Lets tie him up, cut him and suck him and then lets kill him!

So this is what Jeff meant by Patterns of Force.

Silence of The Lambs.

1/21/2007 08:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent as always, Jeff.

Here ya go!

BTW, I want you all to know that this information came at great personal expense to me. It was 2 AM whilst reading this post, and my wife woke up and said "YOUR ALWAYS ON THAT F#@%ing COMPUTER!! ARE YOU CHATTING WITH SOME WHORE? Then she pushed my laptop off of my desk and went back to bed, slamming the door behind her. AHHHH, a small price to pay for such knowledge.....

1/21/2007 08:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ay least she didn't tie you up, cut you, suck you...and then kill you.

You need to go ahead and belt her after that little tirade....that's completely out of line.

Thanks for the info.

1/21/2007 08:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Jeff
In case anyone hasn't realized the true extent of Kissinger's powerful influence in the plan of death and destruction here goes. Kisssinger has spoken: "So Be It"

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, an iconic conservative who continues to command the attention of the White House, praises President Bush's moves in Iraq and says that leaving the war-torn nation is not possible under present conditions.

Kissinger has penned an editorial in which he states that Bush's "bold decision to order a 'surge' of some 20,000 American troops for Iraq has brought the debate over the war to a defining stage. There will not be opportunity for another reassessment."

The elder statesman remarks that the early strategy of replacing U.S. forces with Iraqis was "in retrospect, premature," and says that the "most flagrant shortcoming of Iraqi forces" is that they are unclear on what they're fighting for and for whom.

Kissinger asserts that the Iraq war is part of a larger conflict, namely "the assault on the international order conducted by radical groups in both Islamic sects," particularly against the United States. He insists that despite public disenchantment with the war in Iraq, "under present conditions, withdrawal is not an option."

He calls America "the indispensable component of any attempt to build a new world order."

Perhaps most telling, Kissinger declares that the U.S. is in Iraq as "an expression of the American national interest to prevent the Iranian combination of imperialism and fundamentalist ideology from dominating a region on which the energy supplies of the industrial democracies depend."

Excerpts from Kissinger's op-ed

According to mind control survivor Savali he has beeen orchestrating "Patterns of Force" for decades.

I wonder what god he worships???

1/21/2007 09:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In case you have him in another post soon.

1/21/2007 09:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I understand the calling the Summerian god from Anannuki, Enki the creator of humans, Satan. I have always liked Enki's story a lot and I love the Summerian god/creator stories.

But I just cannot get my mind around Venus as Lucifer. Venus will always be the Goddess of Love. A name change and a gender change is just too much for my pitiful antiquated belief system.

Thanks anyway......

1/21/2007 10:16:00 PM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...

Only in 21st century America could the greatest living war criminal be called a respected elder statesman: Henry Kissinger, the avatar of imperialism. Notice where old Hank finds himself in Bruce DePalma's 1995 declaration:

...In the old days, prior to the second world war, scientists would have to raise money for their researches from wealthy private individuals, Trusts or Foundations. Thus we have the Hale reflecting telescope, the Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, and the Fels Planetarium. With the discovery of the splitting of the atom and the possibility of military power based on the atomic bomb, the tenor of science changed. Funding came from the government and projects were developed along lines consistent with the concept of a New World Order. Not only the character of research but the sequence of introduction of new technology was controlled in the interests of the maximisation of profit and the maintenance of a strong, credible military deterrent.

Into this best of all possible worlds three factors entered to disturb the implementation of the Plan. First there was a limitation of material resources obtained from fossil planetary deposits. Second, the means of enforcement of a New World Order based on atomic power became flawed because people realised that the carrying out of the threat of its use would destroy the planet. Thirdly, in a world of total centralised control of resources, the population eventually became jaded and unfulfilled. Man does not live by bread alone, and a world without a dream has no spiritual dimension. Consequently there was total control, but nothing to believe in. Thus the desire to work and fulfill the orders of the masters withered away. To say we live in a safer, cleaner, more satisfying world now than we did fifty years ago, before the dawn of the atomic era, is a manifestation of the Orwellian nightmare.

In all of this we have not yet spoken of free energy. That is because free energy is not part of this world. Free energy comes from a place where limitation is not the paradigm of Mankind, and ownership and control are ideas which have been forgotten long ago. In the sense that free energy is available now, the contemporary establishment is confronted with something it does not want to understand, because in its understanding all other realities are shattered.

I have often thought that this situation is mythological in the following way. In history we find kings and rulers allied with wizards and sorcerers, in the happy and successful kingdoms of the past. The wizard [a.k.a. scientist] Merlin, educated the young King Arthur. Aristotle was the teacher of Alexander who conquered the world. It was never so that the king would attempt to control or usurp the power of the sorcerer any more than the sorcerer was interested in ruling the kingdom. In modern times, with the power of money, bankers and businessmen rule the roost with their handmaidens of wealthy property owners and families. Nowhere in this is the power of the sorcerer recognised. In such a world the power of non-doing is unappreciated.

In this world of contemporary times, all the agencies, CIA, FBI, KGB, NSA, Electric Power Research Institute, DARPA, Brookings Institution, Henry Kissinger, Edward Teller, et al., all are aware of DePalma and his ideas. Because these individuals and institutions are employed by the ruling elite to forecast the future and satisfy present needs and demands, it is clear that free energy is a threat to the world order constructed by business and the mindset of those who want to own the world. Free energy represents Man's aspirations and dreams of freedom and equality, uniform division of resources and the ability to choose one's own future. The fact that free energy is suppressed speaks to the greed and self-interest of a ruling elite which, even in the face of an emergency of global starvation, resource depletion and environmental pollution, will not give one inch if it means loss of control. This is an attitude of paranoid delusion and fantasy which can only arise from the alienation of a class of elitists who, through their money, are completely insulated from the reality of the day to day fight for existence of the common man.

Many things have been said to me in the long years I have spent in the development of the science and technology of free energy. One of them has been, "After the crash." Another has been, "If there was one chance in a hundred of this working, then we should go for it because there is no alternative." I would hate to think that society would have to destroy itself before this new form of energy were introduced. In terms of the world of the bankers, property holders, money men, elitists and others of their ilk, their world is over, with or without free energy. I have always felt that we live in a compassionate world of Nature, in which the choice of life or death is always available, both to individuals and societies. As long as we the people allow our collective future to be controlled and manipulated, we have no choice. Given the possibility of a new source of energy, the world can be turned and we can re-create Nature once again on this planet. I am not advocating my machine or any other machine in particular to be "the solution". What is needed is a change of attitude. We have to go beyond the understandings and strategies of our feudal and warlike past. Our theories of Nature must take into account the transcendence of all things that exist, and the possibility of an energetic principle latent in Nature. With this we may survive...

Bruce DePalma

1/21/2007 11:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey IC, here's another sci-fi writer who sniffs around the edges of authoritarianism. This time it's Ben Bova. Get the reference to the surveillance tape on 911:

"A more serious case in point: My grandson (age 12 at the time) read on an Internet site that the government is lying about the 9/11 terrorist attack on the Pentagon. With graphics and supposedly expert testimony, the site purported to show that the Pentagon was not hit by a hijacked airliner, but by a missile fired by the Department of Defense itself.

I looked at the presentation and it was pretty convincing, as far as it went. It’s easy to prove a point when you don’t allow any contradictory evidence to be presented. I showed my grandson the images recorded by a surveillance camera in the Pentagon parking lot, horrifying images that showed the airliner swooping in below treetop height and slamming into the building."

Wow. Wonder what drugs he was on that allowed him to see that footage.

Has the Internet made our speech a little too free?
By Ben Bova

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Bova's first sentence: "You wouldn’t drink unfiltered water. So why are you reading unfiltered information?"

Uh, to be informed by a wide array of information? And information isn't water, anyway, so what on earth does one thing have to do with another?

But at the end of his exercise, to be fair, Bova makes a nod towards diversity of thought, before wondering if we should think about "ways to make ourselves more responsible in the search for truth."

(link thanks to Mike Rivero)

1/21/2007 11:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks, IC, for the DePalma, one of my heros.

And on the ongoing theme of different drugs 'patterns of force' psychoactively, surely everyone has seen the spider psychoactive drug tests done in the 1960s, i.e,. the different geometric effects of different web behaviors? Here's a short 90 second excerpt at YouTube showing more recent drugs as well.

Spider Drugs
spiders drug tested

1/22/2007 12:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Y'know, y'all are a crew of crackpots.
& I don't mean that in a derogatory sense even if some of you will take it that way.
After all, it takes one to know one, doesn't it? So I'm not excluding myself from the crockery.

"Blessed are the cracked, for they shall let in the light."

Or something like that.

Y'all have lofty goals & that's commendable.

I don't particularly subscribe to the ' He's got High Hopes. He's got High apple pie in the sky Hopes,' school of thought.

It's nothing personal.


Hell(ahem), I've even learned some things from the Satanists. Some good, some...well, to be honest, quite annoying. At times, bits of the personal asides that burrowed into all that cut paste text read better as poetry than journalism. &, while I don't exactly agree with what they have to say, I'd never go along with (ahem pt.2) exorcising them from the comments section.

As a matter of fact, I think that the National Book Association's new motto is, "Ideas don't kill, people do."

Like I said, today I find your lofty ideas admirable & I honestly wish you well.

I, on the other hand, am going to aim nice & low.

Y'see, I've finally figured out what would make me less paranoid about this little experiment in Democracy called Ameica.

Recently, due to my wife's unemployment, I've had to shift job areas. Returning to the violent behaviors I had left behind 9 years ago.
Due to, common in this field, staff shortages, we've had a steady parade of Temps coming through. Since I've been working a lot of 16 hour shifts, & since I work with violent clients, they send primarily men. Now, as corny as it sounds, guys shoved into violent situations really do bond pretty damn quickly.

Anyway, the gentlemen they've been sending have all been black gents from Africa here to become American citizens. Also, my buddy Christopher is my full-time co-worker who is a a naturalized American citizen here since 1997.

Working long hours together with these fellows, I've been having some of the most informed & goddamn motherfuckingly cool political discussions I have ever had. They are well aware of our horrible conduct around the world. It is really a treat to talk about, oh say, Guatamala or El Salvador & not have to sidetrack into an explanation that invariably derails your original train of thought.

But even though they know all this they love America in a big effing way. Talking to my new friend Lawrence today, he said "Geez, what is it with you Americans? You're the beacon of freedom we all look at from afar. How can you guys keep fucking up like this?

All I could say was, "Ummmm.....I don't know.

There, I've just given away the depth of my brain pan.

Anyway, back to my itsy-bitsy teeny weeny polka dot wishini...I'd be just tickled pink if I could talk to actual born in the USA Americans & find in them, the depth of knowledge displayed by these gentlemen who have spent the majority of their lives living somewhere else.

And another thing, the whole anti-Immigration fiasco that stinks of xenophobia & good old fashioned racism, I say, Fuck that.

I happen to like the multi-colored crayon box that is America.

The whole melting pot of competing races & ideologies & cultures is as much a part of the American heritage as justice is, or lynchings, or rule of law or Trails of tears, or freedom or burning crosses or love or crass vile greed or selfless generosity, etc., etc.

As my long dead grandmother used to say as she tried to shove some noxious castor oil/ipacac concoction down my throat, "Ya got to learn to take the bitter with the better son."

1/22/2007 02:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Richard said...
"Y'know, y'all are a crew of crackpots."

hear, hear. as for the rest: best damn thing i've read of yours, rich. might not have been the best damn thing you *ever* wrote, but one of the best i've ever been around to read....

1/22/2007 04:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are those that practice MORALITY.

Which is adhering to a code of ethics for someone elses benefit.

Morality never works because mostly the EDICTS of MORALITY are at cross purposes with the needs of the SELF.

The Self will always win out because
in the game of morality, somebody else is always the winner.

Therefore it is doomed to failure.

Adepts will never allow themselves to be controlled and will take whatever action necessary to twart such efforts.


A man has two houses one physical and one spiritual.

The physical body live in the here and now.

The spiritual body lives in the there and then, on the OTHER side of the VEIL.

Both bodies must be well supported and maintained for the whole to gain fullfillment.
The two bodies are interlinked, and at birth, the spiritual supports the physical.
Then as the body grows, the PRIME conciousness moves to the physical body in order to maintain it.

However the spiritual nature of a person should not be left to atrophy
as LATER, when the physical body begins to fail, the prime conciousness must be ready to return to whence it camewith a minimum of trauma.

Imagine the great shock when anyones prime conciousnessleaves the LIGHT Spiritual body and finds itself totally helpless in a strange
, new
, heavy
, too small
, limited
Physical body rioght in the middle of the earth plane.
At this point the spiritual body
must do all it can to support the new physical body and help it make the transition as easy as possible.

Conversely when the prime conciousness leaves the tired worn physical body it certainly does not want to snap right back into the bright and light world of the spirit, having forgotten all it once knew about that life.

That would be like adding insult to injury suffering the rigors of being an infant on both side of th CYCLE.
Surely you can see the point.

Lief Meisjes

1/22/2007 04:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i wrote twat, hahaha

thwart Pronunciation (thwôrt)
tr.v. thwart·ed, thwart·ing, thwarts
1. To prevent the occurrence, realization, or attainment of: They thwarted her plans.
2. To Oppose and Defeat the efforts, plans, or ambitions of.

WISDOM, KNOWLEDGE and such assets you can muster at a given time.

Like begets like.


1/22/2007 05:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

These Principles have been handed down for thousands of years.

The reason is that they worked then and they work now and that they will work thousands of years into the future.

That they are the norm on the higher realms might also be of some interest.


1/22/2007 05:26:00 AM  
Blogger sunny said...

Hey Jeff, come in here and tell us what is going on- getting an "error 505, Unknown Host" when I try to get into the board.


1/22/2007 07:04:00 AM  
Blogger sunny said...

Now it's 504, timing out.

1/22/2007 07:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Artist: Stealers Wheel Lyrics
Song: Stuck in the Middle With You Lyrics
Well I don't know why I came here tonight,
I got the feeling that something ain't right,
I'm so scared in case I fall off my chair,
And I'm wondering how I'll get down the stairs,
Clowns to the left of me,
Jokers to the right, here I am,
Stuck in the middle with you.

Yes I'm stuck in the middle with you,
And I'm wondering what it is I should do,
It's so hard to keep this smile from my face,
Losing control, yeah, I'm all over the place,
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right,
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

Well you started out with nothing,
And you're proud that you're a self made man,
And your friends, they all come crawlin,
Slap you on the back and say,
Please.... Please.....

Trying to make some sense of it all,
But I can see that it makes no sense at all,
Is it cool to go to sleep on the floor,
'Cause I don't think that I can take anymore
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right,
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

Well you started out with nothing,
And you're proud that you're a self made man,
And your friends, they all come crawlin,
Slap you on the back and say,
Please.... Please.....

Well I don't know why I came here tonight,
I got the feeling that something ain't right,
I'm so scared in case I fall off my chair,
And I'm wondering how I'll get down the stairs,
Clowns to the left of me,
Jokers to the right, here I am,
Stuck in the middle with you,
Yes I'm stuck in the middle with you,
Stuck in the middle with you.

Go ask Alice how deep does it go?

1/22/2007 07:39:00 AM  
Blogger Sounder said...

anon 5:26

More like, our forms of understanding have been corrupted for thousands of years, so as to maintain a corrupt priest class. Confusion still reigns. Stupid 'gods'; stupid on both sides.

1/22/2007 07:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Diana Lucifera,

She, being the bearer of light, also called


carries the torch symbolizing spiritual resurrection and illumination.

"No one has lifted my veil"

According to Greek Pagan tradition the Goddess has declared Herself

"No one has lifted my veil."

It is a question not exactly of the veil, but of the garments which covers Her female nakedness, the veil is a later misinterpretation for the sake of decency.

The meaning is:

"I am the Mother without spouse, the Original Mother; all are my children, and therefore none has ever dared to approach me; the impudent one who attempts it shames the Mother --- and that is the reason for the curse."


Venus' rotation is unusual in that it is both very slow
(243 Earth days per Venus day, slightly longer than Venus' year)
and retrograde.

The only planet in our solar system that is reversed in its rotation.

In addition, the periods of Venus' rotation
and of its orbit are synchronized such that it
always presents the same face toward Earth when the two planets are at their closest approach.
This is a RESONANCE effect.

Venus is regarded as Earth's sister planet.

A curious aspect of Venus' orbit and rotation periods is that the 584-day average interval between successive close approaches to the Earth is almost exactly equal to five Venusian solar days. Whether this relationship arose by chance or is the result of some kind of tidal locking with the Earth, is unknown.

Because Venus and Earth take different times to complete their orbits,
it is 8 years before the two planets arrive back at the same initial point.

In that time Venus has completed 10 orbits and the Earth 8.
There have thus been ten conjunctions ­ five superior and five inferior in the 8 years.
The next step is to imagine two circles,
each representing the zodiac as followed by the sun,
and mark on one the position of the superior conjunctions
and the order in which they occur.
On the other circle, mark the positions of the inferior conjunctions
and the order in which they occur.
In both cases, draw a line between position one and position two, then position two and position three and so on. The result is more than interesting:
the result is shattering.

2004 first transit
2012 second transit

=8 years, 1 pentagram

Ther are very ancient symbols
among the last remnants of earlier civilisations,
along with myths and very ancient remains.

The subconcious communicates using symbols until you get it.


1/22/2007 07:48:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some of our earliest surviving myths come from the Sumerian culture (approximately 2000 BCE) in the area known today as IRAQ.

The Sumerian goddess Inanna, is an early Venus archetype.

Inanna of the Morning Star had to journey to the underworld where she was trapped and rendered naked and defenseless. Only by her cunning and strength does she gain release.

Another early Venus-star deity is Ishtar, who also travels in the underworld to bring back her lover Tammuz. After a terrifying ordeal, she is returned to the land of the living because the other gods cannot abide even their utopian existence without a goddess of love. Ishtar returns to reign as the Queen of Heaven, though without her lover,
Venus Transit: Venus - Goddess of the Morning Star


Today's occultists view this transit as a harbinger of great world events about to explode.

"Very soon the planet is entering into the window some believe is the entrance to the Golden Age; The Venus Transits of June 8 2004 and June 6 2012. This will be celebrated with a global prayer for oneness all over the world ... We are moving into a time of evolutionary renewal, a time of global purification, even what some refer to as the dawning of a Golden Age!!

The ancient Mayans developed a calendar system that is very relevant to these times. It can be seen as a cosmic timing code ... The planet Venus is rich in archetypal SYMBOLISM.

On June 8, 2004, the path of Venus directly crosses over the disc of the Sun, an eclipse lasting for the space of seven hours. The energies of Sun and Venus blend together, and as these blended radiations make their way into the Earth’s electromagnetic fields, it weaves the energies of love and unity into the mass consciousness of the planet, and potentially into the hearts of every man, woman, and child alive on Earth!"

This "Golden Age" to which this New Age author is referring is none other than the planned 1,000-year reign of the coming New Age Christ, whom the Bible calls Antichrist. After cleansing the earth of all its "impurities" for seven years, this Christ will then take the world into this 1,000-year reign, where mankind is supposed to live in peace and harmony with each other and with Mother Gaia (Mother Earth). This is the New Age belief.

"The transition into Unity consciousness WILL be be very turbulent.

As old structures of human consciousness collapse, it may be accompanied by a degree of darkness and destruction ...

This current 'doorway of Venus' is especially significant because it remains open until 2012 AD, the completion of our current cycle of human evolution. Some refer to this date as the end of linear time, or as the end of a period of human consciousness conditioned by separation and duality.

The Mayans refer to this time as the Return of Quetzalcoatl, the Plumed Serpent, and look to this eight-year doorway as the timeframe within which the mass enlightenment of humanity will take place."

This period of destruction and darkness referred to above, is definitely the time The New Age Christ will cleanse the earth so the new Golden Age can begin; the Bible calls this period the 7-Year Tribulation. If you have any doubts that this New Age author was referring to Antichrist, that doubt should be cleansed away when you re-read this one sentence, above. Listen to one sentence again:

"The Mayans refer to this time as the Return of Quetzalcoatl, the Plumed Serpent..."

Dr. Cathy Burns tells us about Quetzalcoatl: "Then there's the winged serpent (or uraeus), a symbol of royalty. Quetzalcoatl, an Indian god, was portrayed as a plumed, feathered, or winged serpent. The serpent was a wisdom symbol, and when it plumed, it meant that wisdom had been given wings and had become spirit-wisdom, or illumination." [Dr. Cathy Burns, "Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated", p. 161]

Quetzalcoatl is Antichrist in the Mayan religious system.

Now, let us hear from former Satanist, Pastor Meyers of Last Trumpet Newsletter, as he describes how a Satanist views this Venus transit.

NEWS BRIEF: "Warnings of Coming Judgment!", Last Trumpet Newsletter, June, 2004

"At the end of April, 2004, we had an eclipse of the moon, which caused it to turn blood red, and this was followed by two COMETS. According to old Roman occultism, the appearing of a comet means the death of a leader is imminent. On June 8th, something is to happen that has never been seen before. The planet Venus will come directly between the sun and the earth causing a cosmic eclipse.

In witchcraft and the occult, it means that the shadow of Venus, the 'mother goddess', will be cast upon the earth. This is the mother and child reunion that the witches have been waiting for in the age of Aquarius.

Witches everywhere will be going berserk with spell-casting and celebrating."

Will any worldwide calamity result from the Venus transit? We cannot know for certain; however, almost every single prophecy required to be fulfilled prior to the appearance of Antichrist and the establishment of his kingdom, is either already fulfilled, or has set the stage for fulfillment. Jesus told us how we are to approach the End of the Age when we see the general stage being set.

"Keep awake then and watch at all times [be discreet, attentive, and ready], praying ..." [Luke 21:36a; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary
"So also when you see these signs, all taken together, coming to pass, you may know of a surety that He is near, at the very doors." [Matthew 24:33; Ibid.]

Truly, the events of the day tell us we are at the very End of the Age.



1/22/2007 08:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Third Reich

Tried to get rid of the abrahamic forces but failed.

They boasted of a 1000 year reign.

Or did they just set the stage?


1/22/2007 08:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dionysos was one of the names applied to the Logos,
and the infancy signifies the commencement of this manifestation.

In this infancy he is represented as playing, and his toys are a spinning-top, a ball, a mirror and a set of dice.

You may think these incomprehensible symbols, but if you could see them you would understand at once, for these playthings are the matter of which the worlds are built. The spinning-top is the atom, always whirling round and round; and atoms are the bricks out of which the edifice of the solar system is constructed. The dice are not of the ordinary type, but are all different, for they are the five Platonic solids – the only regular solids which exist – the tetrahedron, the cube, the octahedron, the dodecahedron and the eikosihedron. These again may be regarded as building material, though in rather a different way. They represent the atoms of the various planes of nature – not that these are the shapes of those atoms, but that they indicate to the student of practical occultism certain fundamental qualities of the atoms, and the direction in which their force can be poured forth. We may make them into a series of seven by adding the point at the lower end and the sphere at the higher, and they then give us a sequence of deep hidden meaning. The ball with which he toys is naturally the earth, and his mirror is the astral matter, which so readily reflects and reverses everything, and is, therefore often symbolized as water, as in the story of Narcissus. It is interesting to note how all these curious and apparently unmeaning points clear up and become luminous as we study and understand them. It is also noteworthy for the Theosophical student that the indication of the earth by a ball shows the acquaintance of the teachers with its sphericity, and that the atom as drawn by Mrs. Besant in The Ancient Wisdom is by no means inaptly represented by a spinning-top.

Fear Not

1. That, in spite of all appearances, all things are definitely and intelligently moving together for good; that all circumstances, however untoward they may seem, are in reality exactly what are needed; that everything around us tends, not to hinder us, but to help us, if it be only understood.

2. That, since the whole scheme thus tends to man’s benefit, it is clearly his duty to learn to understand it.

3. That when he thus understands it, it is also his duty intelligently to co-operate in this scheme.

From the second great truth it follows:

1. That the true man is a soul, and that this body is only an appanage.

2. That he must therefore regard everything from the standpoint of the soul, and that in every case when an internal struggle takes place he must realize his identity with the higher and not with the lower.

3. That what we commonly call his life is only one day in his true and larger life.

4. That death is a matter of far less importance than is usually supposed, since it is by no means the end of life, but merely the passage from one stage of it to another.

5. That man has an immense evolution behind him, the study of which is most fascinating, interesting and instructive.

6. That he also has a splendid evolution before him, the study of which will be even more fascinating and instructive.

7. That there is an absolute certainty of final attainment for every human soul, no matter how far he may seem to have strayed from the path of evolution.

From the third great truth it follows:

1. That every thought, word or action produces its definite result – not a reward or a punishment imposed from without, but a result inherent in the action itself, definitely connected with it in the relation of cause and effect, these being really but two inseparable parts of one whole.

2. That it is both the duty and interest of man to study the divine law closely, so that he may be able to adapt himself to it and to use it, as we use other great laws of nature.

3. That it is necessary for man to attain perfect control over himself, so that he may guide his life intelligently in accordance with the law.
LEADBEATER: Some Glimpses of Occultism


1/22/2007 11:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Her is an Occult Library, some of the books there are good.
OM Library: List of Books


1/22/2007 11:31:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

But even though they know all this they love America in a big effing way. Talking to my new friend Lawrence today, he said "Geez, what is it with you Americans? You're the beacon of freedom we all look at from afar. How can you guys keep fucking up like this?


Don't let him become an American....because when he does, or his offspring do, they will have their answer but no longer be asking the question.

1/22/2007 11:53:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nazi mysticism is a Völkisch movement with roots in the Thule Society and Theosophy,

as well as the ideas of Arthur de Gobineau. Guido von List and Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels were important early figures who would influence mystical Naziism,

with the Artgemeinschaft of Jürgen Rieger and the Armanen-Orden founded by Adolf Schleipfer in 1976 representing significant developments after World War II.

High Nazi officials such as Heinrich Himmler, Rudolf Hess, and R. Walther Darré are known to have been interested in mysticism and the paranormal.

Esoteric Hitlerism features the Nazis' race-specific pre-Christian “pagan” (including Hindu) mythologies, and the incorporation of Adolf Hitler into those mythologies.

The role played by mysticism in the development of Nazism and its ideals was identified by outsiders at least as early as 1940, with the publication of Lewis Spence’s Occult Causes of the Present War (London: Rider & Co., 1940).

In the book, Spence identified a pagan undercurrent in Nazism,
which he equated with "Satanism;" he further connected Nazism to the ILLUMINATI.



1/22/2007 12:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...,20867,21095979-2703,00.html

British police have identified the man they believe fatally poisoned a former Russian spy with radioactive polonium-210 in London last year.
The suspected killer was captured on cameras at Heathrow as he flew into Britain to carry out the murder.

Friends of the ex-spy say that the man was a hired killer, sent by the Kremlin, who vanished hours after poisoning Alexander Litvinenko.

He arrived in London on a forged EU passport and reportedly slipped the poison into a cup of tea he made for Litvinenko in a London hotel room. Litvinenko was reportedly able to give vital details of his suspected killer in a bedside interview with detectives just days before he died on November 23 at University College Hospital, London.

Police have decided not to publish pictures of the man, who was seen on CCTV cameras as he flew in from Hamburg on November 1, the day Litvinenko fell ill.

He is described as being tall and powerfully built, in his early thirties, with short, cropped black hair and distinctive Central Asian features.

He reportedly travelled on the same flight as Dimitri Kovtun, a Russian businessman who is being investigated for trafficking the radioactive material used in the poison plot.

Oleg Gordievsky, a former KGB agent and friend of Litvinenko, who has worked closely with police on the investigation, said: "This man is believed to have used a Lithuanian or Slovak passport. He did not check into any hotel in London using the name or that passport, and he left the country using another EU passport."

1/22/2007 01:00:00 PM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...

Hey Oarwell,

Yeah, I had an interesting chat with Bova last year--I'm still amazed at how accessible a lot of these authors are, as I've had conversations with a good many of them and most have gone very smoothly, unlike the Brin fiasco. Part of that accessibility has to do with the fact that the publishing biz is just like the bigger biz--a few cretins like Crichton make out big-time, while lesser-known, usually far better talents languish in such obascurity that they still have to keep their day jobs. Crichton is the worst case--a talentless hack who recycles his fear of the other in every goddamned blockbuster or fake science for the Republicans he writes, but he's not alone. Occasionally, someone worthwhile makes it big, like Terry Pratchett, but mostly it's a winner-take-all market, just like everywhere else. For a very interesting look at this phenomena, as well as an intelligent defense of libertarianism, check out this interview with John C. Wright, one of the best and brightest sci-fi minds out there.

Back to Ben Bova. At the time I talked to him, old Ben had just written Powersat, in which he totally wasted the opportunity to preach the the DePalma gospel, since it was premised on free (micro-waved solar) energy. The plot, a cheap, tinny thing he picked up in some '50s dimestore, revolved around the typical red meat-eating, square-jawed cowboy single-handedly saving the world from the evil A-rabs who had conspired to turn our clever new technology against us. Sure, there were greedy American oilmen, but they were still protecting the national interest and were the lesser of two evils...So, naturally, I had to write to Ben and say, "WTF?!"

At first Ben's major-domo/webmaster wasn't going to let me at the great man, but Ben apparently saw my email and wanted to talk to me. We ended up having some great conversations which resolved our differences in the following way--I was far too suspicious of the overlords while Ben was far too trusting in the magical protective powers of the Constitution. Looking back on it now, it seems to me that the best explanation for what happened to Bova (whose earlier work was not sponsored by G.E.) was the Wordsworth syndrome: radical youth gives way to conservative old age. Not everyone is prone to this disease, of course. Rudy Rucker is a retired, old-ish man whose mind is radiantly, fractally radical. While never truly a sci-fi guy, Kurt Vonnegut hasn't changed his Bokononist worldview in fifty years, although he has adapted his targets.


That was a nice piece. This anti-immigration xenophobia is not only dangerously growing, it's also part and parcel of our reaction to the ugly truth of the American Dream. The reason the immigrants keep coming is two-fold: the ideals are (were?) laudable--it's the execution that sucks. My wife, who grew up on the other side of Dr. Goebbels' Iron Curtain, has a much greater love for this country than I ever had, but that only brings us back to the ugly part.

What no pundit wants to talk about is George Kennan's outline of our real mission in the world:

...we have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction.

This is what no one will acknowledge--that we squeeze the rest of the world, trampling on everyone's else's God-given rights & resources, in order to maintain our dominance & control. Would Mexicans really take so many risks just to pick up our scraps if we weren't subjugating the rest of the hemisphere? Even when the evidence of our brutal militarism, our naked aggression in pursuit of hegemony is obvious--see Iraq--do we face up to the truth, or do we escalate the madness? Repudiation of this path won't come until Henry Kissinger sits in Milosevic's cell. Until then, watch out for more adventures in our manifest density.

1/22/2007 01:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Thanks for the Rucker and his asteroids applet.

See you guys later, I've got some rocks to blast.

1/22/2007 03:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This could be a continuation of the story about about the Schactman-Fabian "Clivenden Set" group which allied with the Nazis, though the other pro-USSR wing was successful in calling the strategy shots of WWII instead. This group lost out however after WWII, and really lost out when Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, and afterwards when 'Mr. Detente' Nixon was additionally removed. Then you get the Nazi-opportunist supporting Schactmanites all coming in in the USA in the 1970s and 1980s ('Neocons' as neo-trotskyites) and the Fabians in the UK (like Blair), as stragegies change from letting the USSR gain territory through intentionally losing wars, to increasingly supporting turning the USA into the vehicle for global conquest instead, allied with international corporatism. Follow.

'freyja' wrote:

The role played by mysticism in the development of Nazism and its ideals was identified by outsiders at least as early as 1940, with the publication of Lewis Spence’s Occult Causes of the Present War (London: Rider & Co., 1940). In the book, Spence identified a pagan undercurrent in Nazism,
which he equated with "Satanism;" he further connected Nazism to the ILLUMINATI.

Interesting book title I had never heard of. Thanks for that.

Though the construction Spence's presumed "me British me good, they German they bad" in a review I read when I looked up the book is hardly the case.


This view has to ignore how

[1] pro-British Hitler was as well as

[2] his main staffer Ribbentrop was practically British raised--by British aristocrats connected to the British-German royal house of Victoria. Hanoverians in England only adopted "Windsor" as a cover name I believe during WWI anyway.

On Ribbentrop as British-German wing agent (and agenteur!), from Treason in America:

In Switzerland Joachim [Ribbentrop] and his brother came to know Englishmen and Canadians and learned "about the English way of life." In 1909, the 16-year old Joachim Ribbentrop went to London with his brother, stayed with an English family, and studied linguistics at London University. Ribbentrop said, "In London...we thought we felt the heartbeat of the world. How much experience, influence, capital and world-pervading efficiency combined to keep all this going! Later, in my talks with Adolf Hitler, I often expressed regret that he had never stood at the Mansion House where he would have understood the meaning of the British Empire....I have always pointed out to Hitler the enormous strength of this empire and the heroic conduct of its ruling class."

Several years earlier, the Canadian High Commissioner to England, Lord Stratchcona, had been travelling throughout Germany and Austria, seeking immigrants to Canada of the "right type." In 1910 young Joachim Ribbentrop found himself recruited, cut short his linguistics studies, and sailed to Canada. Albert, the fourth Earl Grey, associate of Milner in the Round Table, was then the Governor General. Young Joachim Ribbentrop spent three of his four years in Canada as an employee of Lord Strathcona's Canadian Pacific Railway.

In 1911, the Duke of Connaught succeeded Earl Grey as Governor General. Joachim Ribbentrop was unofficially adopted as a member of the Duke's household, playing his violin, performing in plays, and learning more about "the English way of life." Well, almost "English." Although the Duke was the son of Queen Victoria [German Hanoverians], he was also the son of the [German] Coberg Prince Albert, and he was married to Princess Margarete of Prussia. The Duke spoke English and German. The rest of the ["English royal son's] household spoke nothing but German.

Ribbentrop was introduced to the cream of Society in the Empire.


In 1914, Germany went to war against England and Canada. Joachim Ribbentrop, who by law should have been interned as an enemy alien, easily went to New York and took ship for Europe. As Ribbentrop explains it, the ship was halted off the English coast, and "next morning a British intelligence officer arrived and announced that all Germans would be taken ashore and interned...[he] told me he had once been aide-de-camp to the Governor-General [the [German-English] Duke of Connaught and we discovered that we had many mutual friends...I told him that I was German, had no visa, but must get to Germany whatever happened...he allowed me to stay on board and stamped my papers 'passed by military authorities.' (Ribbentrop a double agent for the British since WWI?)

Having been passed through into Germany by British military intelligence, Ribbentrop went to work in the German War Ministry. After WWI, Ribbentrop worked as a "merchant" in international travel around Western Europe. In 1932, he acted as an intermediary between his friend Franz von Papen and Adolf Hitler, in negotiations that were held at Ribbentrop's house. This led to the selection, in January 1933, of Hitler as Chancellor and to the creation of the Nazi dictatorship.

A few weeks later Hitler came to dinner with Joachim and his old father, and they talked of foreign affairs. Somewhat later Hitler appointed Ribbentrop Under-Secretary of the Foreign Office, but Ribbentrop declined and got Hitler to make him Ambassador to England instead. His Ribbentrop Bureau was a sort of private Anglo-German Nazi intelligence agency from 1934 to 1938, aided by the British pro-Nazi set (discussed above), including the short term [hugely pro-Nazi king] Edward VIII. [Though someone more powerful than the puppet king made him resign, the British-Soviet wing stronger who said "our WWII (as opposed to the other version attempted, the Anglo-German alliance) wasn't supposed to turn out that way" in other words.]

In 1938, Ribbentrop and Hitler concluded the pact with Neville Chamberlain to take Czechoslovakia without shooting.

[Britsher agent] Ribbentrop negotiated the Anti-Comintern Pact, setting up [the battle lines the way Brits wanted them], setting up the Axis of Germany, Italy, and Japan.

[Despite setting up the Axis against the USSR, simultaneously] Ribbentrop suggested and negotiated the Hitler-Stalin pact in 1939. [This pact between supposed 'ideological opposites' really was revealed as the same team working together, and then setting those proxy countries against each other. Read the interesting Red Symphony document, where Trotskyites are involved as well in promoting such a pact to attempt to finagle Stalin back toward world military conquest/revolution, instead of his 'socialism in one country'.]

Ribbentrop was Hitler's Foreign Minister throughout WWII.

He was hanged at [Anglo-American run] Nuremberg [to kill off "those who knew too much"] and never succeeded in bringing about "Hitler's...original idea, the creation of a powerful Reich of all Germans allied to Britain...."


And the pro-Hitler American contact was Ernst Hansfstaengl, who could be seen giving Nazi salutes in the USA just after Hitler's takeover in Germany.

He was half a Boston Sedgwick and a friend of Theodore Roosevelt.

He promoted Hitler's early career on assignment from the anti-American group in the State Department.

Known to Hitler and friends as "Putzi," Hanfstaengl could 'calm Hitler down' by playing the piano, and thus became inseparable from Hitler in Germany with Hitler taking him around and having him play.

Putzi, who went to Harvard, introduced into Hitler's circle how mass psychology could be directed via "modern American methods". Putzi adapted Harvard football songs for German street brawls, novel lyrics in 'animated American style' that the SA would play in German street bands and around Hitler in public to excite the crowd.

The American, Putzi, was additionally Hitler's confidential secretary in Germany.

Who's to blame for WWII, remind me? Keeping in mind that excellent link above about the Bush family intergenerational treason as well, working funding Hitler's regime through Brown Brother's Harriman.

Harriman as well had Dulles connections.

The whole eugenic-racial depopulation movement of 'the categorically unfit' was an British and American invention, imported into Germany as well.

German Nazism was an external project of select hyperrich Americans and Britishers, just as the USSR was such a generation before.

1/22/2007 04:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

IC, I do agree with your assessment. i suppose i should have been a bit more rigorous & stated that they love the idea of this country. Not, of course, the predatory capitalism part, but the freedom part. We've just been stuck with a long line of "leaders" who constantly equate freedom with capitalism. An idea that I don't agree with, which probably explains why I'm never invited to join the pundits club.
Folk act like the capitalist credo is some kind of holy writ handed down by some divine being, rather than a theory dreamed up by humans with all their attendent faults & foibles. A theory that we have (gasp) the power to alter as we see fit. I've never understood why we can't take workable parts of communism & socialism & capitalism & whatever other ism you can think of & combine them into a better system.
Of course, that would probably mean we'd have to start looking out for everyone's interests instead of that small minority of "elites" we slavishly idolize & hope to marry off our daughters to.
I would disagree when you lump everyone into the dominance & control category. Again, it's our "leaders" who want to maintain dominance & control. I have trouble believing that the majority of Americans would agree with the bondage & dominance thrust of our foreign policy if they didn't continually nod off at the switch, so to speak.
As Lawrence pointed out to me, "You Americans have such blatant disregard for your own freedom that it appears to be little more than criminal negligence to guys like me who know from experience how rare & precious it really is."
I don't profess to know the answer to all this, but I would be a bit more confident that an answer could be found if I'd actually meet native born Americans who had the grasp of American history that these African gents had.
I don't see that happening though.

& Shrub, I hear you pal. Afraid there's not a whole hell of a lot I can do about it though.

1/22/2007 04:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know, Richard. My comment was more rhetorical, than anything. I also agree with IC's assessment, combined with mine.

They come here and within a generation, if not sooner these days, are absorbed into the black hole of Consumerism and Excess. Before you know it, they're right there with all the rest if us, idly watching as the bombs continue to drop on those who still ask Lawrence's most crucial question.

That question does need to be answered if per chance we were to forge a new paradigm, if for no other reason than to understand how we slipped into complacency in order to avoid slipping again.

That "per chance" I mentioned above comes with some extremely slim odds, as you well know.

Looking on the bright side of things, at least your fellow statesmen can shut the hell up about the Steelers for a while....or is that wishful thinking even though they didn't make the post season? I used to follow sports closely in my youth (I was a big Eagles, Sixers and Phillies fan), but it is no longer a priority in my life. There is too little time to waste endlessly on the sofa watching the same thing over and over again, week in and week out, month in and month out, year in and year out, and decades in and decades out.

1/22/2007 07:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looking on the bright side of things, at least your fellow statesmen can shut the hell up about the Steelers for a while....or is that wishful thinking even though they didn't make the post season? I used to follow sports closely in my youth (I was a big Eagles, Sixers and Phillies fan), but it is no longer a priority in my life. There is too little time to waste endlessly on the sofa watching the same thing over and over again, week in and week out, month in and month out, year in and year out, and decades in and decades out."

I used to love sports too. Loved to play it. But, as an adult, whether my fav. team wins or not, my life doesn't change one iota for either the good or the bad.
As you said, life's too short to waste time on idle voyeurism.
Although, I have to admit Shrub, if they showed more cheerleaders & less football, I might stop by a little more often.

1/22/2007 11:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ode to the Synagogue of Satan

A World Revolution is what we seek
We are the destroyers and conquers of the meek

Our day of victory is close at hand
Where freedom of expression and religion is banned

For one will be the god raised up in the land
The shining one, the harbinger of light
To whom we pray and die and fight

Our temple we have built both level and square
Our sacrifice is the cremation of care

Liberty, fraternity, equality is our battle cry
But power wealth and greed are the reasons you die

Our origins are hidden
To disclosure we are not prone
Was it an Edomite king that sat on the throne
Or an oral tradition kept all to our own

A mystery religion what is in the name?
Worship of Moloch, Dagon and Lucifer it is all the same

With power of the Red Shield we have been built up
With the blood of innocents doth runeth our cup

The curtain is opening for the final act
The destruction of Christendom is our main pact

The World Revolution is reaching its goal
Grinding humanity in satans mixing bowl

What’s That, Oh My, with our victory now in sight
Comes this deep sinking feeling of dread and fright

For it is the God of Heaven whom we have maligned
And it is with the devil satan whom we are aligned

And what has been revealed in the sacred writ
But that the betrayer of men shall be cast into the pit

And as for the wicked agents of he
They will taste the vengeance of God Almighty.

by Ryan

1/23/2007 04:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Shrubster...

We are all the victims of a perversely prevalent paradigm that it seems we are only too willing to defend to the death in spite of the fact that it
has always been untrue, illogical, contrary to both nature and human nature, and quite hazardous if not positively lethal to most life on our planet...hmmm?

I might also add that that same prevailing paradigm has always been basically a right-wing, elitist, and conservative one from the very beginning... and one to which even all the so-called "progressives", democrats, liberals, reformers, or thinkers alike, have either been coerced or manipulated into being subservient to, despite the obvious if not preposterous contradiction which has seen even their best efforts turned upside down to defend rather than ever dare to challenge it.

Why, for instance, Darwin who was quite sympathetic to the anti-slavery and anti-colonialism view, could nevertheless be professionally, financially, and even medically blackmailled to keep his mouth shut and completely ignore the larger social and political implications his thories genuinely raised so the PTB of his day could grotesquely distort them into a seemingly "scientific justification" for the slavery and empire they were vigorously and quite profitably intent on at the time...hmmm?

Or why Freud could be similarly blackmailled into retracting his groundbreaking paper on the severe sexual abuse he had discovered and personally witnessed on countless bodies of deceased children whose causes of death had been invariably attributed to "falling down stairs", "run over by a carriage", this or that "natural illness", and so forth, and replace it with the one that would come to make him "the Great Freud" and a greater fraud instead.

The one that that stated yes, some mental patients did have unconscious ideations of abuse, and yes, those often lead to hysterical or other psychological symptoms and disorders, but the ideations were not or could not be memories of any real or actual events. Rather, they were "fantasies" that had been concocted, because the patients themselves were subconsciously desirous of such events, which again, had never and could never have happened in real life. A fantasy to be sure, but whose?

Or pehaps why the work of Karl Marx would be immediately turned away from all the ethical and principled deliberations it should have raised concerning reponsible relationships in any society and instead re-focussed into the more simplified not to mention manageable one of eternal class struggle or warfare; so the PTB could simply present an equally false yet supposedly "authentic" rationale that history ultimately proved that they must, or inevitably would have to do whatever violence and manipulation are necessary to defend their own "class interests" against those of others...hmmm?

And last but far from least we might well consider the way in which Albert Einstein's quite brilliant work, (that was never predicated on anything less than the most noble ideal of advancing human knowledge and improving the human condition), could be so quickly subverted, even before it was even properly understood by the PTB of his day into creating atomic bombs and other lethal toxins under the guise of their being normal "scientific advances" instead of the thoroughly deranged and crackpot science they actually were and still very much are.

All these are the quite serious distortions and handiwork of that same pernicious paradigm at work. Corrupting and tainting virtually every supposed truth that has influenced our modern development; turning them instead into half-truths, lies or complete misdirections for one sole hide the basic fact that the altogether artificial heirarchy that has been forcefully imposed on human society throughout most of its history is the primary source of all it's ills.

That to all extents and purposes it has been deliberately constructed to parasitically feed off the very problems it creates and at the very same time ruthlessly deny or destroy any and every example that indicates that another alternative can and must be devised if those obvious harms are to be adressed and any real progress made.

And so my friend, only the window dressing is changed as reality tries repeatedly to impress the same lesson we have yet to learn upon us and instead we are perpetually distracted and taught to be distracted by those very trappings themselves.

Still looking for meaning only on the outermost surfaces and most superficial levels of things or events and stubbornly believing that that is only where we might find them, "scientifically" or otherwise. That's the paradigm, believe it or not.

1/23/2007 04:47:00 AM  
Blogger Sounder said...

Anon 11:23 said;

“Communism, socialism, facism whatever you want to call it, if it is enforced through the barrel of a gun or a prison sentence, then it is total control. Common folk have been shafted from both sides of the 'left' v 'right' illusion.

For instance an ideology called distributism which involves combining voluntary socialism with free enterprise capitalism & liberty, is a common sense solution.
You wont see that being pushed, since it calls for the abolition of absolute capitalism (banks & corporatism) as well as enforced collectivism. Surprisingly enforced collectivism is a natural by-product of absolute capitalism, since everything eventually gets owned by the few.”

Left, Right, doesn’t matter, at the extremes its the same, they both think they are better situated to properly define the nature of your bieng for you. Now, how will that help us learn to think for ourselves?

Proteus said:
“Authority exists only in the vacuum of our lack of awareness.” Right on!

IC said;

“You and Proteus seem to be dancing around Ego-Death, which has moved out of the monastery and into your local ethernet.”

IC, while I can see why you may consider my project one of ‘ego-death’, I do not. Three thousand years of dominance, and still the ego is insecure. I am looking for a more proper integration for the ego, not it’s death.

Anon 8:02 Thank-you
Anon 9:10, Good stuff, call this repost spam but I really liked it.

Anonymous said...

I am new to this blog site and I have been looking forward to reading it everyday for the past several weeks. I was delighted to read some very reflective and evolved thoughts which could inspire a New Reality or New Myth. Some people seem to have to quote long thoughts that are not their own and while entertaining and informative….. well, There seemed to evolve a distinct direction in people wanting something more than what they have created or what is being presented to them by the events that getting our daily, hourly and moment to moment attention and effecting us each in a different way but still as we evolve our being to yearns to be connected and our thoughts validated. If we could only express ourselves in relationship to God, without being labeled Christian, Jew, Muslim, or the Satanist and just tell each other the Truth about what it is we all really want???
The Satanist “plugged me in” meaning I had a severe, flash back to all the Christian doctrines that are being circulated and their hatred for being lied to in the past about God and the Mysteries of Life.
Its so simple, Each and every being’s soul has that yearning to return to Living Forever in God’s Paradise. Every soul yearns and requires that experience of Love, the all encompassing Experience of Oneness. The Warmth, the Light, …that which cannot be put into words.
Someone mentioned that Manson lacked love and nurturing as he was growing up and like so many beings, he transferred the meaning of love for him to POWER. He replaced or filled the void of Love with the experience of POWER. When someone seeks the experience of power, when the experience of human love has been denied then the need to KILL becomes the is ultimate experience of POWER.

But this Power that Manson realized, thru his ability to “control” others to KILL and do all that stuff that people call evil, then maybe we can see what direction we need to take as evolved humans that have found that Love, and can express and experience it in ALL things including, out of date religious beliefs that give us POWER to destroy that which really pisses us off or is in the way of what we think we really want.

The God that the Christians and Satanists believe in seem to inspire hate and destruction because they have not experienced the Love of the CREATOR which dwells within our beings. our souls. And the POWER that has replaced Love, is a power drawn from outside of us instead of the IMMENSE POWER that resides within and our true connection the each other and the One and Only True God. The One that resides within ALL Creation, within each one of US.

Explaining God is pointless and in vain and a waste of time. It’s the relationship that each one of us has, and each one of knows to the core of our being that there are no word to express your own special relationship to what we call God. An Atheist has the most unique relationship of all.
God, Almighty, Creator of ALL is unknowable,…. and yet we know.

All that Satan/god whatever I actually took the time to read..... Is not a new Myth. TOO MUCH INFORMATION thank you! Please enjoy your relationship with Satan/god but enough! You’re sounding so much like another religion that preaches destruction of the “enemies” I don’t see anyone else interested in how to send pain and suffering to an enemy. What is your definition of “enemy”?

When??? will we get that Fear is the Real Enemy and get on to The Conscious Loving of Ourselves and Holy Mother Earth?? When??????????

There is nothing more significant or of more importance than the Care and Cultivation of All Life on this Earth. That is Our Salvation.

Anyway, The Very Loving and Conscious GOD I know was reported to have promised LIFE Eternal at the time we reach Full Humanity.

Please, A NEW MYTH…. so we can finally get beyond myth and SURRENDER! …….And Fear becomes the Holy Spirit guiding us to LOVE>>>

Anon 9:10, if you would read and comment at my blogspot, I would be honered.

Then I am reminded of something written here a while ago, maybe from Silverfox, not sure, He said; Learn from history, and then forget about it.

Anon 9:10, if you would read and comment at my blogspot, I would be honered.

1/23/2007 08:12:00 AM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

yes there are many types of libertarians that "don't hate poor people."

Ayn Rand and the FSP are the "right-wing path" while the Mutualist and the Second Vermont Republic are the "left-wing path."

There is nothing novel about sitting at a keyboard and coming up with a Grand Reordering, No Questions Asked. What would be novel is if people get off their asses and did exactly what they tell other people to do.

1/23/2007 09:28:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very well said, Silverfox.

I guess that's as close to the answer as we are going to get, Richard. Freedom is an illusion until we come to grips, once and for all, with this paradigm.

As Charlton Heston said in The Planet of The Apes, "it's a mad house, I tell you...a mad house.."

1/23/2007 10:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1/23/2007 12:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Very beautifully said. Thank you for your poetic effort. You encapsulated so much in just a few lines.

That said, don't expect much, if any, approbation on this site. You are preaching to the distaff set, not the choir. Nor do they typically recognize irony much, even when it is clearly framed, as in your poem.

A noble effort just the same. My thanks again for putting something worthwhile to read up on this board.

1/23/2007 01:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

During the 1970s I came into contact with HUNDREDS of German nationals living in Los Angeles, California who worked for Howard Hughes - Rockwell - Hughes Tool & Die - Douglas Air etc.

One man in particular had a multi-million dollar mansion ON THE WATER in Malibu.

He used to shoot sea gulls from his balcony every morning with small calibre rifles and pistols, while people jogged, just below his balcony. The residents of the Malibu Colony who are the MEGA RICH, often made complaints to the local Sheriffs, but NOTHING ever happened.
I personally SAW the L.A. County Sheriffs come TWICE and this guy was

I did some construction work on his house and he had an ENORMOUS collection of Nazi regalia, including his OWN NAZI SS UNIFORM, medals, weapons etc. His rank was a
Colonel in the SS.

The guy I worked for was also German and had been a Tool & Die expert in
Germany during the 1930's. He could literally build an airplane engine out of WOOD. I saw it done. All these people spoke FLUENT GERMAN.

They had a close knit group of friends which he said numbered over TWO THOUSAND Germans, who all lived in the Southern California area.

I always thought it AMAZINGLY IRONIC that in Malibu and the Canyons, Zuma, there were MILLIONAIRE NAZIS living the life of quiet retirement, while up on Fairfax at Beverly, one could meet and talk DAILY with concentration camp survivors who STILL HAD NUMBERS ON THEIR ARMS!

I am an EYE WITNESS to the German
scientists and SS people living in
Los Angeles after the war. They ALL had MONEY!!!

This is TRUE!

1/23/2007 03:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

looks like the word of the day here is "paradigm", eh, cunning linguists?.."we must squeeze this word in wherever possible to maintain a sense of erudition and making best use of the word du jour."

1/23/2007 03:44:00 PM  
Blogger iridescent cuttlefish said...


Maybe Ego-Death (as we know it) isn't quite what I meant. Look at how it works in the following dump, which neatly ties together many of the threads in this still-unfrayed thread (sorry about the length, everyone):

The Fear of Free Energy

As human beings, we seek certainty. Due to the limitations of the conceptual mind, only concrete ideas can generally provide this certainty. Yet the more spiritual truths of love, faith, and the Divine Mystery, suffer from diminution when they encounter our analytical brains. They are indeed difficult to 'grasp' and must be perceived by another, more subtle faculty.

Similarly, the ego, or limited idea of self, often holds dominant sway over our lives. We cling to our assumed roles and, in the most extreme examples, will destroy all threats to the ego-centric character structure. Whether by reinforcing delusion and denial, or actually eliminating the objects of our fear, the ego is intent on self-preservation.

When a society becomes comfortable with its own self-destruction due to the collective fear of transcendence, there is an odd parallel with the death of the ego. We see our species struggling to shed the pre-occupations of its past, simultaneously risking an era of stillborn possibilities. Petroleum politics are a perfect example of this fear-based attachment to what is familiar. It appears we might rather live in the prison of ecological suicide and artificially imposed poverty than admit the old order must die.

The concept of Free Energy, an idea whose time has come, will bring with its introduction a collective 'ego death'. Society can be considered the aggregate psyche of humanity. Based upon the mere shadow of abundance that fossil fuels represent, the human economic sphere currently identifies itself with scarcity. This inspires competition over generosity, the pursuit of private gain over the greater good. The earth itself is considered expendable, as are the innocents and indigenous peoples who stand in the way of our modern appetite for destruction.

Free Energy is an expression of the Generative Principle in nature. It is viewed as the primordial force behind all energy of celestial, chemical, geological and biological origin. Often referred to as the Quantum Vacuum or Zero Point Energy, its properties are only partially understood by Physics. As one is asked to embrace the existence of this field of virtually unlimited potential, those schooled in the conventional view of nature cannot escape the sense that it is as much a religious quantity as a scientific one.

Recent experiments have demonstrated that consciousness itself has a measurable effect upon physical reality. Thus, we should not wonder that the discovery of Free Energy has a commensurate effect upon consciousness. We must ask, "What is it that so inspires fear in the face of such knowledge."

Could it be that we are loath to accept our true adulthood in the knowledge that individuated souls are utterly fused together by the field of infinite potential? We may find that to invite Heaven to earth we would have to relinquish cherished beliefs and the ego's sense of 'who we are'.

It is this author's conviction that every ordinary person's greatest fear is dissolution of the conceptual framework that informs our existence. Death has associated with it all manner of conceptual overlays, and so it is often considered in terms of our projections. If the Petroleum magnates were to find themselves disenfranchised, would they not have experienced a form of conceptual death? Were the Physics authorities to have to admit Science had discovered God and yet could not explain Him, would they still perceive themselves knowledgeable?

If Free Energy becomes the order of the day, perhaps love could triumph over division. The society is headed for an ego-death nonetheless. We have been measured in the balance of the Ages and found wanting. What is missing is our willingness to surrender to the inevitable gravity of human need. And Free Energy, the equally abundant availability of resources to all, is the pre-requisite to our transcendence as a species.

It may come as a thief in the night. Or it may come on angel's wings. Yet the liberation from false economic hierarchy that Free Energy brings will be accompanied by our growth into Divine Awareness -- the end of fear and the covenant of Grace.

Andrew Mount
Winter 2005

1/23/2007 04:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought the word of the day was distaff.

The confusion is due to the obfuscatory pattern replications of the current, and thoroughly entrenched, paradigm.

Tomorrow's word/phrase du jour will be Nocturnal Penile Tumescence. Let's say it together, in unison, shall we? It sounds so much more lovely when ejaculated in syncronicity.

1/23/2007 04:18:00 PM  
Blogger ericswan said...

Watching sporting events may not have been a complete waste of Time. The Mystery symbols were as evident there as they are here. WMD's have been around for most if not all of Time. The Trojan horse was full of dead bodies that carried the black plague. Blankets wth small pox or mosquitoes with mycoplasma have been replaced by chemtrails. Just like natural gas gets a boost, so to the drug companies and their minions. Just count all the cold remedies on the tube in one hour.

Every dog has it's day.
Or is that Ëvery day is Groundhog day.

1/23/2007 05:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

...and sever-al butcher´s aprons...

1/23/2007 06:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seriously though, I was flipping through the book ´Bitter Fruit´ today and Schroeder Bank was mentioned as having a controlling interest in the Guatemalan rail system and was working hand in glove with the United Fruit Company-CIA toward Operation Success, 1954. Which, of course, later lead to Reagan´s ´Apocalypto´ and a 36 year civil war. Robert Parry has a great article here:

1/23/2007 07:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Part Three of the International Nazi totalitarians vs. the Internationlist USSR totalitarians: FDR as linchpin for USSR side

In the interim "sitting war" where Germany didn't really want to attack England, and feelers via Rudolf Hess were sent to the Nazi wing in England, the possibly could have been that Britain 'as a state' would have joined the Nazis and attacked the USSR like the British Nazi wing wanted:

Like Joseph Goebbels, Hess was privately distressed by the war with Britain. According to William L. Shirer, author of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, Hess may have hoped to score a stunning diplomatic victory by sealing a peace between the Reich and Britain. Hess at the time flew to Britain [almost certainly under his hero Hitler's instructions] in May 1941 [before the USA was in WWII] to meet the Duke of Hamilton and Brandon, parachuting from his Messerschmitt Bf 110 over Renfrewshire on May 10 and landing (though breaking his ankle) at Floors Farm near Eaglesham, just south of Glasgow. He was quickly arrested, although the details of how this happened are somewhat unclear and remain controversial, and he was taken to the Maryhill army barracks and held captive as a prisoner of war....

Apparently, Hess believed [correctly] Hamilton was an opponent of [the other sides recently implanted] Winston Churchill, whom he held responsible for the outbreak of war. His proposal of peace included giving all the Western European lands back their own national governments, but German police would stay stationary. Germany would also pay back the cost of rebuilding these countries. In return, England would have to support their war against Russia.

However, Churchill (that empty puffbag who sold himself to whatever was required), was always close to FDR.

When notified that his country had biggie Rudolf Hess under lock and key, in Britain, Churchill was about to relax and see a private showing of a Marx Brothers film. Instead of seeing what Hess wanted, 'statesman' Churchill decided to ignore Hess, and instead watch a private screening of a Marx Brothers film and then go to bed. Churchill knew which side he was supposed to be on.

WWI and WWII: A Roosevelt and Churchill State Terrorism Operation Helps Start Both Global Wars, an Anglo-American Tradition in the Making, from 1898 Onward

During the 1898 war against the Spanish Empire, it was the US and UK working together in the South Pacific. [cite: Empire of the City]

During WWI, it was FDR (in his early 20s! appointed Assistant Secretary of the Navy!--in his youth, he vacationed on the German Kaiser's yacht), and Churchill (himself involved in British Navy in WWI) who organized the Lusitania operation.

These two were the very same pro-(future)USSR set side, just like in WWII!

You can read about the blow by blow play of the two arranging the removal of the civilian passenger Lusitania's convoy of protection when they knew (and hoped) it would be destroyed by German submarines. [cite: Shadows of Power] Germans knew (and warned Americans in public ads they took out in American papers), that they knew that the USA was illegally for a neutral shipping munitions to warmaking Britain via hiding them in passenger liners, in attempting to get the USA to go to war with them. Many of these adds were kept out of the (Morgan owned) papers.

So, remove the public warnings that the German Consolate attempted to publish, and then remove that convoy around said passenger liners, and you have a war on schedule. It would be like a neutral USA shipping munitions to warmaking Britain via a Princess Cruise Line nowawdays, with no one on board aware of it, until they were hit with torpedoes, and then the munitions explode.

(There was another lie of a 'boat being bombed, full of Americans right in the Thames by those evil Germans!' which additionally made the USA citizens mad. However, that one was a complete media lie. Never happened.)

The 1915 conspiracy to intentionally sink the Lusitania started to create the war ire. By 1917, they were successfully in selling U.S. entry into an exclusively European global WWI, that ended within the year.

On May 7, 1915 the Lusitania was torpedoed by a German submarine, the U-20. The Lusitania sank after a subsequent massive internal explosion blew out her starboard bow. The sinking galvanized American opinion against Germany's policy of unrestricted submarine warfare and played a role in the United States' later entry into World War I on April 17, 1917.

The Lusitania was carrying (illegally, and as a temptation for the Germans to hit it, and thus launch the U.S. into a European war) armaments to warring Britain from neutral country USA.

More information about this FDR-Churchill WWI operation can be read in _Shadows of Power.

The League of Nations is started up, large agenda is rejected by countries. League organizers, the elite Americans and British basically, in the Cecil Rhodes dreamworld they live, only took the lesson that "I guess the war we set up had just a sufferable destruction , so it wasn't big enough."

Meanwhile, the British steered globalist institutions of the League made sure to support British empire continuation, while demoting German ones: the 'peacemaking' League of Nations, British dominated, gave the German Empire's South Pacific Territories to 'the League.' Mandates! These League of Nations Mandates were quickly turned over to British Empire ally Japan to run! League of Nations additionally didn't seem to mind the international elite sponsored Italian fascism from attacking League member Ethiopia as well. The whole thing was a dead letter because the U.S. Senate rejected the League of Nations treaty. Regroup with only lesson learned: "We gotta make the next war MUCH MUCH BIGGER".

The Secular Revolutionary Zionists (not pro-Jewish religion): on the USSR side of the equation as well, then later the Nazi side as well

This is an important (not so side-)theme to thumbnail sketch, so let's backtrack a bit into WWI.

In WWI, Britain was going to make peace a bit earlier in the war with Germany, though the Zionist wing said "stay in the war, we can get the USA in the war and win this thing, if you do us a little favor...."

The Zionists had attempted to get everyone to help them start a Zionist state in the Middle East.

They asked the Ottoman Empire to do it, since it was their province. They said no.

They asked the Germans to do it. The Kaiser said no.

Then the Zionists installed one of their own as PM, Balfour, and he said yes.

So WWI was additionally the link between the Zionists and the USSR-side of the internationalist equation, in the letter from Arthur Balfour.

Balfour was previously, attorney for the Zionists international organization, later inserted as British PM because....the previous PM was opposed to the Zionists.

So when the suitably installed Balfour sent a private letter to Lord Rothschild saying basically, breezily, "sure, Britain will now help you conquer a bit of the Ottoman Empire territory during WWI for your desired Zionist secular state"--it happened.

Earlier, British troops first battle in WWI was an attack on Ottoman territory of Palestine anyway to get to Mesopotamian areas and the oil, and to stop Germany from building the Berlin-to-Baghdad railway as well... [as discussed, among other places of course, in the a British 'stand up comedy history "A History of Oil"]).

However, the British never left their area, making it part of the British empire territory after WWI, and the Zionists started making deals with the Nazis in Germany to get them to go to Palestine [cite: Edwin Black's The Transfer Agreement; Lenni Brenner's _51 Documents: Zionist Cooperation with the Nazis]

(Many of the leaders of the Zionist movement were Sabbatean, which was a cloaked elite in the USSR totalitarian set up, though that's another story...)

Churchill, FDR, and Secretary of War Bonesman Stimpson: WWI...and WWII Regroup

The same team regroups for WWII, on the same international side: wanting Britain and the USA to support the US-UK international banker sets' (post WWI creation) the USSR in a larger WWII to destroy Germany once more. One British set attempted to do it after WWI, by extending (illegally) the British blockade of Germany well after the war was over, until people were starving in the streets due to the British blockade. (There was a failed Kapp Putsch to establish a dictatorship after WWI in Germany, in which Allen Dulles seems to have figured as important... cite: McGowan, Understanding the F-Word]

Germany started getting built back up intentionally however, once the USSR attempt to invade militarily the rest of Europe failed (the 1920 invasion of Europe/Poland, where the USSR troops were stopped by the Poles. Even though the Brits 'promised' a free Poland would be a settlement of the war, you're talking to the Brits! What kind of trust would you have with the way that country is run! The Brits instead watched the USSR turn all of Eastern Europe into USSR-proxy states.

Germany started being built back up several months after the Trostkyites were completely ejected from USSR, and Stalin takes over. He stops a global revolutionary (military consolidation) goal. Lots of mad US and UK bankers there....both their proxy Lenin (dead 1924) and Trotsky (ejected 1929) completely removed.

Germany starts getting built back up.

Great Depression engineered in 1929 as well, after a decade of allowing huge inflationary money policies in the USA--that were suddenly called short all on the same day by the Morgan Banks. Then to extend the difficulty the Federal Reserve shrank the money supply, extending the Great Depression for political goals.

Enter dictatorial political calls all across Europe and the USA.

In the USA, FDR become pseudo-dictator, supporting the common man. However, he supported them "a bit too much" from the point of view of his sponsors. People in his own Democratic Party attempted to remove him in a pro-Nazi coup in 1933-4 that soured. FDR still there, and a decidedly left-leaning one party state policies were instituted. (One key platform of FDR was identical to the German one actually--a corporatist national planning oversight. This was installed in Germany, the US Supreme Court disliked giving corporations formal state power to dominate their industries and 'sectors', and struck it down. Then FDR attempted to stack the Supreme Court to get it in. This failed as well. [cite: Sutton's Wall Street and FDR]

By WWII, FDR was a linchpin for the USSR internationlists, you see.

Even though England had declared war against Germany, USA was still neutral, and Germany wanted to call the whole thing quits with the British. However, Churchill and Roosevelt could smile at each other across the water, because they were in executive control of Britain and the USA military decisions, a similar part they played in WWI when both were in the Navy and arranged the 'stand down' and the Lusitania disaster.

So if FDR and Churchill could get the USA back into the war in a similar way against Germany--then automatically Britain's USSR-sided internationalists would have more public backing as the USA side would bring its firepower to bear.

The USA was already being strangely built up from the late 1930s as well under another "take two" person:
this was Skull and Bonesman Secretary of War, Henry Stimson. Stimson had built up the US Army and Navy for a desired US entry into WWI, as well, between 1911-13. He was puppet President Wilson's Bonesman Secretary of War. Then FDR appoints the same person for expanding peacetime military, over 25 years later!

(There's another similar Bonesman, Seymour, who was close friends to Wilson's 'watcher' Col. Mandell House, who was the major US 'peace treaty' operative at both WWI's Versailles peace conference as well as at the peace conference in WWII as well.)

So FDR, Churchill, and Bonesman Stimson all back in place, same as in WWI and WWII.

Bonesman Stimson's (S&B, 1888) bio:

Sec War 40-45; Chmn Am Delg 30, London Naval Conferences; Mbr 32, Am Delg to Disarmament Conferences; Sec State 29-33; Gov Gen 27-29, Philippines; Specl Rep of Pres 27, Nicaragua [shoring up Brown Brothers banking imperium there--Brown Brothers CEO co-signed and ran the "Nicaraguan" currency]; Sec War 11-13; Attny 06-09, Southern Dist NY; 1901w/Winthrop & Stimson; 1897 w/Root, Howard, Winthrop & Stimson; 1893, w/Root & Clarke (NYC); Lt Col AEF WWI

(Bonesman George H. W. Bush is a great fan and admirer of Bonesman Stimpson--Bush carried around Stimpson writings at Camp David to read them for inspiration in off moments while he was strategizing to get war in the Middle East in "Gulf War One.")

First, FDR attempted to get Germany directly to attack the USA, making it all quite easy by doing many illegal things for a neutral country to German nationals in the USA like seizing all German assets, etc.

Still, Hitler didn't bite, which made the group mad. There's nothing worse than an independent dictator that you helped install. (That's why the group started to hate Nixon in the USA as well, by the way, and had him removed...)

After many other failed attempts to get Germany to attack the USA directly with provocation as talked of extensively in Charles Higham's books _Trading with the Enemy: the Nazi American Money Plot and _American Swastika, (the latter, the book that started this thread of Jeff's), the idea gelled: get Japan, which was allied to Germany, to attack the USA.

This Japan-Germany "Axis international" alliance was set by by pro-British double agent Ribbentrop, discussed above. One side was primed for global war, though they were unable to get the German dictator to bite!

So FDR started to make the Japanese nibble a bit at it indirectly.

FDR allowed and earlier even encouraged an attack by the Japanese on Hawaii. For instance, FDR even put lots of boats in the harbor intentionally against hot arguments against this by his commanders in the field already concerned about the Japanese in the Pacific.

FDR made sure to leave the aircraft carriers out of the harbor though for the fateful day--those would be used for the later war...

The first commander at Pearl Harbor complained so much about FDR's tactics....that FDR had him reassigned. Kimmel was put in place.

The Japanese codes were already broken by the USA, so they knew what was about to happen. They desired what was about to happen.

Then, voila, it happened. The Japanese finally bit. It helped that the 'neutral' USA was simultaneously attempting to kill them off with seige warfare that was depleting their metal and oil supplies. That's really what made the Japanese attack.

The USA higher ups had around 90 minutes forewarning--though they refused to tell anyone at Pearl Harbor.

Just like 9-11, thousands died to create a war ire to get the USA into an international war.

Just like 9-11, they refused to have a real investigation.

Kimmel eventually was forced to write his book on the treasonous affair, privately, because no one wanted him to testify to anything!

Before 1941, the USA public was authoritatively against any foreign war intervention in Europe once more. This of course put the anti-interventionists on the side of Nazis which was used with great propagandistic effect by the group that did want intervention--attemping to say that those "all those not with us for are against us" ("those against intervention were all Nazis".)

Tis true some were Nazis promoting "non intervention in Europe." Though most weren't Nazis and didn't want a repeat of US dying in a 'banker's war' as it was widely talked of by Smedley Butler and others. The USA wasn't as educatedly brain dead as it is currently. People could still ask questions of Cio Bono, openly. The media was not as consolidated as 'they' liked. So, this whole questioning of the real motives of a two faced FDR who promised to keep "our boys out of the war, should it occur" in his reelection campaign (which was a major issue), while of course he was scheming all the while to do just that, and implanted Bonesman Stimpson for the purpose to ramp up the war budget and production during peacetime.

However, 'banker's war' and the questioning of FDR as two faced was way the whole thing was publicly talked about.

And people knew what was going on. They knew that there were some dictatorial minded people admiring the "efficiency methods" of Germany after 1933. However, the Nazi coup failed to happen, and probabaly really when it comes down to it, through the work of one man's publicity: pro-peace activist Retired General Smedley Butler.

Famous general Smedley Butler with elite-annoying press coverage and radio talk show appearances, spilled the beans about him being approached to lead, for international bankers, a USA dictatorial coup against Roosevelt via a US version of a paramilitary that the banker's group had organized. This was called the "American Liberty League" which was additionally used in strikebreaking during the Great Depression by major corporations.

THEY DID IT BEFORE in ‘34…EXCERPTS: Butler exposes 1933-‘34s real WALL STREET FASCIST PLOT

2004.10.03 07:42

Description: THEY DID IT BEFORE in ‘34…excerpts of Jules Archer's book, The Plot to Seize the White House; Major General Smedley D. Butler exposes ‘33-‘34’s real Wall Street fascist plot. This is an extensive through succinct excerpt of THE VERY RARE Jules Archer book, The Plot to Seize the White House. Hawthorn Books, Inc. New York: New York. 1973. It has a comparison of this Congressional Committee verified, very real 1933-34 fascist plot strategy, with a post-9-11 America…

The plotters against FDR were in the Democratic Party--and that was the Morgan interests. Morgan was additionally heavily 'in' to Germany as well in the 1930s.

These plotters in the Democratic Party of Roosevelt wanted to turn the USA into something like a dictatorship the moment that FDR was elected on his watch during the Great Depression.

(There was likely a failed assassination attempt of Roosevelt organized immediately after he was elected that would have put the more amenable Vice President in a position of power for the group.)

With the corporate wing getting desperate at FDR's 'help the people' ideology and policies that raised corporate taxation to 90% in some cases, the corporate Democrats
business interests themselves were more pro-Nazi soon, while FDR 'their candidate' was more openly pro-USSR.

It was almost the first thing that FDR did as president was to recognize the Soviet Union diplomatically.

Then there was all the pro-citizen make work programs, and the incredibly high taxation of corporations to fund it, up to 90%.

This led to a huge pro-Nazi attempt to get FDR out of there by 1933-34, by a fascist coup plot, organized through the Remington Arms. (After the failed coup, there was a high level Roosevelt family marriage between the owners of Remington Arms and the Roosevelt family...)

Since the plot was organized from the Democratic Party themselves around Roosevelt [cite: The Plot to Seize the White House] attempting to make FDR back into a puppet of sorts, it was very embarrassing for his parties continued popular success to hush the whole thing up.

However, the plot with annoying publicity was being aired all the while by Butler.

Even though the USA was not a Nazi 'culture' in the 1930s, it was becoming increasingly 'statist' with two decades of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve caused the Great Depression intentionally in 1929 by suddenly reversing the scale of the money supply. Then the Federal Reserve extended the Great Depression intentionally by further reducing the money supply afterwards.

The subsequent crash of monetary inflated valuations on the stock market led to a lot of cronyism in the stock market consolidation of the era.

Thus FDR's appeals were 'primed' so to speak, similar to how Hitler's appeals were primed by the same globalized Great Depression. Germany came out 'more to plan's form.' The USA had many different quirks that didn't really come out to plan, and even the back up operations of the fascist coup itself to 'rectify the plan' didn't work as well. Then FDR himself couldn't 'rectify the plan' by passing the corporatist-German style planned economy, due to the Supreme Court, which was the keystone of "his" (supplied) policies. Then to 'rectify the plan' once more, he attempts to stack the Supreme Court. This fails as well.

Three cheers for balance of powers, that actually worked in the 1930s to stop a fascist corporatist takeover side of FDR's policies. [cite: Sutton's Wall Street and FDR]

So by 1939 and 1940, the whole 'plan' in the USA had failed, while it was radically successful in Germany. Even Britain and Germany were already going at it in war, according to plan.

However, FDR couldn't get 'his' country to join in the global war, despite Bonesman Stimpson already installed from 1940 as "ready" Secretary of War.

So FDR let Pearl Harbor happen, used to declare war on Germany indirectly, since Japan was Germany's ally. Thus the U.S. was at war with Germany at well at last--like they wanted all the while.

This immediately forced Britain 'back in line' against Germany as well, and against "Hess's feelers for peace with Britain, and group war on the USSR"

Bonesman Stimpson even got to set up USA concentration camps, just like like Germany, which housed all Japanese in the USA for the duration of the war. However, they were not 'work till you're dead' termination camps. Bonesman Stimpson even did a good thing, he countermanded orders to firebomb the historic (mostly wooden) capital of Kyoto with US bombers--if only so someone could surrender.

After WWII, Stimpson sent Marshall to Japan, 'the new shogun', who worked to set up a Japan run by Japanese organized crime, increasingly to the present. [cite: Yakuza: Japan's Criminal Underworld, by Kaplan and Dubro]

By 1949, Marshall was additionally instrumental in taking orders to lay seige to the Chinese coast--though it was to hold off the Chinese nationalists that had fled to Taiwan, to keep them from reinvading China against Mao's USSR aligned Communists.

Thus, Marshall set up Mao Tse-Tung's Chinese Communist dictatorship.

Marshall took the order from the U.S.'s Second Secretary of "Defense" (the title change happened after WWII), Louis A. Johnson (March 28, 1949 to September 19, 1950). You see the First Secretary of Defense went and got himself assassinated for not 'going with the plan.' That was Forrestal, who worked for a Bonesman filled bank, Dillon Read, based in Switzerland really, though strangely that's good enough to make one of their underlings the First U.S. Secretary of Defense. Forrestall was not Bones. He was expendable. And he was expended.

Next, was Louis A. Johnson (March 28, 1949 to September 19, 1950). In this short tenure, on the other side of the world, he would be giving Marshall orders to surround China to protect the USSR-helped consolidation of China. Who was Louis A. Johnson? Head administrator of the American Liberty League back in the 1930s, the 'patriotic paramilitary organization' that was to unset FDR and start the 'real dictatorship' for the USA.

Who appointed this surprising guy? He was appointed by "surprise president" ex-Vice President Harry S. Truman. Truman himself was suprisingly inserted at the last minute as Roosevelt's 1944 running mate, then blamo!, he was another accidental president. Same suprising turn of events that led to Vice President Teddy Roosevelt to become President by accident. And Teddy brought in pre-emptive U.S. war in Philipines and Cuba, and he brought in all the Bonesmen to staff the executive to start this American empire, and Bonesmen have been in the excutive branch of the USA (and have been termites eating away at the other branches) ever since.

It's just accidental that Truman was a 33rd degree mason President as well. Though it was not accidental that TRUMAN ARRANGED in advance for the Zionist terrorist state in 1949 to "pretend to ask" the U.S. to recognize them. Actually, them asking was all Truman's idea, and he instructed them to 'ask' immediately after they were established. Thus Truman recognized his own handiwork, a mere 10 minutes or so after the Zionists/Sabbateans announced their state on the other side of the world.

Who was next rewarded with Secretary of Defense. "Good boy who follows international totalitarian cabal's orders with regard to helping the Communist Chinese consolidate a one-party state, General George C. Marshall (September 21, 1950 - September 12, 1951), headed by Mao.

Mao was originally "picked as a rising star" in the chaos that was China's 25 year civil war. Mao was sponsored by Bonesman run double intelligence and missionary operation "Yale in China." Yale-in-China even let Mao run a revolutionary bookstore on their property, and Yale-in-China funded his journal writing when his other journal had been shut down during the period. Small world.

Even smaller that Bonesman George H. W. Bush and another Bonesmen were in on 'opening' China in the 1970s--which assuredly meant getting a piece of Yunnan opium sales of the "golden triangle" area--that Mao's China had been making money off of.


So with the global alliances in place, WWII occurred as scheduled.

Was it all Commander Pike's long term ideal from the late 1800s? You decide.

And from 1949, it was extended into China, and into "Israel"--the latter to set up WWIII, which is being postponed presently by smart Arab leaders, refusing to take the US cabal's bait. Commander Pike talks about that set up as well, from a letter reputedly written in the late 1800s, when he was global head of the Scottish Rite. Even if it is a fake letter, it was faked before 1925, the first instance of it being uncovered. That means that it predicted WWII and WWIII completely accurately even if it is a fake. And if it is true: it predicted WWI and WWII, and is likely going to make it three out of three for predictions if someone does something stupid in the Middle East....

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam [the Moslem Arabic World] and political Zionism [the State of Israel] mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4

Thanks, FDR, for WWI.

Thanks, FDR, for WWII.

And no thanks, Bushes, who are attempting to start WWIII on schedule.

You can read FDR's Pearl Harbor treason in many places. though this BBC film just appeared at Google Video:

Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor
1 hr 49 min 59 sec - Dec 19, 2006

In this authoritative and suspenseful documentary, the BBC takes you inside the secret activities of the Americans, the British and the Japanese as each nation moved fatefully toward the "date that will live in infamy."

For nearly 50 years, the world has believed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's declaration that the Pearl Harbor attack was a completely unexpected assault on a neutral nation. Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor tells another, hidden story - using actual recording of intercepted diplomatic communications, declassified government documents, archival footage and interviews with diplomats and spies from around the world.

We now know that intelligence operatives from the US and three Allied nations monitored the Japanese fleet's progress on its deadly mission to Oahu in late 1941.

Yet neither Admiral Kimmell nor General Short received a word of warning that might have allowed them to avert the sacrifice of 4,000 American casualties in less than 90 minutes.

Of course some groups played both sides like the Kennedies--connected to Prohibition era organized crime and to FDR. Kennedy Senior, a Wall Street con artist extrordinaire, was appointed by FDR to head the novel invention of the SEC that oversaw Wall Street.

Kennedy Senior certainly wasn't going to ask questions how his own wealth pulled out of the stock market just before the engineered Great Depression, was reinvested back in--like many of his big banker compatriots--becoming the basis for the current Kennedy family wealth. It grew so much that it sired Kennedy Senior's dream to see (and put) one of his son's into the Presidency....which happened by 1960 due to 'help' from Chicago vote fraud due with Kennedy organized crime links.

Kennedy ran against VP 'heir to the throne' Nixon, originally close to and sponsored by Bonesman Prescott Bush into California politics, as well as ever useful to create a false "hard on communism" front--used as a shield when it started to look like the internationalist coupmeisters themselves were beginning to be exposed by people like Whittaker Chambers and others. So Nixon was invented to make a lot of noise about it. It helped that he was ideologiically already connected to Nazis [cite: McGowan's Understanding the F-Word]

So Kennedies upset the Bush/Nixon expectations of the Presidency in 1960. Nixon was quietly 'put on ice' and promised a run once more. By 1963-1967, Bushes/CIA had 'put on ice' two dead Kennedies.

While they were still rising stars in the 1930s, FDR appointed Kennedy to be Ambassador to England as well, supposedly to force him into a role on FDR's side even though Kennedy had been investing heavily in Nazi Germany all through the 1930s himself.

Kennedies were huge elite criminal opportunists, just like the Bushes. Just because the Genoveses of the 1960s (the Bushes in the CIA) bumped off two Gambinos (JFK and RFK), doesn't mean WE have to choose 'their' sides in their little petty wars for power. Though we should recognize it for what it is: though the Bushes "did a bad thing, twice" (and were involved in killing JFK in 1936 and likely JFK, Jr. in 2000, who threatened to run for the Presidency in 2000 against Bush, Jr.) that's why Bushes are Presidents now.

It's perhaps poetry that a major WWI war profiteering organized crime and endlessly on the make opportunist elite family, the Bushes [cite: American Dynasty] killed off another Prohibition era organized crime opportunist family in the 1960s, the Kennedies. The Kennedies took the low road to power then on, in the Congress, on or completely got out of power. Attempts to run in 2000 were to lead to the death of JFK, Jr., as well by "airplane accident."

Strange. Gore himself almost suffered "airplane accident" in the run up against Bush, Jr., as well. Illegally, his Secret Service detail was not in position in the Chicago O'Hare control tower. What happened then was that THREE SEPARATE PLANES were veered into Gore's Air Force Two jet. Only competent piloting saved Gore's ass from the same "airplane accident" fate that another potential Democratic Party runner, JFK, Jr., did have.

Hey, it's just another day in the real USA
behind the TV's pixellated fray.

That's why TV is so important--and
why Hitler conducted the world's first TV broadcast...

You're supposed to be coached to watch a consolidated script, and to think the same thoughts, at the same time, instead of participate in the multifarious script that is life being made all around you while you are comatose and Theta-entraining suggestible (not everyone is, though a large portion of people are. And a lot is enough for them).

1/23/2007 07:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Important book review of Archer's The Plot to Seize the White House, that ties a lot together: and it shows what Dulles invested in and when, helping to explain their alignments in 'patterns of force.':

This book has achieved the "rare" book status. Rumor has it that copies are being bought up to erase its existence, ending its stain on reputations on rich families with embarrassing ancestry. In any case, readers will only find it in a few libraries. A recent book: The Corporation : The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, by Joel Bakan , ISBN: 0743247442, has a concise synopsis of the facts presented in chapter 4. Also, extensive quotes are online on website, issue #53.

Before reading this book, one should read The Sociopath Next Door: The Ruthless Versus the Rest of Us, by Martha Stout, ISBN: 076791581X. All of history needs to be interpreted through the understanding of sociopathy.

The Plot To Seize The White House contains a few primary sources, and records links to many other primary sources, which is its archival value. The details of the Plot itself are told here, and can be retold endlessly by others who care about this event.

The story in brief is General Smedley Butler was approached to lead a coup d'etat to overthrow democracy in 1933 & 1934. (Reminding modern readers, 1933 was the year Hitler assumed power in Germany.)

He declined, and exposed the plot.

The plotters then employed the "OJ Simpson" theory of defense: "if you have enough money you can get away with murder."

Nobody was ever prosecuted.

Important men were never arrested or grilled over facts. The newspaper sensation created by an impotent congressional investigation in 1934 and 1935 died down and the story collected dust, forgotten ever since.

However, the story fits into some others, including other suppressed and buried history. In telling the story of the Plot, Jules Archer tells also the biography of General Smedley Butler who declined to become the American Hitler or Mussolini, over a fascist takeover of the US. There are two books in one, woven together around this Plot.

Smedley Butler's biography shows him in Vera Cruz, Mexico, in 1914, simultaneously when armed men, government troopers, were killing American men, women and children in Ludlow, Colorado. Also, at this same moment in time, early 1914, Rockefellers were taking over the Remington Arms Company. For details of the Ludlow Massacre you need to read two books: Buried Unsung: Louis Tikas and the Ludlow Massacre, by Zeese Papanikolas, ISBN: 0803287275, and The Great Coalfield War, by George S McGovern, ISBN: 0395136490. Remington Arms Co. history is documented in the book: Remington Arms in American history, by Alden Hatch, ASIN: B0007DYPC4.

These details are not important only to The Plot To Seize The White House, but central to unravelling the Hitler Project. Yet two more books are required to place everything in order: Hitler's Secret Backers, by Sidney Warburg, ISBN: 0960035869, and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, by Antony C. Sutton, ISBN: 0945001533.

From these books a timeline can be constructed:

1929 Wall Street interests send Hitler $10,000,000.

1931 Wall Street sends Hiltler another $15,000,000.

1933 Wall Street Sends Hitler a final $7,000,000. (total $32,000,000.)

1933 Wall Street puts up initial $3,000,000, backed by another reserve $15,000,000, for the Plot to Seize the White House. Up to $300,000,000 backing is promised.

Believable? The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance, by Ron Chernow, ISBN: 0802138292, reports that JP Morgan was Mussolini's banker for over $500,000,000 and heavily invested in fascist Japan by 1931.

JP Morgan has over $3 BILLION invested in Germany by 1931. A Law Unto Itself: The Untold Story of the Law Firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, by Nancy Lisagor, Frank Ipsivs, ISBN: 0688048889, reports that John Foster Dulles and S&C [Sullivan and Cromwell] law firm have $1.15 BILLION invested in Germany by 1931. Titan : The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr., by Ron Chernow, ISBN: 0679757031, reveals the Rockefeller "method" of business, including secret takeovers, bribed officials, blatant lawbreaking, industrial spying, and philosophy "the weakest must die first".

Yes, Wall Street was behind Hitler and Mussolini, without any doubt. All the plotter named in Archer's book, named by Smedley Butler to congress, were fascist supporters. Rockefellers were at war with the weak, using soldiers to kill.

In 1927 Smedley's marines landed in China at the (Rockefeller's) Standard Oil docks, were stationed on S.O. property and protected S.O. investments.

In 1914 Rockefellers and Morgans used Butler in Vera Cruz to kill peons in Mexico, just as Rockefeller-directed government troopers gunned down Americans at Ludlow, Colorado, at the same moment that Rockefeller-controlled Remington Arms was expanding arms production even before the Duke was shot starting [a well engineered alliance framework for] WWI.

Using government troopers to quell democracy was a tradition by 1933, and fascist investments in German continued past Pearl Harbor. See: Trading with the enemy: An expose of the Nazi-American money plot, 1933-1949, by Charles Higham, ISBN: 0440090644, and American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush, by Kevin Phillips, ISBN: 0670032646.

This book stands alone as a mystery story, a spy story, a thriller, a history, a biography of a patriot, a record of government corruption.

It also fits in with a great body of literature with pieces of information telling bits of the history of sociopathy that killed over 200,000,000 people last century.

1/23/2007 08:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

John Foster Dulles was also part of the Nazi connection. Through the Wall Street firm of Cromwell & Sullivan, billions of dollars were funneled from wealthy families like the Rockefellers, Sloans, Pitcairns, Clarkes, Fords (to name just a few) and into the Nazi war machine. Ford had a car factory in Germany and built the first Volks Wagons for Hitler. Rockefeller had synthetic oil production facilities as did many other recognizable American companies. The Bushes handled the American investments for the Nazi elite like Fritz Thyssen (Hitler's banker) and they did not divest of these holdings until 1952 (although they did lie about it). All of these disgusting traitors profited greatly from the war and wanted to impose a fascist system here in the US.

Read Smedley Butler's story about the plot to steal the white house. With respect to Kissinger, the Nazis is not accident that Richard Nixon used Croatian and Eastern European Nazis in his campaigns. They were supposed to bring in the ethnic vote. Nixon resigned from the Presidency because he was afraid that the Nazi clique and other campaign irregularities would be discovered. Kissinger was involved in all of these things and he has an accent because he is German.

Go to NARA and look at the surnames of the famous Nazis brought to the US to work on rockets and HELP START THE CIA (where do you think that the ideas for experimenting on innocent civilians came from?). Gehlen, a former Abwehr officer, became a very big player in the early CIA.

1/23/2007 09:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shrub, when you said : "They come here and within a generation, if not sooner these days, are absorbed into the black hole of Consumerism and Excess. Before you know it, they're right there with all the rest if us, idly watching as the bombs continue to drop on those who still ask Lawrence's most crucial question."

were you aware of the study below or did you just make a damn good guess with your single generation assessment?

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Is living in America bad for your mental health?

A new study released Monday reported that, for many immigrants from Mexico, mental health problems rise the longer they live in the United States.

``This is clearly a social effect, not a biological one,'' said William Vega, the professor of public health at the University of California-Berkeley who conducted the study.

``Mexicans come to this country with some kind of natural protection against mental disorder, and that breaks down very quickly in American society,'' he said. ``In fact, it goes in one generation.''

Vega's report, which appears in the current issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry, studied some 3,000 urban, rural and small town residents of California's Fresno County. Half of those studied were Mexican-Americans, while the other half were Mexican-born immigrants.

The study found that U.S.-born Mexican-Americans had mental disorders at about the same rate as non-Hispanic Americans, with roughly 48 percent suffering from maladies including depression, panic disorder, phobias, or alcohol or drug abuse.

But for recent immigrants and Mexican nationals, the rate of mental disorder was much lower at only around 25 percent -- reflecting a healthier outlook that Vega believes is linked to the traditional Mexican family structure."

1/24/2007 12:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

May 1941 to June 1941: Important for How the Die Was Cast for the 'Red Symphony'

May 1941: Like Joseph Goebbels, Hess was privately distressed by the war with Britain. According to William L. Shirer, author of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, Hess may have hoped to score a stunning diplomatic victory by sealing a peace between the Reich and Britain. Hess at the time flew to Britain [almost certainly under his hero Hitler's instructions] in May 1941 [before the USA was in WWII] to meet the Duke of Hamilton and Brandon, parachuting from his Messerschmitt Bf 110 over Renfrewshire on May 10 and landing (though breaking his ankle) at Floors Farm near Eaglesham, just south of Glasgow. He was quickly arrested, although the details of how this happened are somewhat unclear and remain controversial, and he was taken to the Maryhill army barracks and held captive as a prisoner of war....

June 1941: With Hess's trip failed, Goring only here starts finalizing the tentative Operation Sea Lion, the invasion of Great Britain.

and one comment on someone else's comment:

John Foster Dulles was also part of the Nazi connection....

It's not "the Nazi connection" no more than the other side is the "Soviet connection."

Would your claimed "Nazi", John Foster Dulles have written the pro-U.N. "The Six Pillars of Peace" in 1943 if he was "a Nazi"? Would he be part of the nearly hereditary administration of the World Council of Churches?

Claimed "Nazi" John Foster Dulles wouldn't have sponsored Communist Party members like he did, if he was "a Nazi" either.

To quote two spies talking to each other in one of McGouhan's The Prisoner episodes: "Whichever way you look at it, we both want to conquer the world....Ideologies don't matter, only success."

That sentiment is total Schactmanite: "non-ideological, world revolutionary, opportunist, global military consolidation". And Schactman had this 'non-ideological ideology' from 1939, mentioned above, when he broke with the other Trotskyites.

It's the Schactmanites that have taken over the world, with that recipe above.

Is this your claimed "Nazi", John Foster Dulles? Not!:

In 1943, John Foster Dulles convened another Council of Churches conference. It endorsed “Six Pillars of Peace,” a plea for a world political organization – a United Nations. In his speech, recorded in the Council’s 1944 Biannual Report, Dulles said,

"Interest in this subject had been enormously increased by the declaration of the Moscow conference, which stressed the necessity of creating at the earliest possible moment a general international organization…. People in and out of the churches were urged to 'remain united and vigorous to achieve such [an] international organization.' … This statement, signed by more than 1,000 Protestant leaders, was given to the press and mailed to the President and members of Congress.”[17]

The most infamous of the Council leaders, Alger Hiss, was an active member of the Communist party. That didn’t keep him from serving President Roosevelt both in the State Department and as his adviser at the 1945 Yalta Peace Conference. Nor did it block his acceptance as coauthor of the UN charter and as Secretary General of the United Nations organizing conference in San Francisco in 1945. The Soviet connection may even have encouraged John Foster Dulles to recommend that Hiss head up the multimillion dollar Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [which was nothing of the kind, and started by a Bonesman which decided that "war", and particularly global war, was the best way to change society the way they wanted, back before WWI]. Strong links to high places would speed their agenda.

Come on, friend. So you are saying we have Allen Dulles "as a real Nazi" and we have his brother "as a real Nazi, though playing Communist and U.N?"

What "different sides?"

They're brothers, one leading Nazi internationalist connections, and reporting back, the other organizing and leading pro-USSR sided connections, and reporting back--both reporting to the innately apolitical string puller global revolutionaries of both.

The Dulles brothers worked well together throughout post WWII State Department and CIA positions as well. So, give up that line of approach that they are motivated by belief in ideology, no matter how painful.

If you believe that, then I have some WTCs to sell you. I swear they weren't really destroyed, only hidden under some elaborate mirrors. I'll let them go to you for a song, say 1 billion?

It's just The Connection supporting totalitarianism and military consolidation where it sees fit, using whatever it sees fit, to ratchet the contention onward toward more consolidation and controlling both sides--better yet making sure to sponsor ONLY different sides that ideologically hate each other, though are equally totalitarian in sentiment, so nothing like a "third side" or "middle ground" ever develops in the social psychology of the popular mind or a state or international world politics. That is why the post WWII unaligned movement was the only truly progressive group left, as they attempted to military consolidation based on the dynamic tension of Nazi-wing cold warriors 'vs.' Communist-cold warriors--while the coldest of all were the same people profiting from both sides and making sure that they stayed pretty well balanced, as well as assured that such a society based on hatred of some unknown other instead of their own elites developed. The latter makes far more sense.

How much easier to rope people into being elite servants of the right and the left--if they are so caught up in hating the other elite puppet dangled before them while they serve as an elite puppet themselves for the other side?

Earth to Punch and Judy: look within you and you will see yourself animated by hands not of your own. And moreover, hands connected to the same body, just off stage.

And Earth to the audience that watches Punch and Judy Parties running for legislatures: you being caught up in watching another's action is THE POINT OF the show.

You're just the 'audience participation' part of the "Red Symphony!"

Usefully introduced and summarized, this is what "Red Symphony" means:

Incredible and bizarre as it sounds, humanity is indeed the victim of a diabolical conspiracy.

War, depression and genocide in the past century were not accidental or inevitable but the result of malevolent design.

Shocking evidence is a 1938 Stalinist police (NKVD) interrogation of a founder of the Communist International, Christian G. Rakovsky, 65, who was facing execution for plotting to overthrow ["rogue socialism in one country"] Stalin.

[This was between 1929-1938, before before Stalin was coerced to rejoin and play his part during WWII. That's why FDR and Stalin hung out together, so close, as noted in many Yalta pictures, and why everyone surrounding FDR was either a U.S. Communist spy or a Bonesman), while Churchill looks like a frantic jilted bride thrown out of a menage a trois with the bridesmaid. Even supposedly old "common man elitist" FDR got a bit megalomaniac on the world stage as well, and started wearing capes everywhere...They eventually assassinated FDR in 1945 by arsenic poisoning after he won his fourth term. The elite was tired of working with a guy who was taking his cue from the public at large more and more so they made way for another guy, Truman, to make the peace issues after WWII. Truman carried around Tennyson poems in his wallet that were two generations earlier the favorite inspirational poems of global Anglo-American revolutionary Cecil Rhodes. Then of course of all people the "Republican" Rockefellers started being the international communist friends after WWII, whether the Russians or the Chinese, and Averell Harriman, on the "Democratic" side did the same. Sure.... Anyway, back into the 1930s:]

The 50-page transcript of his interrogation, dubbed "The Red Symphony," was not meant to become public. It confirms that the Rothschild-Illuminati planned to use Communism to establish a world dictatorship of the super rich.

[Lord Rothschild was the estate executor--who determined where the money goes--to CECIL RHODES' ESTATE, which was to set up a global secret society in its first five or so iterations to create the Anglo-American world empire, and in its last iteration was changed into the creation of the fund for sponsoring 'global elite integrationist' Rhodes Scholarships. "Anybody who's anybody" in elite steered world revolution is Rhodes Scholar sponsored, boy or girl. They attempt to go thorugh the same wringer that Rhodes did that he thought so formative to his views: they go to Oxford for a little finishing polish and introduction service to the next generation, like Clinton, and many others.]

This is perhaps the most explosive political document in modern history. It reveals why the Illuminati created Hitler and then sought to destroy him, and why Stalin made a pact with Hitler in 1939.

Christian Rakovsky was a veteran Communist insider. Born Chaim Rakeover in 1873, he studied medicine in France before becoming a revolutionary. He was the leader of a terror group that attacked government officials.

In 1919, Lenin put him in charge of the Soviet Ukraine government. He successfully kept the area for the Bolsheviks during the Civil War. Stalin appointed him Russian ambassador to Paris in 1925.

Rakovsky belonged to the powerful Trotskyite faction that took their orders from the Rothschilds.

Many of this group were shot in Stalin's 1937 ["socialism in one country" version of a] Communist Party purge.


The circumstances of the midnight interrogation Jan. 26, 1938 were very dramatic.

What could Rakovsky possibly say to save his life?

Rakovsky appears to use the tactic of "deceiving with the truth." He wins trust by revealing the truth but leaves some of it out. He tries to impress his interrogator that he and Trotsky represent an invincible power he calls the "Capitalist-Communist Financial International."

He confirms that the "revolutionary movement" was designed to enlist support by pretending to serve mankind's moral and collective ideals. The real aim however is to give total world power to the bankers by dividing society and undermining established authority.

"Revolution" really means, "overturning" Western civilization.

"Christianity is our only real enemy since all the political and economic phenomena of the bourgeois states are only its consequences," Rakovsky, says. (Griffin, p. 264)

Peace is "counter-revolutionary" since it is war that paves the way for revolution.

Rakovsky, whose tongue was loosened by a mild inebriant in his wine, refers to the Illuminati as "they" or "them." He is a member although not part of the inner circle.

He explains that the "Illuminati" is a Masonic secret society dedicated to Communism [at least his side of the Punch and Judy equation can say that...]. Significantly, its founder Adam Weishaupt took the name from "the second anti-Christian conspiracy of that era, gnosticism." (249)


The interrogator was one of Stalin's cleverest agents, Gavriil Kus'min known as "Gabriel."

Apart from him and a hidden sound technician, a doctor Jose Landowsky was the only other person present.

Conscripted by the NKVD to help "loosen the tongues of detainees," Dr. Landowsky was sickened by the many tortures he witnessed.

The interrogation of Rakovsky, however, was cordial. Dr. Landowsky doubts if the mild euphoric he put in Rakovsky's drink had much effect.

The interrogation, conducted in French lasted from midnight until 7 a.m. After, Kus'min ordered Landowsky to translate the interview into Russian and make two copies.

The content was so mind boggling that Landowsky made an additional carbon for himself. "I am not sorry that I had the courage for this," he wrote. (279) (The Bolsheviks had shot Landowsky's father, a Tsarist colonel, during the 1917 revolution.)

A Spanish Fascist volunteer later found the manuscript on Landowsky's dead body in a hut on the Petrograd front during World War Two. He took it back to Spain where it was published as "Sinfonia en Rojo Mayo." in 1949.

The complete text of "The Red Symphony" was put online by Peter Myers.

The transcript was [first] published in English in 1968 as "The Red Symphony: X-Ray of Revolution." You can find it in Des Griffin's "Fourth Reich of the Rich." (1988) I recommend this book and everything this fine man has written."

1/24/2007 01:16:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The similarities between nazis and neo-con/zionist is tragic. Currently, the gov't rountinely violates our Constitutional rights.
They violate the 1st Amendment by opening mail, caging demonstrators and banning books like "America Deceived" from Amazon.
They violate the 2nd Amendment by confiscating guns during Katrina.
They violate the 4th Amendment by conducting warrant-less wiretaps.
They violate the 5th and 6th Amendment by suspending habeas corpus.
They violate the 8th Amendment by torturing.
They violate the entire Constitution by starting 2 illegal wars based on lies and on behalf of a foriegn gov't.
However, Bush is not Hitler. Hitler served in combat.
Support indy media.
Last link (unless Google Books caves to the gov't and drops the title):
America Deceived (book)

1/24/2007 06:52:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous One,Jeff are you still out there? I hope everything is allwritting,only punning.Annoymous 1:16,I like the Punch and Judy anology,any slite of hand takes the sheepu'll anywhere they want them."The hand that writes and quickly moves away",now that they have the better part of this fucked up "Jonestown" Pys-Ops working,get ready for the fucken of a life time.The package thats been layed out wasn't put together yesterday,this stuff is old as time.It feels like our time has come,a great change is going on just outside your field of vision.When the"snap"to your brain comes hold on it's going to get wild,later.

1/24/2007 07:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

were you aware of the study below or did you just make a damn good guess with your single generation assessment?

Hey Richard,

I wasn't aware of the was a damn good guess based on observation.

1/24/2007 09:15:00 AM  
Blogger ericswan said...

I'm not appreciating the longish cut and pastes. They are sooo long that it wastes my time trying to scroll through them.

Some observations that need to be considered. The word neo-conservative (which is step 1 toward neo-con which is step 2 to neocon which is step 3) has become part of the lexicon of CNN and other mass media and I believe it has only just been introduced in the last couple of days.

The State of Union address was remarkable for it's ignoring the Chinese missile attack except for the one proviso which got them all on their feet. That was when he mentioned that he was going to "double" the gas reserves. That should "double" the price of gas at the pumps.

1/24/2007 10:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What we wrote is not for you to understand.

So GO ahead and scroll that is our idea, to keep to profane in the dark.


1/24/2007 10:24:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I couldn't tell you how many times I've heard people blame their personal failures or psychological stresses on "Catholic guilt" in the last 20 years. It is as though the Church is the great rain cloud ever shadowing the grand Mardi Gras that so many expect life to be. All that stands in the way of a good old time is the Church and her teachings regarding sin. Whether subtle or not so subtle, we see this condemnation in the movies, in the general media, in politics and in some treatises from the theological far-Left. Not a few people leave the Church thinking to rid themselves of this vestige of "medieval thinking".

The most common complaints have revolved around sex. If only we could let go and do what is "natural," we would have our bliss like Margaret Mead's (mythic) "primitives" in Samoa, or Sigmud Freud's (defrauded) neurotics. In their day (which seems so long ago now) the works of both Mead and Freud were considered "science". Each contended that almost the whole notion of "western" guilt was the product of nurture, not nature, and that if only we could get back in touch with nature, sexually especially, we could finally be free of all that neurosis.

Too bad it didn't pan out. Reality must intrude. We got what Mead and Freud and so many others wanted ---and indeed far more than they could have ever hoped for---but along with it a host of unforeseen horrors which followed: at least 60 million dead of AIDS at this writing and climbing---to say nothing of the ravages of other sexually transmitted diseases---- to a more than 50 percent divorce rate in the West with all that this has meant for the psyches of the children from such families, to abortions uncountable, and, finally, to societies which have become ever more violent and unsafe from predators of all types (even affecting the schools, Boy Scouts and churches, etc). Increasing areas of the West today are in virtual lockdown for fear that our children and young people will be sexually preyed upon, drugged, kidnapped, tortured or murdered. No paradise is here, but more and more a jungle.

The Passions

It used to be the common wisdom of humankind that to surrender oneself to one's passions, unrestrained by morality and reason, was madness. It was to invite both personal and social disaster. The terrible facts have borne out the truth of such ancient wisdom, beyond all need for demonstration or footnotes. We see the truth with our own eyes every day, in our families, neighborhoods, nations, everywhere. And yet, amazingly, very many still do not believe. The Commandments are viewed as irrelevant to the human condition.

The fact is we are hardly allowed to believe. The media continues daily to heighten the desire for violence and sexual arousal, without regard for the consequences. Sex sells. The market rewards it. Free sex and a "free" market are considered the Enlightenment's legacy. Anything else is considered retrograde, even cruel.

Government Promotion of Nihilism

The other side of these uncomfortable truths is that any government which condones this peddling of free indulgence of passions without regard for personal and societal consequences is a government which actually promotes it all, whatever its pretensions to civil righteousness. It doesn't matter whether political parties blame each other; it doesn't matter what the pretext---whether it is "free speech" or any specious kind of reasoning, the rationalizations fall of their own weight in front of our eyes. The nation which condones it, promotes it.

The Human Person

Man (male and female) is that being who can say 'no' to his passions for the good of himself and others, unlike beasts. This is the distinguishing feature of the human being, together with the quest for spiritual meaning. One need hardly reference God or the Church at all to see the truth of these things. It is the Natural Law. "Nature" has produced a being with reason---a being who can foresee the consequences of his actions by measuring what would happen if everyone acted the way he does, for good or ill, as the philosopher Immanuel Kant recommended. A being who, weighing the need for measure, self-control, and the continuation of the species, can say "no" to anything which impedes or crushes such obvious goods, without being forced.


But when morality will not restrain the passions, all that is left is the paycheck or prison---positive and negative reinforcement, ala Pavlov's dogs--- safeguarding selective corporate or civil interests. Even arbitrary power must have some laws, lest human passions landslide into the frenzy of the mob which all principalities and powers fear. For the powers know that when Fido joins the hungry pack of dogs, our pet turns into something brutal, truly unrecognizable. Bloodlust unleashes the beast within, which we thought had been tamed.

Age of Paranoia

It is similar with a person. When the conscience is deadened and the only thing which keeps a neighbor from taking your daughter or son, stealing your wallet or your life is fear of civil punishment, everyone fears his neighbor may be a harnessed beast, but a potential beast nonetheless, in waiting.

When the media constructs a world saturated with lusts and violent passions, few can be at ease.

This is what has made our age an age of violence, paranoia, and opiates. Opiates aim to ease the tensions of the cognitive dissonance which is an inevitable part of a society which pits man against his own conscience, and which allows the State and its media to define the "good". Opiates also make transgression easier, by suprressing conscience.


Prisons represent the necessary hypocrisy of the same State which promotes moral nihilism precisely by its condoning of moral nihilism. The State lures people into crime by promoting decadence and indulgence of the passions (destroying the foundations of family structure and traditional authority in the process), then it punishes those who follow the sensual logic of the State with consistency, i.e., those who see and show contempt for the State's arbitrariness.

Blaming the Faith

In the 1980's and 1990's, blaming parents and especially their religious upbringing for much or all personal failure became a staple of Public Television and booksellers far and wide for the Baby Boomer generation. Many, many, innocent parents and traditional authorities were openly pilloried in group "therapy" or on Oprah or similar shows for having set limits, for spanking, or whatever; so much so that many parents saw the handwriting on the wall and simply gave up their roles and turned all parenting, guidance and punishments over to the increasingly Almighty State. Then they remade themselves into a new kind of spectacle: middle-aged teenagers. But when the State becomes the only lawful Parent, alone determining what is good or evil, it matters little then whether we are talking about North Korea's 'Dear Leader,' or our own "enlightened" leaders. It is the will to power ---and persecution looms.


Guilt, Christians know, has reference to the moral law, to how we were made in the image of the Creator (Gen1:26,27). When we turn our backs on guilt's truth and transgress, we know it. We feel pained by our transgressions against God and our neighbor whether or not anyone sees. This pain is a redemptive pain if we hear its message and allow it to work its truths in us spiritually and existentially. For in the Christian faith there is no "right" to act in such a way as will physically or morally harm our neighbor whom the Creator says we are to love even as ourselves. In the Christian faith we have no right to renege on our moral obligations to wives, husbands, children, neighbors. To trash a spouse for another "flavor" is a spiritual crime.

No Escape from Truth

When we refuse to be guided by God's commandments, God has no choice but to give us up to our own depravity and its consequences (Rom 1:26) and leave us to our own choices. But evil must fall of its own weight in time, as surely as night must follow day. If we choose to worship the Golden Calf of self-indulgence and turn our backs on the commandments then we are unprotected indeed along with everyone else, and love grows cold.

A society is doomed which in principle turns the notion of "freedom" into the "right" to dispose of others---whether through easy divorce laws, encouraging sexual promiscuity, theft, aggression against others, euthanasia, etc --- is condemned to the consequences and constant fear.

The Blessing

Guilt is in truth a blessing, for it calls us to a higher consciousness, to a higher place spiritually than where we were in the act of transgression. Real guilt prods us to think of others, and not just ourselves. It makes us think of human obligations and not just our own alleged "rights". The opposite of selfishisness is self-denial, where love is born. For every act of love in some way puts the 'other' above oneself.

The Good News of Jesus Christ in His Church is that a people who uphold conscience and the truths of real guilt are finally liberated to the order of the Kingdom of God, and so easily forgiven when they fall; forgiven by the God who loves, and who made us in His image. For God "is" love, the scripture says (1 Jn 4:16; Jn 3:16). And forgiveness is free for the asking. Denial and selfishness, however, are very, very expensive.

1/24/2007 10:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unlike the Judean-Christian-Moslem religions, we do not look at sex as being sinful or dirty. Nor is it ungodly or shameful. We believe that man was made in the image and likeness of God and woman was made in the image and likeness of The Goddess; not just our spirits, but our whole body, genitals included. This is in marked contrast with modern religions which have made their god into an ascetic, old grouch and totally eliminated the Goddess. It is also in contrast to the femi-nazi-feminist who holds that sex with men is nothing more than rape, even in marriage.
Modern religions have taught that women should not experience sexual pleasure but should endure intercourse only for the sake of having children. Until recently men and women were not even permitted to see their "sinful" naked bodies. In colonial times, sex was performed through many layers of cloths which had a hole for the insertion of the penis. Femi- nazis have adopted the principles of the male religions which degrade women and eliminate heterosexual sex for any purpose. To them, not only is sex with a man rape, but disrespect for women is a form of rape, to be punished by imprisonment of the male offender. The femi-nazi ignores the differences between men and women and condemn women who reject their concepts of heterosexlessness. This attitude is creating a division in the feminist movement. There are many women who advocate, as I do, equal rights for women while extolling women's sexuality. The femi-nazi (the fascists of the feminist movement) who would make women into copies of men are often lesbians, if sexual at all, whereas the feminine feminist, or true feminist, is heterosexual or bisexual. The feminine feminist recognizes the differences between the sexes, accepts those differences and makes her sexuality a source of strength and power.
There may seem to be a conflict between the male double standard and femi-nazi-feminist philosophy, but they both produce the same results - asexual women. Is it any wonder women in the true feminist movement don't know what is expected of them. For a man to have a large cock and fuck many women is commendable. He is looked up to, admired and called a stud. For a woman to admit to enjoying sex or to having sex with more than one man places her in contempt and brands her a slut and a whore. Femi-nazi-feminists on the other hand, refuse to accept the fact that women can, and do enjoy sex. They place the "blame" for her sexuality on male coercion, male exploitation and child molestation. In order to avoid the image of the sexual woman, and her sexual nature, they change woman into an asexual being whose "imagined" desire is to avoid sex, just as christian fundamentalist change her into a submissive creature whose only role is to endure sex. But that goes against nature itself. A woman's biological and sexual composition enables her to have and enjoy sex more often than a man - with many men - every day. But what femi-nazi even wants a man's cock in her? Femi-nazis-feminists reject the biological nature of women and seek to rewrite history and the psychology of women to advance their cause.
In doing this femi-nazis-feminists seek to ban anything which they consider to be anti women. I find no difference in the NOW gang's boycott of book stores which sold American Psycho, because it is demeaning to women, and the Catholic Church's banning of,Boccaccio's, Decameron, six hundred years earlier, because it was demeaning to the Church clergy. Femi- nazis refuse to recognize that prejudices and ignorance have as much right in the marketplace of ideas as do "eternal truths" and "feminist exaggerations." Censorship may have worked to suppress ideas and women in an age before the printing press, but with the modern multimedia dissemination of information, censorship is as unworkable in an advancing society as it is ignorant. Failing censorship, femi-nazi- feminists have insisted that our society be "political correct." It is not "politically correct" to approve of the portrayal of a nude woman in magazines, film or videos -- one nude woman represents all women -- or so their bull shit goes.
I am my own woman. I love to be seen nude, to have others see my cunt. Femi-nazis deny that this is natural, let alone desirable, but history is agaisnt them. All feminist point to the dawn of civilization when women ruled under the auspices of "The Mother Goddess" but too many turn a blind eye to Her sexuality. 5000 years ago, before the patriarchs controlled women, priestesses of Inanna, the Sumerian "Queen of Heaven" (Ishtar of Assyria/Babylon) wrote of Her:

"Inanna reclined against the fig tree;
When Inanna lay against the fig tree her cunt was glorious to observe;
Delighted at her glorious cunt, the young lady, Inanna, praised herself."

How could Inanna glory in her cunt; show her cunt to the world; have her priestesses write of her cunt, and not be sexual? It is this heritage that the femi-nazis and christian fundamentalists want to suppress. They cannot imagine sex as being a positive force because it is something both men and women can enjoy. Femi-nazis seek to create a superior woman and subjugate men, just as men have created the superior man and subjugated women. But the promotion of women's rights to the determent of men's rights is as offensive to reason and logic as is the promotion of religious ideas over scientific ideas. True feminists - the feminine feminist or sexual feminist - recognize that the roots of women's authority lies in her ancient past and are awakening to the reality that women's authority was founded on her sexuality - her love and desire to have sex with men, her use of men as sexual toys, her ability to turn her sexuality to her advantage - to be sex-positive.
I have personally experienced 300 orgasms in a single day. Yes, someone did count them. I could have enjoyed myself even longer, but the sixteen men got worn out. (For the man who thinks he can satisfy a woman sexually, it should be noted that all he can do is wear out a woman with boring sex.) Men are physically incapable of such pleasure. Women can experience orgasm again and again within a very short period. And they should. Men normally do not. Women need to enjoy what the Goddess has given. For it is the sexual capacity of the woman which makes her different from other animals. Sexual pleasure for women is a gift to be enjoyed to its fullest capacities
Yes we've come a long way, baby. A woman who enjoys sex is no longer killed as a witch, a heretic or an adulteress. But we've still got a long way to go to get back to the open sexual freedom enjoyed by women in the days when the religion of The Goddess covered the earth; when sexual freedom was the path to the divine; when priestesses purified men through the sexual rituals of the Goddess, and the act of sex lifted both the priestess and the man to a higher level to become in tune with their nature and the divine. These free agents of love did not deny their bodies with a false sense of righteousness, nor have animosity towards sex and men as the feminist movement preaches today.
We need to progress "backward" in time and attitude, to pry ourselves out of the "Dark Ages" of this sex-negative society.


1/24/2007 12:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Goddesses have been know throughout the world in different languages and cultures by different names. Often they are different Goddesses, but just as often they are the same. In Sumer, which has some of the oldest written records of the sacred rituals, she was called Inanna. The same name, written with the same cuneiform (wedged writings) is pronounced Ishtar in the Assyrian and Babylonian languages. She was Astarte in Phoenicia, while the Bible refers to her as Ashtoreth. In Greece She was Aphrodite and in Rome, Venue. Although the Goddess was known by many names, those names were often different attributes of her character, and more correctly, the title of Her Priesthood. Many of Her names, such as Ishtar and Astarte mean, "The Star", which refers to both Sirius, the brightest star in the heavens, and to the planet Venus, which is also known as the Evening and Morning Star.

................... The Christians so called New Testament illustrates what the early Christians believed about the resurrection. Luke 24:29, speaks of the time when Jesus is claimed to have appeared to his disciples after the resurrection. Jesus is quoted as saying, "Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me and see, for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have." He then took some fish and a honeycomb and ate them. His disciples even touched him and felt the print of the nails in his hands and the hole from the Roman spear in his side. Obviously Jesus had a physical body. Later Paul would write to the Romans that "Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more, death hath no more dominion over him." (Romans 6:9)
It took Christianity another 300 years before Jesus died again. In 325 C.E. Christianity was confronted with the contradiction of the Jewish belief in only one god and the obvious polytheistic three gods of the trinity, God the father, the son, Jesus Christ and a Holy Ghost. After all how can you claim to worship only one god when there is a father, son and holy spirit? Christianity changed the nature of their polytheistic god to one god. They removed his resurrected body, and the Christian god who could die no more, was dead - yet he somehow lived without a body - another mystery of a god which men can not comprehend.
In the religion of The Goddess, we believe that we are literally the spirit offspring of God and Goddess, our Heavenly Father and Mother. That our spirit bodies were created in what might be called Heaven just as our physical bodies were created on earth, through a sexual union of God and Goddess. Our spirit existed before this life, but it did not live until it entered the physical body at birth. We come to earth to gain physical experience, to learn of our spiritual nature and to die. In death our spirit and body separate. The spirit, if it has gained sufficient spiritual knowledge is either taken to the spirit world, or makes its way there. Those spirits that survive death return, or are brought back to be born again through metempsychosis, or reincarnation, until the spirit and body are united in metensomatosis and resurrected as gods and goddesses. This belief in metensomatosis or resurrection inspired the Egyptians to mummify their bodies.
Other pagan religions burned the bodies of their dead, thus sending their spirit into the heavens through the smoke of the funerary fires.
Surviving death is not easy. It is only because the sheer number of souls is so great that some survive on their own. Other souls are guided to the underworld by the priestess or psychopomp priest, but only if the soul is able to recognize the priestess in death. That is the purpose of our religious rituals, to lead men and women to become gods and goddesses. It is in that moment of orgasm the French call le petit mort, the little death, that a priestess can communicate with the souls of men. The body is controlled by the brain, and the brain has conditioned itself from its beginning to shut out all extraneous things. When the spirit enters the body at birth, when the Breath of Life breaths the spirit into the body and it becomes a living soul, it enters a body that is already controlled by the brain. The struggle between the spirit and brain is one sided, and the brain subdues the spirit so the "mind" is as much a slave to the brain as the "soul" is a slave to the body. It is only when the soul can be set in harmony with the mind that spiritual knowledge can be attained, and it is spiritual knowledge that allows one to survive death and be born again. Symbolically, when men perform sexual intercourse with a priestess, they are representing that they will continue to have sex in the hereafter. The pleasures of earth are also the pleasures of heaven.
Only Islam has a vaguely similar teaching. In the heaven of Islam the faithful will be surrounded with the beautiful brown eyed Horae, who will fulfill the man's every sexual desire. The Arabic word, Horae, comes from the word Horais or Hora, which was a term for the priestesses of The Goddess who performed their rituals of the Hour - meaning the 24 hours of the day and night. The Israeli dance, the Hora, was originally a dance of the priestesses in the groves in ancient Israel. Christians perverted the term to Whore, because the priestesses engaged in vaginal sex in their rituals of the hours. It does not take much insight to see why Christianity would want to get rid of there god's body, and make him a spirit. After all, spirits do not have sex. They do not create spirit children through sex acts. And while they were at it, they got rid of the Goddess and made women less than human. Until the 16th century Christian doctrine did not even give women a soul and therefore there were no women in heaven, only men wearing women's long robes - makes you wonder, doesn't it?
We, however, believe in a literal metemsomatosis. Aset or Isis, who once lived on this earth is now a Goddess. Many who were once mortal are now immortal and have attained godhood. They are distinguished in the Egyptian language by the term, neter. For to the Egyptians, time was a continuum. They were aware of their pre existent life as spirits and spent their earthly life preparing for the lives to come, and the eventual life as Gods and Goddesses, Neter and Netert. Religion was an integral part of Egyptian life. The elaborate funerary ceremonies attest to the time spent preparing for surviving death and their future life in the world to come.
The Egyptians had no equivalent of possibility. Something was, or it was not. There was no "if". A noble spirit in the preexistence would be noble on this earth and come back as an even nobler mortal and become a god or goddess in the resurrection. In death, the living acknowledge those noble spirits as gods - or Neters. After all, since they were to become gods, then they were as good as gods.
Many people shy away from the word, polytheism. Since monotheism has been extolled in our days as the supposed highest evolution of religion (mainly by the Jews), most religions are reluctant to say that they believe in more than one god, male or female. As we all know, Christians believe in three gods, the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. They get around being called polytheistic by saying they are three gods, mysteriously combined in one. The Mormons on the other hand, argue for the unique distinction of each personage, each being a separate god the Father, god the Son and god the Holy Ghost. However, they avoid the issue of polytheism, claiming that they only worship one god, the father. They may worship only one god, but they believe in many. They are polytheistic.
The religion of The Goddess is admittedly polytheistic. We believe in and worship many Gods and Goddesses. There are many great and noble men and women who once lived on this earth who have been resurrected to become gods and goddesses. We revere them as such, much in the same way that Catholics revere their saints.
In several instances the tombs of Egyptian queens have been discovered where all of the valuable gold, jewelry and such were totally undisturbed. The seal of the tomb were unbroken, yet the physical body of the queen was missing. In one case the wrappings of the mummy were neatly folded next to the empty sarcophagus. Archaeologists explain that the thieves stole the bodies, yet never explain why the valuables were left in place. They postulate that the thieves were perhaps caught in the act and had to run. Of course that doesn't explain why they bothered unwrapping a leathery old body to begin with and then run off with the body without first filling their pockets with the easiest things to grab. Since we believe in the metemsomatosis, the missing bodies are no mystery. They were righteous priestesses who have their spirits reunited with their bodies. They now live eternally as immortal beings - neters - goddesses - Kahs. And yes, they are enjoying themselves, having sex. Almost all of the queens of Egypt were the head, or supreme High Priestesses of our religion. A notable exception is Nefertiti who was not a priestess.
Religion was completely woven through the Egyptians life. Most religious matters were so well known that they were not written down. The legends of Isis that have come down to us in written form are largely those written by Greeks, notably Plutarch. These were written at a times much latter than Isis actually lives, somewhere between 15,000 to 40,000 years later. The Greeks tended to make epics out of everything and you all know the old party game of one person telling a story to the next person on his right and passing it around to each person in turn in a circle. By the time the story comes back to the originator, it is nothing like what it started out to be. Things can get a bit distorted over thousands of years and leaves things open to a lot of interpretation and exaggeration.
Even with written records in Egypt there is much room for interpretation because for many years there was no one alive who knew how to speak or read the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics. Not until the deciphering of the Rosetta Stone which was found by Napoleons troops in 1799 in the mud of the Rosetta branch of the Nile River were hieroglyphics able to be translated into English. On this stone is carved a decree of Ptolemy V Episphaes ruler of Egypt from 203 to 181 B.C. It is inscribed in three different written languages. At the top was the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics, followed by demotic, the common written language of Egypt at the time of the decree, and at the bottom of the stone, the Greek language. A French scholar, Jean Francio Champollion studied the Rosetta Stone. He fortunately knew Greek and Coptic, the language of the Egyptian Christians. Using the Greek as a guide, he studied the proper names and their position on the tablet and was able to pick those out in the hieroglyphics. Then by comparing the modern Egyptian language with the ancient glyphs he was able to recognize many of the words. Finally in 1822, he published the entire text. That enabled other scholars to begin translating hieroglyphics.
Today there is a huge proliferation of material on ancient Egypt. It seems that everyone and his dog lays claim to secret magic known to the ancients. Usually they know nothing, or they recreate the Egyptian religion as an early form of Christianity. It was not. There are many similarities between what the original Christians believed and the Egyptian religion, because many early Christians came from Egypt. But by the 2nd Century C.E. Christianity had digressed to a point where there were few similarities. Christians from that time on destroyed every Egyptian temple or writing they could get their hands on.
Occasionally people will call me up very presumptuously and say "I know all about your religion, I've read, Crowley", or Cally or Campbell or whomever. If I reply that that is not my religion, they indignantly respond that that is Egyptian, so it must be my religion, or else my religion isn't really Egyptian. Such people have about as much validity as the person who says he know all about my religion because he saw Joanne Cameron on the Saturday morning children's program, spin around and turn into "Oh, Mighty ISIS."
I look for truth in all things and accept truth wherever I find it. I do not necessarily accept everyone's interpretation of Egyptian writings. It is quite easy to determine what is related to the Goddess religion and what is not. If anyone teaches that the Egyptian religion was ascetic, that there was no sex, but only a pure platonic love, you can be sure that it is a man made doctrine. Women were the priestesses of the religion of The Goddess up until about 300 B.C.E.
When Alexander the Great conquered the Mid East he set about Helenizing what to him was the world. After his death, his conquered territory was divided, with Ptolemy, Alexander's "half-brother" and general of the southern army, taking Egypt as his kingdom. The Greeks had little or no respect for women, and so Ptolemy, who was fascinated by the religion of the Egyptians, founded the Cults of Apis and Isis. The existing cults of Osiris and Ptah (from which Ptolemy's name was derived) was renewed by mythological ascension to become the neo-Egyptian, Apis. The Bull of Heaven. The religion and beliefs in Isis were transformed into a Hellenistic religion with male priests as well as priestesses. Although the new religions had many of the trappings of the original religions, they were nevertheless, male centered and the sacred sexual rituals of Isis were changed to accommodate the new belief. The Egyptian people did not accept the Cult of Isis, but rather continued with the Egyptian religion of Aset. 250 years later, during the reign of Cleopatra the VII, the last Queen of Egypt, the Egyptian people accepted the Greek Queen as the head of their religion. Cleopatra had become Egyptianized - the Egyptians had not become Hellenized.
Cleopatra was the first Greek Queen to learn the Egyptian language and the only one to become a priestess of the Goddess. This distinction is lost to most historians who have stated that Cleopatra appeared before Marc Anthony dressed as Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love. Since Aphrodite and Isis were the same, this transposition of names was understandable. However, Isis was a Greek name, which by that time represented the goddess of the Cult of Isis. The original inscriptions of the event show that Cleopatra appeared dressed as the High Priestess of Aset, spelled Aset (not Isis) in Greek and written as Ast in hieroglyphics. Cleopatra never used the Greek name "Isis", but used the Egyptian title, Aset. This distinction was quite clear to the Egyptian people, who loved their new queen.
When I say they loved their queen, I mean that literally. Cleopatra was noted for her sexuality. On one occasion she is recorded as having performed fellatio on (sucked the cocks of) one hundred Roman noblemen in one night. That was not only accepted by the Egyptian people but applauded by them. No woman could become a High Priestess of Aset without first having had sex with at least 1000 different men. Cleopatra accomplished this in less than a week - a week in Egypt was ten days. I have to admire her. It took me two years to have sex with a thousand different men. Of course, I had sex with many of them more that once and the most I ever had sex with in one day was 16 different men. I would love to have been in the position of Cleopatra, to have sex with a hundred men a day.
But why sex? "Surely there is something which could take the place of sex", is the comment I get from many Christians who are impressed with the theology, history and magnetism of our religion, but are biased against its sex.
Sex is the essence of the religion.
In Judaism, the sins of the individual are put on some animal which is ritualistically killed by the priest. Needless to say, there hasn't been a Jew absolved of his sins in over 1800 years. In Christianity, the sins are put upon a dead god who takes all men's sins, past, present and future upon himself. In the religion of The Goddess, it is the priestess who literally takes upon herself the sins and transgressions of the man.
In the Egyptian language, the word, "Negation", meant man's semen or his essence, his all. The word modernly means to cancel or wipe out - to make negative. You may wonder, how did it get from one language to the next with such a drastic change in meaning. That is because the "Ritual of Negation" in our religion involves vaginal intercourse with a priestess. What a man is doing in the Ritual of Negation, when he ejaculates inside a priestess, is to give up his semen, his very essence, in order to have his sins wiped out, or negated. The word, negation, meaning semen, came to be applied to the whole ritual. Gradually over hundreds of years the word, negation, went from its specific meaning of semen- essence to what the purpose of the ritual was, that is, to cancel or wipe out - to make negative. It is the priestess who literally takes upon herself the transgressions of the man in the Ritual of Negation. It is the priestess who intercedes on man's behalf with the Goddess. She is his guide in this life, the Mother of his new spiritual knowledge and spiritual life, and she is his guide in death when she conducts his soul to the Underworld. And it is the priestess who prepares the soul for rebirth into another body.
Hopefully this will give the reader some understanding of why the religion of The Goddess is so different from other religions. It is not the teachings of ancients which brings men to salvation, but the knowledge one gains in the purification rituals of priestess that brings man closer to his maker. Sex is not only pleasurable, but a gift of The Goddess which must be enjoyed, appreciated, and not spurned.
Religion gives many choices. Some give guilt for sex in this life and the promise of no sex after death. The religion of the Goddess gives love, pleasure, sex and spiritual knowledge in this life as well as in the life to come. It is for this reason that the Christian religions became the antithesis of the Goddess religions. In order to eliminate Goddess worship, early Christians changed Her joyous sexual celebrations into holidays for ascetic Christian saints. They brand priestesses as prostitutes and make religious rituals criminal acts, and changed the Goddess from a sexual, divine being into the perpetual virgin, the Virgin Mary. And as Mary was a virgin, Christians developed as obsession with virginity which still effects sexual expectations and enjoyment today.


1/24/2007 12:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kneel before my altar

Pussy Worship

"Vulva," the primary Tantric object of worship, symbolized variouslyby a triangle, fish, double-pointed oval,horseshoe, egg, fruits, etc. Personifying the yoni, the Goddess Kalibore the title of Cunti or Kundu, root of the ubiquitous Indo-Europeanword "cunt" and all its relatives: cunnus, cunte, cunning,cunctipotent, ken, kin, country.

The Yoni Yantra or triangle was known as the Primordial Image,representing the Great Mother as source of all life. As the genitalfocus of her divine energy, the Yantra was adored as a geometricalsymbol, as the cross was adored by Christians.

The ceremony of baptismal rebirth often involved being drawn bodilythrough a giant yoni. Those who underwent this ceremony werestyled "twice-born."

from The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets by Barbara Walker

In devanagari, the word created by the four letters y,o,n, and i is a construction of various concepts. The letters signify the following:

Y = The animating principle, the heart, the true self, union
O = Preservation, brightness
I = Love, desire, consciousness; to shine, to pervade, pain and sorrow
N = Lotus, motherhood, menstrual cycle, nakedness, emptiness, pearl

This succession of letters is a peculiarity of SANSKRIT. Although pronounced yo-nee, the word is writted as yoin.

The term yoni heralds from a culture and religion in which women have long been regarded and honored as the embodiment of divine female energy -- the goddess known as Shakti -- and where the female genitals are seen as a sacred symbol of the Great Goddess. Because the Eastern Tantrics and other ancient cultures worship the Divine in the form of a Goddess, the term yoni has also acquired another, more cosmic meaning, becoming a symbol of the Universal Womb, the Matrix of Generation and Source of All.

from The Yoni - Sacred Symbol of Female Creativity by Rufus C. Camphausen


Most births took place at home, with a midwife in attendance.

Upper- and middle-class babies were baptized at the church on the day of their birth, as death without baptism would send the little soul into Limbo.

The child's mother did not attend; the Church considered her impure for a certain number of days after labor.

(Must be the blood that made the unclean in their eyes, whereas we love body fluids.)

The ceremony called "churching" restored a woman's purity (Gies and Gies, City 62-3).


1/24/2007 01:24:00 PM  
Blogger Syn Diesel said...

Richard said...
were you aware of the study below or did you just make a damn good guess with your single generation assessment?

Then again maybe it's something as simple as Vitamin D deficiency due to the more northerly light?

1/24/2007 01:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am my own woman. I love to be seen nude, to have others see my cunt.

Richard.....pour some cold water on me now!!! I can't go to my aura has expanded and it makes it difficult to stand, let alone walk.

1/24/2007 01:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cunt is the root word of country.

38 Arabic terms for the yoni

From The Perfumed Garden, circa 16th century

El feurdj (the slit ) - It has this name because it opens and shuts again when hotly yearning for coitus, like the one of a mare in heat at the approach of a stallion.

El kelmoune (the vulva ) - This word serves as the name of a young woman's vulva in particular. Such a vulva is very plump and round in every direction, with long lips, grand slit, the edges well divided and symmetrical and rounded; it is soft, seductive, perfect throughout. It is the most pleasant and no doubt the best of all the different sorts. It is warm, tight, and dry; so much that one might expect to see fire burst forth from it. Its form is graceful, its odour pleasant; the whiteness of its outside sets off its carmine-red middle. There is no imperfection about it.

El kelmoune (the voluptuous ) - The name given to the vulva of a young virgin.

El ass (the primitive ) - This is a name applicable to every kind of vulva.

El zerzour (the starling ) - The vulva of a very young girl.

El cheukk (the chink ) - The vulva of a bony, lean woman. It is like a chink in the wall, with not a vestige of flesh.

Abou tertour (the crested one ) - It is the name given to a vulva furnished with a red comb, like that of a cock, which rises at the moment of enjoyment.

Abou khochime (the snub-nose ) - Is a vulva with thin lips and a small tongue.

El gueunfond (the hedgehog ) - The vulva of the old, decrepit woman, dried up with age and with bristly hair.

El sakouti ( the silent one ) - This name has been given to the vulva which is noiseless. The member may enter it a hundred times a day but it will not say a word, and will be content to look on without a murmur.

El deukkak (the crusher ) - So called from its crushing movements upon the member. It generally begins to push the member, directly it enters, to the right and to the left, and to grip it with the matrix, and would, if it could, absorb the two testicles.

El tseguil (the importunate ) - This is the vulva which is never tired of taking in the member. This latter might pass a hundred nights with it, and walk in a hundred times every night, still that vulva would not be sated -- nay, it would want still more, and would not allow the member to come out again at all, if it was possible. With such a vulva the parts are exchanges; the vulva is the pursuer, the member is the pursued. It is only found in a small number of women, who are wild with passion, all on fire, and in flame.

El taleb (the yearning one ) - This vagina is met with in a few women only. With some it is natural; with others it becomes what it is through abstinence. It is burning for a member, and, having got one in its embrace, it refuses to part with it until its fire is completely diminished.

El hacene (the beautiful ) - This is the vulva which is white, plump, in form vaulted like a dome, firm, and without any deformity. You cannot take your eyes off it, and to look at it changes a feeble erection into a strong one.

El neuffakh (the swelling one ) - So called because a torpid member coming near it, and rubbing its head against it a few times, at once swells and stands upright. To the woman who has such a one it procures excessive pleasure, for, at the moment of the crisis, it opens and shuts convulsively, like the vulva of a mare.

Abou djebaha (one with a projection ) - Some women have this sort of vulva, which is very large, with a pubis prominent like a projecting, fleshy forehead.

El ouasa (the vast one ) - A vulva surrounded by a very large pubis. Women of that build are said to be of large vagina, because, although on the approach of the member it appears firm and impenetrable, as soon as it feels the friction of the glans it opens wide at once.

El aride (the large one ) - This is the vulva which is as wide as it is long, that is to say, fully developed all round, from side to side, and from the pubic to the perineum. It is the most beautiful to look upon. As the poet said,

It has the splendid whiteness of a forehead
In its dimensions it is like the moon,
The fire that radiates from it is like the sun's,
And seems to burn the member which approaches
Unless first moistened with saliva the member cannot enter
The odour it emits is full of charms.

It is also said that this name applies to the vagina of women who are plump and fat. When such a one crosses her thighs over the other, the vulva stands out like the head of a calf. If she lays it bare it resembles a saa for corn placed between her thighs; and, if she walks, it is apparent under her clothes by its wavy movement at each step. It is of all the most pleasing, the most celebrated, the most wished for.

Abou belaoum (the glutton ) - The vulva with a vast capacity for swallowing. If such a vulva has not been able to get coitus for some time it fairly engulfs the member that then comes near it, without leaving any trace of it outside.

El mokaour (the bottomless ) - This is the vagina of indefinite length, having, in consequence, the matrix lying very far back. It requires a member of the largest dimensions; any other could not succeed in rousing its amorous sensibilities.

Abou cheufrine (the two-lipped ) - This name is given to the amply developed vagina of an excessively stout woman. Also to the vagina the lips of which having become flaccid, owing to weakness, are long and pendulous.

Abou aungra (the humpbacked ) - This vulva has the mount of Venus prominent and hard, standing out like the hump on the back of the camel, and reaching down between the thighs like the head of a calf.

El rorbal (the sieve ) - This vulva on receiving a member seems to sift it all over, below, right and left, fore and aft, until the moment of pleasure arrives.

El hezzaz (the restless ) - When this vagina has received the member it begins to move violently and without interruption until the member touches the matrix, and then knows no repose till it has hastened on the enjoyment and finished its work.

El lezzaz (the unionist ) - The vagina which, having taken in the member, clings to it and pushes itself forward upon it so closely that, if the thing were possible, it would enfold the two testicles.

El moudd (the accomodating ) - This name is applied to the vagina of a woman who has felt for a long time an ardent wish for coition. In rapture with the member it sees, it is glad to second its movements of come and go; it offers the matrix to the member by pressing it forward within reach, which is, after all, the best gift it can offer. Whatever place inside of it the member wants to explore, this vulva will make him welcome to, gracefully according to its wish; there is no corner it will not help the member to reach.

El mouaine (the assistant ) - This vulva is thus named because it assists the member to go in and out, to go up and down, in short, in all its movements, in such a way that if it desires to do such a thing, to enter or to retire, to move about, etc., the vulva hastens to give it all facilities, and answers to its appeal. By this aid the ejaculation is facilitated, and the enjoyment is heightened.

El meusboul (the long one ) - This name applies only to some vulvas; everyone knows that vulvas are far from being all of the same conformation and aspect. This vulva extends from the pubis to the anus. It lengthens out when the woman is lying down or standing, and contracts when she is sitting, differing in this respect from the vulva of a round shape. It looks like a splendid cucumber lying between the thighs. With some women it shows projecting under light clothing, or when they are bending back.

El molki (the duellist ) - This is the vulva which, on the introduction of a member, executes the movement of coming and going, pushes itself upon it for fear of its retiring before the pleasure arrives. There is no enjoyment for it but the shock given to its matrix by the member, and it is for this that it projects its matriz to grip and suck the member's gland when the ejaculation takes place. Certain vulvas, wild with desire and lust, be it natural or a consequence of long abstention, throw themselevs upon the approaching member, opening the mouth like a faminished infant to whom the mother offers the breast. In the same way this vulva advances and retires upon the member to bring it face to face with the matrix, in fear that, unaided, it could not find the same.

The vulva and the member resemble thus two skillful duellists, each time that one of them rushes its antagonist, the latter opposes its shield to parry the blow and repulse the assault. the member represents the sword, and the matrix the shield. The one who first ejaculates the sperm is vanquished; while the one who is slowest is the victor; and assuredly, it is a fine fight! As the poet says,

I have let them see the effect of a subtle shadow
Spinning like an ever busy spider.
They said to me, 'How long will you go on?'
I answered them, 'I will work til I am dead.'

El harrah (the fugitive ) - The vagina which, being very tight and short, is hurt by the penetration of a very large and soft; it tries to escape to the right and left. It is thus, people say, like the vagina of most virgins, which not yet having made the acquaintance of the member and fearful of its approac, tries to get out of its way when it glides in between the thighs and wants to be admitted.

El sabeur (the resigned ) - This is the vulva which, having admitted the member, submits patiently to all its whims and movements. It is also said that this vulva is strong enough to suffer resignedly the most violent and prolonged coitus. If it were assaulted a hundred times it would not be vexed or annoyed. It will show the same patience if it has to do with several members who visit it successively.

This kind of vagina is found in women of a glowing temperament. If they only knew how to do it, they would not allow the man to dismount, nor his member to retire for a single moment.

El mouseuffah (the barred one ) - This kind of vagina is not often met with. The defect which distinguished it is sometimes natural, sometimes it is the result of an unskillfully executed operation of circumcision upon the woman. It can happen that the operator makes a false move with his instrument and injures the two lips, or even only one of them. In healing there forms a thick scar, which bars the passage, and in order to make the vagina accessible to the member, a surgical garden will have to be resorted to.

El merour (the deep one ) - The vagina which always has the mouth open, and the bottom of which is beyond sight. The longest members only can reach it.

El addad (the biter ) - The vulva which, when the member has got into it and is burning with passion, opens and shuts again upon the same fiercely. It is chiefly when the ejaculation is coming that the man feelts the head of his member being bitten by the mouth of the matrix. And certainly there is an attractive power in the same when it clings, yearning to sperm, to the gland, and draws it in as far as it can.

El meuass (the sucker ) - This is a vagina which in its amorous heat in consequence of voluptuous toyings, or of long abstinence, begins to suck the member which as entered it so forcibly as to deprive it of all its sperm, dealing with it as a child drawing on the breast of the mother. The poets have described it in the following verse:

She -- the woman -- shows in turning up her robe
An object -- the vulva -- developed full and round
In semblance like a cup turned upside down
In placing thereupon your hand, you seem to feel
A well-formed bosom, springy, firm, and full.
In boring yout lance as it gets well bitten,
And drawn in by a suction, as the breast is by a child.
And after having finished, if you wish to recommence,
You'll find it flaming hot as any furnace.

Another poet composed on the same theme in the following lines:

Like to a man extended on his chest, she -- the vulva -- fills the hand
Which has to be well stretched to cover it.
The place it occupies is standing forth
Like an unopened but of the blossom of a plum tree.
Assuredly the smoothness of its skin
Is like the beardless cheeck of adolescence;
Its conduit is but narrow,
The entrance it is not easy,
And he who essays to get in
Feels as though he was butting against a coat of mail.
And at the introduction it emits a sound
Like to the tearing of a woven stuff.
The member having filled its cavity,
Recieves the lively welcome of a bite,
Such as the nipple of the nurse receives
When places between the nursling's lips for suction.
Its lips are burning,
Like a fire that is lighten,
And how sweet it is, this fire!
How delicious for me.

El zeunbour (the wasp ) - This kind of vulva is known by the strength and roughness of its fur. When the member approaches and tries to enter, it gets stung by the hairs as if by a wasp.

El harr (the hot one ) - This is one of the most praiseworthy vulvas. Warmth is in fact very much esteemed in a vulva, and it may be said that the intensity of the enjoyment afforded by it is in proportaion to the heat it develops. Poets have praised it in the following verses:

The vulva posesses an intrinsic heat;
Shut in a solid heart (interiour) and pent up breat (matrix).
Its fire communicates itself to him that enters it;
It equals in intensity the fire of love.
She is as tight as a well-fitting shoe,
Smaller than the circle of the apple of the eye.

El ladid (the delicious ) - It has the reputation of procuring an unexampled pleasure, comparable only to the one felt by the beasts and birds of prey, and for which they fight sanguinary combats. And if such effects are produced upon animals, what must they be for man? And so it is that alll wars spring from the search for the voluptuous pleasure which the vagina procures, and which is the highest fortune of this world; it is a part of the delights of paradise.

Nubile Kallisto

1/24/2007 01:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Forget about the water, Richard. I just saw this

(Must be the blood that made the unclean in their eyes, whereas we love body fluids.)

.....and my aura deflated, immediately. I can now go to my meeting without trying to conceal my engorged aura.

I think Ryan would have the ride of his life with these gals...what do you think?

1/24/2007 03:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us.

Everything has its wonders, even darkness and silence, and I learn whatever state I am in, therin to be content

Never bend your head. Hold it high. Look the world straight in the eye.

People do not like to think. If one thinks, one must reach conclusions. Conclusions are not always pleasant.

The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched. They must be felt within the heart.

Life is either a daring adventure or nothing. Security does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than exposure.

Helen Keller
US blind & deaf educator (1880 - 1968)


2/18/2007 04:44:00 PM  
Blogger butlimous said...

Thanks for the nice post!

Free PS3

9/08/2007 11:13:00 AM  
Anonymous enemy territory said...

The home of the infamous european toxic clan, psycho urban fraggers that pawn the virtual return to castle wolfenstein enemy territory battlefields.

7/20/2010 06:29:00 AM  
Anonymous justpub said...

Just Pub, a dumb return to castle wolfenstein enemy territory comic strip by feuersturm.

7/20/2010 06:29:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home